- page 1 July 22 2011 NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center PACS Photometer AORs How to Prepare an Observation with HSpot: 2 Science Use.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
DES PreCam A Proposal for the PreCam Calibration Strategy J. Allyn Smith David L. Burke Melissa J. Butner 15 July 2009 DRAFT.
Advertisements

Cosmos Data Products Version Peter Capak (Caltech) May, 23, 2005 Kyoto Cosmos Meeting.
General Overview and Primary Functions. Introduction This presentation will help you quickly find some of the features of the GPSMAP295 and the procedure.
Bruno Altieri September # 1 PACS photometer pipeline overview Bruno Altieri (ESA/HSC)
ASI Review Padova ICC Contribution 1 WP3000 : Padova ICC Contribution Mattia Vaccari & Giulia Rodighiero & Gabriele Mainetti Department of Astronomy -
- page 1 NHSC PACS Web Tutorial PACS-401 NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS Photometer pipelines PACS-401.
Venus Observations HST Program Objectives v Explain Venus observing strategy. v Review areas of special concern with Venus observations and explain.
PACS NHSC SPIRE Point Source Spectroscopy Webinar 21 March 2012 David Shupe, Bernhard Schulz, Kevin Xu on behalf of the SPIRE ICC Extracting Photometry.
PACS Page 1 NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena Sept 10-14, 2012 SPIRE Spectrometer Data Reduction: Mapping Observations Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (On behalf.
PACS FM-ILT SPECTROMETER SPATIAL CALIBRATION A. Contursi (H. Feuchtgruber) PACS Science Verification Review – 8/9 November 2007 MPE-Garching.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 26 th - 30 th Aug 2013 Photometer Extended Source Photometry Bernhard Schulz NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the SPIRE.
1 NHSC PACS NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines PACS-202 (for Hipe 9.0) Level 0 to Level 2 processing: From raw data to calibrated.
Page 1 PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 26 th - 30 th Aug 2013 Overview of SPIRE Photometer Pipeline Kevin Xu NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the SPIRE.
Consortium Meeting La Palma October PV-Phase & Calibration Plans Sarah Leeks 1 SPIRE Consortium Meeting La Palma, Oct. 1 – PV Phase and.
PACS Hitchhiker’s Guide to Herschel Archive Workshop – Pasadena 6 th - 10 th Oct 2014 The SPIRE Photometer and its Observing Modes Bernhard Schulz (NHSC/IPAC)
1 NHSC PACS NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines PACS-202 (for Hipe 8.0) Level 0 to Level 2 processing: From raw data to calibrated.
A look at XMM slew data Richard Saxton, Andrew Read, Michael Freyberg, Bruno Altieri, Puri Munuera.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 10 th - 14 th Sep 2012 SPIRE AOTs, Products and Quick Look Tools Bernhard Schulz NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the.
PACS Spectrometer Spatial Calibration plan in PV phase A.Contursi D. Lutz and U. Klaas.
- page 1 NHSC – DP workshop – Feb – N. Billot PACS PACS Photometer Standard Pipeline Level 1 to Level 2 processing: How to make a map for point source.
EPOCH 1000 Series Procedure Phased Array Angle Beam Calibration
PACS Hitchhiker’s Guider to Herschel Archive Workshop – Pasadena 6 th – 10 th Oct 2014 SPIRE Photometer Data Products Kevin Xu NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the.
PACS Hitchhiker’s Guide to Herschel Archive Workshop – Pasadena 6 th - 10 th Oct 2014 Roberta Paladini NHSC/IPAC PACS photometer maps: several flavors.
PACS Hitchhiker’s Guide to Herschel Archive Workshop – Pasadena 6 th - 10 th Oct 2014 The PACS Photometer: Overview and Products Roberta Paladini NHSC/IPAC.
1 NHSC PACS NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines PACS-402 (for Hipe 12.0) Level 1 to Level 2 processing: The JScanam pipeline Prepared.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 10 th - 14 th Sep 2012 Measuring Photometry from SPIRE Observations Presenter: David Shupe (NHSC/IPAC) on.
ASI Review Padova ICC Contribution 1 WP3000 : Padova ICC Contribution Staff Alberto Franceschini (AF) [Professore Ordinario] Giulia Rodighiero (GR) [Ricercatore.
Two-Gyro Science Impact and Observer Information Ken Sembach STUC Meeting 18-November November-2004.
1 NHSC PACS NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines PACS-201 (for Hipe 12.0) Level 1* to Level 2 processing: The High-Pass Filter pipeline.
NASA Herschel Science Center - page 1 NHSC Cycle 1 Open Time Proposal Planning Workshop 3-4 June 2010 PACS Accepted Programs & Observations to Date B.
Obs. Planning Workshop 22 July 2011 NASA Herschel Science Center - page 1 PACS David R. Ardila NHSC-HSC liaison The OT2 Call.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena 10 th - 14 th Sep 2012 The SPIRE Destriper Bernhard Schulz NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the SPIRE ICC 1.
