Doi> DOI and MPEG RDD Standard IDF Strategy meeting Bologna 2005.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The <indecs> Data Dictionary
Advertisements

OMV Ontology Metadata Vocabulary April 10, 2008 Peter Haase.
Putting the Pieces Together Grace Agnew Slide User Description Rights Holder Authentication Rights Video Object Permission Administration.
Doi> DOI Standardisation DOI Tools and Technologies.
DOI update on progress Norman Paskin DOIs and journal publishing Ed Pentz, CrossRef DOIs and book publishing David Sidman, CDI [DOIs and non-English language.
doi> Digital Object Identifier: overview
Resource description and access for the digital world Gordon Dunsire Centre for Digital Library Research University of Strathclyde Scotland.
Status on the Mapping of Metadata Standards
IDF Open Meeting 2008: Resource Access for a Digital World International DOI Foundation Brussels, June
ITU Focus Group on Identity Management Geneva, February 2007 Norman Paskin Content industry standards activities T E R T I U S L t d.
Electronic Publishing, Digital Archiving and Licensing workshop Frankfurt October Norman Paskin, International DOI Foundation
IDF open meeting 2007 doi>. Eight possible innovations doi> Innovative uses of the DOI System.
Godfrey Rust, Ontologyx © Rightscom 2004Presentation to DOI Members meeting June 2004 Godfrey Rust, Ontologyx DOI Metadata consultant Metadata interoperability.
Doi> DOI – new applications panel IDF Annual Members meeting Bologna 2005.
Standard License Expression CNI Meeting Arlington, VA April 4, 2006 Christopher McKenzie John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
GSC: Standardization Advancing Global Communications Towards a Common ITU/ISO/IEC Patent Policy by Masamichi Niiya Telecommunication Standardization Bureau.
Putting together a METS profile. Questions to ask when setting down the METS path Should you design your own profile? Should you use someone elses off.
Optimising metadata workflows in a distributed information environment R. John Robertson & Jane Barton Centre for Digital Library Research University of.
Metadata vocabularies and ontologies Dr. Manjula Patel Technical Research and Development
Vocabulary Mapping Framework Tertius Ltd / International DOI Foundation Norman Paskin London Nov Next Steps.
Forest Markup / Metadata Language FML
Effective management Accurate tracking Easier automation.
Key to the management of intellectual property in digital media BISG/NISO The Changing Standards Landscape Washington DC, June Norman Paskin IDENTIFY.
Policy interoperability in electronic signatures Andreas Mitrakas EESSI International event, Rome, 7 April 2003.
ISO TC184/SC4 Future architecture Rotterdam Progress on the Future SC4 Architecture PWI Friday 13 th November 2009.
OASIS Reference Model for Service Oriented Architecture 1.0
3. Technical and administrative metadata standards Metadata Standards and Applications.
Philips Research France Delivery Context in MPEG-21 Sylvain Devillers Philips Research France Anthony Vetro Mitsubishi Electric Research Laboratories.
The Digital Object Identifier: A Tool for E-Commerce and Rights Management doi> Glen Secor 26 Nov 01.
Data Seal of Approval Overview Lightning Talk RDA Plenary 5 – San Diego March 11, 2015 Mary Vardigan University of Michigan Inter-university Consortium.
CORDRA Philip V.W. Dodds March The “Problem Space” The SCORM framework specifies how to develop and deploy content objects that can be shared and.
DataCite: Making Data Citable Jan Brase (DataCite/TIB Hannover) Brigitte Hausstein (GESIS) Wolfgang Zenk-Möltgen (GESIS)
Future of MDR - ISO/IEC Metadata Registries (MDR) Larry Fitzwater, SC 32 WG 2 Convener Computer Scientist U.S. Environmental Protection Agency May.
Doi> Norman Paskin, International DOI Foundation Digital Object Identifier.
Digital Rights Management on the Web Dr Renato Iannella IPR Systems Chief Scientist 10th World-Wide Web.
