LIGO-G050650-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LIGO-G D 1 Toward Enabling Co-Located Interferometric Detectors to Provide Upper Limits on the Stochastic Gravitational Wave Background Nick Fotopoulos,
Advertisements

GWDAW9 – Annecy December 15-18, 2004 A. Di Credico Syracuse University LIGO-G Z 1 Gravitational wave burst vetoes in the LIGO S2 and S3 data analyses.
GWDAW, Dec 2003 Shawhan, Christensen, Gonzalez1 LIGO Inspiral Veto Studies Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech) Nelson Christensen (Carleton College) Gabriela.
GWDAW-10 (December 14, 2005, University of Texas at Brownsville, U.S.A.) Data conditioning and veto for TAMA burst analysis Masaki Ando and Koji Ishidoshiro.
GWDAW-8 (December 17-20, 2003, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA) Search for burst gravitational waves with TAMA data Masaki Ando Department of Physics, University.
Comparing different searches for gravitational-wave bursts on simulated LIGO and VIRGO data Michele Zanolin -MIT on behalf of the LIGO-VIRGO joint working.
E12 Report from the Burst Group Burst Analysis Group and the Glitch Investigation Team.
LIGO-G Z Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates Laura Cadonati Massachusetts Institute of Technology LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G DM. Landry – Amaldi5 July 9, 2003 Laser Interferometer Gravitational Wave Observatory Monitoring LIGO Data During the S2 Science Run Michael.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
3 May 2011 VESF DA schoolD. Verkindt 1 Didier Verkindt Virgo-LAPP CNRS - Université de Savoie VESF Data Analysis School Data Quality and vetos.
Data Characterization in Gravitational Waves Soma Mukherjee Max Planck Institut fuer Gravitationsphysik Golm, Germany. Talk at University of Texas, Brownsville.
LIGO-G Z LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Upper Limits on the Rate of Gravitational Wave Bursts from the First LIGO Science Run Edward Daw Louisiana.
A coherent null stream consistency test for gravitational wave bursts Antony Searle (ANU) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji, Albert Lazzarini, Leo.
The Role of Data Quality in S5 Burst Analyses Lindy Blackburn 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge,
LIGO-G Z Peter Shawhan, for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting April 25, 2006 Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in Data from the.
LIGO-G M GWDAW, December LIGO Burst Search Analysis Laura Cadonati, Erik Katsavounidis LIGO-MIT.
Analysis of nonstationarity in LIGO S5 data using the NoiseFloorMon output A proposal for a seismic Data Quality flag. R. Stone for the LSC The Center.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
M. Principe, GWDAW-10, 16th December 2005, Brownsville, Texas Modeling the Performance of Networks of Gravitational-Wave Detectors in Bursts Search Maria.
Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from the fifth science run of LIGO Soma Mukherjee CGWA, UTB GWDAW11, Potsdam, 12/18/06 LIGO-G
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
S.Klimenko, December 2003, GWDAW Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), G.Mitselmakher (UF),
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 1 “Data quality studies for burst analysis of Virgo data acquired during.
S.Klimenko, July 14, 2007, Amaldi7,Sydney, G Z Detection and reconstruction of burst signals with networks of gravitational wave detectors S.Klimenko,
LSC glitch group report Shourov K. Chatterji for the LSC glitch group LSC/Virgo meeting 2007 October 24 Hannover, Germany LIGO-G Z.
Veto Selection for Gravitational Wave Event Searches Erik Katsavounidis 1 and Peter Shawhan 2 1 Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139,
Amaldi-7 meeting, Sydney, Australia, July 8-14, 2007 LIGO-G Z All-Sky Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts during the fifth LSC Science Run Igor.
LIGO- G D Burst Search Report Stan Whitcomb LIGO Caltech LSC Meeting LIGO1 Plenary Session 18 August 2003 Hannover.
Searching for gravitational-wave bursts with the Q Pipeline Shourov K. Chatterji LIGO Science Seminar 2005 August 2.
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Multidimensional classification of burst triggers from LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Status of MNFTmon Soma Mukherjee +, Roberto Grosso* + University of Texas at Brownsville * University of Nuernberg, Germany LSC Detector.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
1 LIGO-G Z Glitch and veto studies in LIGO’s S5 search for gravitational wave bursts Erik Katsavounidis MIT for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Laura Cadonati, MIT For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS meeting Tampa, FL April 16, 2005 LIGO Hanford ObservatoryLIGO Livingston Observatory New.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida for.
S.Klimenko, G Z, December 21, 2006, GWDAW11 Coherent detection and reconstruction of burst events in S5 data S.Klimenko, University of Florida.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
S.Klimenko, LSC, August 2004, G Z BurstMon S.Klimenko, A.Sazonov University of Florida l motivation & documentation l description & results l.
S.Klimenko, G Z, March 20, 2006, LSC meeting First results from the likelihood pipeline S.Klimenko (UF), I.Yakushin (LLO), A.Mercer (UF),G.Mitselmakher.
Coherent network analysis technique for discriminating GW bursts from instrumental noise Patrick Sutton (CIT) in collaboration with Shourov Chatterji,
LIGO-G Z Confidence Test for Waveform Consistency of LIGO Burst Candidate Events Laura Cadonati LIGO Laboratory Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Data Analysis Algorithm for GRB triggered Burst Search Soumya D. Mohanty Center for Gravitational Wave Astronomy University of Texas at Brownsville On.
Multidimensional classification analysis of kleine Welle triggers in LIGO S5 run Soma Mukherjee for the LSC University of Texas at Brownsville GWDAW12,
S.Klimenko, March 2003, LSC Burst Analysis in Wavelet Domain for multiple interferometers LIGO-G Z Sergey Klimenko University of Florida l Analysis.
LIGO-G Z GWDAW9 December 17, Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO Science Run 2 Data John G. Zweizig LIGO / Caltech for the LIGO.
S.Klimenko, December 2003, GWDAW Burst detection method in wavelet domain (WaveBurst) S.Klimenko, G.Mitselmakher University of Florida l Wavelets l Time-Frequency.
LIGO-G All-Sky Burst Search in the First Year of the LSC S5 Run Laura Cadonati, UMass Amherst For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration GWDAW Meeting,
Peter Shawhan The University of Maryland & The LIGO Scientific Collaboration Penn State CGWP Seminar March 27, 2007 LIGO-G Z Reaching for Gravitational.
LSC meeting – Mar05 Livingston, LA A. Di Credico Syracuse University Glitch investigations with kleineWelle Reporting on work done by several people: L.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
LIGO-G Z Searching for gravitational wave bursts with the new global detector network Shourov K. Chatterji INFN Sezioni di Roma / Caltech LIGO.
LIGO-G Z Introduction to QScan Shourov K. Chatterji SciMon Camp LIGO Livingston Observatory 2006 August 18.
Abstract: We completed the tuning of the analysis procedures of the AURIGA-LIGO joint burst search and we are in the process of verifying our results.
LIGO-G Z The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration APS Meeting.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
LIGO-G Z Results from LIGO Observations Stephen Fairhurst University of Wisconsin - Milwaukee on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Advanced Virgo Detector Monitoring and Data Quality
The Q Pipeline search for gravitational-wave bursts with LIGO
Igor Yakushin, LIGO Livingston Observatory
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
Coherent detection and reconstruction
Coherent Coincident Analysis of LIGO Burst Candidates
Performance of the WaveBurst algorithm on LIGO S2 playground data
Presentation transcript:

LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis Workshop University of Texas at Brownsville 2005 December 14

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December 14 2 Detector characterization tasks Monitor a large number of auxiliary interferometer and environmental channels Near real time feedback for control and commissioning Histograms of trigger significance Measures of detector non-stationarity Trigger rates as a function of time Develop event based vetoes Time lag correlation studies of veto efficiency Use simulated burst injections to test for veto safety Reject epochs of poor data quality Detailed time and frequency domain studies of interesting events Existing burst search tools can be applied to these tasks

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December 14 3 KleineWelle trigger generator Identifies statistically significant clusters of signal energy in the dyadic wavelet transform of a whitened timeseries. For S4, triggers were generated for ~50 interferometer and environmental channels at each LIGO site. kleineWelle triggers used to: Provide daily feedback for data quality investigations Study correlation between triggers and candidate bursts to develop safe and effective event based vetoes Evaluate effect of epoch vetoes based on data quality flags (dust, enhanced seismic activity, etc.)

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December 14 4 KleineWelle daily statistics

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December 14 5 Tests for correlated triggers Time between GW and auxiliary channel triggers:

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December 14 6 Event based vetoes Identify channels that show a statistically significant correlation with the gravitational-wave channel triggers Avoid false rejection by studying simulated bursts that are physically injected into the detector Unsafe channelSafe channel

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December 14 7 Data quality epoch vetoes Reject periods of anomalous detector behaviour Based on kleineWelle, BurstMon, and many other studies For S4, a number of epoch vetoes were applied: One of two Hanford detectors not in lock 30 seconds before the end of each lock segment Increased seismic noise at the resonant frequency of the seismic isolation system Anti-symmetric port photodiode saturation High wind velocities at Hanford Injection of simulated gravitational wave signals For S4, repository of data quality flags maintained on web For S5, moving to a database solution

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December 14 8 BurstMon Implementation of WaveBurst unmodeled burst search algorithm applied to rapid detector characterization Near real-time figure of merit for detector non-stationarity Fraction of detected events that consist of clusters of more than two time-frequency pixels:

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December 14 9 Event display Permits a detailed study of a large number of interferometer and environmental channels around the time of interesting events Results published on-line as html reports Displays lock segment information Displays time series and time-frequency spectrograms Guide search for potential veto channels Incorporates parameter estimation for candidate events Applied to candidate events and simulated burst injections For S5, automatically applied to study the most significant events on a daily basis

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December Event display example Hardware injection into H1 and H2

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December Event display example (cont.)

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December Q Scan Based upon Q Pipeline search for unmodeled bursts Multi-resolution time-frequency search for statistically significant excess signal energy See tomorrow’s poster for more information Easy to use configuration utility permits scanning of hundreds of interferometer and environmental channels Displays channels with statistically significant signal content Produces multi-resolution time-frequency spectrograms Currently incorporating into event display: Automatically applied to most significant events, simulated burst injections, candidate events, etc. Results published on web

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December Q Scan: hardware injection Simulated 235 Hz Q 9 sinusoidal Gaussian burst physically injected with SNR ~150 into the H1 detector Search for potentially related time-frequency structure in auxiliary and environmental channels Anti-symmetric port orthogonal phase signal not a safe veto

LIGO-G Z Shourov Chatterji - GWDAW December Q Scan: environmental injection Intentional seismic and acoustic excitations used to study environmental coupling Related signal observed in gravitational wave channel and accelerometer mounted on anti-symmetric port output table Suggestive of potential veto channel