POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS) A Staff Overview.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior.
Advertisements

PBS Overview Goal for Today To introduce you to key principles and basic concepts for a continuum of support for students known as Positive Behavior.
SWPBIS and the Changing Role of the Clinician
Positive Behavior Intervention and Support (PBIS)
Response to Intervention: What is it?. RtI is… A process for achieving higher levels of academic and behavioral success for all students through: High.
Multi-tiered System of Supports District Application.
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
Overview of SW-PBIS Cohort 10 ( ) Metro RIP (Regional Implementation Project) November 6, 2013 Shoreview Community Center T. J. Larson, MAT Barack.
Moving School-wide PBIS Forward with Quality, Equity and Efficiency 2011 Tennessee School-wide PBIS State Conf Rob Horner, University of Oregon
Schoolwide Positive Behavior Interventions and Support -SWPBIS- Mitchell L. Yell, Ph.D. University of South Carolina
CESA 1 Coach Networking Wisconsin PBIS Network/RtI Center Regional Technical Assistant Coordinators: Marlene Gross Ackeret Lori Cameron Tier 1.
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Response to Intervention: Multi- Tiered Systems for Student Success Janet Graden, PhD University of Cincinnati October, 2011.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports CCSD
Family Engagement Basics Jennifer Grenke, Regional Technical Assistance Coordinator Marlene Gross-Ackeret, Regional Technical Assistance Coordinator Dan.
John Carter Project Coordinator PBIS Idaho: Menu button: Idaho PBIS Presentations and Webinars.
Essential Elements in Implementing and Monitoring Quality RtI Procedures Rose Dymacek & Edward Daly Nebraska Department of Education University of Nebraska-
Vermont Positive Behavior Support Services
San Jose Unified School District School-wide PBS Initiative Leadership Team Rob Horner Celeste Rossetto Dickey University of Oregon Pbis.org.
Rob Horner University of Oregon Implementation of Evidence-based practices School-wide behavior support Scaling evidence-based practices.
SW-PBS District Administration Team Orientation
Tier 1/Universal Training The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support.
The District Role in Implementing and Sustaining PBIS
9/15/20151 Scaling Up Presentation: SIG/SPDG Regional Meeting October 2009 Marick Tedesco, Ph.D. State Transformation Specialist for Scaling Up.
Linking Behavior Support and Literacy Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Michael Lombardo Director Interagency Facilitation Celeste Rossetto Dickey PBIS/MTSS Coordinator
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Sustaining School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on Positive Behavior Support
Implementing School-wide PBIS Pennsylvania PBIS Implementer’s Forum Rob Horner University of Oregon.
The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Positive Behavioral Interventions & Supports (PBIS) Core Behavioral Component The Response to Intervention Best Practices Institute Wrightsville Beach,
Intro to Positive Behavior Supports (PBiS) Vermont Family Network March 2010.
Moving PBS Forward with Quality, Equity and Efficiency 2011 APBS Conference Rob Horner, University of Oregon
Introduction to Coaching School-Wide PBS:RtIB. 2 Agenda PBS:RtIB Brief Overview Coaching Tier 1 Coaching Skills and Activities Resources and Barriers.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
Connecting PBIS & SST to Address Student Needs
2015 WI PBIS Conference A5. Benchmark of Quality – Implementation Plan Dave Kunelius - WI RtI Center Regional Coordinator-PBIS.
PBIS Team Training Baltimore County Public Schools Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports SYSTEMS PRACTICES DA T A OUTCOMES July 16, 2008 Secondary.
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS) Dana Kuehl Technical Assistance Coordinator Tina Taylor Internal Coach-Crandon Jessica Keao Internal.
1 RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION ________________________________ RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION New Opportunities for Students and Reading Professionals.
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports: Data Systems Northwest AEA September 7, 2010.
Establishing Multi-tiered Behavior Support Frameworks to Achieve Positive School-wide Climate George Sugai Tim Lewis Rob Horner University of Connecticut,
Data Driven Decision Making Across All Content Areas WI PBIS Network Summer Leadership Conference Rachel Saladis Lynn Johnson The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin.
School-Wide PBIS: Action Planning George Sugai OSEP Center on PBIS Center for Behavioral Education & Research University of Connecticut August 11, 2008.
Spartan Expectations Be Responsible  Return promptly from breaks  Be an active participant  Use the law of two feet Be Respectful  Maintain cell phone.
Presented From the WI RtI Center Lori Cameron PBIS Technical Assistance Coordinator Sara Summ and Lynn Johnson Academic Technical Assistance Coordinators.
Click to edit Master title style Click to edit Master subtitle style 11/29/20151 Overview of PBIS and Necessary District/School Commitments Jennifer Grenke.
“Sustaining & Expanding Effective Practices: Lessons Learned from Implementation of School-wide Positive Behavior Supports” Susan Barrett Cyndi Boezio,
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
Data-Based Decision Making: Using Data to Improve Implementation Fidelity & Outcomes.
“Kids are here to maintain our humility.” Dr. Rob Horner
RtI Initiative Intensive Coaches Institute 9/8/09 Setting the Context.
The Wisconsin RtI Center (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation.
1 Topics to be Covered Wisconsin’s vision for RtI Essential elements High Quality Instructional practice Balanced Assessment Collaboration.
POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Introduction to School-wide Positive Behavior Support.
OSEP Project Director’s Meeting: Establishing, Sustaining and Scaling Effective Practices Rob Horner University of Oregon OSEP TA Center on PBIS
RtI Response to Instruction and Intervention Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District Understanding RtI in Thomspon School District.
A Preparation Presentation For: Administrators Team Members Classroom Management Trainers Coaches Start Here! The Wisconsin RtI Center/Wisconsin PBIS Network.
Implementing School-wide Positive Behavior Support Rob Horner and George Sugai University of Oregon and University of Connecticut OSEP TA Center on Positive.
Introduction to the Grant August-September, 2012 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development Grant (SPDG) project.
Iowa Behavior Alliance: School-wide PBS Third Annual State Conference October 2-3, 2007.
Tier 1 Positive Behavior Support Response to Intervention for Behavior Faculty Overview.
POSITIVE BEHAVIORAL INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS)
Positive Behavior Interventions and Supports (PBIS) Rachel Saladis Wisconsin PBIS Network
New Jersey Tiered System of Supports (NJTSS)
Systematic Support for Students
Using PBIS to Support Social/Emotional and Academic Needs
SWPB Action Planning for District Leadership
Presentation transcript:

POSITIVE BEHAVIOR INTERVENTIONS AND SUPPORTS (PBIS) A Staff Overview

In Partnership with OSEP’s TA Center on Positive Behavior Support Co-Director’s: Rob Horner, University of Oregon, and George Sugai, University of Connecticut The Wisconsin PBIS Network (CFDA #84.027) acknowledges the support of the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction in the development of this presentation and for the continued support of this federally-funded grant program. There are no copyright restrictions on this document; however, please credit the Wisconsin DPI and support of federal funds when copying all or part of this material.

Wisconsin RtI Center Our mission is to support schools through the phases and sustainability of their RtI system implementation. The core reason that the Wisconsin RtI Center exists is to develop, coordinate and provide high-quality professional development and technical assistance… as well as to gather, analyze and disseminate RtI implementation data to enhance the support of schools’ implementation.

Principles for RtI in Wisconsin: 1. RtI is for ALL children and ALL educators. 2. RtI must support and provide value to effective practices. 3. Success for RtI lies within the classroom through collaboration. 4. RtI is a framework for academics and behavior together. 5. RtI supports and provides value to the use of multiple assessments to inform instructional practices. 6. RtI is something you do and not necessarily something you buy. 7. RtI emerges from and supports research and evidence based practice.

RtI Definition An organizational framework that guides implementation of a multi-level system of support to achieve academic and behavioral success for all Wisconsin RtI

RtI Definition Response to Intervention Is what? An organizational framework that guides implementation of a multi-level system of support Does what? to achieve academic and behavioral success for all For what?

Schools face a set of difficult challenges today when dealing with behavioral needs  Multiple expectations (Academic accomplishment, Social competence, Safety)  Students arrive at school with widely differing understandings of what is socially acceptable.  Traditional “get tough” and “zero tolerance” approaches are insufficient.  Faculty come with divergent visions of effective discipline

MOST EFFECTIVE TRENDS IN SCHOOL DISCIPLINE PRACTICES Proactive school-wide discipline systems Social skills instruction Academic/curricular restructuring Behaviorally based interventions Early screening & identification of antisocial behavior patterns (Biglan, 1995; Gottfredson, 1997; Colvin, et al., 1993; Lipsey, 1991, 1992; Mayer, 1995; Sugai & Horner, 1994; Tolan & Guerra, 1994; Walker, et al., 1995; Walker, et al., 1996)

What is PBIS ? “PBIS” is a research-based systems approach designed to enhance the capacity of schools to…  effectively educate all students, including students with challenging social behaviors  adopt & sustain the use of effective instructional practices

What has research shown for schools implementing PBIS? Creates learning environments that proactively deal with behaviors. Improves support for students with specialized behavioral needs. Maximizes on-task behavior and increases learning time for all students.

What does PBIS emphasize? The PBIS decision-making process emphasizes 3 integrated elements to provide measureable outcomes for students: – DATA sources to support decision-making, – PRACTICES that support student behavior, and – SYSTEMS that support staff behavior.

