Auriga, Explorer and Nautilus Eugenio Coccia INFN Gran Sasso and U. of Rome “Tor Vergata” GWADW Elba 2006.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A walk through some statistic details of LSC results.
Advertisements

Design and performance of the Dual detector with large area capacitive readout 4 rd ILIAS-GW Meeting, October 8 th – 9 th 2007, Tuebingen Paolo Falferi.
A High Frequency Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts 2. Motivation for High Frequency Search 3. Summary of Analysis Pipeline Previous LIGO burst searches.
Final Thoughts and Highlights Barry C. Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 Okinawa 24-June -05 LISA.
Mechanical amplifiers for the DUAL detector: lumped and distributed element design 3 rd ILIAS-GW Meeting, October 26 th – 27 th 2006, London Paolo Falferi.
ILIAS meeting Mallorca 2005 V. Fafone Viviana Fafone INFN - LNF Future plans for resonant detectors
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
G Z April 2007 APS Meeting - DAP GGR Gravitational Wave AstronomyKeith Thorne Coincidence-based LIGO GW Burst Searches and Astrophysical Interpretation.
Oct 2006 g.modestino1 Experimental results correlating GW detector data and Gamma Ray Bursts Giuseppina Modestino LNF ROG Collaboration INFN – LN Frascati,
ILIAS GW Meeting Mallorca - October 23-24, 2005Luca Taffarello Status of the commissioning of the AURIGA detector Luca Taffarello (INFN Sezione di Padova)
Acoustic gw detectors: from resonant “bar” to wideband “dual” AURIGA DUAL R&D Erice June 3 rd 2006 Massimo.
Paik-1 Search for Gravitational Waves Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland and Seoul National University January 12, 2006 Seoul, Korea KIAS-SNU Physics.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
Francesco Salemi - London, October 26th - 27th, VIRGO-bars joint data analysis Francesco Salemi for the VIRGO-bars Collaboration.
STATUS of BAR DETECTORS G.A.Prodi - INFN and University of Trento International Gravitational Event Collaboration - 2 ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
Resonant mass detectors Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001.
GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 STATUS OF EXPLORER AND NAUTILUS INFN – LN Frascati, LN Gran Sasso, Sez. Roma 1, Roma 2 and Genova Universities “La Sapienza”
Status of stochastic background’s joint data analysis by Virgo and INFN resonant bars G. Cella (INFN Pisa) For Auriga-ROG-Virgo collaborations Prepared.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Upper Limits on the Rate of Gravitational Wave Bursts from the First LIGO Science Run Edward Daw Louisiana.
Analysis techniques for data from resonant-mass detectors Pia Astone SPIE conference, Waikoloa, Hawaii,
Le Fond Gravitationnel Stochastique Tania Regimbau ARTEMIS - OCA.
Searching for gravitational radiation from Scorpius X-1: Limits from the second LIGO science run Alberto Vecchio on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
Coincidences in gravitational wave experiments Pia Astone 4 th Amaldi conference Perth July 8-13, 2001.
RAS National Astronomy Meeting, Queens University, Belfast Gravitational wave astrophysics: Are we there yet? Matthew Pitkin for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
Astrophysical Sources of Stochastic Gravitational-Wave Background Tania Regimbau CNRS/ARTEMIS GWDAW 12, Boston, Dec LIGO-G
INTERPRETATION of IGEC RESULTS Lucio Baggio, Giovanni Andrea Prodi University of Trento and INFN Italy or unfolding gw source parameters starting point:
The AURIGA experiment: updates and prospects BAGGIO Lucio ICRR on behalf of AURIGA collaboration The AURIGA detector re-started data taking in Dec 2003,
GRBs & VIRGO C7 run Alessandra Corsi & E. Cuoco, F. Ricci.
Toward a 3rd generation European Gravitational Wave Observatory Dual R&D: presented by Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics Padova how.
ILIAS WP1 – Cascina IGEC – First experience using the data of 5 bar detectors: ALLEGRO, AURIGA, EXPLORER NAUTILUS and NIOBE. – 1460.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
C.Vigorito, University & INFN Torino, Italy 30 th International Cosmic Ray Conference Merida, Mexico Search for neutrino bursts from Gravitational stellar.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Wideband acoustic gravitational wave detectors at kHz frequencies: from AURIGA to DUAL AURIGA Caltech Dec 12 th 2005 Massimo Cerdonio.
Gamma ray burst triggered searches in the S2, S3, S4 runs of LIGO Soumya D. Mohanty On behalf of the LIGO Science Collaboration.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO- G D Gravitational Wave Observations with Interferometers: Results and Prospects Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 2 nd.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
T.Akutsu, M.Ando, N.Kanda, D.Tatsumi, S.Telada, S.Miyoki, M.Ohashi and TAMA collaboration GWDAW10 UTB Texas 2005 Dec. 13.
Gravitational wave astronomy: a facilities overview Barry C. Barish Caltech AAS San Diego 13-Jan-05 LISA.
Data analysis for impulsive sources with resonant g.w. detectors Pia Astone ROG collaboration Villa Mondragone International school of Gravitation and.
ILIAS WG1 - April 7 th, 2005 G.W. ANTENNA NAUTILUS LNF - FRASCATI G.W. ANTENNA EXPLORER CERN - GENEVA Bar Al 5056 M = 2270 kg L = 2.97 m Ø = 0.6 m A =
Stochastic Background Data Analysis Giancarlo Cella I.N.F.N. Pisa first ENTApP - GWA joint meeting Paris, January 23rd and 24th, 2006 Institute d'Astrophysique.
TAUP 2007, Sendai, September 12, 2007 IGEC2 COLLABORATION: A NETWORK OF RESONANT BAR DETECTORS SEARCHING FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVES Massimo Visco on behalf.
GWDAW11 – Potsdam Results by the IGEC2 collaboration on 2005 data Gabriele Vedovato for the IGEC2 collaboration.
LIGO- G D Results from the LIGO Science Runs Stan Whitcomb for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Aspen Winter Conference on Gravitational Waves.
The first AURIGA-TAMA joint analysis proposal BAGGIO Lucio ICRR, University of Tokyo A Memorandum of Understanding between the AURIGA experiment and the.
Status of AURIGA AURIGA Sept 21 st 2005 Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics University of Padova,
GW – the first GW detection ! Is it a start of GW astronomy ? If “yes” then which ? «Счастлив, кто посетил сей мир в его минуты роковые !...» Ф.Тютчев.
November, 2009 STAC - Data Analysis Report 1 Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi Università di Urbino and INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Palma de Mallorca - October 24 th, 2005 IGEC 2 REPORT International Gravitational Events Collaboration ALLEGRO– AURIGA – ROG (EXPLORER-NAUTILUS)
Thomas Cokelaer for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Cardiff University, U.K. APS April Meeting, Jacksonville, FL 16 April 2007, LIGO-G Z Search.
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
Brennan Hughey MIT Kavli Institute Postdoc Symposium
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
Wide Bandwidth Dual Acoustic GW Detectors
Searching for gravitational-wave transients with Advanced detectors
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Coherent wide parameter space searches for gravitational waves from neutron stars using LIGO S2 data Xavier Siemens, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Detection of gravitational waves from binary black hole mergers
Brennan Hughey for the LSC May 12th, 2008
Stochastic background search using LIGO Livingston and ALLEGRO
Status of the LIGO Detectors
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Joint bar-IFO observations
Presentation transcript:

Auriga, Explorer and Nautilus Eugenio Coccia INFN Gran Sasso and U. of Rome “Tor Vergata” GWADW Elba 2006

Frequency emitted by a dynamic system of density  kHz frequencies correspond to nuclear densities ( g/cm 3 ) Sources: compact objects gravitational collapse to form neutron star or black hole, last orbits of an inspiraling neutron star or black hole binary system, its merging, and its final ringdown, starquakes, phase transitions neutron to quark star

EXPERIMENTAL CONFIGURATION Capacitive transducer Al 5056 m t = 0.75 kg t = 916 Hz C t = 11 nF E = 2.6 MV/m Superconducting Low-dissipation Transformer Lo=2.86 H Li=0.8  H K=0.8 dc-SQUID M s = 10 nH  n = 3 ·10 -6  o/  Hz L0L0 LiLi

EXPLORER Duty cycle > 90% NAUTILUS 2004 Duty cycle > 90% T noise = 690  K Astone et al.(ROG Collaboration) Phys. Rev. Lett The peak sensitivity depends on T/MQ The bandwidth depends mainly on the transducer and amplifier

AURIGA Status: duty cycle, sensitivity and T=4.5 K 1 year of continuous data taking with sensitivity 1.5x < S h < 5x Hz -1/2 within a 100 Hz band Thorough study of intrinsic noise via fluctuation/ dissipation theorem: small fluctuations agree with Re{1/Z(ω)} (thermal noise) Detector sensitivity is dominated by thermal noise of bar and 2 modes transducer (purple + blu lines) Events due large fluctuations in the Hz band mostly due to up-conversion of noise in the very low frequency band (5-70 Hz) but limited to few events per day Noise rms Hz -1 (i.e. gw strain noise integrated over the detector bandwidth h rms ~ ) Good noise level stability: rms of noise in the full detection bandwidth fluctuates less than 25% Short peaks correpond to 4 He refilling (few hours) Each dot represent 3 hours of data taking