Harmonising without Harm: towards an object-oriented formulation of FRBR aligned on the CIDOC CRM ontology Maja Žumer (University of Ljubljana) & Patrick.
Tutorial for SC 32/WG 1 e-Business Standards Prepared for: SC Gyeongju Plenary Meeting Wenfeng Sun, Convenor ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 WG1 (eBusiness)
1 SAIC Phong Ngo Considerations for Establishing and Managing A Registry for Metadata Phong Ngo (NCITS/L8 - SAIC) April 15-17, 1998 Metadata Registry Workshop.
1 Chuck Koscher, CrossRef New Developments Relating to Linking Metadata Metadata Practices on the Cutting Edge May 20, 2004 Chuck Koscher Technology Director,
1 Guidelines For The Future Sharing Best Practice For National Bibliographies In The Digital Era Neil Wilson Information Coordinator IFLA Bibliography.
3 rd Annual European DDI Users Group Meeting, 5-6 December 2011 The Ongoing Work for a Technical Vocabulary of DDI and SDMX Terms Marco Pellegrino Eurostat.
App-ID Use Cases, Syntax and Attributes SEC App-ID_Use_Cases,_Syntax_and_Attributes Group Name: Architecture Source: Darold Hemphill, iconectiv,
MPEG-21 : Overview MUMT 611 Doug Van Nort. Introduction Rather than audiovisual content, purpose is set of standards to deliver multimedia in secure environment.
SDMX Standards Relationships to ISO/IEC 11179/CMR Arofan Gregory Chris Nelson Joint UNECE/Eurostat/OECD workshop on statistical metadata (METIS): Geneva.
Metadata and Geographical Information Systems Adrian Moss KINDS project, Manchester Metropolitan University, UK
API-OGP Joint Task Force Update 2013 Exploration and Production Standards Conference on Oilfield Equipment and Materials Dan Mueller ConocoPhillips Vice-Chairman.
Tutorial for SC 32/WG 1 e-Business Standards Prepared for: SC Kona Plenary Meeting Wenfeng Sun, Convenor ISO/IEC JTC1 SC32 WG1 (eBusiness)
The Final Study Period Report on MFI 6: Model registration procedure SC32WG2 Meeting, Sydney May 26, 2008 H. Horiuchi, Keqing He, Doo-Kwon Baik SC32WG2.
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects (INF 389K) September 18, 2006 The Big Metadata Picture, Web Access, and the W3C Context.
Evolving MARC 21 for the future Rebecca Guenther CCS Forum, ALA Annual July 10, 2009.
Lifecycle Metadata for Digital Objects November 1, 2004 Descriptive Metadata: “Modeling the World”
RELATORS, ROLES AND DATA… … similarities and differences.
Rights management through Digital Objects doi> Norman Paskin The International DOI Foundation.
Overview of SC 32/WG 2 Standards Projects Supporting Semantics Management Open Forum 2005 on Metadata Registries 14:45 to 15:30 13 April 2005 Larry Fitzwater.
C-2-C Industry workshop The future starts with DRM.
Metadata and Meta tag. What is metadata? What does metadata do? Metadata schemes What is meta tag? Meta tag example Table of Content.
Digital Object Identifier doi> Norman Paskin The International DOI Foundation W3C DRM workshop January 22/
Statistical Data and Metadata Exchange SDMX Metadata Common Vocabulary Status of project and issues ( ) Marco Pellegrino Eurostat
ISO TC46 / SC9 What is it? What does it do? So what? Brian Green.
METADATA IDENTIFIERS DOI b Coalition for Networked Information Fall Meeting, Seattle, b b Albert Simmonds b albert simmonds development b
Metadata Schema Registries: background and context MEG Registry Workshop, Bath, 21 January 2003 Rachel Heery UKOLN, University of Bath Bath, BA2 7AY UKOLN.
Attributes and Values Describing Entities. Metadata At the most basic level, metadata is just another term for description, or information about an entity.
NAMING AND MEANING Norman Paskin
Digital Object Identifier
Metadata for research outputs management
Health Ingenuity Exchange - HingX
2. An overview of SDMX (What is SDMX? Part I)
Metadata in Digital Preservation: Setting the Scene
Oya Y. Rieger Cornell University Library May 2004
Towards a Common ITU/ISO/IEC Patent Policy
Presentation transcript:

doi> DOI and MPEG RDD Standard IDF Strategy meeting Bologna 2005

DOI and MPEG RDD standard MPEG Rights Data Dictionary standard, ISO/IEC IDF initiated consortium (CONTECS) which developed indecs concepts further (IDF, MMG, MPAS, RIAA, RightsCom) Accepted by ISO/IEC MPEG Standard published last year – see Press Release 3 June 2004 IDF recommended as Registration Authority Rightscom as technical subcontractor At last years meeting we noted that formal confirmation by ISO was expected. This is a major step forward! Has opened up connections with REL (Rights Expression language), Digital Item ID, and hence potentially much wider non-text world doi>

Press Release (CONTECS June 2004) The Contecs:DD Consortium ( comprising the International DOI Foundation, Melodies and Memories Global Ltd, the Motion Picture Association, the Recording Industry Association of America and Rightscom Ltd ), the International Publishers Association, the Association of American Publishers, The International Scientific, Technical and Medical Publishers, the and the Publishers Association (UK) and EDItEUR welcome the publication by ISO of the MPEG Rights Data Dictionary standard, ISO/IEC The ISO MPEG Rights Data Dictionary (RDD) provides the basis for a resource to create widely understood, consistent meaning for Digital Rights Management (DRM) systems. The RDD will be available to all those involved in building and deploying DRM systems to ensure that the terms used in permissions granted by the systems can be interpreted consistently. The RDD specification is intended to support the ISO MPEG Rights Expression Language. Together, the two standards equip the DRM world with interoperable ways of expressing rules and interoperable ways of communicating the meaning of these rules. This is to the benefit of rights holders, who can be confident that business rules can be interpreted consistently and to consumers, who can be sure that usage permissions will not vary unpredictably across different systems. Manufacturers can also benefit because their systems can interoperate without detailed negotiation on the interpretation of permissions.

Press Release (CONTECS June 2004) To support the new standard, MPEG is recommending the appointment of the International DOI Foundation (IDF) and its technical partner, Rightscom, as the Registration Agency for the RDD. The Registration Authority will enable DRM builders, device manufacturers and other parties to register their terms in a database, which will be available for automated queries to determine the precise meaning of terms in permissions. Chris Barlas, who edited the RDD standard said: "The MPEG Rights Data Dictionary is a unique addition to the DRM environment. By providing a set of standard meanings to enable different communities to exchange precise information, the system cuts down on possible misinterpretation. It is a big boost for DRM interoperability." Norman Paskin, Director of IDF said: "Rights are complex and many metadata schemes are already in use; the deployment of an interoperable and standard dictionary provides a solution to cope with this real-world diversity. The MPEG RDD is a realisation of the concept of semantic interoperability we have campaigned for, and we are delighted to see it now made available ".

DOI and metadata standards RDD is part of the overall indecs Data Dictionary approach –All the RDD terms are in the actual iDD as it now stands That is is not the DOI Metadata Standard scheme you must use. DOI can use ANY metadata; the Dictionary simply enables interoperability. Using ONIX is best example so far CRM, FRBR are similar philosophy so map very well SCORM, DC, METS, etc can also be mapped The existence of the dictionary can help develop a scheme by offering standard terms doi>

OntologyX RightsCom (Mi3p etc) indecsDD IDF + ONIX Development of indecs Black = what Red = who indecs (2000) indecs Framework Ltd IFPI/RIAA, MPA, IDF, DentsuMMG, Rightscom CONTECS (2001+) 2004 ISO MPEG21 RDD IDF : Defining what is identified through metadata

Next steps in formal appointment of IDF Submitted by MPEG to ITTF June –Sept 2004 From ITTF to Technical Management Board –No response received by end ot year 2004 –Reminders Jan/Feb 2005 March 05: received question re clarification re fees –Generally, if RA operates with a fee structure, the structure shall be for the purpose of cost recovery. –Requested that "IDF agrees to operate with a fee structure for the purpose of recovering the RA administration, in accordance with the JTC 1, and approved by the ISO and IEC councils. End April: RA contract for signature by IDF approved at SC 29 Plenary meeting –sent to MPEG and then to IDF. –Regarding the fee structure, we can request the ISO/IEC Council for approval of fee requirement for cost recovery, whenever your request document is ready. –Compared example of CISAC (DII RA) (in the case of CISAC, the letter was sent to ISO/IEC when CISAC finalised amended its fee structure.) doi>

Role of IDF in RDD and business model Currently: have not signed contract pending development of business model –No urgency from MPEG but we should decide way forward in latter half of 2005 –Rightscom key to this –Strongly related to work on iDD, ERMI, etc –Also depends on IDF progress and other issues Contecs:DD Consortium has licensing procedures for the underlying RDD technology. Annex C of the ISO/IEC standard contains the requirements for the RDD Registration Authority: includes: C.3.1Establishment The Registration Authority shall establish registration and identification procedure for RDD Terms and TermSets in accordance with JTC1 Directives…. Clause C6 specifically refers to fees: (a) JTC1 approval must be obtained and (b) fees may only b on a cost-recovery basis. C.6Fees Subject to approval by JTC1, the Registration Authority may charge fees for the registration of Terms and TermSets on a cost-recovery basis only. The nominated organization should describe the nature of any anticipated fees or other service charges directly related to the process of RDD Term registration. doi>

What is a data dictionary? A set of terms, with their definitions, used in a computerized system Some data dictionaries are structured, with terms related to other terms through hierarchies and other relationships: derived from an ontology: –An explicit formal specification of how to represent the objects, concepts and other entities that are assumed to exist in some area of interest and the relationships that hold among them - i.e. not just free text An interoperable data dictionary contains terms from multiple computerized systems or metadata schemes, and shows the relationships they have with one another in a formal way. The purpose of an interoperable data dictionary is to support the use together of terms from different systems. doi>

Metadata scheme e.g. ONIX Metadata scheme e.g. SCORM Agreed term-by- term mapping or Crosswalk

Metadata scheme e.g. ONIX Metadata scheme e.g. SCORM

Data Dictionary Metadata scheme e.g. ONIX Metadata scheme e.g. SCORM ONIX:Author = NormanRights:Writer Metadata Scheme NormanRights Term Author Term Writer

Metadata interoperability: semantic problems But such mappings are not simple: Different names (and languages) for the same thing (Author vs Writer) Same name for different things (title, Title) Data elements at different levels of speciality (title vs FullTitle, AlternativeTitle). Different allowed values for elements (pii vs not pii) Data at different levels of granularity (journal_article vs SerialArticleWork/SerialArticleVersion). Data in different structures (article as attribute of journal or vice versa). Data from different sources (local codes vs ONIX codes). Different contextual meaning (DOI of what…?) Different representation (1 title vs n titles). Different mandatory requirements (ISSN mandatory vs optional) Schemas are being updated all the time..... etc. To manage all of this requires a coherent structured approach.

The dictionary model The methodology is the one –developed in more detail by CONTECS and by Rightscom –MPEG21 RDD was the first result of the extended methodology It uses the context model to express an events-based structure –the accepted ontology approach [context based= events and states] We often think of metadata as about things, people, etc – static views e.g. about person A or creation B We link things (e.g. to describe rights activities) by describing events relating things and people – dynamic views e.g. A created B Events description is the key to rights metadata –all rights transactions are contextual (events) –describing the event in context, using formal dictionary terms, enables interoperability See Last years Annual IDF meeting technical workshop – slides on our web site

doi> DOI and MPEG RDD Standard IDF Strategy meeting Bologna 2005