Science Olympiad Workshop Arbitration: “Here Comes the Judge” November 1, 2013 David B. Johnson.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
2012 Michigan Championship Reminders and Announcements Lawrence Technological University 1.
Advertisements

August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
OFFICE OF EARLY AND EXTENDED LEARNING Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education.
Information for Panel Presidents. WELCOME & THANK YOU You have been chosen to serve as a Panel President because of your expertise in human rights and.
SCIENCE OLYMPIAD COACHING 101 CeAnn Chalker
Information for Judges. Since its inception in 1995, the Competition has been an important forum for the analysis of international human rights law and.
Writing Reader-Focused Letters, Memos, and
DIFFERENCES BETWEEN Old and New A & P Grievance Procedures.
Preparing for Compliance Monitoring Reviews Understanding CMS Protocols Used by Review Organizations January 14, 2009 Presented by: Margaret deHesse, RN,
BEAL BANK DALLAS REGIONAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR 55 th YEAR JUDGING ORIENTATION 1. Organization 2. Scoring 3. Conduct.
Speech & Play Production Rules Meeting. The entries to the district contests are to be submitted no later than a fixed date to be determined annually.
Streamlined Consultation Training Modules Module #1 - Frequently Asked Questions on the Section 7 Consultation Process Module #2 - An Overview of Streamlined.
Litigation and Alternatives for Settling Civil Disputes CHAPTER FIVE.
Judging Process. Judges’ Responsibilities Provide feedback to all teams via the rubrics. Determine which teams should win awards. Determine which teams.
Pentathlon Presented by Tim Taylor
Q Comp Peer Reviewer Training Covering: Job Description and Expectations Norms and Confidentiality Agendas Interviews Rubric and Debriefing Wrap-up.
National Christian Forensics and Communications Association “…addressing life issues from a biblical worldview in a manner that glorifies God…” Welcome.
Nursing Workload/Staffing Report Guidelines For Use.
Judging Orientation 58 th Annual DRSEF. Agenda 1) Organization 2) Scoring 3) Conduct.
The Use of Counseling and Discipline to Improve Employee Productivity.
UNDERSTANDING, PLANNING AND PREPARING FOR THE SCHOOL-WIDE EVALUATION TOOL (SET)
The Rotary Four-Way Test Speech Contest for (Fill in name of school) The Rotary Club of (Fill in Club name) School Year.
Running a Competitive Event HOSA Advisors: Everything you need to know.
MGT-555 PERFORMANCE AND CAREER MANAGEMENT LECTURE NO
January 18, 2014.
Teaching Improvement Program “Your Students and Their Conflict Resolution in a Classroom Setting”
Michigan District Optimists ORATORICAL CONTEST
PRO-EAST Workshop, Rome, May 9-11, Final Report, Accreditation Decision, Register and Results Publication Oleg V. Boev, Accreditation Centre, Russian.
Florida 4-H Demonstration Judge’s Orientation. Demonstrations  Purpose: To learn public speaking skills and delve into chosen subject matter  Presentations.
Conflict Resolution II. Agriculture Education Instructor:
1 HRSA Division of Independent Review The Review Process Regional AIDS Education and Training Centers HRSA Toni Thomas, MPA Lead Review Administrator.
August 28, 2009 Federal Emergency Management Agency Public Assistance Arbitration Process.
1: Overview and Field Research in Classrooms ETL329: ENTREPRENEURIAL PROFESSIONAL.
Implement Educate Monitor Ask Before You Act! Football November 2009.
Preseason Coaches Meeting. When faced with a question or concern regarding NCAA rules and regulations, the following process should be followed: Step.
Tackling the Field Tips and Tricks. The Flow of a match On Deck Approaching the table The match Scoring Leaving the field.
Pikeville Regional Science Olympiad General Information.
January 17, 2015.
PRACTICAL CASES 1)Competitor active / not active 2)DH Draw Board 3)SL pole missing 4)Wrong bibs 5)DSQ racer Alpine Technical Delegates Update 2011.
PICTURE THIS Science Olympiad Summer Institute Phoenix, AZ July , 2015.
Chapter 9* Managing Meetings. Chapter 10/Managing Meetings Hilgert & Leonard © Explain why meetings, committees, and being able to lead meetings.
FLL 2015: The Tournament. Agenda Tournament overview Tips and ideas Q&A as we go along.
Page  ASME 2013 Standards and Certification Training Module B – Process B7. The Appeals Process.
BEAL BANK DALLAS REGIONAL SCIENCE & ENGINEERING FAIR 54 th YEAR JUDGING ORIENTATION 1. Organization 2. Scoring 3. Conduct.
Science Olympiad LaVergne Middle School’s First team!!
Class of 2016 Senior Advisory 2/17/16. What’s next?
Elementary Science Olympiad at FAU Mike McKee Ingrid Johanson State Director Regional Director.
OLMCA SCIENCE OLYMPIAD WE CAN DO IT AGAIN!!!
-NEW URL? January 14, NEW URL?
Science Olympiad.
Pikeville Regional Science Olympiad General Information
ENTER FACILITY NAME HERE*______________________
Call for applications: Presenters for Japan Heritage International Forum! Would you like to experience Japanese culture and convey its appeal to the world?
Protests and the Appeals Process
Council Working Group on Financial and Human Resources January 2017
Pikeville Regional Science Olympiad General Information
Cross Country Pre-Season Parent Meeting
VEX IQ Challenge STEM Research Project Judging Process
Meeting Facilitation: Turn Hate to Love
Delivering Feedback Effectively
NFHS & CDTO-Rules Update 2018
Willard High School Speech & Debate Tournament— October 20-21
Step One Make Contact Visit the school or schools within your club area The right contact person is important Be prepared to discuss Rotary and the concepts.
The Student Teaching Handbook
Cobb County Helen Ruffin Reading Bowl
FIRST Tech Challenge Judging and Awards
Florida Science Olympiad
WORKSHOP DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS AGAINST JUDGES AND PROSECUTORS IN UKRAINE JUDICIAL DISCIPLINARY PRACTICE: PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF JUDICIAL MISCOONDUCT.
Preparing for the Assessment
Step One Make Contact Visit the school or schools within your club area The right contact person is important Be prepared to discuss Rotary and the concepts.
Presentation transcript:

Science Olympiad Workshop Arbitration: “Here Comes the Judge” November 1, 2013 David B. Johnson

Overview What is Arbitration and the Arbitration Panel? What kinds of things lead to Arbitration? How does the Arbitration process work?

What is Arbitration? The place where contestants and supervisors come to be satisfied that their concerns are considered. Philosophy - Dedication to making Science Olympiad work.

The Arbitration Panel Three members – typically the members represent specialties that include: biology geology physics chemistry engineering But issues are seldom related to the subject. More commonly they relate to the conduct of the event.

Problems The sooner we know about problems, the better. Options disappear as time passes.

General Kinds of Problems (Perceived and Actual) Conduct of the event (in no particular order) Accusations of cheating Impounding irregularities Quality of the competition area or provided materials Not conducted as expected by participants –Differs from regional events –Failure of the event supervisor to follow published guidelines and rules – especially an issue for new events and established events that change. –Publication of rules clarifications

Other Kinds of Problems –Tardy because of long running prior event –Impediments related to travel

Who may file an appeal? Competitors (team members and coaches) who have a concern regarding the conduct of an event. Supervisors

General kinds of problems (Perceived and Actual) If there is a question related to the conduct of an event, please have the team member(s) bring this to the attention of the Event Supervisor immediately. –Have contestant speak with the event supervisor immediately. –Try to resolve issues before resorting to arbitration. –If issue is unresolved, inform the event supervisor that an appeal will be filed. –File appeal

Where is Arbitration? Typically located in the vicinity of scoring (probably Brown Hall Rm. 210)

How Does Arbitration Work? Arbitration begins when a report is filed with the receptionist at Arbitration. Must be filed within 30 minutes of completion of event This report is typically filed by a coach. The person filing the report will be asked to have the affected students come to Arbitration when it is convenient so that their story can be heard. The report is delivered to the panel who reviews it. If appropriate, a panel member will visit the event supervisor immediately. Students are asked to tell the panel what happened.

Student Interview Who? What? When? Where? Why? Possible resolutions?

Filling out the form: The top line will be completed by the receptionist after the form is submitted.

Filling out the form: One (not both) of these is required. Description of the problem should be as complete as possible.

Filling out the form: Resolution Requested

Processing the Appeal Interviews Deliberation “Publication” Decision may be reviewed at the receptionist’s desk. The team will entertain follow-up questions.

You may return to determine the findings of Arbitration. If you see an entry for “Time completed” you may ask to see the “Decision/Recommendation” sheet.

Judge’s Decision/Recommendation Form

“Typical” outcomes Resolve misunderstandings Re-runs Penalties or disqualifications Recommendations for future years. We do everything possible to avoid throwing an event out entirely.

Questions? Thank you and good luck to you and your teams in the 2014 NM Science Olympiad!