Introduction to BGI Instruments

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SPOTLIGHT ON THE LELAND LEGACY ® PUMP FROM THE LELAND LEGACY PUMP Provides answers to particulate sampling problems. High flow rates + 24-hr run times.
Advertisements

Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
1 Comparison of Analog vs. Advance Technology Air Sampling System Designs To Facilitate Correction of Measured or Calculated Volumes to a Set of Reference.
Update on Mercury Calibration Gas Standards and Traceability Scott Hedges US EPA, Clean Air Markets Division 2009 EPRI CEM User Group Conference St. Louis,
PM-2.5 FEM Requirements for Met One BAM Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center
Why do we lose analyzer data? Monitor malfunction DAS malfunction Power outages Environmental problems Wildlife damage Vandalism Operator error.
2025 Partisol Sequential Sampler
ADVANCES IN MONITORING METHODS FOR AIRBORNE PARTICLES Philip K. Hopke Department of Chemical Engineering, Clarkson University, Potsdam, NY USA.
Nephelometer Introduction & Operation. What is a Nephelometer? The Nephelometer is an analytical instrument used to measure the light-scattering coefficient.
AQS Concepts. In This Section We Will Talk About AQS Concepts 2 AQS Background History AQS as part of a monitoring program Types of Information in AQS.
P13625 – Indoor AIR Quality Monitor
Working Together for Clean Air PM 2.5 Continuous Methods Lynnwood, Washington Site.
Ozone and Ozone Monitoring 2015 National Tribal Forum Glenn Gehring, Technology Specialist III Tribal Air Monitoring Support (TAMS) Center Institute for.
Evaluation of Simultaneous PM10, PM2. 5, and PM10-2
1 Guest Speaker: Bill Frietsche US EPA.  April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control.
Continuous Ambient Particulate Monitors A Review of Current Technologies by Michael Corvese, Product Manager Thermo Electron Corporation Air Quality Instruments.
Introduction to Thermo Electron Instruments Robert Kinsella Sky Patton Thermo Electron.
Presented by: Mike Hamdan South Coast Air Quality Management District Diamond Bar, CA Presented at: The Tribal Air Monitoring Training, Pechanga Reservation,
What to compare against the validation templates (see templates in course webpage: Resources/Validation%20Templates%20from%20Red.
Ozone Monitoring Issues & Opportunities - II Ozone Transport Commission MANE-VU Fall Meeting November 19, 2014 Crystal City, VA Will Ollison 1220 L Street,
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
1 Key Monitoring Issues Status of PM 2.5 monitoring methodologies Criteria for acceptance of monitors and sites Special considerations for comparing ambient.
Monitoring Station Location and Siting Initially on a residential porch at Marina Towers, aligned with the Mirant Potomac River Generating Station (PRGS)
Met One BAM-1020 Operation Key Points
Quality Assurance/ Quality Control
Continuous Particulate Training Workshop
1 Dec. 8, 1997 LEADS Quality Assurance Summary Robert Brewer (512) Monitoring Operations Division Network QA Manager.
AMP255 – Precision and Bias Data Report 2008 AQS Conference The AMP255 Precision and Bias Data Report August 22, 2008 Presented by Jonathan Miller EPA.
1 Guest Speaker: Brandy Toft Leech Lake Ojibwe.  Overview of FRM/FEM/ARM status, requirements, and reporting  QC (routine checks, audits, and method-
1 Saxony-Anhalt State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang Garche Bukarest EU-Twinning Project RO 2006 IB EN 09 Wolfgang Garche Saxony-Anhalt.
Continuous Particulate Monitoring Using Light Scatter Photometers.
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
1 Saxony-Anhalt EU Twinning RO 04/IB/EN/09 State Environmental Protection Agency Wolfgang GarcheWorkshop European Standards Requirements of.