Joint search of gw burst events Search for periodic signal from binary pulsars with em phase measured by Radio Telescopes Search for gw flux from stationary sources using the Antenna Pattern properties (sidereal time analysis) Search for gw in coincidence with X or Gamma flares emitted by Soft Gamma Repeaters (SGR) e Gamma Ray Bursts (GRB) e.g. the giant flare of SGR due to crustal failure of a magnetar (see L. Baggio et al. Phys Rev Lett (2005)) From IGEC2 events lists of 6 months (May-Nov 2005) Duty time 96.6% (after epoch vetoes) <SNR<6 (most from thermal noise background) as predicted by a gaussian noise simulation Few SNR > 6 per day Only 85 very large events with SNR> 30 Event lists ready for IGEC2 coincidence analysis Amplitude of a 1ms burst SNR=4.5 → h ~ AURIGA targeted searches of gw 95%confidence upper limits on gw energy the flare time:  gw < M O c 2 SGR giant flare time of Dec 

Explorer and Nautilus status Since 2003 in continuous data taking with a sensitivity 8· <S h 1/2 < within 40 Hz bandwidth. Analysis of the Explorer-Nautilus coincidences in the years 2001 and 2003 already published, in progress for IGEC2 joint search for GW burst events in the period May-December 2005 in progress. Calibration signal Variance of the noise computed over 10 minutes before each event in the period May-December 2005

Distribution of the SNR of the events in the period May-December 2005, for IGEC2 coincidence analysis Operation with high duty cycle. In the period May-December 2005: Explorer 89%, Nautilus 90% (preliminary - validation in progress). 99% of events associated to a noise with sigma < Hz -1 (Explorer) and < Hz -1 (Nautilus) Cumulative analysis of the association between the data of the gravitational wave detectors NAUTILUS and EXPLORER and the gamma ray bursts detected by BATSE and BeppoSAX Phys. Rev. D 71, (2005)

NAUTILUS OPERATIONS DURING April 2005 Liquid Helium Refillings Duty Cycle  85 % Days of April 2005

The IGEC Network of 4 Resonant Detectors set upper limits for burst signals IGEC 2

The EXPLORER/NAUTILUS SEARCH FOR SHORT GW BURSTS IGEC search PRL 85, 5046 (2000) hours; CQG 18, 43 (2001) hours; CQG 19, 5449 (2002) hours; CQG Amaldi 6, (2006) hours; Analysis being completed 2005 Analysis in progress in the IGEC2 framework

T

DIRECTIONALITY INTERFEROMETERBAR DETECTOR

*= coincidences_______= accidentals G. Paturel, Yu.V. Barishev Sidereal time analysis as a tool for study of the space distribution of gw sources. Astro-ph/ v1, A&A 398, 377 (2003) The expected rate of events on EXPLORER for sources on the galactic disc and on the GC

gr-qc gr-qc , PRD 2004

Cosmic ray interaction in the bar Thermo-Acoustic Model: the energy deposited by the particle is converted in a local heating of the medium:  = Gruneisen “constant” Excitation of the longitudinal modes of a cylindrical bar A resonant gw detector used as a particle detector is different from any other particle detector

NAUTILUS is equipped with 7 layers (3 above the cryostat - area 36m 2 /each - and 4 below -area 16.5 m 2 /each) of Streamer tubes. The cosmic ray effect on the bar is measured by an offline correlation, driven by the arrival time of the cosmic rays, between the observed multiplicity in the CR detector (saturation for M≥10 3 particles/m 2 ) and the data of the antenna, sampled each 4.54 ms and processed by a filter matched to  signals Effect of cosmic rays EXPLORER is equipped with 3 layers (2 above the cryostat - area 13m 2 - and 1 below -area 6 m 2 ) of Plastic Scintillators.  E = 1 mK = 0.15  eV

predizioni

Interferometric NS-NS NS-BH BH-BH SNe Network Event Rate (per year) Range (Mpc) Network

Network Interferometric NS-NS NS-BH BH-BH SNe Network Event Rate (per year) Range (Mpc)

Sensitivity predicted for next run 3 x

Read the differential deformations of two nested resonators Intermediate GW broadband Dual Main Concept 3-5 kHz π Phase difference The inner resonator is driven below frequency The outer resonator is driven above resonance - gw signals add - - back action noises subtract - MC et al. PRL 87 (2001) MB et al. PRD 68 (2003)

Mo Dual 16.4 ton height 2.3m 0.94m SiC Dual 62.2 ton height 3.0m 2.9m Q/T=2x10 8 K -1 M. Bonaldi et al. Phys. Rev. D (2003) Spectral SQL Antenna pattern: like 2 IFOs co- located and rotated by 45° M. Bonaldi et al. gr-qc/

Conclusions Auriga, Explorer and Nautilus are taking data continuously with high duty cycle Events lists of 6 months May-Nov 2005 ready for analysis Explorer-Nautilus coincidence search published soon: excitements and limits of a two-detectors coincidence search. INFN Roadmap: Bars ON up to No large Spherical detector project. Continuation of the R&D for Dual.