Genetic diversity and population structure of sea trout in Gulf of Finland: implications for conservation and management Riho Gross, Marja-Liisa Koljonen,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Resident Fish Stock Status in the Palouse River and upper Crab Creek watersheds, Washington. Jason McLellan Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife.
Advertisements

Problems and challenges with Baltic Salmon Management – with special attention to Estonian salmon - Mr Gunnar Norén Executive Secretary to Coalition Clean.
HELCOM Seal management in the Baltic. HELCOM Contracting parties: Denmark EC Estonia Finland Germany Latvia Lithuania Poland Russia Sweden.
The Five Factors of Evolution
1 BI3010H08 Population genetics Halliburton chapter 9 Population subdivision and gene flow If populations are reproductible isolated their genepools tend.
Population Genetics and Natural Selection
Genetic diversity analysis of CWR in Portugal Joana Magos Brehm, Brian V. Ford-Lloyd, Nigel Maxted, Maria Amélia Martins-Loução Joint PGR Secure/ECPGR.
Population Structure Partitioning of Genetic Variation.
Habitat Fragmentation 1. A reduction in total area 2. Creation of separate isolated patches from a larger continuous distribution 3. Leads to overall reduction.
Stock Structure of Pacific Sardine (Sardinops sagax), an ongoing question John R. Hyde Southwest Fisheries Science Center, La Jolla.
Genetics The rate of evolutionary change in a population is proportional to the amount of genetic diversity available.
© Luonnonvarakeskus Results of a questionnaire Recreational fisheries in the coastal areas of the Baltic Sea Outi Heikinheimo, Antti Lappalainen and Jens.
Molecular Markers DNA & PROTEINS –mtDNA = often used in systematics; in general, no recombination = uniparental inheritance –cpDNA = often used in systematics;
Human Migrations Saeed Hassanpour Spring Introduction Population Genetics Co-evolution of genes with language and cultural. Human evolution: genetics,
Evolution Test Study Guide Answers
Population Genetics Packet #29. Population Genetics The study of genetic variability within the population and of the forces that act on it.
BALTIC RING STUDY From the beginning of 1996 to early 1998, 18 power companies and utility organizations from the 11 countries around the Baltic Sea have.
KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool.
Morphological and genetic diversity of the larch populations on the Kuril Island I.Yu. Adrianova Group of Plant Molecular Genetics Institute of Biology.
Chapter 3 -- Genetics Diversity Importance of Genetic Diversity Importance of Genetic Diversity -- Maintenance of genetic diversity is a major focus of.
1 BI 3063 J. Mork H08 Genetic and biologic stock management I C E S The International Council for the Exploration of the Sea
Applications of Genetics to Conservation Biology -Molecular Taxonomy -Population Genetics and Gene Flow -Relatedness (Kinship, Paternity, Individual ID)
Population genetics of Puccinia triticina in North America Maria E. Ordoñez James A. Kolmer USDA-ARS-Cereal Disease Laboratory University of Minnesota.
Biodiversity IV: genetics and conservation
KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool.
1 BI 3063 J. Mork H08 Genetic and biologic stock management Hallerman Ch. 15 Genetic impacts of fish introductions INTRODUCTION Introductions and transfers.
Evolution as Genetic Change and Speciation. A Population’s Gene Pool A gene pool is all the alleles available in all of the individuals in a population.
and Atlantic Salmon By Jonathan Sheppard
Chapter 5 Characterizing Genetic Diversity: Quantitative Variation Quantitative (metric or polygenic) characters of Most concern to conservation biology.
Digital Map of the Baltic Sea Region MapBSR A new tool for co-operation in the Baltic Sea Region National Land Survey of Finland.
NGSSS SC.912.L.15.14* Discuss mechanisms of evolutionary change other than natural selection such as genetic drift and gene flow. (MODERATE)
Population Genetics Evolution depends upon mutation to create new alleles. Evolution occurs as a result of population level changes in allele frequencies.
Characterization, Inventory and Monitoring of trends in indigenous livestock Dr. E. D. Ilatsia D. N. Kamiti 23-Oct-15Animal Breeding and Genomics Group1.
Deviations from HWE I. Mutation II. Migration III. Non-Random Mating IV. Genetic Drift A. Sampling Error.
Lecture 13: Population Structure October 5, 2015.
Evaluating Genetic Diversity Between Populations of New England Cottontail (Sylvilagus transitionalis) and Eastern Cottontail (Sylvilagus floridanus) Tricia.
Relationships between resident and anadromous O. mykiss in Cedar River, WA: Anne Marshall WA Dept of Fish and Wildlife improving the chances for steelhead.
Steelhead Genetic Diversity at Multiple Spatial Scales in the Snake River Basin, Idaho Authors: Jennifer L. Nielsen 1, Alan Byrne 2, Sara L. Graziano 1.
Lab 7. Estimating Population Structure. Goals 1.Estimate and interpret statistics (AMOVA + Bayesian) that characterize population structure. 2.Demonstrate.
Connectivity over ecological and evolutionary time in coral reef fishes Serge PLANES Connectivity over ecological and evolutionary time Serge Planes
Genetic impacts of hatchery stocks on Steelhead in Lower Cowlitz tributaries Anne Marshall, Maureen Small, and Julie Henning Washington Department of Fish.
Lecture 13: Population Structure
Evolution of Populations
Lab 7. Estimating Population Structure
Conservation Genetics
Methods  DNA was isolated from blood samples collected at four separate locations.  Samples were Nanodropped to ensure proper concentrations of DNA.
SPECIATION How Populations Evolve. What is a Species?  A species is often defined as a group of individuals that actually or potentially interbreed in.
Cooperation and expertise for a sustainable future INTRODUCTION The endangered freshwater pearl mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera, requires.
 DNA was extracted from New England cottontail fecal pellets 1 using a QiAmp DNeasy Stool Kit (Qiagen) Genetic Structure of an Isolated New England Cottontail.
11.1 Genetic Variation Within Population KEY CONCEPT A population shares a common gene pool.
Population Structure High population divergence at the state level Populations from western Indiana genetically differed from the BONWR population Genetic.
Robert Page Doctoral Student in Dr. Voss’ Lab Population Genetics.
Crystiana Tsujiura (’14) and Judy L. Stone
Box 9.1 History of Conservation Genetics
Gene flow is the movement of alleles between populations.
Why study population genetic structure?
Unit Mass Extinctions and Biodiversity
Diversity and selection of the MHC class II genes in canids
WORLDWIDE ENC DATABASE WORKING GROUP (WENDWG)
DNA-Based Pedigree Analysis of Chinook Salmon from the Yakima River
Island Biogeography Theory
Freshwater pearl mussel, Margaritifera margaritifera: Host specificity and genetic variation in Norway BJØRN MEJDELL LARSEN & STEN KARLSSON Norwegian Institute.
Gene flow is the movement of alleles between populations.
The Evolution of Populations
Track the Split of Crocodile Sub Populations
Gene flow is the movement of alleles between populations.
Gene flow is the movement of alleles between populations.
The Evolution of Populations Ch. 11
Gene flow is the movement of alleles between populations.
Presentation transcript:

Genetic diversity and population structure of sea trout in Gulf of Finland: implications for conservation and management Riho Gross, Marja-Liisa Koljonen, Oksana Burimski, Jarmo Koskiniemi

There are approximately 1000 sea trout populations in the Baltic Sea of which about 500 reproduce naturally in Baltic rivers, including about 100 populations in Gulf of Finland (HELCOM 2011). Based on electrofishing surveys of parr densities, the sea trout populations in the Gulf of Finland are in an adverse state due to excessive fishing pressure, obstacles to migration, habitat degradation and variation in water flow. Stocking of sea trout is widely practiced with the aim of increasing their production. Potential threats: – irreversible changes of the genetic composition of native populations due to direct (stocking for enhancing purposes) or indirect (immigration of hatchery fish from neighboring rivers) impact; – non-natural selective pressures under captive conditions (domestication effect) or loss of genetic variation through genetic drift and inbreeding (that always occur in populations of restricted size such as hatchery stocks) may compromise local adaptations of the native populations and pose threat to the evolutionary potential of the species. In contrast to the Atlantic salmon, the current knowledge of genetic diversity and structure of sea trout populations in the Baltic Sea is very limited. Only local populations in different countries (e.g. Denmark, Sweden, Poland, Lithuania) have been studied by using various genetic markers but information about the populations in the whole Baltic Sea or even within different major subdivisions of it (including the Gulf of Finland) is still missing. Background

Average densities of 0+ trout in Estonian (EE) Finnish (FI) and Russian (RU) rivers in Gulf of Finland (ICES 2012) Sea trout smolt releases (*1000) to the Gulf of Finland by country in

Aims of the study to reveal the genetic structure of sea trout populations within the Gulf of Finland to estimate the level of genetic variation of sea trout populations within the Gulf of Finland to give general recommendations for management

Material Sampled sea trout rivers in the Gulf of Finland (22 populations ) (16 populations ) (12 populations)

Sampled sea trout rivers in the Gulf of Riga and from Estonian islands 7 populations 5 populations

Methods: Genomic DNA was isolated from fin clips or muscle tissue 15 microsatellite loci: Ssosl417, Str60INRA, SSa407, SSosl1311, BS131, SSosl438, Strutta58, SSsp2201, Str15INRA, OneU9, Str73INRA, Ssa85, Str85INRA, SSsp1605, Ssa197 PCR amplification products were separated by capillary electrophoresis on AB3500 (Tartu) and AB3130 (Helsinki) Genetic Analyzers and the sizes of the microsatellite alleles were determined using Genemapper software Allele sizes of microsatellite loci were calibrated and standardized by exchange of reference samples

Data analysis The genotype data were analysed by standard population genetic analysis tools (GENEPOP, ARLEQUIN, FSTAT, POPULATIONS, MEGA) Genetic diversity was estimated as an allelic richness and an average observed/expected heterozygosity of populations The level of population differentiation was esimated by pair-wise F ST values Hierarchical distribution of genetic diversity was estimated by AMOVA method Genetic similarities/dissimilarities between populations were estimated based on pair-wise D A genetic distances and depicted graphically as an unrooted neighbour-joining dendrogram

Results and Discussion

Genetic similarity of sea trout populations: NJ dendrogram (Nei’s Da distance) Population structure

Average genetic diversity of sea trout populations in different geographic regions

Estonia + Luga, Sista FinlandFin/Rus Russian Karelia Genetic diversity of sea trout populations in the Gulf of Finland

Differentiation of sea trout populations global F ST = % - between geographic regions 6.0 % - among populations within the geographic regions 89.2 % - within populations Gulf of Finland: EST_G. FinFIN_G. FinFIN/RUS_G. FinRUS_G. FinEST_G. RigaEST_Islands EST_G. Finland FIN_G. Finland FIN/RUS_G. Finland RUS_G. Finland EST_G. Riga EST_Islands Average from other Average F ST within (along diagonal) and between regions:

Conclusions The average level of genetic variation of sea trout populations in Gulf of Finland was comparable to that in Gulf of Riga but a little bit lower than in Estonian islands. Within countries, the level of genetic variation among populations was relatively similar in Estonia and Russia but more variable in Finland and Finnish/Russian border area. Populations with the highest genetic variation should be considered as a basis for forming hatchery stocks within each region. The overall level of genetic differentiation between studied populations in Gulf of Finland was moderate (F ST = 0.108). The populations were most differentiated in Finland and Finnish/Russian border area and least differentiated in Estonia and Russia. Based on genetic distances, the populations clustered well according to the geographic regions. These 4 geographic groupings should be managed separately. The results of our study allow to propose genetic management and conservation units for sea trout in the whole Gulf of Finland and enable genetic data based planning for hatchery rearing and enhancement releases.