MISSION ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UJTL Ontology Effort TMCM Nelson And Marti Hall. Overview Vision for the UJTL and METLs Scenario Mapping Findings Proposed POA&M outline.
Advertisements

EXPERIENCE WITH UAS,s. Structure Concep of Use and Needs UAS Testing in Spanish Scenario Way Forward Conclusions.
Command and Control for Border Protection
Managing a Multi-Function Radar from an operational perspective
L3 Communications.
Efs UkENDo 1 Research Institute for Communication, Information Processing and Ergonomics Ergonomics and Information Systems KIE 9-1 Support concept for.
Air Force Core Functions
Evaluating the Benefit of Networked EW Systems
InformationInWarfareIW-100 College of Aerospace Doctrine, Research, and Education.
Airpower: the Industry Vision
Future Command and Control The Interoperability Imperative 29 Oct 07 Maj Gen Bill Rajczak USJFCOM J8A.
Ergonomics and Information Systems RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR COMMUNICATION, INFORMATION PROCESSING, AND ERGONOMICS FGAN A Knowledge-based Human-Machine Interface.
Overview An emerging challenge A belated response Debating the alternatives – Air-Sea Battle – A distant blockade – Maritime denial Conclusions.
1 NATO WORKSHOP Visualization of Massive Military Multimedia Datasets June Defence Research Establishment Valcartier (DREV)
Sensors and location technologies – the front end of ISR
MILITARY AIR VEHICLE AS A SYSTEM György Seres DSc
April 28th, 2015 USMC IT Day LtGen Jon M. “Dog” Davis
ESSENCE CHALLENGES FUTURE. BALLISTIC MISSILE CAPABILITY – 1972.
April 2010 U.S. Army Space & Missile Defense Command/Army Forces Strategic Command Forces Strategic Command Future Warfare Center Advanced Warfare Environment.
New Army Terms Table D-1. New Army terms Army positive control Army procedural control civil support1 combat power (Army) command and controlwarfare command.
C4ISR and Information Warfare
Geodynamic Situational Awareness for Intelligence Operations
MILITARY AIR VEHICLE, AS A SYSTEM György Seres DSc
Army Doctrine Publication (ADP) 3-37; and Army
C4ISR via OA Mike Danjczek November, 2014 Copyright GTS 2014.
John Gruetzmacher, Lockheed Martin
2009 M&S LEADERSHIP SUMMIT REGIONAL INITIATIVES IN MODELING & SIMULATION FAR WEST John Illgen Sector Director, Modeling & Simulation Northrop Grumman Information.
GROUP CONTROL CENTRE K. Suchendar, Sc ‘E’, DRDL. AKASH WEAPON SYSTEM - GROUP CONTROL CENTER Commands upto 4 batteries Display of Air Situation Picture.
Radar Video Surveillance
Team 2 Initial Proposal Meeting Pierson Team Lead & Systems Engineer Precision Company, Inc.
Joint Dynamic Engagement Model JDEM 14 August 2008 Henry Neimeier.
Previous Slide TRADOC DCSINT Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command TRADOC DCSINT.
MILITARY SIMULATIONS Note: inclusion of particular simulation models in this discussion is based solely on the availability of information on the internet.
A Tactical Perspective. Airspace challenges Military Training “vs” Renewable Energy Renewable Energy Impacts –Military mission –Economy Balancing need.
Randy Scott USSTRATCOM/J72 Dep Chief, Modeling & Simulations and Intel Scenario Development Div MDST WARFIGHTER SUPPORT ISSUE UNCLASSIFIED.
WHY REGIONAL DEFENSE? WALES, Ltd. Prepared By: Mr. A. Hermetz WALES, Ltd., Israel 1 st Annual Israel Multinational BMD Conference & Exhibition UNCLASSIFIED.
Afloat EW and IW Systems Topic 14 Afloat EW/IW Systems
UAS Combat Threat Survivability SURVICE Engineering Company
Working in the Virtual Environment Practical Experience
Pg 1 of 10 AGI AWarE/STK Integration Marc Neely Science Applications International Corporation (SAIC) Space and Missile Defense Command Battle.
C4ISR and Information Warfare Naval Weapons Systems.
Navy in JIAMD Programs – The Way Ahead Sea-Based Terminal Working Group Update to NDIA RDML Brad Hicks Deputy Surface Warfare for Combat Systems/Weapons.
M&S Based System Development and Testing in a Joint Net-Centric Environment Bernard P. Zeigler, Ph.D., Co-Director, Arizona Center for Integrative Modeling.
Assessing the Military Benefits of NEC Using a Generic Kill-Chain Approach David Nevell QinetiQ Malvern 21 ISMOR September 2004.
“Missile Defence Factor in Establishing a New Security Environment” International BMD Conference “Missile Defence Factor in Establishing a New Security.
MAY 2010 WALES, Ltd. AirBorne EO Sensor for BMD - 1/17 UNCLASSIFIED Approved for Public Release - 10-MDA-5450 (04 MAY 10) AIRBORNE ELECTRO-OPTICAL SENSORS.
JLENS The Joint Land Attack Cruise Missile Defense Elevated Netted Sensor System.
CBR and CNP Applied to Litoral Reconnaissance Goal: –Apply the research on the integration of CBR mission specification with CNP task allocation towards.
CNA Mainstreaming mine warfare: Fleet initiatives 26 July 2001 MINWARA conference CNA Sabrina R. Edlow CNA.
Warfare Communities of the Fleet and Marine Forces
UNCLASSIFIED 2/6/2016 7:56:41 PM UNCLASSIFIED Page 1 of 7 Pages Space Policy Issues - Space Warfare Definitions - 15 June, 2010.
Measure of System Effectiveness Missile Defense System By Alfred Terris UNCL:ASSIFIED1.
USJFCOM 27 Jul EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW Col David Brown, USAF JFIIT Commander UNCLASSIFIED Joint Fires Integration and Interoperability Team (JFIIT)
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML MARK R. MILLIKEN Navy International Program Office.
Information Fusion Command and Control (IFC2) The OTBSAF is generating the simulated ground truth as well as displaying it in the OTBSAF GUI.
Authorized for Public Release IAW SPR dtd RDML Mark R. Milliken Deputy Assistant Secretary of the Navy, International Programs (DASN IP)
Strike, Land Attack and Air Defense Marine Corps Systems Command
Fires Center of Excellence MG David D. Halverson Infantry Warfighting Conference September 2010.
Persistent Surveillance – Aerostats for Border Security
Introduction The JAAR-RL (Joint AAR – Resource Library) is a collection of AAR components from all the different services. JAAR (collective) engineers.
FLTLT Matthew Murphy Growler Transition Office – Air Force Headquarters UNCLASSIFIED.
Designing Data Exchange Experiments Using Architectural Techniques
Instantiation of the Concept in GAMMA Prototypes
THE MANY ASPECTS OF C4I INTEROPERABILITY
Joint Protection of the Sea Base
NDIA Targets, UAVs and Range Operations
Force Packaging.
MiG-29 aircraft upgrade.
DDR&E Advanced Capabilities Overview
Presentation transcript:

MISSION ENGINEERING APPLICATIONS

STRAITS OF HORMUZ Integrated Air and Missile Defense Scenario Multiple Battlegroups and Areas of Responsibility (AOR) AOR 3 Joint Concepts of Operations Tracking Sharing across AORs Build Single Integrated Air Picture Fuse Tracks & Combat ID Composite Tracking Assess Capabilities Assess Key Performance Parameters IAA AOR 1 IAA Intelligence Surveillance Reconnaissance Network IAA IAA IAA AOR 5 AOR 4 AOR 2 Composite Tracking IAA = Inter-Area Coordination Joint Warfighter Mission – Protect multiple land & sea areas of responsibility

Mission Engineering Topics Launcher Command Post Launcher Launcher Radar Radar

Threat Definition Mission Simulation System Exerciser Simulates Complex Threat Laydowns and Maneuvers Threat Database Enemy Air Strikes System Exerciser Hijacked Aircraft Jamming TBMs Cruise Missiles Injects threat for HWIL & Sim Maneuvers Rapid and Complex Threat Generation TBMS, Bomber & Cruise Missile

Surveillance Coverage Analysis Tools for Sensor Placement Studies Graphical Sensor Polygon Displays Intervisibility Profiles for Detailed Coverage Analysis Sensor Capability at Specified Altitudes Azimuth and Elevation Profiles Includes Effects Terrain and Jamming Includes Radar Cross Section Sensor Steering Scripted Pointing and Activation Times Event-Based Triggers Event-Triggered Sensor Activation Allows specified sensors to be turned off Emissions Control (EMCON) planning Intervisibility Displays

Surveillance Coverage & Composite Track Sensor Coverage & Composite Track Capability Estimates Deployment Configurations Area of Operations Weapon System 1 - Blue Weapon System 2 - Pink Example Intervis Display: 10 m RCS 100 m Altitude Weapon System 3 - Yellow Elevated Sensor - White

Single Integrated Air Picture Multiple Sensor Models Radar, Signal Intelligence, Passive RF, Infra-Red Combat ID (Composite Score) IFF Interrogation (Rules/Probabilities for IFF at Detection and at Launch) Target Classification Non-Cooperative Target Recognition (NCTR) Procedural Identification Scores based on track locations and actions Track Networks Track Areas of Interest and Filters Track Fusion Capabilities Rules for Fusing Local and Remote Data Target Identification Scores Assessment and Decision-Making Processes Assessment and Prioritization of Tracks as Threats Commander Displays of SIAP

Coordinated Engagement Planning Early Engagement Planning Upon receipt of initial track/threat assessment Early Engagement Reporting Launch Time, Intercept Time, Planned Probability of Kill, Engagement Supporters Weapon Selection and Deconfliction Rules Hierarchical Selection Criteria Coordinated Fire Doctrine/Cumulative PK Adjustable based on weapon inventory Track Forwarding Engagement Quality Track Data Launch from Remote Data

Joint Assessment Wargaming System (JAWS) CYBERSPACE SPACE AIR SEA LAND JSWS CGS C4ISR SYS ASAS RWS Mission-in-the-Loop Joint Assessment Wargaming System (JAWS) JAWS FUSION CENTER DIGISIM ` Driver ADCP TAOM USMC EW/C Camp Pendleton RNG 1553B (Class 2H) S - TADIL J TADILJ Patriot Redstone and Ft. Bliss MTS Albuquerque Aegis AAW Dahlgren RE BMD Moorestown CT X.25 VMF IBS I JREAP C MCE E3 THAAD Tactical FMS/D ETEDDS RES TTC SIMPLE (TADIL J, S TADIL J, IBS S) AOR GW at JNIC CDLMS JADE @ SED LAN Live Satellite Element JRE TIPOFF NT (Class 2) Class (2H) XML Regional JRE SBIRS / MCS Azusa JTAGS (DM3P) C&D Adj VMF (EW to GMD and C2BMC) JTT I & IBS CTT HR A STATS ESI MP(2) GFC(2) I/S I EWS N P Series FBX CNIP F-16 F-18 NAVY E2 MEADS AWACS GMD JLENS UAV SLAM RAAM JSTARS SBIRS NOTIONAL HWIL Systems in-the-Loop