Findings from California Statewide Surveys: Overweight and Related Variables Angie Jo Keihner, MS, Alyssa Ghirardelli, MPH, RD Cancer Prevention and Nutrition.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Burden of Obesity in North Carolina
Advertisements

The Burden of Obesity in North Carolina
Childhood Obesity Landscape. Objectives for This Session  Define childhood obesity (CHO) and understand its scope and effects  Share who some of the.
Freshman Health Initiative Survey: A Pilot Study Roseanne Schnoll, PhD, RD, CDN, Robert Curran, DC, Steven Burroughs, BA Department of Health and Nutrition.
Community Health Assessment San Joaquin County.
Arizona Adult Tobacco Survey Response to Health Professional Query Behavior Richard S. Porter, MS Bob Leischow, MPH Arizona Department of Health Services.
LATINO FACT SHEET The Network for a Healthy California (Network) strives to create innovative partnerships that empower low-income Californians to increase.
ASSOCIATIONS BETWEEN WYOMING THIRD GRADE BODY MASS INDEX AND THE SCHOOL FOOD ENVIRONMENT Marilyn Hammond.
Nutrition and Physical Activity Iowans will enjoy balanced nutrition, lead physically active lives and live in healthy communities.
Pediatric Behavioral Epidemiology Xinguang (Jim) Chen, MD, PhD Pediatric Prevention Research Center
Using data to tailor a school-based worksite wellness program Stephanie Vecchiarelli, Judith Siegel, Michael Prelip University of California Los Angeles,
Assessing the Nutritional Health of Populations. Some Definitions Joint Nutrition Monitoring Evaluation Committee, 1986 Expert Panel on Nutrition Monitoring,
Enhancing Surveillance with the Colorado Child Health Survey Jodi Drisko, MSPH Jason Gannon Alyson Shupe, MSW, PhD Colorado Department of Public Health.
By: Kristin Haberman Hlth 361.  Obesity is a term used to describe a condition in which ratio of body fat to total body mass is higher than accepted.
 Increase the availability of fresh foods,  Develop a stable food supply in underserved communities, and  Improve the connection between urban and agricultural.
A STUDY OF RURAL CHILDHOOD OBESITY Dr. Marilyn Duran PhD, RN Department of Nursing Tarleton State University.
Press Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:CONTACT: Roseanne Pawelec, Tuesday, July 23, 2002(617) NEARLY HALF OF ALL MASSACHUSETTS RESIDENTS OVERWEIGHT.
The Link between Nutrition, Learning & Academic Achievement.
Childhood Overweight in Sacramento County, 2001 Cassius Lockett, Ph.D., MS Epidemiology Program Manager Epidemiology Services Department of Health and.
A Profile of Health among Massachusetts Adults: Highlights from the Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) Health Survey.
Delaware Survey of Children’s Health March 7, 2013 Zhongcui Gao, Co InvestigatorJia Zhao, Co Investigator Judith Johnson, Team MemberMonica Burnett,
November 10, 2010 Statewide Conference Call Healthy Children, Healthy Weights Curriculum provided in cooperation with Columbus Public Health. Funding provided.
CATCH grant: Pediatric Obesity and Weight Management Community Assessment Naya Antink, MD June 25, 2008.
2004 Falls County Health Survey Texas Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS)
Punam Ohri-Vachaspati, PhD, RD Associate Professor, Nutrition College of Nursing and Health Innovation Arizona State University.
Linking Primary Care, Communities, and Families to Prevent Obesity Among Preschool Children Jerica M. Berge, PhD, MPH, LMFT Collaborative Family Healthcare.
Public Health Department Creating a Vision for a Healthy Pasadena Pasadena City Council Presentation April 25, 2011.
Participation in Community-Originated Interventions is Associated with Positive Changes in Weight Status and Health Behaviors in Youth Lauren MacKenzie.
Women’s Health in Massachusetts Highlights from the Massachusetts Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS): Health Survey Program Bureau.
School-based obesity prevention: Opinions, beliefs & current practices of licensed school nurses. Findings from the Minnesota School Nurse Survey School.
Abstract Health Trends in US Adolescents Over the Past 20 Years Sutherland, LA. Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center and Department of Nutrition, University.
BOARD OF SUPERVISORS Gloria Molina First District Yvonne Brathwaite Burke Second District Zev Yaroslavsky Third District Don Knabe Fourth District Michael.
Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes in Children A presentation to initiate awareness and advocacy for an international health epidemic.
