MICE Status (with a UK slant) Paul Drumm, MICE Collaboration UK-NF June 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Summary of Report to IATI Steering Committee, Paris 9 February 2011 Richard Manning.
Advertisements

Report from MICE project teams Proposed MICE organogram: revised Revised request for resources for financial year 2003/04 Review of iMICE schedules – status.
Report to JMPB Topics: Progress Hall Clearance Programme Hall Layout Beam Line RF Power System MICE Management Structure Common Funds 14 th October 2003.
1 UK Project Alan Grant, STFC. Finance How savings are made Update on stepIV position Milestones Critical Path - stepIV Concerns 2.
Indicative Business Case
Need to Invest Investment Objectives and Case for Change Determine Potential Value for Money Strategic Case: Economic Case: Financial Case: Affordability.
Governance and delivery through Opt-In Organisations.
DISTILLATE Appraisal Workshop 21 May 07 Michael Padgett, Regional Transport Advisor, Yorkshire & Humber Assembly.
March 2003 Paul Drumm MICE Collaboration Meeting, CERN 1 Beam Line & Installation Plans Paul Drumm CLRC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Paul drumm; 1 st December 2004; PM&TB Report 1 Project Management & Technical Board Reports.
MICE FAC Alain Blondel 7 October   MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment MICE CM19.
Gateway process Gateway Process: ‘owned’ by UK Office of Science and Technology Essentially the mechanism by which UK involvement in large projects gets.
MICE Project Report Paul Drumm ~ Sunday August 1 st 2004.
Paul Drumm 9 Feb 2004 MICE at RF system: power source, distribution Paul Drumm RAL Ambitious title!
1 MICE PM Report Installations to date Future installation work Preparations for Phase Two Target status MICE Video Conference, 22nd May, 2008.
Paul Drumm 30 March 2004 MICE at RF Power System: power source, distribution Paul Drumm RAL Ambitious title!
1 MICE Project Report, paul drumm, 9 march 2005 CM Highlights & Tasks… –Tracker base line – scintillating fibres – performance validated –TOF performance.
K. Long, 26 June, 2015 Phase II: introduction to discussion Background (reminder) Responses Assumptions Presently planned bids Input to summary table Summary.
Paul drumm; 3rd December 2004; AFC MM 1 Why? Goal: Ultimate (CCLRC defined) Safety & Design Review –How do we get there? We need a Process –What is needed?
UK Funding PPRP Meeting on Monday 30 th June Accepted need for urgent work this year –no discussion on this –but also no indication of the level of funds.
UK Costs Beam & Infrastructure Coils Tracking Detector.
An updated Baseline Design for MICE From proposal to technical reference Paul Drumm, Dec 2003.
MICE – the UK Perspective Rob Edgecock RAL/CERN-AB Introduction Introduction UK Contributions UK Contributions Location Location New beamline New beamline.
Discussion Document By G How. History LeadershipStructureProcessesInformationEnvironment The path of Shared Services is littered with failed attempts.
MICE TECHNICAL UPDATE & ISIS/RAL PLANS. Belgium Italy Japan The Netherlands Russian Federation Switzerland UK USA Acknowledge.
 Commissioners in Somerset wanted to test whether outcomes based commissioning would lead to better outcomes and greater financial sustainability  External.
Project manager report paul drumm CM16 October 2006.
K. Long, 14 October 2003 MICE-UK: progress report Progress: WP1: B&I: Target u/g (Sheffield) … PD Focus coil assembly Spectrometer Software Issues: Scientific.
In-Kind Contribution Management Update Allen Weeks March 20, Lund.
MICE Collaboration Meeting Frascati 26 – 29 June 2005 Work Group report On Design & Safety Review.
MICE CM in New York Alain Blondel, June MICE COLLABORATION Columbia University June 2003 Action List (online) 1.Funding and some organization.
The status of the construction of MICE Step IV K. Long, on behalf of the MICE collaboration.
Andrew Moss ASTeC CM32 9t h February 2012 RAL MICE RF System.
Status of the MICE Project & Dashboard MICE Project Board 14 th November 2013 Roy Preece.
U.S. Muon Accelerator Program: MICE Milestones & Resource-Loaded Schedule M. A. Palmer, Director October 31, 2012.
MICE FAC Alain Blondel 21 september   MICE The International Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment BRIEF STATUS OF MICE.
WG3 – Part 3 - Design Studies Introduction Introduction View from Europe - RE View from Europe - RE “ “ Japan- Yoshi Kuno “ “ Japan- Yoshi Kuno “ “ US-
MICE Status & Plans MICE-UK paul drumm 15 th September 2004.
Report from MICE project teams Feedback from PPRP MICE funding: various scenarios Issues  Financial year 2003/04  iMICE common fund.
UK status report (funding) Status of UK bid for funding Savings/contributions in kind Gateway process Support from ISIS Conclusions/personal comments.
John Womersley Welcome Director of Particle Physics, CCLRC International Scoping Study Meeting, RAL April 2006.
MICE Oversight Committee Meeting RAL, 24 April 2014 Paul Soler on behalf of the MICE Collaboration Status of MICE and Spectrometer Solenoids.
Hall clearance completed Revisiting Water & Cryo Plant Prepare for shutdown ’04 –beam tube –Contract hole cutting Negotiating with DF to help target work.
1 Voluntary and Community Sector Review Voluntary & Community Sector Review Grants Strategy Working Party Participative Session 28 September 2006 Appendix.
Paul Drumm, cm10, 27 Oct 2004 MICE Project Report Paul Drumm Collaboration Meeting 10 Rutherford Appleton Laboratory October 2004.
MICE Project Report Alan Bross (for Paul Drumm). Project Issues ● Key dates: – ISIS Synchrotron start-up scheduled for 1st August ● Shielded area around.
MICE CMPB Alain Blondel 1 Highlights on MICE.
12 GHz Stand alone power source at CERN G.McMonagle AB/RF.
Plan to go forward Peter Wilson SBN Program Coordinator 27 September 2014.
1 UK PM Report Costs & Schedule Alan Grant, STFC.
Status of the MICE Construction Project Resource Loaded Schedule Review 29 th April 2014 Roy Preece.
MICE RF Power Status Paul Drumm ~ Sunday August 1 st 2004.
Technical Board Summary Alan Bross MICE CM17 CERN February 25, 2007.
1 How the Muon Ionization Cooling Experiment Found a Home MICE hall at RAL in Spring
1 MICE PM Report Phase One installations to date Phase One remaining items Progress with Phase Two Worries Don’t have time for a detailed status report,
1 paul drumm; Date; Title …project report …more comments paul drumm february 2005.
RLSR 16/4/2015 UK Financial Plan & Risks. Content Finances – FY 2014/15 – Cost to Completion Risks – Top level to completion – R9 working space – Summary.
Practical IT Research that Drives Measurable Results Make the Case for IP Telephony 1Info-Tech Research Group.
K. Long, 25 June, 2016 IDR: structure and overall timeline: Slides are to introduce discussion of how we prepare IDR. Propose to revise slides as we discuss.
1 MICE Coupling Coil Cryostating and Test Steve Gourlay March 1, Office of Science.
MICE VC Alain Blondel, April MICE exectutive board met on 1 April 2004 after the collaboration meeting and remarked the very large amount of.
New Economy Breakfast Seminar – 13 July What Has Changed?
Final CALICE OsC meeting: Status and summary of project
Status of the MICE Construction Project
BANKING INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Second SPL Collaboration Meeting, Vancouver May 2009
MICE CM31 Schedule summary
MICE Project in the US: Completion of Efforts
Portfolio, Programme and Project
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

