B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL 050417 1 The Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory Site Independent Study The process The science Infrastructure requirements.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trigger issues for KM3NeT the large scale underwater neutrino telescope the project objectives design aspects from the KM3NeT TDR trigger issues outlook.
Advertisements

Neutrinos in CHIPP Allan Clark Neuchâtel Meeting June 2004.
J. Kotcher HEPAP Meeting, July 13-14, 2007, Washington, DC 1 Deep Underground Science & Engineering Laboratory (DUSEL) Jon Kotcher HEPAP Meeting Washington,
11/05/06GDR-Neutrino à Orsay (LAL)1 GDR-Neutrino (10-11 mai 2006) L. Mosca (CEA-Saclay) The MEMPHYS project (Laboratory excavation) MEgaton Mass PHYSics.
B.Sadoulet Boulder Intro 1/5/05 1 Boulder DUSEL Study Workshop Introduction Apologies: a difficult date! The DUSEL Process The DUSEL (Solicitation 1) Study.
Position of the Czech Republic on the European Strategy in Particle Physics Current main activities in particle physics * Plans for the future Recommendations.
European Strategy for Particle Physics 2013 Preparatory group->Strategy group Individual town meetings Town meeting in Krakow: september 2012 Drafting.
Underground Facilities Stub 2 Stub 2a,3 ‘H’ Area JIF Area The underground research facilities have evolved since dark matter studies began at Boulby. There.
DOE Neutrino Program Plans
May 17, Capabilities Description of a Rapid Prototyping Capability for Earth-Sun System Sciences RPC Project Team Mississippi State University.
PD Connection with National Underground Lab R. Rameika Fermilab October 8, 2004.
B.Sadoulet CDMS DUSEL The Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory Site Independent Study The process The science Infrastructure requirements.
Henderson DUSEL Physics & Geoscience Workshops Lee Petersen, CNA Consulting Engineers Greg Hulne, Miller Dunwiddie Dale Holland, Dunham Associates.
Committee on Science, Engineering and Public Policy Board on Physics and Astronomy Committee on Setting Priorities for NSF’s Large Research Facility Projects.
B.Sadoulet Blacksburg conclusions (updated from discussions) 1 Blacksburg DUSEL Worshop Earth Science and Engineering Tentative Conclusions What have we.
Department of Energy Office of Science Yet Another Report from DOE Office of High Energy Physics Presented to SLUO September 10, 2006 Dr. Robin.
B.Sadoulet DUSEL Henderson 5/4/06 1 DUSEL Site Independent (S1) study Bernard Sadoulet Dept. of Physics /LBNL UC Berkeley UC Institute for Nuclear and.
NSF VISION in PARTICLE and NUCLEAR ASTROPHYSICS Richard N. Boyd  The Present  Dark Matter  Ultra high energy cosmic rays  Ultra high energy gamma rays.
Interdisciplinary and Interagency Cooperation in High Energy Physics Barry Barish BPA 5-Nov-02.
The neutrons detection involves the use of gadolinium which has the largest thermal neutron capture cross section ever observed. The neutron capture on.
B.Sadoulet DUSEL Blacksburg Introduction 1 Blacksburg Workshop DUSEL process Solicitation 1 Workshops: Berkeley, Blacksburg, Boulder, Maryland(?) Goals.
Geosciences in an Underground Laboratory:
International collaboration in high energy physics experiments  All large high energy physics experiments today are strongly international.  A necessary.
CSM/CNA UNO R&D Proposal Lee Petersen –CNA Consulting Engineers Mark Kuchta –Colorado School of Mines Requested budget: $200k/year for two years Cavern.
Reorganization at NCAR Presentation to the UCAR Board of Trustees February 25, 2004.
B.Sadoulet DUSEL seminar 3/4/05 1 The Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory History and process The science Infrastructure requirement Implementation.
HEPAP and P5 Report DIET Federation Roundtable JSPS, Washington, DC; April 29, 2015 Andrew J. Lankford HEPAP Chair University of California, Irvine.
Superconducting Cavities Development at Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Dmitri Denisov DIET Federation Roundtable, Washington DC, April
LSC – Hanford, WA 11th November 2003 The View from NSF Funding: FY 03 (actual) & FY 04 (prospects) Funding Opportunities for GP Research Some Developments.
Fermilab Neutrino Beamline to DUSEL Mike Martens Fermilab PAC November 3, 2009.
Earth Sciences at DUSEL: Ideas and Progress to Date Eric Sonnenthal & Brian McPherson.
Deep Underground Science and Engineering Lab Hamish Robertson for the DUSEL S1 P/Is: E.W. Beier, C. Fairhurst, T.C. Onstott, R.G.H. Robertson, B. Sadoulet,