In 1980, about 50 percent of high school seniors reported eating green vegetables “nearly every day or more.” By 2003, that figure had dropped to about.
Nutrition and Health surveys/nutrition monitoring; Epidemiology Chapters 4 & 6.
1999 California Healthy Eating and Exercise Practices Survey: Programmatic Implications for the California Children’s 5 a Day–Power Play! Campaign Authors:
EAT SMARTER, BE ACTIVE, GET HEALTHY CALIFORNIA Effects of the 5 a Day—Power Play! Campaign’s School Idea & Resource Kit on Knowledge, Self-Efficacy, Peer.
NuPAFP Conference October 13-14, 2010 Color Me Healthy.
CX 3 Communities of Excellence in Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Obesity Prevention APHA- Denver, CO, November 9, 2010 Presented by: Alyssa Ghirardelli,
OBESITY A CURRENT EPIDEMIC FOR HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS THROUGHOUT THE UNITED STATES 9 th Grade Health.
Overweight or obese Adults who are obese30.4 Adults who are overweight35.1 Adolescents who are obese14.9 Adolescents who are overweight15.5 Low-income.
Children Aged 5 to
ERS Studies Using USDA Food Consumption Survey Data Biing-Hwan Lin, Lisa Mancino, Francis Tuan, and Travis Smith Economic Research Service, USDA May 2009.
LIFESTYLE MODIFICATION Chartbook on Healthy Living.
Children and Weight: What Communities Can Do Nutrition and Physical Activity Among Youth.
Flojaune Griffin, PhD, MPH Preconception Health Coordinator
Sixth Annual Social Marketing Conference of the California Nutrition Network Susan B. Foerster, Chief Cancer Prevention and Nutrition Section California.
 2013 Cengage-Wadsworth A National Nutrition Agenda for the Public’s Health.
Childhood Overweight and Obesity. Data from NHANES surveys (1976–1980 and 2003–2006) show that the prevalence of obesity has increased: – for children.
Youth Initiatives Cristina S. Barroso, DrPH University of Texas School of Public Health, Brownsville Regional Campus Presented at the Texas Association.
5 A Day Behavior and Knowledge of Recommendations in Relation to Health Communication in the Health Information National Trends Survey (HINTS) Jennifer.
Creating Positive Health Outcomes for Children by Improving Their Nutritional Environment in Schools Mari Richardson, MPH Student Walden University PUBH.
Discussion Background Fitwits MD: An intervention to prevent childhood obesity Diane J. Abatemarco, PhD, MSW, School of Population Health, Thomas Jefferson.
Catherine J. Lillehoj, Ph.D. 1, Jennifer Thorud, MPH 2, Debra Kane, Ph.D th Annual American Public Health Association Conference November 9, 2010.
Parent/Caregiver Knowledge, Behavior, and Beliefs Regarding Nutrition, Diet, and Exercise Serge K. Tankeu, M.S., MPH Kay Cherry, M.S., Assistant Professor.
On A Mission for Better Nutrition! Courtney Nordhus UW Honors Program – Senior Capstone Project.
Parental Feeding Behavior: Influences on Elementary Children Health Georgia Southern University 2014 Research Symposium Cydni Martin and Jennifer Paquin,
Poster Produced by Faculty & Curriculum Support, Georgetown University School of Medicine The Unique Implementation of a Childhood Obesity Program In a.
Data on lifestyle risk factors in Latvia Dr Iveta Pudule Health Promotion State Agency.
Factors Associated with Obesity in Children and Adolescents in California Sherri Rose, Denise Herd, May Wang School of Public Health University of California,
OBESITY EPIDEMIC: POOR DIET AND PHYSICAL INACTIVITY A MAJOR GLOBAL PUBLIC HEALTH CHALLENGE The health implication of the nation’s weight Okechukwu Ndukwu.
Yolo County Obesity Data Yolo County Childhood Nutrition and Fitness Forum September 18, 2004 Samrina Marshall, MD, MPH Assistant Health Officer, Yolo.
Results: CalCHEEPS 2007 Soda and Sweetened Beverage Consumption Among Children and Adults in California: What Factors Really Make a Difference? Angie Keihner,
NJ Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program - Education (SNAP-Ed) NJ’s Expanded Food and Nutrition Education Programs (EFNEP)
CONCLUSIONS & IMPLICATIONS
Lunches from Home Associated with Better Dietary Behaviors Among California Teens Findings from the 2005 California Health Interview Survey Theresa A.
Sugar Consumption Among Adolescents through Beverage Intake
Bronx Community Health Dashboard: Nutrition, Physical Activity and Obesity Last Updated: 1/16/2018 See last slide for more information about.
Are School Wellness Policies Associated with Weight
Childhood Overweight in Sacramento County, 2001
Presentation transcript:

Findings from California Statewide Surveys: Overweight and Related Variables Angie Jo Keihner, MS, Alyssa Ghirardelli, MPH, RD Cancer Prevention and Nutrition Section, Public Health Institute California Childhood Obesity Conference January 24, 2007

California Children’s Healthy Eating and Exercise Practices Survey (CalCHEEPS)

CalCHEEPS Funding United States Department of Agriculture Food Stamp Program The California Endowment California Department of Food and Agriculture

CalCHEEPS Survey Purpose Fills a monitoring gap – No comprehensive statewide surveys on nutrition for 9- to 11-year-old children Includes dietary practices; physical and sedentary activity; out-of-home eating; weight status; environmental factors; knowledge, attitudes, beliefs; PP! Campaign awareness

CalCHEEPS Sample Selection Market research panel households Quota sampling based on Current Population Survey Demographically representative English-speaking sample

CalCHEEPS Administration Years: 1999, 2001, 2003, & 2005 Conducted April-June/July Parent-assisted 2-day food and physical activity diary: Mailed, filled out, and returned Unassisted follow-up telephone interview (14 mins)

CalCHEEPS Sample and Response Rate ~2000 qualified households Returned food/activity diary –N = 814, 754, 632, & 712 –41%, 35%, 29%, & 32% response rate Completed telephone interview –N = 394, 369, 379, & 400 –51%, 53%, 68%, & 61% response rate

CalCHEEPS Strengths Only detailed statewide measure of dietary intake & PA among this age group Collects 2 days of diet and PA data Examine interrelationships between variables Examine ethnic and low-income segments Track changes in population over time; Track impacts corresponding to State legislation and/or PP! Campaign efforts

CalCHEEPS Limitations Uses market research panel, not random sampling – limits external validity Complex and lengthy journal Collects only 9 key foods (10 in 2001/3/5) –Simplified food details –Limited portion size quantification Little unstructured PA Weekdays only English language only Self-report bias Social desirability bias

CalCHEEPS Results *** Notes: ** p<.01, *** p<.001; BMI ≥ 85 th percentile.

CalCHEEPS At Risk/Overweight Compared to State & National Data CalCHEEPS (9-11 y) 1 34%36%38%40% Fitnessgram (5 th grd, measured) 2,3 33%34% 33% 34% CA PedNSS (5-<20 y, measured) 1,4 36%37%38%39%40%41% NHANES (6-11 y, measured) 1,5 30%32%37% Notes: 1 BMI ≥ 85th percentile; 2 Not within the healthy fitness zone. Sources: 3 California Department of Education. California Physical Fitness Report, Summary of Results for , , , , , dataquest/page2.asp?Level=State&submit1=Submit&Subject=FitTesthttp://data1.cde.ca.gov/ dataquest/page2.asp?Level=State&submit1=Submit&Subject=FitTest 4 California Department of Health Services. Children’s Medical Services Branch. CHDP Information Notice 05-D. Pediatric Nutrition Surveillance System (PedNSS) Annual Reports for Calendar Year 2004; Table 18C: Summary of Trends in Growth and Anemia Indicators by Race/Ethnicity, Children Aged 5 to <20 Years, page 5. Run Date: Summary of Trends in Growth and Anemia Indicators by Race/Ethnicity 5 Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 2006;295:1549–1555.

CalCHEEPS Results *** Notes: ** p<.01, *** p<.001; BMI ≥ 85th percentile.

CalCHEEPS Results Notes: p<.001; BMI ≥ 85 th percentile.

CalCHEEPS Results At Risk and Overweight was positively related to the consumption of: –Fried potatoes –High calorie, low nutrient foods High-fat snacks Sodas or sweetened beverages

CalCHEEPS Results Foods At Risk/ Overweight vs. Not At RiskSign. 1+ Servings of Fried Potatoes 14 vs. 8 percentp<.05 High Calorie, Low Nutrient Foods 4.2 vs. 3.5 mean servings p<.001 High-Fat Snacks1.1 vs. 0.8 mean servings p<.01 Soda or Sweetened Beverages 1.4 vs. 1.0 mean servings p< Servings of Soda or Sweetened Beverages 14 vs. 5 percentp<.001 Notes: BMI ≥ 85th percentile.

