Paik-1 Search for Gravitational Waves Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland and Seoul National University January 12, 2006 Seoul, Korea KIAS-SNU Physics.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The sound of the Universe: The search for Gravitational Waves Giovanni Santostasi, Ph. D. Baton Rouge Community College, Baton Rouge, LA.
Advertisements

Dennis Ugolini, Trinity University Bite of Science Session, TEP 2014 February 13, 2014 Catching the Gravitational Waves.
Laser Interferometer Gravitational-wave Detectors: Advancing toward a Global Network Stan Whitcomb LIGO/Caltech ICGC, Goa, 18 December 2011 LIGO-G v1.
LIGO-G M First Generation Interferometers Barry Barish 30 Oct 2000 Workshop on Astrophysical Sources for Ground-Based Gravitational Wave Detectors.
Gravitational Waves Laser Interferometric Detectors
Jonathan Gair Graduate Seminar, St.Catharine’s College, 28 th November 2005 The Black Hole Symphony – listening to the Universe with gravitational waves.
1 Science Opportunities for Australia Advanced LIGO Barry Barish Director, LIGO Canberra, Australia 16-Sept-03 LIGO-G M.
Dual Sphere Detectors by Krishna Venkateswara. Contents  Introduction  Review of noise sources in bar detectors  Spherical detectors  Dual sphere.
Interferometric Gravitational Wave Detectors Barry C. Barish Caltech TAUP 9-Sept-03 "Colliding Black Holes" Credit: National Center for Supercomputing.
LIGO Status and Advanced LIGO Plans Barry C Barish OSTP 1-Dec-04.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
Final Thoughts and Highlights Barry C. Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 Okinawa 24-June -05 LISA.
LIGO-G W The Status of Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Detectors Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G W The Status of Gravitational-Wave Detectors Reported on behalf of LIGO colleagues by Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
1 What can gravitational waves do to probe early cosmology? Barry C. Barish Caltech “Kavli-CERCA Conference on the Future of Cosmology” Case Western Reserve.
Einstein’s Theory of Gravitation “instantaneous action at a distance”
LIGO-G W Report on LIGO Science Run S4 Fred Raab On behalf of LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
1 Observing the Most Violent Events in the Universe Virgo Barry Barish Director, LIGO Virgo Inauguration 23-July-03 Cascina 2003.
1 GWIC Gravitational Wave International Committee Report to PaNAGIC 9-Sept-03.
Overview Ground-based Interferometers Barry Barish Caltech Amaldi-6 20-June-05.
Gravitational-waves: Sources and detection
Paik-1 Exploring Gravity with Proof-Mass Technologies Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland July 6-10, 2008, Warrenton, VA.
Gravitational Wave Detectors: new eyes for physics and astronomy Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University.
30 th January th IAGRG meeting Kolkata S. V. DHURANDHAR IUCAA PUNE.
LIGO-G Z Guido Mueller University of Florida For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration MPLP Symposium Novosibirsk August 22 nd –27 th, 2004 Laser.
1 LISA Science and Concept Robin T. Stebbins. 2 May 13, 2003 LISA Overview The Laser Interferometer Space Antenna (LISA) is a joint ESA- NASA mission.
LIGO-G W Is there a future for LIGO underground? Fred Raab, LIGO Hanford Observatory.
What are GW’s ?? Fluctuation in the curvature of space time, propagating outward form the source at the speed of light Predicted by Einstein’s GTR Gravitational.
Annecy/Dec'04 1 ALLEGRO:status Dec 2004 Warren Johnson, Bill Hamilton, Peter Zhang, Andrew Weber, Damon Nettles, Jon Hanson, Mark Burgamy, Jordan Weaver.
1/25 Current results and future scenarios for gravitational wave’s stochastic background G. Cella – INFN sez. Pisa.
LIGO- G M Status of LIGO David Shoemaker LISA Symposium 13 July 2004.
