Students and staff co-creating curricula: exploring practical ways of engaging students in designing their own learning & teaching Dr Catherine Bovill,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Christopher Graham Garnet Education UK. I dont do rhetorical questions !
Advertisements

+ Changing Participants in Pedagogical Planning: Students as Co-Creators of Course Design, Curricula, and Teaching Approaches Alison Cook-Sather, Bryn.
Students as co-creators of curricula: reflections from a research project on links to SoTL Dr Catherine Bovill, Lecturer, Academic Development Unit, University.
Self- and Peer-Assessment
Peer peer-assessment & peer- feedback
Supporting further and higher education Learning design for a flexible learning environment Sarah Knight and Ros Smith Pedagogy Strand of the JISC e-Learning.
Enhancing the Student Experience The Student Voice
Welsh Assessment and Feedback Practitioners Event Tuesday 5 May 2009 Assessment of Problem Based Learning in Initial Teacher Education and Training Russell.
Dr Niamh Moore-Cherry School of Geography, Planning and Environmental Policy University College Dublin, Ireland Co-creating curriculum in a mass education.
Co-creation of the curriculum Dr Catherine Bovill, University of Glasgow, Scotland, UK Dr Niamh Moore-Cherry, University College Dublin, Ireland Mr Luke.
Evaluation 2 Headlines Pass rate and mean marks improve Improved module review ratings Better attendance at seminars Evaluation 2: Module review Questionnaire.
Students as co-creators of curricula Dr Catherine Bovill, Senior Lecturer, Academic Development Unit Dublin Region Higher Education Alliance 30 th November.
Workshop: Translating graduate attributes into classroom learning A/Prof Simon Barrie Institute for Teaching and Learning Hong Kong Institute of Education.
Slide 1 Building Students’ Teamwork Skills for Successful Integrated Projects Paula M. (Penni) Hudis, Ph.D., Director Pathway and Curriculum Development.
The key characteristics of an autonomous learner at Sheffield Hallam in 2010 Ivan Moore.
Assessment matters: What guides might we use as individuals, teams and institutions to help our assessment endeavours? A presentation to Wolverhampton.
Self-evaluation as a process and an instrument Laura Muresan PROSPER-ASE Bucharest QUEST Romania.
Inclusive Assessment in Practice The Challenge of Assessing Reflection: The Open University Access Programme John Butcher, Stefanie Sinclair, Anactoria.
Information Literacy and Inquiry-based learning Pamela McKinney Learning Development and Research Associate (Information Literacy) at CILASS CILASS identifies.
“Autonomous e-learning to improve careers awareness and employability in first year (post A- Level) language classes.” Newcastle University, School of.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Educational Solutions for Workforce Development PILOT WORKSHOP EVALUATION MARY RICHARDSON MER CONSULTING.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
Research, evidence and engaging learning Profiling the influence of school librarianship Penny Moore
Co-creation of learning and teaching: background, evidence and strategies for success Dr Catherine Bovill, Senior Lecturer Academic Development Unit, Learning.
Providing innovative and engaging professional development for educators CONTEMPORARY LEARNING HUB Creating Flipped Classroom Videos Facilitated by Mark.
Ways EALD teachers can work in DECD schools
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
Southern Regional Education Board Welcome What Does Academic Integration Really Mean in the Career-Technical Classroom? Nancy Headrick, Director State.
Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching in Higher Education Mick Healey HE Consultant and Researcher
The Principles of Student Engagement Ellie Russell, Student Engagement Partnership Manager.
Masterful Meetings September 26, 2007 LEARNERS = LEADERS.
Staff and students co-creating curricula Dr Catherine Bovill, Lecturer, Academic Development Unit, University of Glasgow QAA Enhancement Themes Conference.
International Conference on Enhancement and Innovation in Higher Education Crowne Plaza Hotel, Glasgow 9-11 June 2015 Welcome.
The Art of the Designer: creating an effective learning experience HEA Conference University of Manchester 4 July 2012 Rebecca Galley and Vilinda Ross.
Curriculum development Importance of development - Creating a set of rules - Planning ahead of time - Implementation of the Stage 6 syllabus - The end.
Working towards a connected future; understanding the changing dynamics in the relationships between students and teachers in higher education Karin Crawford,
Welcome. Developing Professional Practice in Partnership Fiona Milne.
Assessment for learning
Centre for Excellence in Teaching and Learning Promoting Learner Autonomy Ivan Moore, Director Dr Jo Elfving-Hwang, Researcher/developer Developing Communities.
Fitness Education Chapter 13. Traditional Views of Fitness Goal was to get kids fit Focus was on activities and doing fitness (for example, weight training,
Session Objectives Analyze the key components and process of PBL Evaluate the potential benefits and limitations of using PBL Prepare a draft plan for.
Intel ® Teach Program International Curriculum Roundtable Programs of the Intel ® Education Initiative are funded by the Intel Foundation and Intel Corporation.
E VALUATING YOUR E - LEARNING COURSE LTU Workshop 11 March 2008.
UnIversity Uncovered Formations of Gender & HE Pedagogies Funded by the Higher Education Academy.
© New Zealand Ministry of Education copying restricted to use by New Zealand education sector. Page 1 Learning-focused relationships.
Liberating the curriculum
Statement of Teaching Philosophy and Practice
Spelling and beyond – Curriculum
Learning-focused relationships
— Students as partners: What is the role of the academic?
Melbourne Centre for the Study of Higher Education
Katherine M. Hyland, PhD Marieke Kruidering-Hall, PhD
The impact of extra-curricular activities on student engagement: In what ways does participation in Symposium affect Higher Prior Attaining students’ engagement.
Student Engagement in Curriculum Design
Dr Ewa Krolikowska 5th January, SHIFT 2018
Spelling and beyond Literacy Toolkit HGIOS
Edinburgh Network: Growing Approaches to Genuine Engagement
Evaluation of the Tower Hamlets Together (THT) vanguard programme Mirza Lalani University College London.
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Learning gain metrics and personal tutoring: Opportunities and ethics
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Making Tomorrow’s Doctors Today’s Teachers
The impact of extra-curricular activities on student engagement: In what ways does participation in Symposium affect Higher Prior Attaining students’ engagement.
Title V Initiatives to Promote Student Success: Capstone Seminar and Student Research With Faculty May 31, 2016.
Contents Introduction/Contacts Description Of Module (& LOs)
Thursday 16th January 2014 Yaz El Hakim and Camille Shepherd
Benefits of OBL for New Teachers
George Curry and Dr John Butcher
Presentation transcript:

Students and staff co-creating curricula: exploring practical ways of engaging students in designing their own learning & teaching Dr Catherine Bovill, Senior Lecturer, Academic Development Unit University of Stirling 4 th December 2012

Overview  Background and definitions  Why co-create curricula?  Possible and desirable levels of participation  Examples of different types of participation  Challenges and solutions  Key design decisions influencing student engagement

What is the curriculum? Fraser & Bosanquet’s (2006) curriculum definitions a) Structure and content of a unit b) Structure and content of a programme of study c) The students’ experience of learning d) A dynamic and interactive process of teaching and learning (p272)

HE Lit supporting co-created curric  Students as co-creators/co-producers of their learning (Bovill et al, 2011& 2009; McCulloch, 2009; Neary, 2010; SFC, 2008)  Literature calling for student participation in curriculum design from critical pedagogy and popular education (Darder et al, 2003; Dewey, 1916; Fischer, 2005; Freire, 1993; Giroux, 1983; Rogers and Freiberg, 1969)  Specific student participation in curriculum design  Breen & Littlejohn (2000) Language teaching  Scandrett et al (2005) Environmental justice  Fischer (2005); Delpish et al ( 2010) Education  Bovill et al, (2011); Cook-Sather (2010) non-disciplinary specific

Why would you co-create curricula?  My course was broken  My students are not engaged  I want to make my classroom more democratic  The benefits look worth exploring  The university was going through a structural change  There was a small amount of funding available

Student benefits Enhanced meta-cognitive understanding of the learning process  collective and individual responsibility  group cohesion  autonomy and self-directed learning  confidence and motivation Enhanced student performance in assessments Enhanced meta-cognitive understanding of the teaching process (See for e.g. Bovill et al 2011; Delpish et al, 2011; Mihans et al, 2008)

Staff outcomes Enhanced meta-cognitive understanding of the learning and teaching process Nerve-wracking Intense / demanded a lot Rewarding experience from genuine dialogue with students and witnessing benefits for students Transformatory (See for e.g. Bovill et al 2011; Delpish et al, 2011; Mihans et al, 2008)

Ladder of student participation in curriculum design Partnership - a negotiated curriculum Stud ents incre asin gly activ e in parti cipat ion Students in control Student control of some areas of choice Students control of prescribed areas Wide choice from prescribed choices Limited choice from prescribed choices Dictated curriculum – no interaction Participation claimed, tutor in control Students control decision-making and have substantial influence Students have some choice and influence Tutors control decision-making informed by student feedback Tutors control decision-making Gathering feedback from students… Depends what you do with the feedback Students as full members of curriculum design team Designing a VLE Students designing their own learning outcome(s) Bovill & Bulley, (2011)

Words of caution… Higher up the ladder is not necessarily ‘better’ Beware of chasing the nirvana of total participation and totally equal participation Different points on the ladder might be possible or desirable in different contexts The ladder is simply a model to facilitate discussion

Examples of co-created curricula Do you have any examples of co-created curricula?

Examples of student participation students choosing the topic for their research project students co-designing marking criteria with staff students and staff collaborate to choose a course text book students influencing the content of the curriculum students’ work forming the basis of the curriculum students co-creating course resources students co-designing the assessment

Some big questions… We have a professional body that constrains what we can do with our curriculum… I only teach these students for two weeks and the course is co- ordinated by someone else… We are all overstretched and this sounds like more work… I teach first years and they don’t have 20 years of experience like me to know what needs to be in the content of the first year chemistry curriculum…

Challenges to the co-creation process What are the key challenges to you co-creating curricula in your context? How can these challenges be overcome?

Pre-design decisions Tutors as gatekeepers… Which students? Retrospective, current or future design? Selecting students – if not all students by interview/criteria Do you reward your students? Course, programme or extra-curricular? Students involved in designing curriculum process or content? Bovill (forthcoming)

Any questions?

What would be a good question for me to ask the group if I wanted to get some feedback on the session today? Choose 1 or 2 of the suggested questions and write a response to the question on the paper provided. Please leave these behind at the end of the session Thank you Evaluation