Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, 2005 2005 National Energy and Environmental Conference.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Update on NRC Low-Level Waste Program – Major Activities Large Scale blending of LLRW -Issued guidance to agreement states for reviewing proposals for.
Advertisements

Course Material Overview of Process Safety Compliance with Standards
Quality Assurance Update Presented byRay Hardwick Presented by: Ray Hardwick.
Department of Energy Quality Assurance Updates Frank Russo Deputy Assistant Secretary Office of Corporate Performance Assessment Energy & Environmental.
IAEA 1 The IAEA has revised the 1996 Safety Standards 50-C/SG-Q: QA Requirements and Safety Guides Published in 1996 Promotes structure: –Management –Performance.
Safety Software QA at BNL’s Collider-Accelerator Department (C-AD) Accelerator Safety Workshop E. Lessard Collider-Accelerator Department August 12-14,
ANSI/ASQ E Overview Gary L. Johnson U.S. EPA
Chapter 7: Key Process Areas for Level 2: Repeatable - Arvind Kabir Yateesh.
LATA Environmental Services of Kentucky, LLC Process for Approved Supplier Selection and Evaluation ASME NQA (and Addenda through 2007), Part I.
1 Extension of Construction Authorization for the Mixed Oxide Fuel Fabrication Facility David Tiktinsky Senior Project Manager Division of Fuel Cycle Safety,
1 Continuing Evolution of U.S. Nuclear Quality Assurance Principles, Practices and Requirements PART II - A Tutorial August 2005 This document.
Meteorology Combined License NRC Review Process Meteorology Joseph Hoch Physical Scientist U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission June , 2008 Nuclear.
Presented By – Robert G. Burns, PE
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency. IAEA Outline Learning objectives Introduction Functions of Regulatory Body (RB) on EPR Appraisal guidance: Part.
Dr. Jose Pires Structural, Geotechnical and Seismic Engineering Branch
Review of Safety-Related Regulations and Standards 2-1 Chapter 2.
Licensing of Nuclear Power Plants in Pakistan
Lindy Hughes Fleet Fire Protection Program Engineer Southern Nuclear Operating Company June 4, 2013 Fire Protection.
School for drafting regulations Nuclear Safety Decommissioning Vienna, 2-7 December 2012 Tea Bilic Zabric.
INSAG DEVELOPMENT OF A DOCUMENT ON HIGH LEVEL SAFETY RECOMMENDATIONS FOR NUCLEAR POWER Milestone Issues: Group C. Nuclear Safety. A. Alonso (INSAG Member)
1 10 CFR Part 26 Subpart I Managing Fatigue Kamishan Martin Human Factors Engineering June 23, 2010 HPRCT conference.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.7 Commissioning Geoff Vaughan University of Central.
Sandia National Laboratories is a multi-program laboratory managed and operated by Sandia Corporation, a wholly owned subsidiary of Lockheed Martin Corporation,
Protection Against Occupational Exposure
ToR of GEOSAF2 WG on Operational Safety Review of WG2.
External Operations Experience Update: NRC Information Notices: Qualification of Safety-Related Components and Antifreeze Agents in Fire Water Sprinklers.
John Farquharson Safety Analysis Approaches – ISA vs. DSA – One Safety Analyst’s Opinion John Farquharson
Basics of OHSAS Occupational Health & Safety Management System
Commissioning of Fire Protection and Life Safety Systems Presented by: Charles Kilfoil Bechtel National Waste Treatment Plant Richland WA.
QA Requirements for DOE Accelerator Safety System Software K. Mahoney Group Leader, Safety Systems TJNAF Presented at the 2008 DOE Accelerator Safety Workshop.
MOX Safety Fuels the Future Integration of Safety in Design in MOX Fuel Fabrication Facility Sue King.
ISMS QMS Integration Dr. Thomas Helms, Parsons DOE SRS SWPF Project.
NHUG - Boston - 08/04/20101 Considerations for Operability of Chillers and Chilled Water Systems NHUG Summer Meeting August 4, 2010 Tim Mitchell Component.
Transportation of Radioactive Material in the United States Earl P. Easton.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
ACADs (08-006) Covered Keywords CFR policy, CFR violation, CFR enforcement Description Supporting Material
Configuration Management in New Reactor Construction Tom Kozak, NRO/DCIP/CAEB
Geoffrey L. Beausoleil Assistant Manager, Office of Operational Support DOE Idaho Operations Office September 12, 2006 Presentation to DOE ISM Champions.
PAGE 1 New Plant - CM Configuration Management For The Next Generation Of Nuclear Facilities Joseph Burack Consulting Engineer Configuration Management.
Main Requirements on Different Stages of the Licensing Process for New Nuclear Facilities Module 4.5/1 Design Geoff Vaughan University of Central Lancashire,
Configuration Management of Post-Fukushima Regulations CMBG June 2013 David Gambrell Director, Severe Accident Management Southern Nuclear.
Regulatory Framework for Uranium Production Facilities in the U.S.
NRC Region I Lessons Learned Steve Barr Senior Emergency Preparedness Inspector Region I US Nuclear Regulatory Commission 2010 NRC Region I Joint Exercise.
Specific Safety Requirements on Safety Assessment and Safety Cases for Predisposal Management of Radioactive Waste – GSR Part 5.
Software QA Safety Systems at SLAC Enzo Carrone Controls Department – Safety Systems SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency Methodology and Responsibilities for Periodic Safety Review for Research Reactors William Kennedy Research Reactor.
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency IAEA Safety Standards for Research Reactors W. Kennedy Research Reactor Safety Section Division of Nuclear Installation.
-1- UNRESTRICTED / ILLIMITÉ Demonstrating the Safety of Long-Term Waste Management Facilities Dave Garrick 2015 September.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Defence in Depth Safety Culture Lecturer.
Practice of HOF regulatory oversight E.G. Kudryavtsev Department of Safety Regulation of Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities, Marine Nuclear Power Installations.
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections Gerald A. Schlapper, PhD, PE, CHP Health Physicist Division of Nuclear Materials Safety Region I.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Workshop Information IAEA Workshop Safety Assessment Process. Plant Modification.
Quality Assurance National Nuclear Standards C. H. Moseley, Jr. 33 rd National Energy & Environmental Conference August 28, 2006.
Improving performance, reducing risk Dr Apostolos Noulis, Lead Assessor, Business Development Mgr Thessaloniki, 02 June 2014 ISO Energy Management.
IAEA Training Course on Safety Assessment of NPPs to Assist Decision Making Diablo Canyon NPP Maintenance Rule Program Workshop Information IAEA Workshop.
PIP-II Environment, Safety, Health & Quality Assurance Strategy John Anderson Jr. DOE Independent Project Review of PIP-II 16 June 2015.
Instructor: Lloyd Hancock
CM-101 Configuration Management Fundamentals
NIEP Evaluation PO&A “How-to” Guide and Issue Classification
South Carolina Perspective on Part 61 Proposed Revisions
Module 1 IAEA Safety Standards on Management Systems.
Flooding Walkdown Guidance
NRC Cyber Security Regulatory Overview
Communication and Consultation with Interested Parties by the RB
Adding Nuclear Power to the Grid
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Industry Perspectives on Part 61 Rulemaking
TRTR Briefing September 2013
Civil/Structural Engineering
Research and Test Reactor Decommissioning Inspections
Presentation transcript:

Quality Assurance Program National Enrichment Facility Warren Dorman September 19, National Energy and Environmental Conference

Agenda Introduction Organization QA Program Basis Management Measures Application Approval Basis Program Applicability Quality Level QL-1 and 2 Program Elements Configuration Management- Design Phase 2

Introduction QA Program Description (QAPD) was reviewed and approved by the NRC in April 2004 Included as Appendix A of Safety Analysis Report Chapter 11, “Management Measures.” License application is principally under 10CFR 70, “Domestic Licensing of Special Nuclear Material.” Regulator will be NRC 3

Organization Consortium of Urenco, Westinghouse, Exelon, Entergy, and Duke Power President and CEO- Jim Ferland Vice President Licensing, Safety, and Nuclear Engineering- Rod Krich Vice President Projects-Mike Lynch 4

QA Program Basis 10 CFR (f)- A description of the quality assurance program to be applied to the design, fabrication, construction, testing and operation of the structures, systems, and components of the plant based on criteria of 10CFR 50 App B. 5

Management Measures 10CFR 70.62(d) - Management measures…shall establish management measures to ensure compliance with the performance requirements of 70.61, “Performance Requirements 10CFR (b)(4) - Management measures mean the functions performed by the licensee, generally on a continuing basis, that are applied to items relied on for safety, to ensure the items are available and reliable to perform their functions when needed 6

Management Measures (con’t) NUREG- 1520, “Standard Review Plan for the Review of a License Application for A fuel Cycle Facility.” Section 11 “Management Measures” Criteria for Management Measures is in addition to QA criteria. Management Measures are implemented through the QAPD 7

Application Approval Basis 10CFR 23(b)….when the Commission has determined that the design bases of the principal structures, systems, and components, and the quality assurance program provide reasonable assurance of protection against natural phenomena and the consequences of potential accidents. 8

Program Applicability Applies to [IROFS] items relied on for safety means structures, systems, components (SSC),and items that affect IROFS and; Safe by Design components, and; Activities of personnel that are: –relied on to prevent potential accidents at a facility that could exceed the performance requirements in –or to mitigate their potential consequences. 9

Quality Level Facility components and processes are assigned a QA Level based on their safety significance. –Quality Level 1 Applied to SSC’s and administrative controls determined to be IROFS. Any items which are determined to affect the function of the IROFS. To items required to satisfy regulatory requirements Applies to development of Integrated Safety Analysis Summary Process. 10

Quality Level (con’t) –Quality Level 2 SSCs and associated activities that are not IROFS. –Owner designated SSCs and activities. Provide support of normal operations. Do not affect the function of the IROFS, e.g., occupational exposure, radioactive waste management 11

Quality Level (con’t) –Quality Level 3 Standard commercial practice. Level 3 covers all activities not designated as QA Level 1 or QA Level 2. Documented Level 3 program not required. 12

QL-1 Program Elements 18 Criteria- Same as App B. Implement with NQA w/NQA-1a addenda (NQA-1). –NRC required explicit commitment to certain Supplementary Requirements. –Part II, Subpart 2.7- Computer Software for Nuclear Facility Application 13

QL-2 Program Elements Owner defined program, use NQA-1 as guidance. Contractors’ Level 2 QA program manual must be approved by LES. Contractors’ Level 2 program documents which are to be approved by LES. ISO-9000 series program is acceptable. 14

QL-2 Program Elements (con’t) Process should include a determination of which QA controls are necessary. Use of nuclear industry precedent acceptable. Specific elements to be included, e.g., Organization, Procedures, Design 15

Configuration Management Design Phase Scope –IROFS identified by the Integrated Safety Analysis.(ISA) –Design documents are subject to Configuration Management. 16

Configuration Management Design Phase (con’t) Program –Design requirements are to be documented in a Design Requirements Document. –Procedures for controlling design. –Changes to approved design are reviewed to ensure consistency with design bases if IROFS. –Audits and assessments are required. 17

Configuration Management Design Phase (con’t) Program (con’t) –ISA team review, includes review of ISA impacts. –Verification process 18

QUESTIONS? 19