BEYOND THE STANDARD OFFER- FULFILLING THE PROMISE OF 1997: COMPETITION, RELIABILITY AND STABILITY.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Customer Acquisition – Energy. Customer Sources 1.Yourself 2.Prospects who do not get involved with the opportunity 3.Everyone Else – Warm Market.
Advertisements

December 12, 2000 Supplier Meeting Parma Aggregation Group.
MASBO February Information to purchase Services Information to purchase Construction.
EMIG Electricity Market Investment Group Presentation to the Ontario Energy Board February 17, 2004.
Energy supply procurement services to improve the transaction process and help you get the most competitive prices Florida Public Service Commission July.
EuroPEX position on Market Transparency and practical example from Nordic Market Baltic Electricity Mini-Forum, Riga, 24th April Pasi Kuokkanen Nord Pool.
REGULATORY AND INVESTMENT CHALLENGES IN HYBRID POWER MARKETS IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES REGULATORY AND INVESTMENT CHALLENGES IN HYBRID POWER MARKETS IN DEVELOPING.
NOVEMBER 18, 2013 | WESTBOROUGH, MA Administrative Pricing Rules for Forward Capacity Auction #8.
Amendment 3/5 Workshop.
Gloria Godson VP, Federal Regulatory Policy Reliability Pricing Model Part 2.
The Sale of Goods and Supply of Services Act 1980
Electricity Distributors Association The Voice of Ontario’s Electricity Distributors OEB Consultation on the Electricity Distribution Sector February 17,
Marcy Mealy Procurement Specialist CDBG Program
1 Resource Adequacy (RA) Workshop Presentation by: Sue Mara On Behalf of: Alliance for Retail Energy Markets (AReM) January 18, 2011.
By Roxana Saplacan Presented by Ugonna Nwaokwu.  The traditional view of electricity distribution is that it is a natural monopoly. Few authors have.
LOCAL REGULATION AND CLIMATE CHANGE QUICK TELECONFERENCE American Bar Association Section of Environment, Energy, and Resources Climate Change, Sustainable.
Descending Clock Auction for New Jersey BGS Power Procurements Workshop to Support RGGI on the Topic: Implementing the Minimum 25% Public Benefit Allocation.
Congestion Pricing: Competitive Locational Prices of Power Stoft (2002)
ECO 436 Natural Gas. ECO 436 David Loomis Pipeline regulation 25 pipelines account for 90% of volume (1987) Most LDCs served by 3 or fewer.
1 Resource Adequacy and Market Power Mitigation via Option Contracts Hung-po Chao and Robert Wilson EPRI and Stanford University Presentation at POWER.
Community Electricity Aggregation Public Information Session May 21, 2015 Martha Grover, Energy Efficiency Manager Office of Planning and Community Development.
Organization of the electricity supply industry © 2012 D. Kirschen & University of Washington 0.
Pricing the Components of Electric Service in Illinois Scott A. Struck, CPA Financial Analysis Division Public Utilities Bureau Illinois Commerce Commission.
Welcome and Introductions CoServ Presentation & Member Input.
COMPETITIVE ELECTRICITY MARKETS March 15, PA Customer Choice Legislation  Distribution service remains regulated by PAPUC.  Transmission service.
Page 1 3/13 – Lynchburg 4/23 – Fredericksburg 3/28 – Charlottesville 4/12 – Danville.
1 WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE? Eric Robertson Lueders, Robertson & Konzen LLC December 10, 2003.
September  In 1998 Queensland Electricity customers exceeding 40GWH were given the opportunity to enter the National Electricity Market (NEM).
The Evolving Roles and Responsibilities of Gas Utilities In Today’s Markets Presented by: Hank Linginfelter Executive Vice President, Utility Operations.
Future Efficiencies in The Electricity Distribution Sector presented by Don MacKinnon, President February 17, 2004.
1.6 Contracting Methods Don Shannon. Sealed Bidding Discussed in FAR Part 14 Solicitation is an “Invitation for Bid” (IFB) IFB is publicly advertized.
Perfect Competition *MADE BY RACHEL STAND* :). I. Perfect Competition: A Model A. Basic Definitions 1. Perfect Competition: a model of the market based.
…………………...  Study the market, coupe with competition (direct and indirect).  New business create pressure on the market either in price, investment.
Retail Competition: Managing a Difficult Transition David L. O’Connor Commissioner Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources (DOER) Presentation to National.
(Econ 512): Economics of Financial Markets Chapter Two: Asset Market Microstructure Dr. Reyadh Faras Econ 512 Dr. Reyadh Faras.
Bulk Power Transmission System
Colombia’s Forward Energy Market Peter Cramton University of Maryland 5 November 2007.
BEYOND THE STANDARD OFFER: DEVELOPING THE RETAIL ELECTRIC MARKET IN MASSASHUSETTS. RETAIL AGGREGATION AND AUCTION OF RESIDENTIAL AND SMALL COMMERCIAL AND.
LEAGUE OF CITIES & COUNTY GROUPS ProcureAZ The State of Arizona’s eProcurement & Sourcing Solution For Public Entities Statewide 1.
Opening Markets, Adding Value and Winning Customers with Innovation, Technology, and Service – a New York Perspective Ronald M. Cerniglia Director Office.
Municipal Electric Aggregation Electric Aggregation Advisory Committee August 22, 2012.
Dealing with Failed Deregulation What would Price C. Watts Do?
1 Market Evolution Program Long-Term Resource Adequacy Regulatory Affairs Standing Committee Meeting May 14, 2003.
MARKET PRICING Prepared by: GREGAR DONAVEN E. VALDEHUEZA, MBA Lourdes College Instructor.
CCSC Energy Aggregation Pools for Chamber Members.
Promoting Distributed Generation Resources Through State Initiatives Ed Ethridge Public Utility Commission of Texas Distributed Resources in Restructured.
Illinois Wholesale Market Update December 10, 2003.
2015 Fall PR-MR & Marketing Meeting October 16, 2015 Fairo Mitchell Energy Policy Director, Public Utility Division Oklahoma Corporation Commission.
MODULE 7 WHO IS OUR COMPETITION?. WHAT IS SUPPLIER COMPETITION? OTHER SUPPLIERS In a deregulated market, fair competition is important! This means IGS.
Understanding the Dynamics of Electricity Trade in the Philippines with the Entry of Retail Competition and Open Access.
JEOPARDY PROCUREMENT EDITION Methods StandardsMystery ProceduresRegulations Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 Q $100 Q $200 Q $300 Q $400 Q $500 FINAL.
Columbia Gas of Ohio, Inc. Supplier Bidding Instructions | January 13 th, 2016.
AES NewEnergy To The Institute For Regulatory Policy Studies May 18, 2000 By David L. Townley.
Electricity Power Market: Competitive and Non-competitive Markets Ito Diejomaoh.
Lecture 4 on Auctions Multiunit Auctions We begin this lecture by comparing auctions with monopolies. We then discuss different pricing schemes for selling.
DPS Data Technical Conference Empire State Plaza, Albany December 16, 2015.
Joint Energy Auction Implementation Proposal of PG&E, SCE and SDG&E California Public Utilities Commission Workshop – November 1, 2006.
DLA AVIATION REVERSE AUCTION PROGRAM
Resource Adequacy and Market Power Mitigation via Option Contracts
PJM Footprint Roundtable
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Affiliate Rules/Code of Conduct
Duquesne Light Company Makes Heads or Tails of “PJM Market Design Proposals Addressing State Public Policy Initiatives Capacity Repricing” OPSI 2017.
Burlington County Energy Aggregation Program
Future Energy Jobs Act: Public Sector Impacts
Diminishing Musharakah
Dominion Retail Default Service for Smaller Customers
Electric Service for Residential and Small Business Customers
Effect of LMP on Massachusetts Electric’s Retail Rates
Presentation transcript:

BEYOND THE STANDARD OFFER- FULFILLING THE PROMISE OF 1997: COMPETITION, RELIABILITY AND STABILITY.

THE BOSLEY PLAN: COMPETITION, STABILITY, AND RELIABILITY. This plan contemplates the peaceful co-existence of the incumbent utilities and competitive retail suppliers. The plan addresses residential and small business customers only. Large C+I (those above kw) would remain on default or competitive supply. This plan contemplates the peaceful co-existence of the incumbent utilities and competitive retail suppliers. The plan addresses residential and small business customers only. Large C+I (those above kw) would remain on default or competitive supply. The plan would see the structural separation of the incumbent utilities’ retail and distribution functions. That is to say, the utilities would be mandated to structurally separate their wires function from their retail function. The newly created retail affiliate would be a competitive affiliate of the utility that would be required to provide last resort service (currently default) as well as MBIS at tarrifed rates to competitive suppliers (until DTE resolves unbundling). Additionally, the affiliated retail service supplier may also bid during the descending clock auction (see infra). The plan would see the structural separation of the incumbent utilities’ retail and distribution functions. That is to say, the utilities would be mandated to structurally separate their wires function from their retail function. The newly created retail affiliate would be a competitive affiliate of the utility that would be required to provide last resort service (currently default) as well as MBIS at tarrifed rates to competitive suppliers (until DTE resolves unbundling). Additionally, the affiliated retail service supplier may also bid during the descending clock auction (see infra).

