Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Orbital Debris 10 June, 2015 Symposium for the Small.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Experimental Permits for Reusable Suborbital Rockets Guidelines Randy Repcheck May 25, 2005 Federal Aviation Administration.
Advertisements

From Cutting Red Tape to Maximizing Net Benefits Alexander T. Hunt U.S. Office of Management and Budget Challenges on Cutting Red Tape Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Space Law Presentation
© The Aerospace Corporation 2011 Space Debris & Debris Mitigation Marlon Sorge The Aerospace Corporation AIAA Improving Space Operations Workshop 5 April.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration The Disposal of Launch Vehicle Orbital Stages Nicholas L. Johnson Chief Scientist for Orbital Debris 28 October.
International Initiatives to Preserve the Outer Space Environment (Update) Amber Charlesworth Office of Space & Advanced Technology United States Department.
Federal Aviation Administration On-Orbit Debris Mitigation Methods for Upper Stages COMSTAC: Space Transportation Operations Working Group and Risk Management.
3 rd Manfred Lachs International Conference ‘NewSpace Commercialization and the Law’ Montreal, March 2015 NewSpace, Small Satellites and Law: Finding.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 7 – Medical Guidance for Crew & Spaceflight.
Safety Evaluation According To UK Regulations Dr Richard Crowther Head, Space Engineering & Technology Division Rutherford Appleton Laboratory Oxfordshire,
Federal Aviation Administration Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Briefing to COMSTAC Kelvin Coleman May 16, 2008.
Introduction to Space Systems and Spacecraft Design Space Systems Design Legal Considerations For Mission Design.
The impact of long-term trends on the space debris population Dr Hugh Lewis Astronautics Research Group, Faculty of Engineering & the Environment.
Introduction: The Role of Agencies
By: P. Brinkman, Senior Technical Advisor, FAA Date: August 15, 2011 Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration.
Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement Experimental Permits COMSTAC Stacey M. Zee October 25, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
International Strategy FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation
Effects of Minimal Regulations on Commercial Human Spaceflight and Public Risk Acceptance Results of Nov 2011 Public Opinion Poll Presented to COMSTAC.
Historical Growth of Space Debris Global Security Program Union of Concerned Scientists.
Long-term evolution of the space debris population Dr Hugh Lewis Astronautics Research Group, Faculty of Engineering & the Environment.
Page 1 Commercial Space Transportation Advisory Committee (COMSTAC) May 18, 2007 Brett Alexander John Gedmark President Executive Director President Executive.
Is NEPA Preventing Energy Development? Bryan Hannegan, Ph.D. Associate Director – Energy and Transportation White House Council on Environmental Quality.
Technical Regulations – U.S. Procedures and Practices U.S.-Brazil Commercial Dialogue Digital Video Conference Series August 22, 2006 Mary Saunders Chief,
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master text styles Second level Third level Fourth level Fifth level Concept of Operations for Commercial.
The Effectiveness of Space Debris Mitigation Measures ISU’s 16 th Annual International Symposium 21 st February 2012 Adam E. White, Hugh G. Lewis, Hedley.
Introduction to the FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation AST Pre-Workshop to the Center of Excellence for Commercial Space Transportation Research.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 5 – Aborts and Abort Systems. December.
2008 Non-Geosynchronous Orbits Commercial Space Transportation Forecast John Sloan Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation.
John D. Rummel East Carolina University and the McGill University Institute of Air and Space Law “Due Regard” in Space Activities: Avoiding Harmful Contamination.
Commercial Space: A New Frontier Dr. George C. Nield Deputy Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation January 9, 2007 Federal Aviation.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 8 – Communications and Commanding Best.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon 6 – Fault Tolerance, Margin and Reliability.
1 ADVANCED SPACEPORT TECHNOLOGY WORKING GROUP May 15, 2001 Stewart W. Jackson Commercial Space Transportation Federal Aviation Administration FAA/AST LICENSING.
AST Research and Development Activities COMSTAC Launch Operations and Support Working Group Chuck Larsen October 24, 2006 Federal Aviation Administration.
1 Federal Aviation Administration COE CST Research Road Mapping Workshop #2 August 16, 2011 Research 1 Hierarchy 1 Space Traffic Management and Operations.
Presented to: COMSTAC RLV Working Group By: Ken Wong, Licensing and Safety Division Manager Date: May 15, 2008 Federal Aviation Administration Federal.
2004 Commercial Space Transportation Forecast for Non-Geosynchronous Orbits (NGSO) John Sloan Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for.
SVDM ConOps 18 May 2010 Federal Aviation Administration 0 0 Space Vehicle Debris Threat Management ConOps Presentation to COMSTAC Space Transportation.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration International Outreach Update FAA Office of Commercial Space Transportation COMSTAC RLV.
Space Transportation Operations Working Group (STOWG) Report to COMSTAC October 7, 2010 Debra Facktor Lepore Acting Chair.
Industry Comments to Commercial Space Transportation Reusable Launch Vehicle Operations & Maintenance Guidelines Presented to the COMSTAC RLV Working Group.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon #3 – Types of Requirements and Guidance.
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation May 2004.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Overview May 11, 2011 Introduction to the FAA Center of Excellence for Commercial Space Transportation May 11,
Streamlining NEPA for Reusable Launch Vehicles Federal Aviation Administration Associate Administrator for Commercial Space Transportation October 2004.
COMSTAC Risk Management Working Group October 28, 2009 Chris Kunstadter XL Insurance
Commercial Space Transportation Research and Development Program COMSTAC RLV Working Group Chuck Larsen October 10, 2007 Federal Aviation Administration.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 COE CST Overview Presentation Federal Aviation Administration Introduction to the FAA Center of Excellence for Commercial.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA AST Overview Presentation Federal Aviation Administration Overview of the Federal Aviation Administration.
SPACE Act of 2015 Dr. Sarah J. Nilsson, Esq. A 3 ir Conference January 2016.
Rulemaking Process and Cost Benefit Analysis
© 2014 Orbital Sciences Corporation. All Rights Reserved. SPRSA Excess Capacity Panel Carol P. Welsch Orbital Sciences Corporation June 10, Welsch.
Office of Space Flight Spaceport and Range Technology Development Initiative Al Sofge NASA Headquarters May 15, 2001.
Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Human Spaceflight Guidelines Update COMSTAC, Systems.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Space Debris Assessment for USA-193 Presentation to the 45 th Session of the Scientific and Technical Subcommittee.
Rulemaking by APHIS. What is a rule and when must APHIS conduct rulemaking? Under U.S. law, a rule is any requirement of general applicability and future.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 FAA AST Presentation at ESIL-1 October 26, 2011 List of Recent Papers 2011 Overview of the FAA Center of Excellence for.
2005 Commercial Space Transportation Forecast for Non-Geosynchronous Orbits John Sloan Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Bretton Alexander, RLV Working Group Chair Date: May 11, 2011.
Federal Aviation Administration AST International Outreach Update and UN COPUOS Long Term Sustainability of Outer Space – Expert Group B (Debris) John.
Special Meeting on Procedures for Information Exchange November 7, 2007 Geneva Session 1 Anne Meininger United States USA WTO TBT Enquiry Point.
Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Space Transportation Human Space Flight Occupant Safety Telecon Telecon #2 – FAA Oversight September 18th, 2012.
Federal Aviation Administration Federal Aviation Administration Presented to: COMSTAC By: Debra Facktor Lepore, Acting Chair, Space Transportation Operations.
U.S. Department of Transportation Pipeline and Hazardous Materials Safety Administration Pipeline Standards and Rulemaking Division: Current Rulemakings.
Small Satellites and the International Arena 18 th Annual Small Payload Rideshare Symposium Seattle, Washington June 7, 2016 Matthew W. Witsil Franklin.
Commercial Space Transportation
SPACE TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University Space Situational Awareness and Space Traffic Management: Towards Their Comprehensive.
Space Junk Aerospace Engineering © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc.
Federal Rulemaking Process for Significant Regulatory Actions
Stakeholder Engagement: Webinar Part I: The Regulatory Development Process for the Government of Canada Part II: Making Technical Regulations Under.
Presentation transcript:

Presented to: By: Date: Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation Orbital Debris 10 June, 2015 Symposium for the Small Payload and Rideshare Association (SPRSA) Steph Earle, FAA AST-100 Steph Earle, PMP Space Traffic Program Lead / Space Transportation Industry Analyst Federal Aviation Administration Office of Commercial Space Transportation

Federal Aviation Administration Expanding U.S. Commercial Capabilities Suborbital RLVs, ELVs with vehicle return capability, habitat demonstration Bigelow Aerospace XCOR Aerospace Orbital Sciences Space X Virgin Galactic Armadillo Aerospace and Masten Aerospace Blue Origin We expect reusable LVs will launch small-sats – increased opportunities and revenue 2

Federal Aviation Administration Commercial remote sensing satellite Licensed by NOAA NGSO commercial communications satellite Licensed by FCC GEO satellite communications slot Allocated by ITU GEO satellite communications Licensed by FCC Commercial launch event Licensed by FAA Commercial launch event Licensed/Permitted by FAA Commercial Suborbital launch/reentry site Licensed/ by FAA Commercial orbital launch/reentry site Licensed/ by FAA Suborbital Orbital NAS Today’s Space Oversight Regime Commercial reentry event Licensed by FAA 3 DOD provides safety of flight information services Different agencies currently have oversight based upon the general mission of the objects Interagency coordinates on regulations and safety requirements but some differences exist

