Maximising In-country Experiences. Amrita Chandra Manager, Strategic Planning International Education Division.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LAO PDR Summary Findings from NOSPA Mission and Possible Next Steps.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Forsyth County Schools February 15, 2012.
Creating the Map To Set the Direction. Educational Positioning System (EPS – a play on GPS)
PORTFOLIO.
What is Connecting Classrooms? Connecting Classrooms is a new partnership programme for linking schools in the UK and across the world. It has three core.
What do the new Standards for Registration mean to me ? To Lead or Not to Lead Hazel Cunningham 2014.
Internationalising Education through the cross curriculum priority of Asia Learning from the L21CSV program Lindy Stirling – Internationalising Education.
RTI as a Lever for School Change School Partnerships for Change in Teacher Education Tom Bellamy—February 2, 2011.
Service Agency Accreditation Recognizing Quality Educational Service Agencies Mike Bugenski
AITSL’s mission is to promote excellence in teacher and school leader practice for the benefit of all young Australians.
Family Resource Center Association January 2015 Quarterly Meeting.
Transforming Districts and Schools A framework to guide culturally responsive and inclusive changes Elizabeth B. Kozleski, Associate Dean University of.
Maximising In-country Experiences. The Strategic Context 16 May, 2012 Chris Wardlaw, Deputy Secretary Strategy and Review Group Department of Education.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Bayard Public Schools November 8, 2011.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Education and Training 2010 Peer Learning Activity, Vilnius 2009 Policy approaches to Practical Classroom Training in ITE.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Using the T-9 Net This resource describes how schools use the T-9 Net to monitor the literacy and numeracy skills of students in Transition, Year 1 and.
International Teaching Fellowship This project tracks the processes involved in introducing the Sister School concept to the students via pen pal letter.
The EMR Internationalising Education China Project Introductions.
Continuing Professional Development Tegryn Jones Policy and Planning Officer.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
Internationalising education Internationalising Education 2011 Leaders in the Making Program Day 2, Monday May 30, 2011 Amrita Chandra, International Education.
National Secondary School Computer Fund (NSSCF)
Local authorities’ role in implementing European Employment Strategy - case Finland Mr. Lauri Lamminmäki, Senior Adviser Association of Finnish Local and.
Connecting Classrooms Online. What is Connecting Classrooms Online?  Connecting Classrooms Online (CCO) provides a single, over-arching framework for.
Cluster Management. What is a Cluster? Structure  Groups of schools rather than individual partnerships  Area links  International coordinator to manage.
Asia Literacy – imperatives for the Australian Classroom Lindy Stirling, Advisor, Studies of Asia, Multicultural Education Unit.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Leading 21 st Century Schools Victoria: engage with Asia project.
Hillsdale County Intermediate School District Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team Education Service Agency Accreditation ESA
Main purpose To strengthen the State’s capacity to engage with the Asia region by building expertise in language and cultural learning in selected primary.
Main purpose To strengthen the State’s capacity to engage with the Asia region by building expertise in language and cultural learning in selected primary.
1. 2 Collaborative Partnerships It’s that evolution thing again! Adult education has been partnering and collaborating for years.
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
What is cultural competency? Cultural competency is a person’s ability to effectively understand, communicate with and interact with people of all cultures.
AdvancED District Accreditation Process © 2010 AdvancED.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report District Accreditation Bibb County Schools February 5-8, 2012.
International Opportunities for Schools The British Council The United Kingdom’s international organisation for educational opportunities and cultural.
MHC at its Best MHC at its Best.
Information & Communication Technologies (ICT) Professional Development Clusters 2010–2012.
FLAGSHIP STRATEGY 1 STUDENT LEARNING. Student Learning: A New Approach Victorian Essential Learning Standards Curriculum Planning Guidelines Principles.
Presentation to North Carolina State Board of Education Global Education Task Force March 14, 2012  Adam Hartzell, Executive Director  Matt Friedrick,
The New York State School Improvement Grant Initiative Five Years On Office of Professional Research & Development, Syracuse University, NY.
Preparing Future Teachers for 21 st Century Learning Partnerships that enhance the capacity of pre-service education 2008 Deakin University Faculty of.
Ulster.ac.uk Learning at Ulster Student Learning Experience Principles.
European Social Fund Promoting improvement Shirley Jones.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation AUTEC School 4-8 March 2012.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Center Grove High School 10 November 2010.
François Josserand European Policies Research Centre (EPRC) University of Strathclyde Interregional cooperation Lessons from Nordic-Scottish projects.
Why Community-University Partnerships? Partnerships Enhance quality of life in the region Increase relevance of academic programs Add public purposes to.
2009 An Overview of programmes. Overview Current country programmes – Ghana, Rwanda Transitioned country programmes – Namibia Potential new country programmes.
Developing Asia literacy Learning from the L21CSV program.
Creating Innovation through International collaboration Melanie Relton & Helen Kidd, British Council 7 April 2013, Qatar.
International Education Leading 21 st Century Schools: Engaging with Asia.
Quality Assurance Review Team Oral Exit Report School Accreditation Sugar Grove Elementary September 29, 2010.
EMR Principal Forum Term 3, EMR Forward Directions The Forward Directions outlines three interlinked priority areas that are the focus for EMR schools.
Helping Teachers Help All Students: The Imperative for High-Quality Professional Development Report of the Maryland Teacher Professional Development Advisory.
Building Relationships through Intercultural Dialogue and Growing Engagement China, Indonesia, South Korea and #bridgeproject.
Presentation on S&T at the Second Managers’ Forum Lynne McHale Federal Science and Technology Community Management Secretariat February 17, 2005.
Extended School Hubs Field Trials. Number of partnerships by organisation type.
Presentation By L. M. Baird And Scottish Health Council Research & Public Involvement Knowledge Exchange Event 12 th March 2015.
STRONG FAMILY AND COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT IS CENTRAL TO EFFECTIVE SCHOOL REFORM Jan Patterson and Ann Bliss Smarter Schools National Partnerships Key Reform.
I NTERNATIONALISING S CHOOLING VASSP L EADERSHIP C ONFERENCE 2016 Lindy Stirling Internationalising Education Unit Internationalising schools: Connecting.
British Council Schools Online (BCSO). Day 01 TimeActivity Welcome and introduction, aims and objectives of the workshop.
International Relations Sector and IR-ECO Group
SETTING UP AN INTERNATIONAL SISTER SCHOOL
Presentation transcript:

Maximising In-country Experiences

Amrita Chandra Manager, Strategic Planning International Education Division

Maximising In-country Experiences 1.About the pilot 2.What’s different about this model? A five phase model 3.Evaluation findings

Maximising In-country Experiences Discretionary One offs Short term More systemic but ‘scatter- gun’ Strategic Coherent Sustainable How do we move from here to here?

Maximising In-country Experiences About the Pilot DEECD/ AEF Partnership Agreement to provide study tour subsidies for teachers and principals Tailored study program developed and piloted involving 10 schools Pilot was evaluated to capture impacts on individuals and school level impacts at 4, 7 and 11 months

Maximising In-country Experiences About the Pilot “This new model of study program was seen as an impetus to internationalising education, which begins with supporting the workforce to develop the necessary knowledge and skills required to expand students’ perspectives and intercultural competencies ”

Maximising In-country Experiences School characteristics/ criteria Commitment to internationalising education agenda, building intercultural understanding and enhancing language learning Commitment to developing enduring and reciprocal sister school relationships Willingness to form/ work as a cluster within or across networks Willingness to navigate and problem solve the challenges inherent in delivery on this agenda About the Pilot

Maximising In-country Experiences Objectives of the Pilot Building leadership skills of the participants and increasing their confidence to teach about Asia and integrate global perspectives into the curriculum. Building school to school relationships with schools overseas that can support future opportunities for student and teacher exchange and enhanced language learning at the school. Developing or deepening participants’ understanding of the overseas education systems and increase their knowledge of contemporary Asian culture.

