Coding data Trudy Bekkering SR course 27 May 20151.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Producing Quality Evidence in a Well Organised Portfolio Doc Ref: 20/04/09-portfolio-quality-evidence.
Advertisements

Protocol Development.
Systematic Reviews Dr Sharon Mickan Centre for Evidence-based Medicine
Growing Success Overview
Student Learning Development, TCD1 Systematic Approaches to Literature Reviewing Dr Tamara O’Connor Student Learning Development Trinity College Dublin.
Reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses: PRISMA
Conducting systematic reviews for development of clinical guidelines 8 August 2013 Professor Mike Clarke
Systematic Reviews: Theory and Practice
Action Implementation and Evaluation Planning Whist the intervention plan describes how the population nutrition problem for a particular target group.
How do nurses use new technologies to inform decision making?
Clinical Trials Hanyan Yang
EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE
What is so good about Archie and RevMan 5
Assessment Activities
SRDR Quarterly Training Brown Evidence-based Practice Center Brown University September 12 th, :00pm-2:00pm SRDR Data Import Tool A Tool to Import.
Making all research results publically available: the cry of systematic reviewers.
Preliminary Results – Not for Citation Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund Evidence & Evaluation Webinar May 2014 Note: These slides are intended as guidance.
Criteria and Standard.
Their contribution to knowledge Morag Heirs. Research Fellow Centre for Reviews and Dissemination University of York PhD student (NIHR funded) Health.
INTER-RATER AGREEMENT IN KANSAS Summer Principals Academy July 22-24, 2014 Abilene, KS.
Research Report Chapter 15. Research Report – APA Format Title Page Running head – BRIEF TITLE, positioned in upper left corner of no more than 50 characters.
POSTER TEMPLATES BY: Introduction Results Discussion References Study Objective(s) Methods (Continued) Specify the objective(s)
Medical Audit.
Viva la evidence.
Program Evaluation. Program evaluation Methodological techniques of the social sciences social policy public welfare administration.
Classroom Assessments Checklists, Rating Scales, and Rubrics
Peggy Cruse and Shandra Protzko Library & Knowledge Services, National Jewish Health COLLABORATING TO PRODUCE SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 1.
Systematic Reviews.
Session I: Unit 2 Types of Reviews September 26, 2007 NCDDR training course for NIDRR grantees: Developing Evidence-Based Products Using the Systematic.
EBC course 10 April 2003 Critical Appraisal of the Clinical Literature: The Big Picture Cynthia R. Long, PhD Associate Professor Palmer Center for Chiropractic.
Systematic reviews to support public policy: An overview Jeff Valentine University of Louisville AfrEA – NONIE – 3ie Cairo.
Advancing Assessment Literacy Setting the Stage II: Understanding Data Purposes & Uses.
RevMan for Registrars Paul Glue, Psychological Medicine What is EBM? What is EBM? Different approaches/tools Different approaches/tools Systematic reviews.
Gill Gyte and Shirley Manknell. Plain language summary The plain language summary (formerly called the ‘synopsis’) aims to summarize the review in a straightforward.
DATA PREPARATION: PROCESSING & MANAGEMENT Lu Ann Aday, Ph.D. The University of Texas School of Public Health.
1 Self-directed Support – Older People’s Service Providers EVOC thinkSpace 20 June 2014.
System error Biases in epidemiological studies FETP India.
Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai University of Turin, Turin, Italy METCARDIO, Turin, Italy A FOCUSED 2008 UPDATE ON METHODS.
Developing a Review Protocol. 1. Title Registration 2. Protocol 3. Complete Review Components of the C2 Review Process.
INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Module INFORMATION MANAGEMENT Module
Sifting through the evidence Sarah Fradsham. Types of Evidence Primary Literature Observational studies Case Report Case Series Case Control Study Cohort.
Developing evidence-based guidelines at WHO. Evidence-based guidelines at WHO | January 17, |2 |
Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence November-December 2012.
Learning Outcomes Discuss current trends and issues in health care and nursing. Describe the essential elements of quality and safety in nursing and their.
Guidelines Recommandations. Role Ideal mediator for bridging between research findings and actual clinical practice Ideal tool for professionals, managers,
Instrument design Essential concept behind the design Bandit Thinkhamrop, Ph.D.(Statistics) Department of Biostatistics and Demography Faculty of Public.
The Bahrain Branch of the UK Cochrane Centre In Collaboration with Reyada Training & Management Consultancy, Dubai-UAE Cochrane Collaboration and Systematic.
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses: when and how to do them Andrew Smith Royal Lancaster Infirmary 18 May 2015.
Evidence Based Practice (EBP) Riphah College of Rehabilitation Sciences(RCRS) Riphah International University Islamabad.
Data Extraction Workshop Lindsay Shepard 30 March 2011 PhD 7113 Systematic Reviews College of Social Work, University of Utah.
Is a meta-analysis right for me? Jaime Peters June 2014.
Preliminary Results – Not for Citation Investing in Innovation (i3) Fund Evidence & Evaluation Webinar 2015 Update Note: These slides are intended as guidance.
Retrospective Chart Reviews: How to Review a Review Adam J. Singer, MD Professor and Vice Chairman for Research Department of Emergency Medicine Stony.
Data Extraction Workshop Lindsay Shepard 20 March 2012 PhD 7113 Systematic Reviews College of Social Work, University of Utah.
EBM --- Journal Reading Presenter :黃美琴 Date : 2005/10/27.
Research Documentation Betty Wilson, CIP, MS Senior Compliance Manager MU IRB Lori Wilcox, EdD Director of Academic Compliance, Corporate Compliance.
Torbay Council Partnerships Review August PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP Date Page 2 Torbay Council Partnerships Background The Audit Commission defines.
Welcome! These slides are designed to help you think through presenting your evaluation planning and results. Feel free to pick and choose the slides that.
Overview Introduction to marketing research Research design Data collection Data analysis Reporting results.
SCO GAAP Reporting updates
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 3. Session 9. Periodic data collection methods.
Review of Evidence-Based Practice and determining clinical questions to address This group of 17 slides provides a nice review of evidence-based.
Supplementary Table 1. PRISMA checklist
Data Extraction Workshop
Meta Analysis/Systematic Review Poster Template
Acknowledgements Thai Cochrane Network Prof. Malinee Laopaiboon.
Common problems with Cochrane skin reviews
Writing Cochrane Protocol Cochrane Thailand Workshop 2017
MECIR: the bits that reviewers keep getting wrong!
What are systematic reviews and why do we need them?
Presentation transcript:

Coding data Trudy Bekkering SR course 27 May 20151

What data should you collect? SR course 27 May comprehensive information about each study population and setting interventions and integrity of delivery Extract factors and variations that may have impact on results of study Extract information to decide whether results can be applied in their context. methods and potential sources of bias outcomes, results, authors’ conclusions citation, author contact details sources of funding, etc.

What data should you collect? SR course 27 May comprehensive information about each study population and setting interventions and integrity of delivery methods and potential sources of bias outcomes, results, authors’ conclusions citation, author contact details sources of funding, etc. information required for: references description of included studies risk of bias assessment analyses

SR course 27 May

Collecting outcome data SR course 27 May focus on those outcomes specified in your protocol be open to unexpected findings, e.g. adverse effects measures used definition (e.g. diagnostic criteria, threshold) timing unit of measurement for scales – upper and lower limits, direction of benefit, modifications, validation, minimally important difference numerical results may be in many formats - conversion may be required collect whatever is available no. participants for each outcome & time point

Data in many formats SR course 27 May OutcomeReported asTrials Volume transfused (mls)Mean and SEM Mean and SD Mean and something in brackets Median and something in brackets Two unlabelled numbers e.g. x(y) Bar chart showing mean per person per day Units transfusedMean and SEM Mean only Total in each group Volume adjusted for patient mass (mls/kg) Mean and SD1 Patients who had a transfusionNumber of patients3 Not measuredNot reported1

Data collection forms SR course 27 May organise all the information you need reminds you what to collect records what was not reported in the study records the decisions you make about each study source document for data entry into your review must be tailored to your review adapt from a good example paper or electronic – your choice

Hints and tips SR course 27 May plan what you need to collect – not too much or too little consider including: name of author completing the form Study ID (and Record ID if multiple reports of a study) plenty of space for notes (at beginning and throughout) source of each piece of information (e.g. page no.) tick boxes or coded options to save time ‘not reported’ and ‘unclear’ options format to match RevMan data entry provide instructions for all authors

What SR course 27 May Paper coding form

Excel coding form SR course 27 May

Minimising bias in data collection SR course 27 May two authors should independently collect data reduces error ensures agreement on subjective judgments and interpretations resolving disagreements can usually be resolved by discussion if not, refer to a third author pilot data collection process include each person assisting ensure criteria are consistently applied may need to revise form or instructions

Managing data SR course 27 May can enter data directly from form to RevMan may need to consider intermediate steps e.g. Excel spreadsheet group studies by comparison & outcomes measured calculations to convert into required statistics

Data needed for meta-analyses SR course 27 May Dichotomous data PainNo pain Intervention2080 Control4060

Data needed for meta-analyses SR course 27 May Continuous data NMeanSD Intervention Control

Available data for review SR course 27 May

Take home message SR course 27 May think carefully about the data you wish you collect design and pilot a data collection form should be done independently by two authors to minimise error and bias

References SR course 27 May Higgins JPT, Deeks JJ (editors). Chapter 7: Selecting studies and collecting data. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors), Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version (updated September 2008). The Cochrane Collaboration, Available from handbook.orgwww.cochrane- handbook.org Acknowledgements Compiled by Miranda Cumpston Based on materials by the Australasian Cochrane Centre Approved by the Cochrane Methods Board