Induced Slip on a Large-Scale Frictional Discontinuity: Coupled Flow and Geomechanics Antonio Bobet Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN Virginia Tech,
Deep Earth Observatory and Laboratory for Life, Fluid Flow and Rock Processes T. C. Onstott, Princeton U. H. F. Wang, U. of Wisconsin-Madison Geoscience.
Recommendations for Science at SNOLAB Andrew Hime On behalf of the Experiment Advisory Committee Aug. 17, 2005 SNOLAB Surface Building.
OIL AND GOVERNANCE State-owned Enterprises and the World Energy Supply GEMBA 11.
Physics Priorities S. Dawson July 11, 2007 Fermilab Steering Committee Meeting.
1 DUSEL and Gravitational Waves Vuk Mandic University of Minnesota 03/17/08.
All this and so much more… Biology Technology Materials Engineering Mathematics Polar Nano Physics Climate Change Earth Science Astronomy Education & Human.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Peter Bond Deputy Director for Science and Technology October 29, 2005 New Frontiers at RHIC Workshop.
Rock Mechanics/Geophysics Larry Costin, Sandia National Labs Paul Young, University of Toronto Discussion Points November 12, 2004 DUSEL Workshop.
P5 and the HEP Program A. Seiden Fermilab June 2, 2003.
System Level Science and System Level Models Ian Foster Argonne National Laboratory University of Chicago Improving IAM Representations of a Science-Driven.
DUSEL: Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory Brian McPherson, New Mexico Tech Overview of the S-1 Geoscience Report to the NSF HUSEP Capstone.
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Chapter 6: Integrating Knowledge and Action Scott Kaminski ME / 9 / 2005.
1 7th Framework Programme “Ideas” 2   Basic research has an important impact on economic performance   Europe is not making the most of its research.
A new underground laboratory at Frejus Jacques Bouchez CEA-SACLAY NNN05-Aussois April 7, 2005 Historical overview Latest developments Outlook.
Underground Laboratories and Low Background Experiments Pia Loaiza Laboratoire Souterrain de Modane Bordeaux, March 16 th, 2006.
International Atomic Energy Agency Roles and responsibilities for development of disposal facilities Phil Metcalf Workshop on Strategy and Methodologies.
E u r o p e a n C o m m i s s i o nCommunity Research Global Change and Ecosystems EU environmental research : Part B Policy objectives  Lisbon strategy.
Alain Blondel -- After the ISS -- What did ISS achieve? 1. Established a « baseline » for the accelerator study 2. Rejuvenated simulation and study of.
Department of Energy Office of Science  FY 2007 Request for Office of Science is 14% above FY 2006 Appropriation  FY 2007 Request for HEP is 8% above.
1 SBIR/STTR Overview Wang Yongqiang. 2 Federal SBIR/STTR Program ‣ A +$2Billion funding program set-aside for small businesses seeking to early stage.
B.Sadoulet CDMS DUSEL The Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory The process Themes DUSEL and CDMS Bernard Sadoulet Dept. of Physics.
Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory at Homestake1 Richard DiGennaro, LBNL DUSEL Project Manager 20 June 2008 Facility Planning for DUSEL.
John Womersley 1/13 Fermilab’s Future John Womersley Fermilab May 2004.
P5 Report: The Particle Physics Roadmap 1 A. Seiden Fermilab May 14, 2007.
The cosmic connection There is a very close connection between particle physics and astrophysics. I’m going to show two examples: Type II supernovas Dark.
Steering Group Meeting 10:30 – 12:30 am CDT Monday, July 23, 2007 Y2K.
Detector R&D through the NSF PHY division. Jim Shank/Jim Whitmore, NSF CPAD Meeting Arlington, TX 5-7 October, 2015.
Solar Neutrinos & Homestake or Something new under the Sun Kevin T. Lesko Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory Berkeley, CA.
CPM 2012, Fermilab D. MacFarlane & N. Holtkamp The Snowmass process and SLAC plans for HEP.
Particle Physics Sector Young-Kee Kim / Greg Bock Leadership Team Strategic Planning Winter Workshop January 29, 2013.
23/11/05BENE meeting at CERN1 (22-25 November 2005) L. Mosca (CEA-Saclay) The MEMPHYS project MEgaton Mass PHYSics in a Large International Underground.
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Charge for APS Neutrino Study
WP4 Positioning European Astroparticle Physics in the world-wide context WP leader CNRS Partners: FOM, IFIN-HH, FRS-FNRS/FWO, FCT Total work: 22 months.
Stanford Linear Accelerator
Preliminary Project Execution Plan
Presentation transcript:

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL The Deep Underground Science and Engineering Laboratory Site Independent Study The process The science Infrastructure requirements The international context Bernard Sadoulet Dept. of Physics /LBNL UC Berkeley UC Institute for Nuclear and Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (INPAC) 6 Principal Investigators B.Sadoulet, UC Berkeley (Astrophysics and Cosmology) Eugene Beier, U. of Pennsylvania (Particle Physics) Hamish Robertson, U. of Washington (Nuclear Physics) Charles Fairhurst, U. of Minnesota (Geology and Engineering) Tullis C. Onstott, Princeton (Geomicrobiology) James Tiedje, Michigan State (Microbiology)

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL DUSEL Process Solicitation 1: Community wide study of Scientific roadmap: from Nuclear/Particle/Astro Physics to Geo Physics/Chemistry/Microbiology/Engineering Generic infrastructure requirements Kimballton SNOlab WIPP Henderson Mine Homestake Soudan San Jacinto Cascades Proposal supported by all 8 sites Approved by NSF (January 05) PI’s went to Washington 28 February to 2 March to clarify goals and time scale Solicitation 2 : Preselection of ≈3 sites 8 proposals submitted February 28. Panel late April. Decisions public by late June  Solicitation 3  Selection of initial site(s)  MRE and Presidential Budget (09) -> See

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Solicitation 1 Organization 6 PI’s responsible for the study in particular scientific quality/ objectivity 14 working groups Infrastructure requirements/management Education and outreach 2 consultation groups The site consultation group (Solicitation 2 sites) The initiative coordination group: major stakeholders (e.g. National Labs) 3 workshops building on NUSL/NESS Berkeley Aug 4-7 Blacksburg Nov Boulder Jan 5-7 Interim report April 22 before the Sol 2 panel meets Working Groups/Sites: July 05 => Finalize content of report, External review à la NRC Rolling out workshop in Washington Early Fall 05 Printed report directed at generalists Agencies OMB/OSTP/Congress cf. Quantum Universe +Web based reports with technical facts for scientists and programs monitors

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Originality of the process Community-wide Site Independent: Science driven! Multidisciplinary from the start Not only physics. astrophysics but Earth sciences, biology, engineering Internal strategy inside NSF : interest many directorates ->MRE line NSF=lead agency but involvement of other agencies:DOE (HEP/Nuclear, Basic Sciences), NASA (Astrobiology), NIH, USGS + industry Adaptive Strategy This is an experimental science facility, not an observatory Specifically adaptive strategy to take into account The evolution of science International environment ( available facilities -e.g. SNOLAB, MegaScience coord.) Budgetary realities Excavate as we go ≠LN Gran Sasso Potentially multi-sites Although some advantages of a single site in terms of technical infrastructure and visibility not necessary provide we have a common management (multi-campus concept) variety of rock type and geological history closer to various universities (important for student involvement) Modules that can be deployed independently (in time or space) Decoupling of large detector from deep science ($1B-$2B)= mega-science decision taken outside the physics community

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Rare Process Physics needs low cosmic- ray rates

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Major Questions in Physics What are the properties of the neutrinos? Are neutrinos their own antiparticle? 3rd generation of neutrinoless double beta decay. (250kg ->1 ton) What is the remaining, and presently unknown, parameters of the neutrino mass matrix?  13 ? hierarchy of masses? CP symmetry? Do protons decay? Current theories ≈ within factor 100 of current limits >factor 10 possible=> may allow a spectacular discovery! Immediately related to the completion of our understanding of particle and nuclear physics the mystery of matter-antimatter asymmetry Surprises very likely!