Spectroscopy with PACS M82 PACS line imaging from the SHINING team (Contursi et al First Results workshop talk) Phil Appleton and Dario Fadda for.
PACS SVR 22/23 June 2006 Scientific/Performance Requirements1 PACS Science and Performance Requirements A. Poglitsch.
MIRI Dither Patterns Christine H Chen. Dithering Goals 1.Mitigate the effect of bad pixels 2.Obtain sub-pixel sampling 3.Self-calibrate data if changing.
PACS page 1 NHSC Open Time Cycle 1 Observation Planning Workshop 3 rd - 4 th Jun 2010 – Bernhard Schulz SPIRE Overview Bernhard Schulz, Nanyao Lu, Kevin.
Observing Strategies at cm wavelengths Making good decisions Jessica Chapman Synthesis Workshop May 2003.
PACS Hitchhiker’s Guide to Herschel Archive Workshop – Pasadena 6 th - 10 th Oct 2014 The PACS Spectrometer: Overview and Products Roberta Paladini NHSC/IPAC.
Page 1 PACS NHSC Webinar: New SPIRE Features in HIPE th Nov 2012, Pasadena Update on SPIRE Photometer Pipeline Kevin Xu NHSC/IPAC on behalf of the.
PVPhotFlux PACS Photometer photometric calibration MPIA PACS Commissioning and PV Phase Plan Review 21 st – 22 nd January 2009, MPE Garching Markus Nielbock.
- page 1 NHSC – DP workshop – Feb – N. Billot PACS Deglitching PACS Photometer Data Presentation based on tutorial PACS-402.
Science Concept for Additional Functionality in the Mosaic Planning Tool Jeff Valenti.
Jan 21/22, 2009PACS PV Review Photometer Spatial Cal1 PACS Photometer Spatial Calibration PVPhotSpatial D.Lutz PACS PV Review Jan 21/ , MPE.
Two-Gyro All-sky Scheduling Study TIPS April 15, 2004
NHSC Cycle 1 Open Time Proposal Planning Workshop 3-4 June 2010 NASA Herschel Science Center - page 1 PAC S prepared by Nicolas BILLOT
PACS ICC Readiness Review MPE, July 3/ PACS Photometer PV Phase Plan 1 Status Report M. Nielbock: PACS PHOT PV Phase Plan Markus Nielbock (MPIA)
Overview, Spectrometer Products and Processing Philosophy Phil Appleton on Behalf of PACS Team PACS IFU Spectrometer.
Page 1 NHSC PACS Web Tutorial Babar Ali PACS 401 PACS photometer map-making with MADmap PACS-401 for HIPE 11 user release Version Babar Ali (NHSC)
NHSC PACS PACS Photometry and Errors Estimate Roberta Paladini (NSHC/Caltech) R. Paladini NHSC Archive Data Processing Workshop – August 26 th – 30 th.
PACS NHSC Data Processing Workshop Aug 26-30, 2013 Page 1 SPIRE Spectrometer Data: Calibration Updates, User Data Reprocessing, and Other Issues Nanyao.
PACS Page 1 NHSC Data Processing Workshop – Pasadena Aug 26-30, 2013 SPIRE Spectrometer Data Reduction: Mapping Observations Nanyao Lu NHSC/IPAC (On behalf.
Page 1 NHSC PACS Web Tutorial PACS 301 nhsc.ipac.caltech.edu/helpdesk NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running the PACS Spectrometer pipeline for CHOP/NOD Mode.
NASA Herschel Science Center - page 1 PACS NHSC Cycle 1 Open Time Proposal Planning Workshop 3-4 June 2010 ESA AO and NASA Funding Call Phil Appleton and.
1 NHSC PACS NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines PACS-402 (for Hipe 13.0) Level 1 to Level 2.5 processing: The JScanam pipeline Prepared.
PACS page 1 NHSC SPIRE Data Processing Webinars 8 th Feb 2012 PACS page 1 Overview of SPIRE Photometer Pipeline C. Kevin Xu (NHSC/IPAC)
1 of 175 Focus 3D X 130 and X 330 Laser Scanners SCENE 5.3 September 2014.
June 27-29, DC2 Software Workshop - 1 Tom Stephens GSSC Database Programmer GSSC Data Servers for DC2.
- page 1 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center PACS Spectrometer AORs Phil Appleton 1Roberta Paladini.
PACS page 1 NHSC SPIRE Data Processing Webinars 7 th March 2012 PACS page 1 SPIRE Photometer Map Making C. Kevin Xu (NHSC/IPAC)
Chapter 7- Basic editing Digitize new features from a paper map or scanned map. Construct new features from survey descriptions. Map areas or objects based.
1 NHSC PACS NHSC/PACS Web Tutorials Running PACS photometer pipelines PACS-403 (for Hipe 13.0) Level 1 to Level 2.5 processing: The Unimap pipeline Prepared.
PACS Hitchhiker’s Guide to Herschel Archive Workshop – Pasadena 6 th – 10 th Oct 2014 Overview of SPIRE Photometer Data Reduction Pipeline Kevin Xu NHSC/IPAC.
Markus Nielbock (MPIA) – PACS Calibration Status Report Herschel Calibration Steering Group Meeting #24 PACS Calibration Status Report Markus Nielbock.
NIRSpec Time Series Observations
The JWST Coronagraphic Visibility Tool: Overview and Demo
Single Object & Time Series Spectroscopy with JWST NIRCam
PACS / SPIRE cross-calibration on prime fidicial standard stars
JWST NIRCam Time Series Observations
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop JWST User Documentation Hands on experience
ESAC 2017 JWST Workshop NIRSpec MSA Planning Tool (MPT)
Presentation transcript:

- page 1 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center PACS Photometer AORs How to Prepare an Observation with HSpot: 2 Science Use Cases Roberta Paladini

- page 2 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Quick Introduction to HSPOT for PACS Photometry – I: Define a Target and Target List TargetTarget List 1)Enter target (fixed or moving) 2)Check target visibility 3)Check background

- page 3 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Quick Introduction to HSPOT for PACS Photometry – II: Define PACS Instrument Settings Target information Unique AOR Label 70 and 160 μm OR 100 and 160 μm # of stars in Star Tracker (better be >9) Warning: HSpot automatically switches to the low-gain setting if the source estimate exceeds the saturation limits. Low-gain setting reduces sensitivity. Saturation limits are very conservative

- page 4 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Quick Introduction to HSPOT for PACS Photometry – III: Check AOR Performance Estimate Sensitivity estimates: values for extended emission are conservatively underestimated by ~30% Details of AOR execution time Confusion noise estimates

- page 5 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center 2 AOTs for the PACS photometer Scan Map is the most efficient observing mode !

- page 6 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Scan-map AOT Scan along the diagonal of the array, i.e. at 70° and/or 110° in array coordinates 20’’/s scan speed Concatenate X-scan map at 110°or 70°  Allows various kinds of mapmaking techniques, and provide higher quality photometry and better spatial characterization of the near source vicinity NO homogeneous coverage, and NO square map scan legs with cross-scan distance of 4’’  For shallow observations: less legs (but even number to minimize satellite movement) with larger cross-scan distances or skip cross-scan direction Scan leg length from 2’ to 4’:  3’ length: optimal usage of constant scan speed of 20’’/s, but during idle-positions the source is outside the array  2’ length: Source is always on-array, but acceleration/deceleration of source on array might require more elaborated processing Scan maps are performed by slewing at constant speed along parallel lines

- page 7 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Scan Map AOT - We consider 2 science case examples Proposal = SDP_fmotte_3 Ra = deg Dec = deg Proposal = Calibration_rppacs_5 Ra = deg Dec =

- page 8 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center How do we choose the settings in these 2 cases ? Filter Scan Speed Scan Leg Length Cross-scan Distance Number of Scan Legs Square Map Homogeneous Coverage Orientation Reference Frame Orientation Angle Orientation Constraint Repetition Factor What are the best choices of parameter values ??? Observing mode Settings Values ?

