The following figures show three modeled measures of network capability 1) Minimum magnitude threshold 2) Network detection time 3) Earthquake Location.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ASL QC Procedures Status and plans. GSN ANSS Traditional Waveform Review  The “morning run” Daily summarizes problems with availability, timing,
Advertisements

Group Velocity Dispersion Curves from Wigner-Ville Distributions Simon Lloyd 1, Goetz Bokelmann 1, Victor Sucic 2 1 University of Vienna 2 University of.
Power Spectral Density (PSD) Probability Density Functions (PDF)
Body and Surface Wave Seismic Tomography for Regional Geothermal Assessment of the Western Great Basin Glenn Biasi 1, Leiph Preston 2, and Ileana Tibuleac.
1 U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Earthquake Monitoring and Reporting through the Advanced National Seismic System Briefing for.
Noise Based Detection Method for the ANSS by Dan McNamara With Collaborators: Ray Buland, Harley Benz, Rob Wesson Art Frankel and Dirk Erickson.
MICHAEL FORNASIERO DAEE – RPI 4/1/2009 Seismic Sleuthing.
SUPERSITES COORDINATION WORKSHOP Monday 10 June 2013
Mike Stickney Montana Bureau of Mines and Geology Earthquake Studies Office Montana Regional Seismograph Network ANSS IMW RAC 21 August 2006.
NGA-East: National Seismic Hazard Mapping Perspective Mark Petersen USGS Golden, CO.
Locating the Epicenter
Locating and Measuring Earthquakes
Yan Y. Kagan Dept. Earth and Space Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA , Global.
UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS Faculty of Geology and Geoenvironment Department of Geophysics and Geothermics A. Agalos (1), P. Papadimitriou (1), K. Makropoulos.
NERA/REAKT Workshop Zürich March 19-20, 2013
Instructions for Locating an Earthquake Epicenter
Earthquakes Susan Bilek Associate Professor of Geophysics New Mexico Tech How to figure out the who, what, where, why… (or the location, size, type)
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson Carleton University.
Seismicity around Lhasa Tsoja Wangmo 1), Norsang Gelsor 1) and Jens Havskov 2) 1) Jiangsu Road No 36 Lhasa, Tibet, PRC 2) University of Bergen, Department.
1 Earthquake Magnitude Measurements for Puerto Rico Dariush Motazedian and Gail M. Atkinson.
RAPID SOURCE PARAMETER DETERMINATION AND EARTHQUAKE SOURCE PROCESS IN INDONESIA REGION Iman Suardi Seismology Course Indonesia Final Presentation of Master.
Tsunami Warning System Elements IOC Assessment Mission to Indonesia 29 August-1 September 2005.
Power Spectral Density (PSD) Probability Density Functions (PDF) A Seismic Data QC and Network Design Tool Developers: Dan McNamara, Ray ANSS.
FULL EARTH HIGH-RESOLUTION EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS Yan Y. Kagan and David D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of California Los.
Crust and upper mantle structure of Tien Shan Orogen and its surroundings by ambient noise tomography and earthquake tomography Yong Zheng a, Yingjie Yang.
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
Mr.Santosh Kumar Scientist Web:
Tsunami Hazard Assessment along the Coast of Lingayen Gulf, Pangasinan, Philippines Julius M. GALDIANO PHIVOLCS Julius M. GALDIANO PHIVOLCS 4 th International.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey Natural Hazards Science – Reducing the World’s.
What is an Epicenter? A point on Earth’s surface where EQ originates. Focus: A point of an EQ within the Earth.
Detecting temporal velocity changes using various methods Haijiang Zhang University of Science and Technology of China.
Quiz/Review Get out a small piece of paper and put your name on it.
A New QUACK Controlet: Sesimic Noise Probability Density Functions Developers: Dan McNamara, Ray Buland, Harold Bolton, Jerry USGS Richard Boaz.