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Major Questions in Astrophysics What is the nature of the dark matter in the universe? e.g. weakly interacting massive particles (WIMPs) ? Supersymmetry? Complementary to LHC/ ILC. What is the low-energy spectrum of neutrinos from the sun? sun but also fundamental properties of neutrinos. Neutrinos from Supernovae: Long term enterprise for galactic SN! Relic SN neutrinos Local galaxies Gravitational detectors + optical ≈ 1 day later Underground accelerator (cf. Luna) -> Nuclear cross sections important for astrophysics and cosmology Follow on surprises and new ideas

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Geoscience: The Ever Changing Earth Processes taking place in fractured rock masses Cracks =>Dependence on the physical dimensions and time scale involved. –in situ investigation of the Hydro-Thermal-Mechanical-Chemical- Biological (HTBCB) interactions at work –This understanding is critical for a number of problems of great scientific and societal importance ground water flow transport of foreign substances energetic slip on faults and fractures. Approach the conditions prevalent in the regions where earthquakes naturally occur help us answer questions such as  Earth crust and tectonic plates motions?  Onset and propagation of seismic slip on a fault?  Prediction of earthquakes? Requires A deep laboratory, with long term access (>20yr) Which rock? Initially any kind would be interesting Eventually all types should be available internationally igneous, metamorphic and sedimentary (+salt)

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Subsurface Engineering Mastery of the rock What are the limits to large excavations at depth?  petroleum boreholes: 10km Ø 10cm  deepest mine shafts: 4km Ø 5m  DUSEL experimental areas: 10-60m at a depth between 1 and 3km Much experience will be gained through the instrumentation and long term monitoring of such cavities at DUSEL Technologies to modify rock characteristics e.g. in order to improve recovery: go beyond hydrofracture, role of biotechnologies Transparent Earth Can progress in geophysical sensing and computing methods be applied to make the earth “transparent”, i.e. to “see” real time processes ? Remote sensing methods tested/validated by mining back In particular, relationship between surface measurements and subsurface deformations and stresses: important for study of the solid Earth Great societal impact  Large underground constructions  Groundwater flow,  Ore /oil recovery methods and mining/boring technology  Contaminant transport  Long-term isolation of hazardous and toxic wastes  Carbon sequestration and hydrocarbon storage underground (sedimentary rock)

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL A recent breakthrough Cells/ml or Cells/g Depth (km) ? Fig. 2 of Earthlab report S. African data + Onstott et al. 1998

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Major Questions in Geomicrobiology How does the interplay between biology and geology shape the subsurface? Role of microbes in HTMCB e.g. dissolution/secretions which may modify slipage or permeability What fuels the deep biosphere? Energy sources ("geogas": H2, CH4, etc.) ≠ photosynthesis? How to sustain a livelihood in a hostile environment? How deeply does life extend into the Earth? What are the lower limit of the biosphere, imposed by temperature, pressure and energy restrictions? => What fraction does subsurface life represents in the biosphere? Need for long term access as deep as possible Current technology requires horizontal probes (negative pressure to minimize contamination ) Long term in situ observation and access to the walls Deeper bores with remote observation modules

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Major Questions in Biology What can we learn on evolution and genomics? Isolated from the surface gene pool for very long periods of time. Primitive life processes today? How different? How do they evolve? Phage? The role of the underground in the life cycle Did life on the earth's surface come from underground? Has the subsurface acted as refuge? What signs of subsurface life on Mars? Is there dark life as we don't know it? Unique biochemistry, e.g. non-nucleic acid based? Signatures? Potential biotechnology and pharmaceutical applications! A reservoir for unexpected and biotechnologically useful enzymes? Same requirements as geomicrobiology + sequencing and DNA/protein synthetic facilities