PowerLogic® PowerView Software
1 β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor SPM-613D β Attenuation Method PM10/2.5 Automated Dichotomous Monitor Model SPM-613D ■SPM.
Quality Control – Part II Tim Hanley EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
EPA Region 9 Meredith Kurpius August 19, Status of Tribal Air Monitoring Value of tribal monitoring Used to protect public health on tribal land.
CARB Continuous PM 2.5 Monitoring Activity (BAM’s) Reggie Smith California Air Resources Board.
NAAQS Altitude Effects Ozone Transport Commission Annual Meeting June 11, 2014 Baltimore, MD Will Ollison 1220 L Street, NW Washington, DC
Overview and Status of Lead NAAQS Review and Overview of Agency Technical Documents on Lead NAAQS Monitoring Issues Kevin Cavender and Joann Rice Presented.
Handheld Flow Calibrator for Aerosol Observing System Jonathan Ma, Dung (Yung) Hoang Nguyen, Mario Zuniga Department of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering,
OAR Perspective on Air Sensors Kristen Benedict National Tribal Forum on Air Quality 5/13/14.
Measuring Particle Pollution ITEP Air Quality Training Kodiak 2015
 April 7: QA Systems, EPA definitions, PQAOs and common sense – Mike Papp  April 14: Routine Quality Control and Data Management (1-pt QC, flow rate,
Federal Equivalent Methods and Federal Reference Methods Tim Hanley U.S. EPA OAQPS.
EGA Technical World Leaders in Combustion Management Solutions Mk7 EGA.
EGA Technical World Leaders in Combustion Management Solutions Mk7 EGA.
World Leaders in Combustion Management Solutions Module Gas Setup Introduction The Mk7 E.G.A Cell Status Further Information.
LEADS/EMS DATA VALIDATION IPS MeteoStar December 11, 2006 WHAT IS VALIDATION? From The Dictionary: 1a. To Make Legally Valid 1b. To Grant Official.
NATIONAL TRIBAL FORUM ON AIR QUALITY 2013 Establishment of a PM 2.5 Monitoring Network on the Colville Reservation.
Janice Lam Snyder, SMAQMD December 11, 2015
Water Horner APG, LLC June 4, What is SmartMQn Water? SmartMQn Water is a packaged monitoring solution that uses sophisticated and easy to use preconfigured.
PM 2.5 Continuous FEMs; Update and Assessments For NESCAUM Monitoring Meeting April 29, 2011 Tim Hanley – US EPA, OAQPS 1.
Assessing Ambient Air Quality James Payne Morongo Band of Mission Indians.
PM Methods Update and Network Design Presentation for WESTAR San Diego, CA September 2005 Peter Tsirigotis Director Emissions, Monitoring, and Analysis.
WHAT IS THE CHEROKEE NATION? Cherokee Nation Air Quality Data Management Concepts for Quality Data Collection Ryan Callison.
Module 11 Module I: Terminology— Data Quality Indicators (DQIs) Melinda Ronca-Battista ITEP Catherine Brown U.S. EPA.
Challenger NIST Traceable Air flow Calibrator. Features Dry air flow calibrator No moving parts NIST Traceable Actual & Standard Conditions 1 LPM to 30.
Continuous Particulate Matter (PM 2.5 ) Monitoring Tom Dann Luc White, Alain Biron Luc White, Alain Biron Environment Canada, Ottawa Tom Dann Luc White,
Environment Canada, ETC, Ottawa
Review of Federal Reference Method for Ozone: Nitric Oxide-Chemiluminescence Office of Research and Development National Exposure Research Laboratory April.
Statewide Compliance Monitoring and Local Monitoring Projects
Particle Physics and Particle Counting for IH&S and IAQ
Session 4: Air Pollution Measurements
F&J SPECIALTY PRODUCTS, INC.
Proposed Ozone Monitoring Revisions Ozone Season and Methods
PMcoarse , Monitoring Budgets, and AQI
A New Tool for Evaluating Candidate PM FEM and PM2.5 ARM Monitors
Precision, Bias, and Total Error (Accuracy)
Series 5300 Lithium Cell Formation System
Presentation transcript:

Introduction to BGI Instruments Tom Merrifield BGI Instruments 58 Guinan St.,Waltham, MA 02451 T:+781 891-9380 info@bgiusa.com http://www.bgiusa.com

Introduction EPA has begun evaluation of PM2.5 Continuous Monitoring Candidate Instruments for AQI and new regulatory network to compliment manual FRM FEM Class III Equivalency procedures in 1997 CFR perceived as technically near-impossible, cost-prohibitive Draft changes to NAAQS for 2003 may allow use of continuous monitors for PM2.5 reporting to AIRS and AQI

U.S. EPA Ambient PM Timeline

EPA, State, Tribal and Local AQ Priorities New PMc Coarse Particulate Matter Network (PMc) PM10 - PM2.5 = PMc Develop continuous PM methods for AQI and AIRS Reduce labor costs May improve data quality & usefulness May increase public awareness Reference (FRMs) & Equivalent (FEMs) program remains a critical component of NAAQS

Methods for Ambient PM Sampling Reference method Gravimetric Filter collection & weighing (manual) Candidate equivalent method(s) Beta attenuation Harmonic Dampening(TEOM™ & Vibrating Crystal) Light scatter & extinction (photometer & COH)

EPA Designation Status Fine particulate monitor, model FPM PM10 Field trials completed. application and approval for PM10 June PM2.5 EPA OAQPS with CASAC proposing regional equivalency and data quality management for PM2.5

Model FPM Continuous PM Monitor – Pros High sensitivity, zero stability Short-term measurements Our goals Report hourly PM2.5 automatically for >7 days without site visit Little PM2.5 bias in relationship to FRM Similar operation and filter temperature like FRM Filter humidity controlled to < 45% with 8°C maximum overheat

Model FPM Continuous PM Monitor – Cons Interference of ambient humidity/artifacts Exempt quantity of beta energy No EPA approval for PM2.5 until June ‘03 No mass calibration or speciation Time interval of one hour or greater Cost of automation compared to manual FRM Electronic data collection complexity Validation of sample & data

Introduction to the BGI Model FPM BGI Model FPM (fine particulate matter monitor) PM2.5 Inlet with BGI Very Sharp Cut Cyclone (VSCC) PM2.5 concentration measured & reported on hourly and 24 hour average Continuous operation of six weeks Filter change hourly to prevent loss of semi-volatile particulate New generation of high sensitivity beta attenuation monitor (FPM BAM)

BGI FPM Sensitivity Precision Repeatability Active sample cycle ±1.5g/m3 Precision r2 > 0.90 to FRM Site factor (optional) Repeatability ± 2% Active sample cycle 56 minutes each hour 4-minute diagnostic test each hour

BGI Very Sharp Cut Cyclone Inlet 90-Day Operation between Maintenance

EPA Field Comparison of Candidate PM2.5 Continuous Monitors to FRM

FPM Outdoor Shelter Inlet Temperature- controlled shelter FRM design with VSCC 16.67 alpm Temperature- controlled shelter Backup data printer & error log Mass Foil standards Zero stability test High mass calibration

Model FPM Outdoor and Indoor Models

Calibration and Audit of FPM Manual use of factory span and zero calibration tools-recommended each calendar quarter or when filter tape changed Audit - Seasonal or annual comparison with FRM audit sampler. EPA agreement not final, but >0.85 r

Maintenance Requirements Six weeks change filter tape Validate flow rate, ambient temperature and barometric pressure sensors each six weeks Clean PM10 FRM Inlet and PM2.5 VSCC each 3 months Replace printer paper and printer cartridge each 3 months Rebuild vacuum pump each 18 months

Data Management & Collection FPM includes hard copy field printer with hourly concentration and min/max for 24 hour. Faults reported in red ink Analog output with 0-1 or 0-5 Volts DC which are scaled to concentration RS-232 Digital Download using FPM-230 software

FPM Applications Air Quality Index (AQI) New PM2.5 Continuous NAM/SLAMS Network Epidemiology & public health studies Hourly reports of PM2.5 concentrations Digital and analog data communication Cell phone compatible PM10, PM2.5 and PM1 inlet compatible Stand alone environmental shelter

NIST Traceable Volumetric Flow Rate, Temperature and Pressure Calibration/Audit Device for FRM and Continuous Ambient Monitors

Introduction Federal, state and local agencies require flow calibration and audits on all ambient particulate samplers and monitors Commercial claims of “primary flow” and “NIST traceability” are confusing New NIST traceable volumetric flow rate, ambient temperature and pressure field calibration/audit device developed, tested

Investigation Primary standard vs. flow transfer standard Requirements for field flow calibrator Current methods available How DeltaCal meets requirements

NIST Primary & EPA Flow Transfer Standards NIST primary flow calibration facility Colorado Engineering Experiment Station (CEESI) Titanium Vessels - gravimetric analysis standard Pressurized and weighed for volume. air flow measured through a NIST flow transfer Venturi Flow transfer standard Traceable Calibrator to NIST (CEESI) Primary CAlibrator CEESI NIST Primary Flow Standard Every other NIST traceable flow calibrator is a flow transfer standard that is traceable to this device

CEESI - NIST Primary Calibration Lab Temperature controlled room in an old missile silo in Colorado

Priorities of a Field Flow Calibrator NIST transfer standard, accuracy to < 2% Calibrator must be field usable to EPA FRM specs Insensitive to atmospheric conditions Calibrator should not add artificial pressure to sampler to interfere with electronic flow controller Portable & battery powered Direct reading of flow rate, ambient temperature, & barometric pressure RS232 calibration report-digital calibration report NIST Temp accuracy is 2oC , DeltaCal is certified to 0.5 oC NIST Flow 2%, DeltaCAl is certified to 1%, and ship at ½% NIST Pressure 5mmHg, DeltaCal ships at 2mmHg. Unit makes measurement, does calculations and displays volumetric flow rate.

“Flow Transfer Standard” Calibrators Bubble meter Gilibrator™ (wet) - (excellent for indoor use) Frictionless piston - (Not field hardened) Bios/DryCal/DC-Lite™ (dry)- 3% low bias Orifice- quartz tube - (sensitive to wind) Streamline/Chinook™ (dry) – adds system pressure, double of a Venturi Venturi- Delrin™ plastic - (field hardened with gust cap) BGI DeltaCal (dry) – flow, temperature & pressure

DeltaCal Calibration Kit Measurements Barometric pressure Ambient temperature Filter temperature Volumetric flow rate Digital output for recording and audit report Insensitive to weather

Schematic Diagram of DeltaCal

DeltaCal NIST Traceable Specifications Operable range –30 to 40C 2 to 20 aLPM (US FRM & Continuous PM) 10 to 50 aLPM (Europe) +/- 1% of NIST Temp sensor range –40 to 50C < +/- 0.5C Difference to NIST Pressure range 400-800mmHg < +/- 2mmHg of NIST

DeltaCal Computer Screen Display Historical record User configurable All readings in one display Auto resolution ASCII file export Flow statistics Also need to specifically define the data output. (download from deltaCal and see)… do we have the software? 7/12/02 Testing flows on an E-BAM portable particulate monitor.

BGI - NIST Traceable Flow Calibration Laboratory < Insert photo of BGI Test Bench >

Conclusions BGI DeltaCal is flow transfer standard traceable to NIST primary Meets all requirements Only field-hardened device with low pressure drop, includes wind gust cap Cost includes 4 measurements, rather than 1 Affordable annual calibration by single vendor US E.P.A. tested – exclusive for PEP QA program $120 per year