Paris, July 17, 2009 RECENT RESULTS OF THE IGEC2 COLLABORATION SEARCH FOR GRAVITATIONAL WAVE BURST Massimo Visco on behalf of the IGEC2 Collaboration.
GWDAW 9 - December 15 th, 2004 STATUS OF EXPLORER AND NAUTILUS INFN – LN Frascati, LN Gran Sasso, Sez. Roma 1, Roma 2 and Genova Universities “La Sapienza”
14 July LNGSSearch for Gravitational Waves with Interferometers 1 The search for gravitational waves with the new generation of interferometers Peter.
Status of LIGO Data Analysis Gabriela González Department of Physics and Astronomy Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration Dec.
LIGO- G D Status of LIGO Stan Whitcomb ACIGA Workshop 21 April 2004.
TAMA binary inspiral event search Hideyuki Tagoshi (Osaka Univ., Japan) 3rd TAMA symposium, ICRR, 2/6/2003.
Koji Arai – LIGO Laboratory / Caltech LIGO-G v1.
New Low-Frequency GW Detector with Superconducting Instrumentation
Advanced interferometers for astronomical observations Lee Samuel Finn Center for Gravitational Wave Physics, Penn State.
Searching for Gravitational Waves with LIGO Andrés C. Rodríguez Louisiana State University on behalf of the LIGO Scientific Collaboration SACNAS
DECIGO – Japanese Space Gravitational Wave Detector International Workshop on GPS Meteorology January 17, Tsukuba Center for Institutes Seiji Kawamura*
LIGO-G Data Analysis Techniques for LIGO Laura Cadonati, M.I.T. Trento, March 1-2, 2007.
Gravitational Wave Detection from the Ground Up
Gravitational wave astronomy: a facilities overview Barry C. Barish Caltech AAS San Diego 13-Jan-05 LISA.
LIGO-G M Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders LIGO Laboratory California Institute of Technology APS Meeting APR03, Philadelphia Gravitational-Wave.
ILIAS WG1 - April 7 th, 2005 G.W. ANTENNA NAUTILUS LNF - FRASCATI G.W. ANTENNA EXPLORER CERN - GENEVA Bar Al 5056 M = 2270 kg L = 2.97 m Ø = 0.6 m A =
1 Probing Einstein’s Universe Barry C. Barish Caltech Heilborn Lecture Northwestern University 18-April-05 Crab Pulsar.
LIGO G M Intro to LIGO Seismic Isolation Pre-bid meeting Gary Sanders LIGO/Caltech Stanford, April 29, 2003.
G Z The LIGO gravitational wave detector consists of two observatories »LIGO Hanford Observatory – 2 interferometers (4 km long arms and 2 km.
LIGO-G M Press Conference Scientific Operation of LIGO Gary H Sanders Caltech (on behalf of a large team) APS April Meeting Philadelphia 6-April-03.
Space Gravitational Wave Antenna DECIGO Project 3rd TAMA Symposium February 7, Institute for Cosmic Ray Research, Japan Seiji Kawamura National.
Status of AURIGA AURIGA Sept 21 st 2005 Massimo Cerdonio INFN Section and Department of Physics University of Padova,
LIGO-G Z 1 Gravitational Wave Searches Peter R. Saulson Syracuse University Department of Physics Spokesperson, LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
Searches for Gravitational Waves Barry Barish Caltech IPA London – Aug 2014 “Merging Neutron Stars“ (Price & Rosswog)
A High Frequency Burst Search with the LIGO Interferometers
The search for those elusive gravitational waves
Gravitational Wave Detection of Astrophysical Sources Barry C
Current and future ground-based gravitational-wave detectors
The Search for Gravitational Waves with Advanced LIGO
Is there a future for LIGO underground?
GW150914: The first direct detection of gravitational waves
Brennan Hughey for the LSC May 12th, 2008
Spokesperson, LIGO Scientific Collaboration
Gravitational wave detection and the quantum limit
Stochastic gravitational wave and its spectral property
Status of LIGO Patrick J. Sutton LIGO-Caltech
Update on Status of LIGO
Detection of Gravitational Waves with Interferometers
LIGO Interferometry CLEO/QELS Joint Symposium on Gravitational Wave Detection, Baltimore, May 24, 2005 Daniel Sigg.
Presentation transcript:

Paik-1 Search for Gravitational Waves Ho Jung Paik University of Maryland and Seoul National University January 12, 2006 Seoul, Korea KIAS-SNU Physics Winter Camp

Paik-2 Gravitational Waves Field equation in General Relativity:  A wave equation, in the weak-field limit. Transverse, spin 1 EM wave: Gravitational wave: Transverse, spin 2

Paik-3 Gravitational Wave Detection Joseph Weber (c1960) A gravitational wave will deposit energy into an elastic solid. (Weber, 1959)

Paik-4 Resonant-Mass Detector 1 Antenna  Transducer  Amplifier Transducer is characterized by an impedance matrix. Electromechanical energy coupling: f()f()u()u()I()I()V()V()

Paik-5 Resonant-Mass Detector 2 Condition to detect a GW pulse with strength h: Optimal strategy: Signal Antenna noiseAmplifier noise Thermal Wideband Backaction

Paik-6 Resonant Transducer To get large , a resonant mass is attached to the antenna (Paik, 1972 )  Displacement gain: (M/m) 1/2  10 2  Energy transfer time:   (  /  a ) (M/m) 1/2 An additional resonant mass with  = (Mm) 1/2 can be added to increase  S further.  Energy transfer time:   (  /  a ) (M/m) 1/4

Paik-7 S/C Inductive Transducer

Paik-8 ALLEGRO 4-K antenna at LSU with a superconducting inductive transducer

Paik-9 AURIGA Best result obtained: h < 5 x Hz -1/2 within ~100 Hz band 100-mK antenna in Italy with a capactive transducer coupled to a dc SQUID

Paik-10 Explorer Switzerland Allegro USANiobe Australia Nautilus, italy Auriga, Italy Resonant Bar Detectors

Paik-11 Network of Resonant Bars Allegro Explorer Auriga Nautilus Niobe IGEC Network

Paik-12 Rate (y –1 ) Search threshold h h ~ 2  ~ 0.02 M ⊙ 10 kpc Upper limit on the rate of gravitational waves bursts from the Galactic Center ( ) The area above the blue curve is excluded with a coverage > 90% P. Astone, et al. PRD 68 (2003) IGEC Coincidence Search No evidence for gravity wave bursts was found.

Paik-13 Spherical Antenna Sphere is omni-directional. By detecting its 5 quadrupole modes, the source direction ( ,  ) and wave polarization (h+, h  ) can be determined. (Wagoner & Paik, 1976) 6 radial transducers on truncated icosahedral configuration maintains “spherical” symmetry. (Johnson & Merkowitz, 1993)  TIGA (Truncated Icosahedral Gravitational Antenna)

Paik-14 Resonant Spheres Much larger cross-section than a bar of the same resonance frequency (up to 70 x) MiniGrail The Netherlands Schenberg Brazil

Paik-15 Interferometer Concept  Laser used to measure relative lengths of two orthogonal arms  Arm lengths in LIGO are 4 km  Measure difference in length to m

Paik-16 LIGO Hardware 6-W Nd:YAG laser Fused silica mirror

Paik-17 Limiting Noise Sources  Seismic noise limits at low frequencies.  Atomic vibrations (thermal noise) inside the components limit at mid frequencies.  Quantum nature of light (shot noise) limits at high frequencies.

Paik-18 Evolution of LIGO Sensitivity

Paik-19 Interferometer Detectors LIGO Louisiana 4000m TAMA Japan 300m Virgo Italy 3000m GEO Germany 600m LIGO Washington 2000m & 4000m

Paik-20 Network of Interferometers LIGO detection confidence GEO Virgo TAMA AIGO? locate the sources decompose the polarization of gravitational waves

Paik-21 LIGO Science Has Begun S1 run: 17 days (Aug - Sep 2002) Primarily methods papers Four astrophysical searches published (Phys. Rev. D 69, 2004): Inspiraling neutron stars, bursts, known pulsar (J ) with GEO, stochastic background S2 run: 59 days (Feb - April 2003) Analyses are mostly complete. S3 run: 70 days (Oct 2003 – Jan 2004) Analysis is in full swing.

Paik-22 Promising Source: Compact Binaries

Paik-23 Matched Filtering “chirps ” NS–NS: waveforms are well described BH–BH: need better waveforms Search: matched templates

Paik-24 Advanced LIGO Active Seismic Multiple Suspensions Improved Optics Higher Power Laser

Paik-25 Sensitivity Improvement Rate Improvement ~ 10 4 narrow band optical configuration

Paik-26 Gravitational Waves in Space Three spacecraft form an equilateral triangle with armlength of 5 million km LISA

Paik-27 LISA Accelerometer The position of a reference mass is sensed by a capacitor bridge and used for drag-free control.

Paik-28 Y-shaped payload has two identical optical assemblies with transmit/receive telescopes. The inertial sensor consists of a free-falling proof mass inside a reference housing. LISA Spacecraft

Paik-29 Sources for LISA

Paik-30 LISA and LIGO

Paik-31 Status of Interferometers  Sensitivity toward gravitational wave detection is improving on many fronts.  Improved limits are being set for all major sources -- binary inspirals, periodic sources, burst sources, and stochastic background.  Data exchange and joint data analysis between detector groups is improving ability to make detections.  Need specific waveforms to improve search sensitivities!  Hopefully, detections will be made soon !!