The California Teen Eating, Exercise and Nutrition Survey (CalTEENS)

CalTEENS Background First comprehensive California-wide survey on nutrition and physical activity for adolescents Developed by Research and Evaluation Unit of the Cancer Prevention and Nutrition Section - California Department of Health Services Based on: –California Dietary Practices Survey –California Youth Tobacco Survey –CDC- YRBSS (Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System)

CalTEENS Funding The California Endowment (1998, 2000, 2002) USDA Food Stamp Program (2002, 2004, 2006) California Department of Health Services (Partial 2006)

About CalTEENS Telephone survey minutes (RDD) Administered biennially since yr olds Sample size aprox About 250 questions Self-reported weight and height, fruits & vegetables, high and low nutrient foods, PA, school environment, behaviors and attitudes Verbal parental consent and adolescent assent English and Spanish languages

About CalTEENS Response Rates –1998: 85%, 2000: 88%, –2002: 60%, 2004: 61% Variable Descriptors Overweight –BMI ≥ 95 th percentile At risk for overweight –BMI ≥ 85 th and < 95 th percentile Income related food risk –Responded yes to hunger within the past 12 months and household participation in WIC or Food Stamps

CalTEENS Strengths Only detailed statewide measure of dietary intake and physical activity among this age group Representative sample Examines interrelationships between variables Examines population segments- race/ethnicity, age, gender, overweight, other health related behaviors Tracks changes in population over time Tracks impacts corresponding to State legislation and/or program efforts

CalTEENS Limitations Single day, modified recall, semi- quantified Measures marker foods rather than food group servings or nutrient values Dietary/PA questions adapted from adult surveys; not validated with teens; surrogate SES data Seasonality Weighting reflects 1990 or 2000 demographics Self-report bias; social desirability bias English/Spanish only

Distribution of At Risk for and Overweight Status of California Teens Aged Based on Body Mass Index (BMI ≥ 85th percentile p<.001), (BMI ≥ 85th percentile p<.01) (BMI ≥ 95th percentile p<.001) CalTEENS Trends

CalTEENS Comparison to National and other Statewide Data Overweight (BMI ≥ 95 th %ile) CalTEENS 8%11%9%12% CHIS12% YRBSS (national) 11% 12%13% NHANES17% Sex-and age-specific BMI ≥ 95th percentile based on the CDC growth charts Sources: University of California Los Angeles Center for Health Policy Research. California Health Interview Survey, 2003 Adolescent AskCHIS internet data query system In. Los Angeles, CA. Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, In: Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Department of Health and Human Services Centers for Disease Control and Prevention; Ogden CL, Carroll MD, Curtin LR, McDowell MA, Tabak CJ, Flegal KM. Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999–2004. JAMA 2006;295:1549–1555.

CalTEENS Trends Distribution of At Risk for and Overweight Status of California Teens by Race/Ethnicity Based on Body Mass Index (Latino BMI ≥ 85th percentile p<.001), (Asian/Other BMI ≥ 85th percentile p<.01, p<.001),

CalTEENS Results (BMI ≥ 85th percentile, with Income Related Food Risk p<.05) Income related food risk includes respondents with hunger in the past 12 months and participation in WIC or Food Stamps assistance programs Distribution of At Risk for and Overweight Status of California Teens by Income Related Food Risk Based on Body Mass Index

2004 Data: At Risk for and Overweight and Behavior Foods At Risk for and Overweight (BMI ≥ 85%ile) Not At RiskSign. No servings of fruits or vegetables 14%9%p<.05 No servings of vegetables 56%48%p<.01 Soda or sweetened Beverages (mean) 1.5 serv1.1 servp< Servings of soda or sweetened beverages 41%27%p<.001 TV time159 min120 minp<.001 CalTEENS Results

Foods Income Related Food Risk Not At RiskSign. No servings of fruits or vegetables 14%9%p<.01 No servings of vegetables 60%48%p<.01 TV time159 min119 minp<.001 Soda or sweetened beverages (mean) 1.4 serv1.1 servp< hour of physical activity 53%65%p<.01 CalTEENS Results 2004 Data: Teens Experiencing Income Related Food Risk and Behavior Income related food risk includes respondents with hunger in the past 12 months and participation in WIC or Food Stamps assistance programs

CalCHEEPS and CalTEENS Conclusions At risk/overweight continues to rise among California children and teens Most prevalent among low-income and minority youth Associated with high calorie, low nutrient foods Specifically for teens: –low consumption of fruits and vegetables –TV viewing

Contact Information For more information about the –CalCHEEPS: Angie Jo Keihner –CalTEENS: Alyssa Ghirardelli –