One–off, DiscretionaryStrategic, Coherent, Sustainable Individual participation Incidental Individual school Unconnected/ limited connections to strategic plan Knowledge building, observational, school visits, cultural component One visit Team approach, led by principal and teachers with abilities to lead change Planned and deliberate Cluster/network/region Seen as an impetus to internationalising education Pre-matching with sister school, joint professional learning, school placement (shadowing, teaching, observing), homestay Ongoing relationship with sister school, return visit

Maximising In-country Experiences SUSTAINABILITY PHASERETURN VISITINTERIM PHASEINITIAL VISITPREPARATION

Maximising In-country Experiences 1.Identification of participants – Set up of Project Board – schools, Region, IED 3.Determine objectives 4.Work with AEF to tailor in-country program 5.Pre-matching with potential partner schools - AEF 6.Professional learning and pre-departure briefing – PISA, AusVELS, basic language and intercultural

PREPARATION Maximising In-country Experiences Criteria for individual participants Demonstrated interest in developing cultural understandings of [x] country Potential to lead a team in the development of curriculum initiatives related to the Asia region An understanding of the Internationalising Education agenda A minimum commitment of 2 years to the project

Maximising In-country Experiences SUSTAINABILITY PHASERETURN VISITINTERIM PHASEINITIAL VISITPREPARATION

Maximising In-country Experiences 1.Orientation 2.School visits and observation 3.Relationship building with partner schools 4.One day professional learning forum on pre- determined topics of mutual interest 5.School placements – teaching, observation, shadowing 6.3 night homestay 7.Visits to significant cultural sites INITIAL VISIT

Professional Learning Program INITIAL VISIT

A Demonstration Lesson INITIAL VISIT

Maximising In-country Experiences SUSTAINABILITY PHASERETURN VISITINTERIM PHASEINITIAL VISITPREPARATION

INTERIM PHASE 1.Reflection as a group and measurement of immediate impacts against objectives – Project Board and school level 2.Sharing with colleagues and school community 3.Strengthening of language provision, Asia studies in the curriculum and school policy and planning documents 4.Follow ups and ongoing communication with partner school 5.Further PL, e.g. L21CSV, ICT capacity building, language learning 6.Planning as a group for return visit – revisiting objectives

INTERIM PHASE

INTERIM PHASE

Maximising In-country Experiences SUSTAINABILITY PHASERETURN VISITINTERIM PHASEINITIAL VISITPREPARATION

RETURN VISIT 1.School visits and placements (teaching, observation, shadowing) 2.Consolidation of sister school relationships Agreement reached on collaborative teaching and learning activities, including virtual and actual exchanges MoUs and month Collaboration Plans 3.Professional learning forum - use of ICT (webex) 4.Additional focus areas: languages, special schools 5.Visits to significant cultural sites

RETURN VISIT Maximising In-country Experiences

SUSTAINABILITY PHASERETURN VISITINTERIM PHASEINITIAL VISITPREPARATION

SUSTAINABILITY PHASE 1.Continuing to engage with more staff and school communities 2.Curriculum changes, e.g. strengthened language provision, integration of Studies of Asia/ internationalisation 3.Implementation of action plans with sister schools- ongoing communication and learning with partner schools 4.Planning for reciprocal visits – teachers/ prins/ students 5.Ongoing PL and leadership development – at individual school and through network forum

Maximising In-country Experiences Summary of Impacts – Individual Level Increased professional confidence and leadership aspirations in the participants Heightened appreciation of the need to teach about Asia and integrate global perspectives into the curriculum Increased reflection on effective teaching practice as a result of observation and learning from counterparts in partner schools Increased knowledge of contemporary Asian culture and society, which has enabled participants to connect better with Asian background students and parents in their schools.

Impacts – Whole School and Community Level School policy and planning documents Leadership development and ongoing professional learning Curriculum planning Sister school relationship Strengthening of language programs Student to student connections Parental and School Council engagement Closer relationships and partnerships with network schools

Maximising In-country Experiences SUSTAINABILITY PHASERETURN VISITINTERIM PHASEINITIAL VISITPREPARATION

Monitoring impacts of the in-country experience SUSTAINABILITYRETURN VISITINTERIM PHASEINITIAL VISITPREPARATION Gather baseline – Asia literate schools rubric Capture immediate impacts – reflection against objectives and any other impacts observed Monitoring – quarterly progress updates Reflection and sharing with other schools Capture immediate impacts – reflection in- country Reassess against baseline, e.g. 12, 18, 24 months on– Asia literate schools rubric Most Significant Change workshop as a group

Maximising In-country Experiences For more… The full evaluation report is available on the DEECD Research Register, at: ister/default.htm ister/default.htm

Maximising In-country Experiences For even more! Amrita Chandra, Manager Strategic Planning, International Education Division Ph or Lu Hong Shen, Senior Project Officer, International Education Division/ Eastern Metropolitan Region Ph or