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Infrastructure Requirements Adaptive strategy: Not necessarily at the same site! Depth Very Deep: ≥6000 mwe unique facility in the world for physics, astrophysics earth science biology easy access, long-term cf. SNOLab Very Large Caverns (1Mm 3 ) Deeper is better Limits by rock, economics Hopefully >2700mwe (Kamiokande) Intermediate depths automatic Rock type Physics: irrelevant if “competent rock”, control Rn! Earth Sciences: Any deep site will yield extremely important result Eventually multiple rock types (at least internationally) Pristine rock Earth science/biology: not dewatered or destressed ≠ Physics Absolutely pristine for ancient life/life not as we know it No water contamination due to site exploration/construction or previous mining Variety of physical scales, long time scales

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Infrastructure Requirements (2) Distance from accelerators Same Megaton detector for proton decay and neutrino long baseline >1000km ( km) for neutrinos 3 GeV but new ideas in Europe (low energy beta 130km) Access Horizontal vs vertical: not a strong discriminator if large hoists 24/7/365 desirable but experiments can be automatized (but IMB experience) Guaranteed long term access important: years Easy personnel access (including casual and E&O) Proximity to universities and airport desirable Safety and specific requirements Proactive, meeting or exceed codes, MSHA,OSHA But potentially dangerous experiments: large cryogenic (Ar,He,Ne), fault slippage If strong scientific motivation, commitment from laboratory to work out adequate safety procedures Management Scientific direction Common management if several sites: multiple campuses Private ownership: can be financially beneficial, but also bring restrictions in particular long term guarantee, whole spectrum of science Public ownership: restrictions from other activities

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Infrastructure Requirements:Preliminary Conclusion Passionate discussions in the community. Significant impact of sites characteristics and institutional arrangements on Range and effectiveness of science Capital investment Operational expenses Restrictions are not necessarily fatal In our multi-site, adaptive approach, not necessary for a site to be able to meet all infrastructure requirements Important criterium: Ability of the site to accommodate some frontier science Some restrictions may be acceptable for a rapid deployment in a realistic budgetary environment

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Preliminary Modules (1)

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Preliminary Modules (2)

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL International Aspects International Science and Engineering ! –Not only in physics and astronomy –But also: geo sciences geo-microbiology is a new frontier DEEP site Our goal: A frontier facility, unique in the world Depth >6000 m.w.e + intermediate depth Full range of science 24/7/365 easy access and long term guarantee years Expansion capacity and capability to accommodate specific requirements We are well aware of SNOLab approved (6000 m.w.e- INCO Mine). Possibility of expansion at Modane ( 4700 m.w.e. - road tunnel) + Baksan Strategic advantage of a premier DUSEL on U.S. Territory Impact on research of U.S. unified institutional support ≠ scattered and isolated effort as guests in other countries Initiative capability of U.S. teams and attraction of exciting projects Development of new technologies Training of the next generation of scientists and engineers + E&O A difficult task: estimate the worldwide demand in realistic scenarios to put in perspective the likely limitations of SNOLab (in spite of INCO’s cooperation) Intuition: This is the direction science goes Chronic over-subscription of existing facilities Likely positive feedback: availability will be a factor in the growth of community We have to check!

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL International Aspects (2) Large Detector + Neutrino beam $1-2B price tag => megascience part of inter-regional governmental negotiations Adaptive strategy Decouple from Deep module But a deep site may be a competitive advantage Science is still evolving rapidly… Get prepared How can we accelerate the convergence in the U.S.? Can we have the case ready at the time of the decision of the ILC? ILC type process; Interregional coordination of R&D Common CDR and TDR??

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Conclusions A very interesting process  Compelling science  Mutual discoveries of several communities  Emergence of an exciting set of roadmaps We are developing powerful arguments! Even at time of budgetary problems, important to launch new and exciting projects: DUSEL is an excellent candidate! Still difficult questions Realistic estimation of the demand How to take into account the unexpected? How to balance international partnerships and national interest?

B.Sadoulet APS DUSEL Science-Methods-Applications Overlap is testimony of the richness of the field Opportunity for multiple advocacy NSF-DOE- Congress - Industry Experts-other scientists- Public at large Applications Resource discovery and recovery Waste management Biotechnology Transparent Earth Remote Characterization Surface-> subsurface Ever Changing Earth Fundamental processes Role of microbes Tectonics/Seismology