Wisconsin’s Vision in detail...

Data Collection (Big 5 x 2) PBIS teams should analyze the following five data points and should be disaggregated by disability and ethnicity status for disproportional trends: 1.Referrals by Problem Behavior, 2.Referrals by Location, 3.Referrals by Time, 4.Referrals by Student, and 5.Average referrals by Day and by Month

Improving Decision-Making Problem Solution From: To: Problem Solving Using Data Solution Monitor Outcome

Supporting Student Behavior – Universal (Tier 1) instruction support for all district learners – Targeted (Tier 2) layered interventions for areas of need determined from data analysis – Individualized (Tier 3) layered supports required for individual students with high-needs or specific situations.

Academic and Behavior Tier 3/Intensive Level 1-5% Tier 2/Selected Level 5-15% Tier 1/Universal 80-90% Increasing Intensity

Attendance Math (Acceleration) Reading (Intervention) PE Hallway Behavior Strengths & Challenges Language Arts Science

Supporting Staff Behavior Reduce teacher stress Increase teacher efficacy in teaching replacement behaviors Support teachers in designing classroom management systems

Six Key Elements of PBIS 1.Define, teach and acknowledge positive behaviors. 2.On-going collection and use of data for decision-making regarding implementation of systems that support effective practices. 3.Continuum of universal supports, targeted interventions, and individualized supports.

Six Elements (cont.) 4.Implement evidenced-based behavioral practices with fidelity and accountability 5.Arrange the environment to prevent the development and occurrence of problem behavior 6.Screen universally and monitor student performance and progress continually.

West Elementary, Alton, IL Reduced ODRs by 719, ISSs by 47, OSSs by 27* 3965 mins hrs. 11 days 135 mins. 2.3 hrs. 235 mins. 3.9 hrs mins hrs. Staff mins hrs. 144 days 9720 mins. 162 hrs mins. 282 hrs mins hrs. Student 9345 mins hrs days 1215 mins hrs. 940 mins hrs mins hrs. Admin Total Time Gained Back OSSsISSsODRs

Elementary Schools Mean & Median Major ODR/100 students/day 2004 to 2011 N = % reduction

Middle Schools Mean & Median ODR/100 students/day % reduction

High Schools Mean &Median ODR/100 students/day N = % reduction

Suspensions - # of students – 2009/2010 to 2010/2011

to 2010/2011 Suspensions - # of Students - by School and Implementation Level N=3

Current Status Nationally Main Messages: – SWPBIS is possible (over 18,200 schools) – SWPBIS is effective at (a) reducing problem behavior, (b) improving academic achievement, and (c) improving perceived faculty effectiveness – Coaching is critical to (a) implementation with fidelity and (b) sustained use of SWPBIS – Coaching is perceived a major contributor to the cultural “fit” of SWPBIS to a community/ school.

SWPBIS in 13,331 schools 8/10’ Wisconsin Illinois

#of schools implementing PBIS by state (incomplete August 2012)

District commitment, school staff buy-in Coaching capacity Professional development plan Efficient data tool How Do We Get There?

District Commitments High priority in District Improvement Plans 3-5 year commitment Continuation of the district leadership team Ongoing staff development Allocation of resources

Big Ideas-District Long term planning is essential Funding sources Coaching and ADMINISTRATIVE commitment at all 3 tiers

Three-five year focus to get sustainable change Active administrative support and participation Administrative leadership for PBIS teams Commitment from staff (80%)‏ Ongoing communication and support with staff Completion and use of data collection (discipline and academic data, survey, checklists)‏ Staff participation in ongoing training Building Level Commitments

Family Involvement or Engagement in a PBIS School? Family involvement is often more of a “doing to,” while engagement is a “doing with.” Involvement – schools tend to lead with their mouth – generally telling family members what to do Engagement – schools lead with their ears – listening to family members’ ideas, and eliciting what they have found works best with their children Larry Ferlazzo, Education Week, March 2012

Components of Family Engagement Family member/parent academic aspirations and expectations for children Family member/parent-child communication about school Home structure that supports behavior and learning Family member/parent participation and connection in school activities

Four Concepts of Family Engagement that Educators Need to Know 1.The positive effect of family engagement on student performance (academic and behavior). 2.The home and cultural context of the students they teach. 3.Family beliefs about ways to support children's learning. 4.Specific strategies to support children’s learning.

Remember PBIS involves all of us – we decide what our focus will be – we decide how we will monitor – we decide what our goals are – we decide what we’ll do to get there – we evaluate our progress – we decide whether to keep going or change

PBIS APPROACH WORKS! Data driven building decision-making Clear expectations that are universally known Focuses on positive interaction and acknowledges appropriate behavior. Proactive rather than reactive Supports a positive learning environment Delivers results

National and State Resources