THE BOSLEY PLAN: THE AUCTION The proposal calls for a descending clock auction of Standard Offer and Default customers into a competitive retail market. It would essentially be a form of opt-out aggregation. Winners of each descending clock auction would provide “Basic Electric Service” (BES) for a period of three years to a block of customers. Here are the highlights of the auction process: The proposal calls for a descending clock auction of Standard Offer and Default customers into a competitive retail market. It would essentially be a form of opt-out aggregation. Winners of each descending clock auction would provide “Basic Electric Service” (BES) for a period of three years to a block of customers. Here are the highlights of the auction process: –All standard offer and default customers will be pooled together and put out to bid via an auction administered by the respective utility. –The bidding will be divided into several suppliers in each service territory chosen by descending clock auction. Moreover, there would be separate auctions for residential and small commercial customers. Contracts for BES would be for a 3 year fixed price. Each group would include approximately 250,000 residential customers randomly drawn from standard offer and default customers. –One competitive retail service provider would be prohibited from winning more than 3 three of the bids, thereby ensuring that at there will be a minimum of 3 CRSP’s operating in the market. –Customers will be given the opportunity to “opt-out” of the market at any time without penalty and procure their own service from another CRSP or revert back to Last Resort Service. However, those who elect to opt out of BES will be prohibited from returning during the term. This will allow for the fluidity the market needs to adequately develop.

THE BOSLEY PLAN: THE AUCTION

THE BOSLEY PLAN: THE UTILITIES As previously stated, there would be a structural separation of the utilities’ retail and distribution functions. The utility would file a plan for structural separation with the DTE. The structurally separated entity of the utility would be responsible for 1) LSR service (i.e., Default Service); 2) MBIS and 3) would be permitted to bid in the descending clock auction for its service territory. As previously stated, there would be a structural separation of the utilities’ retail and distribution functions. The utility would file a plan for structural separation with the DTE. The structurally separated entity of the utility would be responsible for 1) LSR service (i.e., Default Service); 2) MBIS and 3) would be permitted to bid in the descending clock auction for its service territory. –LSR SERVICE: The utilities’ structurally separated entity would be the Last Resort Supplier (LSR). As such, it would be responsible for providing Last Resort Service (LSR) to “new” default customers, those who opt out of the competitive bid process, and those whose suppliers leave the market. A customers ability to remain on LSR would be limited to one year. Every year, the respective utility would hold an auction of those customers on LSR. A customers ability to remain on LSR would be limited to one year. Every year, the respective utility would hold an auction of those customers on LSR. Need to “true-up” the cost of LSR to ensure that it does not become a barrier to the development of a vibrant competitive retail market. Need to “true-up” the cost of LSR to ensure that it does not become a barrier to the development of a vibrant competitive retail market. Policy Question: do we sunset LSR? Policy Question: do we sunset LSR?

THE BOSLEY PLAN: THE IIOU’s --MBIS: Competitive Retail Service Providers would be required to purchase MBIS for all generation supply including BES during the first term of BES at tarrifed rates set by the DTE. Over the time period of initial contracts (3 years), the DTE would be required to conduct an unbundling procedure with respect to MBIS. Over the time period of initial contracts (3 years), the DTE would be required to conduct an unbundling procedure with respect to MBIS.

THE BOSLEY PLAN: THE ADVANTAGES CRSP’s have a statewide presence. CRSP’s have a statewide presence. Customers who “opt-out” of the initial bid could go to another CRSP or on to LSR for up to 1 year. Customers who “opt-out” of the initial bid could go to another CRSP or on to LSR for up to 1 year. There will be a new auction every year thereby providing CRSP’s with the ability to augment their customer base while minimizing the amount of capital needed to do so. There will be a new auction every year thereby providing CRSP’s with the ability to augment their customer base while minimizing the amount of capital needed to do so. Clearing price provides for stability. Clearing price provides for stability. Accomplish the goals of Accomplish the goals of Consistent with out deliberative approach thus far. Consistent with out deliberative approach thus far.

Post Basic Electric Service At the end of the initial term of BES (3 years), a new three year term would begin for the customers remaining on BES at a price proposed by the supplier and approved by the DTE. Again, customers would be free to opt out at any time without penalty. At the end of the initial term of BES (3 years), a new three year term would begin for the customers remaining on BES at a price proposed by the supplier and approved by the DTE. Again, customers would be free to opt out at any time without penalty.