Beginning search for deep moonquakes locations on the lunar far side T. Sonnemann 1, 2, M. Knapmeyer 1 and J. Oberst 1 1 Institute of Planetary Research,
PHYSICS EXERCISE "EARTHQUAKES". 1.) Focus- This is the point, usually deep underground, where the initial dislocation and energy release occurs. Definitions.
Observation of diffuse seismic waves at teleseismic distances
Does Antarctica Provide a Unique Environment for Array Seismology? Andy Nyblade on behalf of the Polar Networks Science Committee (PNSC) Array Seismology.
Lg Q Across the Continental US Dan McNamara and Rob Wesson with Dirk Erickson, Arthur Frankel and Harley Benz.
Large Earthquake Rapid Finite Rupture Model Products Thorne Lay (UCSC) USGS/IRIS/NSF International Workshop on the Utilization of Seismographic Networks.
Do Now – In Notebooks 1.In what order do earthquake waves appear on a seismogram? 2.How many points are needed to determine the epicenter of an earthquake?
An Assessment of the High-Gain Streckheisen STS2 Seismometer for Routine Earthquake Monitoring in the US ISSUE: Is the high-gain STS2 too sensitive to.
Infrasounds and Background Free Oscillations Naoki Kobayashi [1] T. Kusumi and N. Suda [2] [1] Tokyo Tech [2] Hiroshima Univ.
SEISMIC WAVE BASICS.
SEISMIC WAVE BASICS. Finding an Epicenter What is an Epicenter? A point on the surface of the Earth directly above the FOCUS of the earthquake. The point.
Surface-wave Derived Focal Mechanisms in Mid-America R. B. Herrmann 1, C. J. Ammon 2 and H. M. Benz 3 1 Saint Louis University, 2 Pennsylvania State University,
A Study on Characteristics of Seasonally Dependent Infrasound Propagation Based on the Ground-Truth Events from a Long- Term Experiment at a Quarry mine.
Federation of Digital Broad-Band Seismograph Networks The FDSN and Sustainable Seismic Networks Tim Ahern FDSN Archive for Continuous Data.
P wave amplitudes in 3D Earth Guust Nolet, Caryl Michaelson, Ileana Tibuleac, Ivan Koulakov, Princeton University.
1 Wavefield Calibration Using Regional Network Data R. B. Herrmann Saint Louis University.
USNSN/ANSS Real Time Data Flow at the NEIC. Topics NEIC Real-time Data System Networks Contributed to NEIC in Real-time Internal Flow of Real-time Data.
Aim: How can we locate the epicenter of an Earthquake?
SHORT- AND LONG-TERM EARTHQUAKE FORECASTS FOR CALIFORNIA AND NEVADA Kagan, Y. Y. and D. D. Jackson Department of Earth and Space Sciences, University of.
SEISMIC WAVE BASICS. Finding an Epicenter ESRT TABLES – GRAPH PAGE 11.
Locating the Epicenter
Seismic phases and earthquake location
Goal  Locate the epicenter of an earthquake. What is an Epicenter? A point on the surface of the Earth directly above the FOCUS of the earthquake. The.
SEISMIC WAVE BASICS. Finding an Epicenter ESRT TABLES – GRAPH PAGE 11.
Cabled systems for near-field tsunami early warning: An observation system simulation experiment (OSSE) offshore Portugal A. Babeyko1, M. Nosov2 and.
SEISMIC NETWORK DESIGN FOR THE MONITORING OF NATURAL GAS RESERVOIR OF “SANT'ANDREA” (TREVISO, NORTHERN ITALY) S. Carannante1, E. D'Alema1, S. Lovati1,
Brazilian “Strong-Motion” Data Stéphane Drouet, ON, Rio de Janeiro Marlon Pirchiner, IAG/USP, São Paulo Marcelo Assumpção, IAG/USP, São Paulo Luis Carlos.
Earthquake P-wave & S-wave Travel Time Chart Tutorial
1-D Mississippi embayment sediment velocity structure and anisotropy: constraint from ambient noise analysis on a dense array Chunyu,Liu1; Charles A. Langston1.
Université Joseph Fourier Grenoble, France
Instructions for Locating an Earthquake Epicenter
Worksheet – Earthquake P-wave & S-wave Travel Time Chart Tutorial
Aim: How do you locate earthquakes?
So why are seismograms so important?
by Satoshi Ide, Annemarie Baltay, and Gregory C. Beroza
MUSTANG Training Session for North American Regional Networks
Presentation transcript:

The following figures show three modeled measures of network capability 1) Minimum magnitude threshold 2) Network detection time 3) Earthquake Location Error Network Capability Improvements ANSS Backbone from

The map to the left shows the minimum moment magnitude (Mw) detectable in each 1 degree grid cell by the combined 2003 ANSS Backbone network (BK, IU, II, US). The minimum Mw level for each grid cell is modeled by computing the minimum Brune earthquake amplitude (Brune 1970) that exceeds ambient noise levels at 5 stations(McNamara and Buland, 2003). Ambient noise levels are taken from the mode of the PDF distribution for several years of BHZ noise observations. See McNamara et al., (2004) for method details. Magnitude Threshold References: McNamara, D.E., and R. Buland, ANSS Detection threshold, 15th Annual IRIS Workshop, June, Yosemite, CA, McNamara, D. E. and R.P. Buland, Ambient Noise Levels in the Continental United States, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am., 94, 4, , Ambient Noise Levels in the Continental United States, 2003 ANSS Backbone

Magnitude Threshold During the field seasons, 12 broadband seismic stations (yellow triangles) were added to the ANSS backbone network with support from the NSF Earthscope program. The map to the left shows the ANSS backbone network minimum moment magnitude (Mw) detectable in each grid cell at the end of Mw detection capability is improved in a broad region due to the addition of 12 new stations ANSS Backbone 2006 ANSS Backbone During the 2006 field seasons, 14 broadband seismic stations (red triangles, 2 in AK) were added to the ANSS backbone network. The map to the left shows the ANSS backbone network minimum moment magnitude (Mw) detectable in each grid cell at the end of Mw detection capability is improved in a broad region due to the addition of 14 new stations.

Detection Time The map to the left shows the time in minutes for the initial P- wave from an earthquake in each 1 degree grid cell to be detected by the first 5 stations in the 2003 ANSS Backbone Network. The P-wave travel time for an earthquake in each grid cell is modeled with the Tau-P method using the IASPEI91 Earth model (see McNamara et al., 2005 for method details). Detecting station distribution is determined from the minimum Mw detection results from the previous slides. References: McNamara, D., R. Buland and H. Benz, Capabilities of the Advanced National Seismic Network, Seismo. Res. Lett.,76, 2005.Capabilities of the Advanced National Seismic Network

Detection Time 2005 ANSS Backbone 2006 ANSS Backbone During the field seasons, 12 broadband seismic stations (yellow triangles) were added to the ANSS backbone network with support from the NSF Earthscope program. The map to the left shows the ANSS backbone network detection time in each grid cell at the end of Mw detection time is reduced in a broad region due to the addition of 12 new stations. During the 2006 field seasons, 14 broadband seismic stations (red triangles, 2 in AK) were added to the ANSS backbone network. The map to the left shows the ANSS backbone network detection time in each grid cell at the end of Mw detection time is improved in a broad region due to the addition of 14 new stations.

The map to the left shows the theoretical earthquake location error in each 1 degree grid cell for the combined 2003 ANSS Backbone network (BK, IU, II, US). We map the length of the major axis of the error ellipse in km. For this preliminary analysis we assume Surface source and use a P-wave fist arrival at each real-time station (see McNamara et al., 2005 for method details). Location Error References: McNamara, D. E., P. Earle, R.P. Buland and H. M. Benz, An Assessment of Proposed Upgrades to the ANSS Backbone and GSN, 17th Annual IRIS Workshop, June, WA, 2005.An Assessment of Proposed Upgrades to the ANSS Backbone and GSN

Location Error 2005 ANSS Backbone 2006 ANSS Backbone During the field seasons, 12 broadband seismic stations (yellow triangles) were added to the ANSS backbone network with support from the NSF Earthscope program. The map to the left shows the ANSS backbone network theoretical earthquake location error in each grid cell at the end of Location error is reduced in a broad region due to the addition of 12 new stations. During the 2006 field seasons, 14 broadband seismic stations (red triangles, 2 in AK) were added to the ANSS backbone network. The map to the left shows the ANSS backbone network location error in each grid cell at the end of Location error is reduced in a broad region due to the addition of 14 new stations.

Magnitude Threshold Contribution from Regional Networks IW Network: 13 new stations in Idaho, Montana, Wyoming and western Colorado lower the detection threshold to Mw~ for the region and detection time to < 30 sec near the highest concentration of stations in western Wyoming. Detection threshold is likely saturated around Mw~2.0 due to the short period filters and data sampling rate used by the ANSS NOC event detector. Also, high cultural noise sources occur at high frequencies near the source corner frequency (~30Hz) for small earthquakes (Mw~2.0). Detection Time