Federal Aviation Administration Commercial Launch Growth These could change significantly with breakthroughs. Estimates derived from AST engagement with operators, including launch manifests; orbital and sub-orbital 4 Commercial Space Industry is Now a Reality; Poised for Strong Continued Growth

Federal Aviation Administration Orbital Debris Guidance 2010 National Space Policy calls for “minimizing debris and preserving the space environment” 2013 National Space Transportation Policy Execute exclusive authority, consistent with existing statutes and executive orders, to address orbital debris mitigation practices for U.S.-licensed commercial launches, to include launch vehicle components such as upper stages, through its licensing procedures. 5 Continue to follow the United States Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices, consistent with mission requirements and cost effectiveness, in the procurement and operation of spacecraft, launch services, and the conduct of tests and experiments in space. Guidance International forums continue to stress standards to prevent debris creation on orbit Space Policy and Space Transportation Policy Inter-agency Space Debris Coordination Committee (IADC) International Code of Conduct for Outer Space Activities between European Union and the U.S. Rocket Bodies in LEO* ~1800> 1,100,000 KG * Data from 2014

Federal Aviation Administration Current FAA Requirement § Safety at end of launch. A launch operator must ensure for any proposed launch that for all launch vehicle stages or components that reach Earth orbit— (a) No unplanned physical contact between the vehicle and the payload; (b) Debris generation does not result from the conversion of energy sources into energy that fragments the vehicle or its components; (c) Stored energy is removed by depleting residual fuel and leaving all fuel line valves open, venting any pressurized system, leaving all batteries in a permanent discharge state, and removing any remaining source of stored energy. 6 Policy cannot be directly levied on commercial operators except through rulemaking process.

Federal Aviation Administration US Government Standard US Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices (USGODMSP) Four objectives 1.Limit debris released during normal operations Anything ≥ 5 mm must reenter within 25 years 2.Minimize debris generated by accidental explosions Design spacecraft to limit risk Safe spacecraft and upper stages at End of Mission (EOM) 3.Select safe flight profile to minimize lifetime collision risk 4.Plan for cost effective EOM disposal procedures for spacecraft and upper stages 7 Current LV Regulations Reusable upper stages and new technologies for de-orbit Current Typical Practices

Federal Aviation Administration FAA Orbital Debris Mitigation proposed changes 8 FAA has jurisdiction over rocket bodies (including upper stages) through the end of launch Goal: Updated regulations would better align with the US Government Standard Practices Challenge: Cost vs benefits must be analyzed –Difficult to quantify –Rules that impose a cost to the industry are hard to pass through the review process

Federal Aviation Administration Launch Collision Avoidance How does it look for a typical launch window –Considering active satellites and known debris –Objects passing within 200 km of trajectory –Launch window closed when objects and vehicle could collide 9 Close approaches by minimum distance for one hour launch window km Seconds 200 km limit of concern.Orbital Objects Launch Time; sweeps through window. All approaches within 200km identified. Congestion building as we squeeze more objects into the same space!

Federal Aviation Administration Debris Mitigation Standard Practices Relative to Commercial Launch Continue to follow the United States Government Orbital Debris Mitigation Standard Practices, consistent with mission requirements and cost effectiveness, in the procurement and operation of spacecraft, launch services, and the conduct of tests and experiments in space. Guidance 10 FAA Rulemaking process is a deliberative process that often takes years. Yet it allows public and industry to participate. Policy cannot be directly levied on commercial operators except through rulemaking process.

Federal Aviation Administration Identify Need for Rulemaking Legislation Petition Court Decision New Technology Develop proposed rule Initiate rulemaking Draft Cost/benefit analysis Council review Council approval Coordinate proposed rule DOT Review OMB Review Publish in Federal Register Start of public comment period Public Comment Period Possible Public Meeting Develop final rule End of public comment period Analyze and address comments DOT review OMB review Publish Final Rule in Federal Registry Rulemaking Process 450 Days 90 Days310 Days 1.25 Years 1.5 Years Years 11 What’s it take to change the rules? Rulemaking Considerations and Realities Additional scrutiny for rulemakings that are determined to be significant: an annual impact on the economy of $100 million or more Legal agreement and concurrence Complete cost-benefit analysis demonstrating that the benefits justify the cost OMB Review Industry reaction and comments Current US Government anti-regulatory environment – minimization of rules and aversion to additional rules

Federal Aviation Administration Questions 12