2004 R.L. Powell,* A.H. Sanders, and H.D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Genomic imputation and evaluation using 1074 high density Holstein genotypes P. M. VanRaden 1, D. J. Null 1 *, G.R. Wiggans 1, T.S. Sonstegard 2, E.E.

Advertisements

2004 H.D. Norman, A.H. Sanders,* R.H. Miller, and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricutural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD.

Impact of selection for increased daughter fertility on productive life and culling for reproduction H. D. Norman, J. R. Wright*, R. H. Miller Animal Improvement.

2006 J.B. Cole,* G.R. Wiggans, and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

Use of cow culling to help meet compliance for somatic cell standards H. D. Norman and J. R. Wright * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural.

ADSA 2002 (HDN-P1) 2002 Comparison of occurrence and yields of daughters of progeny-test and proven bulls in artificial insemination and natural- service.

2012 ADSA-AMPA-ASAS-CSAS-WSASAS joint annual meeting (1)Norman Comparison of daughter performance of New Zealand and North American sires in US herds H.D.

Derivation of Factors to Estimate Daily Fat, Protein, and Somatic Cell Score from One Milking of Cows Milked Three Times Daily M. M. Schutz* 1 and H. D.

2001 ADSA annual meeting, July 2001 (1) Timeliness of progeny-testing through AI and percentage of bulls returned to service (abstract 1020) H.D. NORMAN,*

2002 7WCGALP (HDN-1) Performance of Holstein clones in the United States H.D. NORMAN,*,1 T.J. LAWLOR, 2 and J.R. WRIGHT 1 1 Animal Improvement Programs.

2003 Rex L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Interbull as a Tool.

Impacts of inclusion of foreign data in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle K. M. Olson 1, P. M. VanRaden 2, D. J. Null 2, and M. E. Tooker 2 1 National.

2001 Interbull, August 2001 (1) Usefulness of international dairy bull evaluations Rex L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research.

2004 R. L. Powell, A. H. Sanders, and H. D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

2007 ADSA 2007 (1)H.D. Norman Effect of service sire and cow sire on gestation length H.D. Norman,* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement.

G. R. Wiggans*, L. L. M. Thornton*,1, R. R. Neitzel †, and N. Gengler ‡ * Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS, USDA, Beltsville, MD †

2007 Paul VanRaden, Curt Van Tassell, George Wiggans, Tad Sonstegard, and Jeff O’Connell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory and Bovine Functional Genomics.

Interbull Technical Workshop, March 2-3 (1) Rex L. Powell and Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,

Performance of Holsteins that originated from embryo transfer or twin births H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright* and R.L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory,

Wiggans, th WCGALP (1) G.R. Wiggans*, T.A. Cooper, D.J. Null, and P.M. VanRaden Animal Genomics and Improvement Laboratory Agricultural Research.

Comparison of Holstein service-sire fertility for heifer and cow breedings with conventional and sexed semen H. D. Norman*, J. L. Hutchison, and P. M.

C. P. Van Tassell, G. R. Wiggans, and L. L. M. Thornton Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,

2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Fertility Trait.

2003 G.R. Wiggans,* P.M. VanRaden, and J.L. Edwards Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

REGRESSION MODEL y ijklm = BD i + b j A j + HYS k + b dstate D l + b sstate S l + b sd (S×SD m ) + b dherd F m + b sherd G m + e ijklm, y = ME milk yield,

Paul VanRaden USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Choice of Scales for Delivery of Genetic Evaluations.

Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Genetic Base and Trait Definition Update.

2005 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA Selection for.

Genetic Evaluation of Lactation Persistency Estimated by Best Prediction for Ayrshire, Brown Swiss, Guernsey, and Milking Shorthorn Dairy Cattle J. B.

2002 Paul VanRaden, Ashley Sanders, Melvin Tooker, Bob Miller, and Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA,

Adjustment of selection index coefficients and polygenic variance to improve regressions and reliability of genomic evaluations P. M. VanRaden, J. R. Wright*,

Genetic interactions for heat stress and herd yield level: predicting foreign genetic merit from domestic data J. R. Wright*, P. M. VanRaden Animal Genomics.

Paul VanRaden, 1 Katie Olson, 2 Dan Null, 1 Mehdi Sargolzaei, 3 Marco Winters, 4 and Jan-Thijs van Kaam 5 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, ARS,

John B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Best prediction.

G.R. Wiggans* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD

2003 P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluations.

J. B. Cole 1,*, P. M. VanRaden 1, and C. M. B. Dematawewa 2 1 Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,

2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA

Norman, 2014ICAR / Interbull annual meeting, Berlin, Germany, May 20, 2014 (1) Dr. H. Duane Norman Interim Administrator Council on Dairy Cattle Breeding.

Paul VanRaden and John Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 Planned Changes to Models and Trait Definitions.

Adjustment of breeding values for past and future inbreeding Paul VanRaden*, Lori Smith Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service,

H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright, and R.H. Miller Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD, USA

2007 John B. Cole USDA Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2008 Data Collection Ratings and Best Prediction.

H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD NDHIA 2009 meeting.

2003 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Genetic Evaluation.

Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Beltsville, MD, USA 2004 NAAB Update : Base Change, Udder Health, Longevity,

Multi-trait, multi-breed conception rate evaluations P. M. VanRaden 1, J. R. Wright 1 *, C. Sun 2, J. L. Hutchison 1 and M. E. Tooker 1 1 Animal Genomics.

Multibreed Genomic Evaluation Using Purebred Dairy Cattle K. M. Olson* 1 and P. M. VanRaden 2 1 Department of Dairy Science Virginia Polytechnic and State.

H.D. Norman* J.R. Wright, P.M. VanRaden, and M.T. Kuhn Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

Interbull meeting (1) Paul M. VanRaden and Rex L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville,

2004 P.M. VanRaden, M.E. Tooker*, and J.B. Cole Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

2006 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD AIPL Contributions.

ADSA Indianapolis 2001 (1) 2001 A Global Scale for Ranking Dairy Bulls Using Blended National Rankings Rex L. Powell * Paul M. VanRaden Animal Improvement.

H.D. Norman*, J.L. Hutchison, and J.R. Wright Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

 The United States provided the most foreign sires of sons every year, as high as 86%.  Canada was second in most years.  Combined, North American contributed.

2002 Rex L. Powell Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD

2007 Paul VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory, USDA Agricultural Research Service, Beltsville, MD, USA 2007 Genetic evaluation.

G.R. Wiggans, T. A. Cooper* and P.M. VanRaden Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD

CRI – Spanish update (1) 2010 Status of Dairy Cattle Breeding in the United States Dr. H. Duane Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural.

2007 Paul VanRaden 1, Curt Van Tassell 2, George Wiggans 1, Tad Sonstegard 2, Bob Schnabel 3, Jerry Taylor 3, and Flavio Schenkel 4, Paul VanRaden 1, Curt.

2001 ASAS/ADSA 2001 Conference (1) Simultaneous accounting for heterogeneity of (co)variance components in genetic evaluation of type traits N. Gengler.

G.R. Wiggans Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA Beltsville, MD G.R. WiggansCouncil.

H.D. NORMAN,* R.L. POWELL, J.R. WRIGHT

Can you believe those genomic evaluations for young bulls?

Percent of total breedings

Abstr. M4 Merit of obtaining genetic evaluations of milk yield for each parity on Holstein bulls H.D. Norman, J.R. Wright,* R.L. Powell, and P.M. VanRaden.

Increased reliability of genetic evaluations for dairy cattle in the United States from use of genomic information Abstr.

Effectiveness of genetic evaluations in predicting daughter performance in individual herds H. D. Norman 1, J. R. Wright 1*, C. D. Dechow 2 and R. C.

3Canadian Dairy Network, Guelph, ON Canada

Relationship of gestation length to stillbirth

Presentation transcript:

2004 R.L. Powell,* A.H. Sanders, and H.D. Norman Animal Improvement Programs Laboratory Agricultural Research Service, USDA, Beltsville, MD Accuracy and stability of national and international somatic cell score evaluations

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (2)R.L. Powell 2004 Objectives Investigate the accuracy and stability of somatic cell score evaluations  From US data (study one) Overall By bull sampling status ‘S’Standard sampling, defined by NAAB ‘O’Other (alternative) sampling  From Interbull data (study two) For bulls with US evaluations By inclusion of foreign daughters

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (3)R.L. Powell 2004 Data Study One 20,811 Holstein bulls born in 1985 or later 17,992 Sampling status ‘S’ 2819 Sampling status ‘O’ 481,416 US SCS evaluations from 1995 through February 2004 compared to May 2004 evaluations 6,975,946 pairs of evaluations including all evaluation pairs for each bull

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (4)R.L. Powell 2004 Methods Study One Mean change, absolute change, SD and expected SD of change where:  Between each evaluation and the May 2004 evaluation, for all bulls and by sampling status  Within all pairs of evaluations, by change in reliability (REL) E(SD) = SD sire  REL 

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (5)R.L. Powell 2004 Results Study One  Overall, May 2004 PTA SCS were greater than earlier evaluations  SD of change in evaluations were larger than E(SD)  For evaluations prior to 2000, SD of change averaged 19% larger than E(SD)  For later evaluations, SD of change was 10% larger than E(SD)

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (6)R.L. Powell 2004 Results Study One  SD of change exceeded E(SD) more with smaller increases in REL  For changes in REL less than.05, SD of change was 25% greater than E(SD)  For changes in REL from.10 to.30, SD of change was 8% greater than E(SD)  Sampling status can affect accuracy ‘O’ bull first evaluations changed less but increased less in REL ‘S’ bull evaluations with an opportunity for 2nd crop daughters more accurate

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (7)R.L. Powell 2004 Data Study Two 13,624 Holstein bulls with only US daughters in Interbull evaluations for May Holstein bulls with US and additional foreign daughters included in Interbull evaluations

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (8)R.L. Powell 2004 Methods Study Two Correlations of 2001 with 2004 evaluations and regressions of 2004 on 2001 evaluations  By increase in US daughters from 2001 to 2004  For bulls with Interbull evaluations including: US daughters only (US-only) US and foreign daughters (Multi-country)

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (9)R.L. Powell 2004 Results Study Two Number of bulls Correlation of IB01 with IB04 US01 with US04 IB01 with US04 US-only bulls13, >25%  daus >50%  daus >100%  daus >200%  daus Multi-country bulls >25%  daus >50%  daus >100%  daus Percent increase in US daughters from May 2001 to May 2004.

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (10)R.L. Powell 2004 Results Study Two Number of bulls Correlation of IB01 with IB04 US01 with US04 IB01 with US04 US-only bulls13, >25%  daus >50%  daus >100%  daus >200%  daus Multi-country bulls >25%  daus >50%  daus >100%  daus Percent increase in US daughters from May 2001 to May 2004.

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (11)R.L. Powell 2004 Results Study Two Number of bulls Regression of IB04 on IB01 US04 on US01 US04 on IB01SE US-only bulls13, >25%  daus >50%  daus >100%  daus >200%  daus Multi-country bulls >25%  daus >50%  daus >100%  daus Percent increase in US daughters from May 2001 to May 2004.

ADSA-ASAS JOINT MEETING 2004 (12)R.L. Powell 2004 Conclusions  Mean PTA SCS tended to increase slightly over time and as REL increased  Addition of daughters caused greater than expected changes in PTA SCS  Correlations and regressions of US and Interbull 2001 and 2004 evaluations were near expectations  Foreign data improved prediction of later US PTA