MICE Status (with a UK slant) Paul Drumm, MICE Collaboration UK-NF June 2003

Proposal Status International Peer Review of Proposal –Jan 2003 Interrogation & homework –May 2003 Blondel, Drumm & Long –Report out ? –Strong Endorsement …. –…equates to Scientific Approval –…some advice to RAL

Management Issues RAL Management interface to MICE Local Technical Team Leaders Understand Costs –Independent Review –effort requirements e.g. during installation –capital costs –common fund discussion Constitution under discussion

Proposal Status & UK Funding PPARC/PPRP review of UK Proposal –May 2003 – accepted science case there is an understanding of the importance of MICE both internationally and of the importance & strength of the UK contributions Strenuous discussions are taking place…

UK Funding for the remainder of 2003/4 –there is a minimal programme of work to avoid loss of rôle (intellectual leadership) and to avoid further delays to the MICE programme pparc/pprp & cclrc have to find funds to enable this years work to take place Referees – (Willke, Froudivaux, Brook) –to scrutinise work plans for 2003/4 –expect an answer before end of June (PPRP next week?)

2004/…. OST budget line to be bid for in collaboration with PPARC & CCLRC in 2004/….  Gateway Total UK Cost estimate is £21.7M indications are that £7.5M is available through OST £10M may be a realistic target for OST/PPARC other sources of funding need to be accessed

scenarios… £7.5M –not enough for beam line £10.0M –gets beam line – ~no UK involvement in MICE £12.5M –involvement suffers £15.0M –can achieve all goals if £21.7M Risks associated with Solenoid taken by PSI Cryogenic infrastructure shared with MICE RF contribution taken in kind This is preferred option of JPB

Gateway Process Gateway 0 – Strategic Assessment: Assessment of business need; Assessment of risk; initiation of an independent review team; review of the objectives and planned delivery; review of management structure and resource plans; Gateway 1 – Business Justification: Assessment of the business case for MICE; review of risk management plans; review delivery plans; Gateway 2 – Procurement Strategy: confirm procurement strategy; full funding availability; appropriate resources are in place; delivery plans, financial and management controls are in place and are realistic; Gateway 3 – Investment Decisions: confirm that the procurement strategy has been followed; review and agree procurement decisions; review risk management & change control procedures; ….4 & 5 GW 1 Papers with Wood & Halliday to take MICE to RCUK GW 1 Review in July Success implies approval for MICE

Gateway Process Gateway 0 – Strategic Assessment: Assessment of business need; Assessment of risk; initiation of an independent review team; review of the objectives and planned delivery; review of management structure and resource plans; Gateway 1 – Business Justification: Assessment of the business case for MICE; review of risk management plans; review delivery plans; Gateway 2 – Procurement Strategy: confirm procurement strategy; full funding availability; appropriate resources are in place; delivery plans, financial and management controls are in place and are realistic; Gateway 3 – Investment Decisions: confirm that the procurement strategy has been followed; review and agree procurement decisions; review risk management & change control procedures; ….4 & 5 GW 2 Funding plans must be shown to be secure.

& Elsewhere US submitted its MICE proposal in 2002 –no decision as yet –MuCool contribution for R&D Italians made request (and obtained) funds for TPG work (? for solenoid) elsewhere require formal approval from CCLRC

Despite the lack of funds…. so far much progress has been achieved…. –absorber, coils & safety –beam line –RF power system –tracker choice

…absorber & coils integration –Moved away from original scheme in favour of a solution which decouples the coil & absorber bringing them together for final assembly - no sparks! –first review under discussion where- states (FNAL?) who- WG members + non - MICE panel when- probably (my guess) start of 2004

…Beam Line –limited options at RAL (3 quads & 2 dipoles) –beam line layout drawn up matching – potential solution seeking resources –front end fixed (in synchrotron room) shortly proceed to clear hall (small step forward) smaller hole to be cut in 2004

RF Power System –Scheme Draw up in outline –Single 1MW drive per cavity flexible advantage of phase & amplitude control cost effective (despite 8 systems) possible to upgrade to deliver 4MW to one cavity –Demonstrated 1.6 MW from “old” ISIS tubes –inventory of what can be reused RAL/CERN/? –Difference Schemes are similar in cost

RAL Scheme >1MW 100 kW 5kW 10mW TH 116 ex RAL Tubes ex SPS SS Driver Low Level Control & RF Source Roy Church Cavity

RAL RF Tube Tests I A ~110 A Field Stock of ~ 12 retired tubes trial tube operated comfortably at 1.25 MW (~300  s pulse at 50/32 Hz) (peaks at ~1.6 MW) 260  s

Tracker Choice Referees appointed – Grégoire & Summers Criteria published –list of measurements & performance figures –to be agreed by proponents Time Scale defined –October collaboration meeting

Conclusion Strong Statement from IPRP (Astbury) Funding Discussion in progress –signs are promising Many Technical Issues still to be addressed – good progress MICE is a strong collaboration & with our best endeavours MICE will succeed!