Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading: Nonpoint Source Offset Options Kurt Stephenson Dept of Ag & Applied Economics Virginia Tech

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
creating a sustainable world The Chesapeake Bay TMDL A Policy Model for Nutrient Pollution Reductions James Noonan October.
Advertisements

Pennsylvania Nonpoint Source BMP Effectiveness, Cost-Effectiveness and Potential for Reducing Loads Jeff Sweeney University of Maryland PA Chesapeake Bay.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Region 10 – Seattle Region 10 – Seattle
The Use of Nutrient Credits in Virginia
RTI International RTI International is a trade name of Research Triangle Institute. Economic Study of Nutrient Credit Trading for the Chesapeake.
The Chesapeake Bay TMDL: Coming to an Impaired Water Near You? Sean M. Sullivan Williams Mullen 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC (919)
Improving Water Quality: Controlling Point and Nonpoint Sources Chapter 15 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
Pollutant Trading Discussion 22 July Why Allow Trading? §To make point sources pay §To lure nonpoint sources into doing pollution control so we.
Water Quality Trading Claire Schary Water Quality Trading Coordinator U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 10, Seattle, WA Region 10, Seattle,
Bureau of Water Overview Wastewater issues Drinking water issues Wrap up topics.
David K. Paylor Director, Department of Environmental Quality May 27, 2014 VEDP Lunch & Learn Environmental Permitting 101.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin Alabama Water Resources Conference September 6, 2012 A Feasibility Study of Nutrient Trading in Support of.
Lee County Government Division of Natural Resources TMDL/BMAP Update TMDL/BMAP Update November 30, 2010 Roland Ottolini, Director Lee County Division of.
Department of Conservation and Recreation 1 Proposed Stormwater Management Requirements for Virginia Rappahannock River Basin Commission June 24, 2009.
Introduction to TMDLs for Nutrients Presented by: Dr. Scott Emery January 15, 2009.
Mark Dubin Agricultural Technical Coordinator University of Maryland Extension-College Park Modeling Quarterly Review Meeting April 17, 2012.
Nutrient Trading Framework in the Coosa Basin April 22, 2015.
Watersheds on Wall Street? Water Pollutant Trading Becky Shannon, Missouri Department of Natural Resources Craig Smith, University of Missouri Extension.
Buyer Seller Nutrient Credits Compensation ($) Maryland’s Water Quality Trading Program Phase II – Agricultural Nutrient Trading in Maryland John Rhoderick.
Nutrient Trading and the Chesapeake Bay Paul K. Marchetti PENNVEST February 18, 2008.
Ann Swanson Executive Director Chesapeake Bay Commission May 2012 Market Solutions and Restoring the Chesapeake The Economics of Nutrient Trading.
Status Report: Chesapeake Bay TMDL Clean Up Plan Presented to P otomac Roundtable by Jack E. Frye April 9, 2010.
The Virginia Bar Association October 22, 2009 Richmond, Virginia Reginald Parrish U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Chesapeake Bay Program Update on.
YOUR SCHOOL AND YOUR WATERSHED LORNA ROSENBERG- US EPA MID-ATLANTIC OCT 1-2, 2014 CHESAPEAKE BAY SCHOOLS WORKSHOP – SHEPHERDSTOWN, WVA.
1 “ Understanding the Local Role of Improving Water Quality” Virginia Association of Counties November 14, 2011 Virginia Association of Counties November.
Update on the Development of EPA’s Chesapeake Bay TMDL and Virginia’s Watershed Implementation Plan Russ Perkinson Potomac Roundtable October 8, 2010.
Department of the Environment Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program Phase I- Trading between point sources and trading involving connecting on-site septic.
Trust for a Clean Water Economy Rappahannock Watershed A Systems Approach to Bay Restoration Presentation to the Virginia Water Commission January.
Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee Meeting Bay Program Water Quality Goals: Focus on Funding Presented to COG Board of Directors September 10, 2003.
Phase II WIP Background & Development Process Tri-County Council – Eastern Shore June 2,
What is the Chesapeake Bay TMDL? Total Maximum Daily Load –Amount of pollutants that a water body can receive and still support designated uses Drinking,
Chesapeake Bay TMDL & Watershed Implementation Plans The Role of Local Governments Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Administrator U.S. EPA Presentation.
Restoring VA Waters the TMDL Way Jeff Corbin Senior Advisor to the Regional Administrator U.S. EPA Region 3.
Great Bay Municipal Coalition New Hampshire Water Pollution Control Association June 13, 2013 Dean Peschel Peschel Consulting
Preparing for Regulatory Change WATER RESOURCES WORKSHOP February 20, 2004 Donald J. Brady, Ph.D.
Virginia’s Chesapeake Bay Nutrient Credit Trading Program
Suzanne Trevena EPA Water Protection Division Chair Milestone Workgroup December 4,
Status Report on Chesapeake Bay Clean Up Plan Wastewater Sector June 2, 2010.
Chesapeake Bay Policy in Virginia - TMDL, Milestones and the Watershed Agreement Russ Baxter Deputy Secretary of Natural Resources for the Chesapeake Bay.
Deliberative, Pre-decisional – Do Not Quote, Cite or Distribute 1 Chesapeake Bay Water Quality Trading.
Urban Water Research Todd Rasmussen Associate Professor of Hydrology The University of Georgia, Athens and Pending Director, Urban Water Research Institute.
Neuse River Basin Provided by Dr. D. Monreau to Dr. G
2004 Tributary Strategies: Assessment of Implementation Options Steve Bieber Water Resources Program Presented at: COG Chesapeake Bay Policy Committee.
John Kennedy VA DEQ - Ches. Bay Program Mgr Tributary Strategies: Point Source Nutrient Controls Potomac Watershed.
Reducing Nutrient Loads from the Opequon Creek Watershed Project Team Meeting Oct 19, 2007 Chesapeake Bay Targeted Watersheds Grant Program.
Impact of Recent Environmental Regulations on Land Use Sean M. Sullivan Williams Mullen 301 Fayetteville Street, Suite 1700 Raleigh, NC (919)
KWWOA Annual Conference April 2014 Development of a Kentucky Nutrient Strategy Paulette Akers Kentucky Division of Water Frankfort, KY.
Preserving York County 2010 Municipal Educational Series January 28, 2010 Rick Keister, Alliance for the Chesapeake Bay Jake Romig, York County Circuit.
Introduction to Water Quality Trading National Forum On Water Quality Trading July 22-23, 2003 Chicago, Illinois.
1 State Parks  Soil and Water Conservation  Natural Heritage Outdoor Recreation Planning  Land Conservation Dam Safety and Floodplain Management Chesapeake.
Nutrient Trading & Nutrient Assimilation Credits Kurt Stephenson Department of Ag & Applied Economics August 25, 2011.
Draft Stormwater Proposal Home Builders Association of Virginia Richmond, Virginia June 29, 2009.
HAMPTON ROADS REGIONAL WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT PROGRAM Presentation John M. Carlock, AICP Deputy Executive Director, Physical Planning Hampton Roads.
Maryland’s Nutrient Trading Program How Trading Works John Rhoderick Maryland Department of Agriculture.
To EMC Water Quality Committee September 10, 2013 Rich Gannon DWR Nonpoint Source Planning Branch.
Nutrient Trading: Principles and Issues April 7, 2006 presentation to Potomac Watershed Roundtable.
Northern Virginia Regional Commission MS4 Workgroup March 17, 2011.
Williamsburg’s Local Strategies to meet the ChesBay TMDL March 2012 Chesapeake Bay Watershed Virginia Maryland Pennsylvania New York Delaware West Virginia.
Improving Local Water Quality in Pennsylvania and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay.
Watershed Management for Urban Water Supply. Why use NYC as a case study? Comprehensive, long-range watershed protection program Illustrates a multifaceted.
Water Quality Trading – Utah Perspective
MACo Winter Conference
Building a Phase III WIP for Wastewater, Stormwater & Septic Systems
GIS Data Management for SHA’s Bay Restoration Program
Understanding the State’s Accounting for Growth Policy
Developing a Water Quality Trading Framework
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Water Quality Trading Advisory Committee MDA Headquarters
Environmental Management Commission January 2014
Presentation transcript:

Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading: Nonpoint Source Offset Options Kurt Stephenson Dept of Ag & Applied Economics Virginia Tech

Virginia Nutrient Credit Trading Program Establish stringent mass load caps for N and P and to provide point sources compliance options for meeting those load caps.

Trade Design and Sequencing In general, the Virginia nutrient trading program requires point sources to exhaust point source compliance options first before allowing any nonpoint source trades. This applies to both existing and new/expanding point sources.

Existing Point Source Compliance 1.Devise plan to meet wasteload allocation (WLA) (individually or as bubble) 2.If discharge > WLA, must purchase credits from another point source 3.If no PS credits available, secure equivalent NPS credit by paying into Virginia Water Quality Program.

New/Expanding Point Source Compliance: Offsets 1A) Meet limit of technology concentration standard for N and P, and 1B) Acquire WLA to offset new discharge: Buy WLA from point source Acquire NPS offset at 2:1 rate If none above, “other means” If none above, payments into WQIF

Nonpoint Source Credits/Offsets Nonpoint source credits/offsets are reductions in nutrient load beyond a baseline. Defined in statute as: “achieve reductions beyond those already required by or funded under federal and state law” § :15.B.1b Must be within same tributary

Nonpoint Source Offsets Any nonpoint source offsets must be included within the point source’s individual VPDES permit. Thus offsets do not represent a transfer of legal responsibility to limit nutrient discharges.

Opequon Project: Evaluating Urban Offset Options Avoiding legal exposure for NPS nonperformance – What potential offset projects could be performed under the local government authority

Options: 1) Urban BMPs (constructed wetlands, wet ponds, bioretention areas, sand filters) 2) Connecting private septic to public sewer system 3) Land conversion on land owned or controlled by local government Opequon Project: Offset Options Being Evaluated

Project team developing a cost screening tool that would allow rapid assessment of cost to generate offset for these options Planning, not implementation, tool. Opequon Project: Screening Tool

Current draft guidelines allow for offsets from enhancing/retrofitting existing stormwater BMPs or stream/wetland restoration. Urban offset must be Consistent with Erosion/Sediment Control laws Consistent with VA’s stormwater management program Compliant with federal MS4 rules Consistent with Ches Bay Preservation Act. Urban BMPs

Sample of Stormwater Screening Tool

Septic Connections Current draft guidelines allow for offsets from “retrofitting” existing septic systems EPA has approved increases in wastewater treatment plant’s WLA by connecting existing septics to central sewer. Nitrogen examples include 20lbs N/yr/septic

Urban Offset Wildcard Proposed Strategy Allocation Reduction Factor (SARF) – A portion of all urban NPS offsets generated will be allocated to achieve tributary strategy goals for urban NPS

NPS Credits: Land Conversion Conversion of some types of land to less intensive nutrient uses could be eligible for NPS credit. For example: Cropland to forest or parkland. Hayland/pasture to forest or parkland Fee simple or conservation easement.