- page 9 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Scan speed: 20”/s (Note: it could have been 60”/s if PSF quality was not critical and region to map was larger than 20’) Scan speed: 20”/s

- page 10 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Scan Map AOT Setting: Map Size Parameters (1) Scan Leg Length, 2) Cross-scan distance, 3) Number of scan legs, 4) Square map, 5) Homogeneous coverage) Scan leg length: sets dimension of one map side, has to be < 20° Cross-scan distance <105’’ ensures overlapping between scan legs for all array-to-map angles (in sky coordinates). Note: cross-scan distance of 51’’ (~sub-array size) gives relatively flat exposure maps in Sky coordinates, whatever the array-to-map angle Square Map makes observation scheduling easier (number of scan legs is set automatically) Recommended use of Homogeneous Coverage (cross-scan distance is set automatically) Options: Scan length: 20 arcmin Cross-scan distance: 2” (set automatically) Square map: 1 scan leg (set automatically) Homogeneous coverage Cross-scans (extended emission) Scan length: 4’ Cross-scan distance: 4” NO square map: 8 scan legs (Note: it could be less for shallow observations) NO homogeneous coverage

- page 11 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Scan Map AOT Setting: Map Orientation Parameters Options: All scan directions are possible in array or sky reference frame, with optional constraints Orientation constraints translates into scheduling constraints, hence in observing time penalties Avoid scanning at array angles of 0° and 90° because of empty inter-module gap If scan maps in Sky coordinates without array constraints, the map coverage depends on the exact observation date, and there is a risk that the array-to-map angle is 0° or 90°. Check the AOR overlay on image at given visibility windows Array reference frame Array-map angle : 45 0 Cross-scan angle : (spare 2 minutes slew time) Array reference frame Array-map angle : Cross-scan angle : 63 0 (provides better characterization of source proximity)

- page 12 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Scan Map AOT Setting: Repetition Factor Sets the sensitivity of the observation once the other parameters are set If repetition factor >1, it is recommended to use an even number of scan legs to minimize satellite slew overheads Options: Repetition Factor : 1 (Note: if RepFactor > 1 and scan at 60”/s, be aware of much longer execution time due to longer turnover intervals between scan legs) Repetition Factor : 1

- page 13 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center … and this is how your AORs would look like

- page 14 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Scenarios that give same sensitivity in final map: 1 Scan at 20’’/s versus 3 Scans at 60’’/s : AOR execution time is significantly higher in case of fast scan due to longer turnover times between scan legs. It is prohibitive for small maps overhead 60’’/s >> overhead 20’’/s 1 fine Scan (short cross-scan distance) versus 3 loose Scans (larger cross-scan distance) while covering the same area (it requires to un-tick homogeneous coverage): AOR execution time is similar, but fine scanning gives more homogeneous coverage Tips and Tricks

- page 15 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center PACS/SPIRE Parallel Mode This is a special observing mode that is intended for large area photometric mapping using both PACS and SPIRE simultaneously Hspot Menu  Observations  PACS SPIRE Parallel Mode 70 and 160 μm OR 100 and 160 μm “Length” and “Height” set size of the area to map Scan speed Direction of scan legs (“Array” or “Sky”) Set gain (“low” or “high” – default is high)

- page 16 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Pros and Cons of PACS/SPIRE Parallel Mode ProsCons Simultaneous observations in five bands are made possible without significant degradation in instrument performance Very efficient for mapping large areas (> 1 deg) No evident degradation of SPIRE performance between Parallel Mode and SPIRE-only observations More accurate relative PACS/SPIRE astrometry Very favorable in terms of science per amount of helium Due to the large offset of the fields of views of SPIRE and PACS (21 arcmin), this mode is very inefficient for small maps : 45 minutes *minimum* execution time for 1 repetition! Given that PACS and SPIRE integration times are identical, sensitivities across the bands and between the instruments are different if scanning at 60”/s, PACS additional data averaging in blue band (8 by 8 frames instead of 4 by 4) causes PSF elongation If scanning at 60”/s, sources in SPIRE bands can appear as glitches, and be mistakenly be corrected for by deglitching algorithms

- page 17 July NHSC Mini-workshop PACS NASA Herschel Science Center Hspot User’s Guide: PACS Observer’s Manual: Herschel’s Observer’s Manual: AOT Release Note: Herschel Reserved Observation Search Tool: Documentation: