Requirements Engineering for the Accelerator Eugene Tanke Systems Engineer www.europeanspallationsource.se Workshop on Requirements Conformance for SRF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNFCCC secretariat, Sustainable Development Mechanisms Verónica Colerio, Standard Setting Unit Standardized Baselines in the CDM: Decisions and Way Forward.
Advertisements

Software change management
Configuration Management
Accelerator Integration Design Integration Group [DIG] Apr. 2015
Configuration Management Managing Change. Points to Ponder Which is more important?  stability  progress Why is change potentially dangerous?
Requirements Structure and Status for NCFE
Software Configuration Management
The ESS vacuum team has overall responsibility for all technical vacuum systems used on the: Accelerator, Target and Neutron Scattering Instruments and.
This chapter is extracted from Sommerville’s slides. Text book chapter
Configuration Management Managing Change. Points to Ponder Which is more important?  stability  progress Why is change potentially dangerous?
Configuration Management T3 Webinar Feb 21, 2008 Chuck Larsen ITS Program Coordinator Oregon Department of Transportation.
Enterprise Product Implementation Process. Components of a Successful Implementation  A detailed Scope Document for customer review and signoff  Creation.
Current Job Components Information Technology Department Network Systems Administration Telecommunications Database Design and Administration.
Expert Group on Techno-Economic Issues (EGTEI) – Paris 04/ Expert Group on Techno-Economic Issues (EGTEI) E xpert G roup on T echno- E conomic I.
2 nd National Energy Efficiency Strategy Review EELN Consultation Workshop 24 April
IT 499 Bachelor Capstone Week 4. Adgenda Administrative Review UNIT three UNIT Four Project UNIT Five Preview Project Status Summary.
ISM 5316 Week 3 Learning Objectives You should be able to: u Define and list issues and steps in Project Integration u List and describe the components.
Copyright © First Option 2008 First Option WebCheck The 1st Option in IT.
July LEReC Review July 2014 Low Energy RHIC electron Cooling Kerry Mirabella Cost, Schedule, Personnel.
SOFTWARE CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT. Change is inevitable when computer software is built. And change increases the level of confusion among software engineers.
IPortal Bringing your company and your business partners together through customized WEB-based portal software. SanSueB Software Presents iPortal.
CLIC Project breakdown structure: organization, documentation and cost estimate Beam Instrumentation Workshop, June 2-3, 2009 CLIC Project breakdown structure:
Future directions Chip Casanave Data Access Worldwide Miami, Florida.
Management Tools K. Pommès. Management Tools - The Project Planning Design Purchasing Production Installation To follow the project through its phases.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
Samy Chemli – Configuration Management - S. Chemli EN-MEF – Contents Configuration Management Hardware Baseline Change Management.
Online Reconstruction 1M.Ellis - CM th October 2008.
MTF – Manufacturing and Test Folder Large Scale Deployment of MTF Sonia Mallón Amérigo Elena Manola-Poggioli on behalf of the EDMS Team, TS-CSE.
Integration Drawing Exchange Solution [IDES] Mar. 2015
United Nations Oslo City Group on Energy Statistics OG7, Helsinki, Finland October 2012 ESCM Chapter 8: Data Quality and Meta Data 1.
1 Chapter 12 Configuration management This chapter is extracted from Sommerville’s slides. Text book chapter 29 1.
© Blackboard, Inc. All rights reserved. SOAP-based Mobilization for an Efficient Personal Learning Environment Nick Schiavi Blackboard R&D.
Review of the processes released in the framework of the MMP Goran Perinić.
General overview of WU : Cryogenic Distribution for Elliptical Linac Jarosław Fydrych Cryodistribution Project Engineer Preliminary Design Review,
ESS | title of presentation | 2012-xx-xx | name of presenter Roles and Responsibilities sub title.
PLM-documentation management plans & status Henrik Lindblad Group Leader PLM & Process support Oct 16, 2014.
Status of the 3D model and updates from the IKC models May 2015
Enterprise Applications Change Management Process Enhancement Presentation October 1 st 2009.
ATUL PATANKAR [ ASUG INSTALLATION MEMBER MEMBER SINCE: 2000 LINDA WILSON [ ASUG INSTALLATION MEMBER MEMBER SINCE: 1999 JUERGEN LINDNER [ SAP POINT OF CONTACT.
Communication Tools Used For Commissioning the 12 GeV CEBAF Accelerator Brian Freeman WAO (Mainz, Germany) October 2014.
Slides for TAC meeting Oct/2015 Marcelo juni Ferreira Vacuum section leader October,
Controls Software Developer - Summer workers The Machine Directorate at the European Spallation Source (ESS) in Lund, Sweden, invites applications for.
CONFIGURATION MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL PLAN ESS Quality Assurance and Control workshop (30June) V. HENNION.
CM-101 Configuration Management Fundamentals
Accelerator Readiness Review October 31, 2006
Cryomodule test stand at ESS site
Standardized baselines
Implementing the DESY EDMS
Configuration Management and Layout Database ELENA Project
Hyper-V Cloud Proof of Concept Kickoff Meeting <Customer Name>
Documentation status in WP 5 Goal: To collect all documentation/know-how needed in a structured way for the ESS installation, commissioning, operation,
IEC and Information Technology
SharePoint Foundation 2010
Lockheed Martin Canada’s SMB Mentoring Program
GHG Data Interface: transition to a new design
Way of working with ICS HWI Hardware and Integration
Ciprian Plostinar Workshop on Testing and Commissioning
Configuration management
Cryomodule ESS FAT & SAT SRF meetinG on 07/11/2017
Configuration Management
Drive Laser Status and Hand-Off to Operations
Drive Laser Status and Hand-Off to Operations
DOE Review of the LCLS Project October 2006
High Level Readiness Reviews
Licensing update ESHAC #7, October 2017
Atefeh Sadeghzadeh Control engineer – Target safety and control
Charge and Agenda of the 18th TAC meeting
ESHAC #8 Safety Readiness Review Thomas Hansson, ESH
SNS-PPU upgrades the existing accelerator structure
General Overview of WP 12 ESS Vacuum System
Presentation transcript:

Requirements Engineering for the Accelerator Eugene Tanke Systems Engineer Workshop on Requirements Conformance for SRF Cryomodules October 15, 2014

Outline Why work with requirements? Framework for ESS accelerator requirements DOORS requirements database Outlook

Why work with requirements in the Accelerator? (slide 1 of 2) Looking backwards in time from the “First beam on target” milestone:  Beam will need to be commissioned  Equipment (beam line and ancillary) will need to be tested  Equipment will need to be installed  Equipment may need to be tested at the “factory” prior to shipping  Equipment will need to be produced  Equipment will need to be designed

Why work with requirements in the Accelerator? (slide 2 of 2) Requirements aid in:  assuring that what is designed and built is what the user needs  providing a basis for testing (ensuring functionality)  and hence aid in reaching our milestone

V-model widely used in industry for requirements Within the ESS accelerator, elements of this model have been implemented

Product Breakdown Structure is the framework for te ESS accelerator requirements (slide 1 of 2) *PBS definition CM =CryoModule LWU=Linac Warm Unit Diciplines (L4) are matrixed to sections (L3)

Product Breakdown Structure is the framework for te ESS accelerator requirements (slide 2 of 2) *PBS definition CM =CryoModule HEBT=High Energy Beam Transport LWU=Linac Warm Unit Product Breakdown Structure forms the framework for the top-down and interface requirements

Accelerator interfaces tracked through an interface matrix “System” contacts have been established

Requirements development (L4,L5) is ongoing Top-down requirement examples in Excel Interface requirement examples in Excel

Reviewed requirements are uploaded into DOORS Requirements pass an ESS Lund internal review before upload to DOORS DOORS is a database that has been built for requirements management  Accelerator L1, L2 and L3 requirements are in DOORS  DOORS has a thin (web) client, accessible to the ESS partners  ESS partners can comment on requirements using the “Discussions” option in DOORS  ESS Lund engineers will then respond to these  DOORS has a thick client for database management

Thin client of DOORS allows for discussion threads

Reviewed requirements are uploaded into DOORS Requirements pass an ESS Lund internal review before upload to DOORS DOORS is a database that has been built for requirements management  Accelerator L1, L2 and L3 requirements are in DOORS  DOORS has a thin (web) client, accessible to the ESS partners  ESS partners can comment on requirements using the “Discussions” option in DOORS  ESS Lund engineers will then respond to these  DOORS has a thick client for database management

Requirements process: an outlook Starting from requirements in DOORS, the following process is proposed:  Review by ESS partner (where applicable)  Base-lining of requirements in DOORS with  Export (automated?) of base-lined requirements to document control center (CHESS)  Automatic to relevant parties to inform about new baseline  In the case of requirement changes:  Have change request approved at appropriate CCB (Change Control Board)  Export new baseline to CHESS & relevant parties