October 8, 2013 Shared & Distributed Leadership CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness Monthly Webinar.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Inquiry Team Eydie Wilson, Ph.D. Math Coach November 3, 2009.
Building Effective Leadership Teams: A Practitioner’s Look
Parents as Partners in Education
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Education Committee Meeting Professional Development Plan November 3, 2014.
Edward S. Shapiro Director, Center for Promoting Research to Practice Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA Planning for the Implementation of RTI: Lessons.
Comprehensive Literacy Program Louisiana Department of Education
Campus Staffing Changes Positions to be deleted from CNA/CIP  Title I, Title II, SCE  Academic Deans (211)  Administrative Assistants.
Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness Webinar June 11, 2013 Practical Advice for Integrating the Common Core.
Thank you for joining us for Implementing an RTI Model The presentation will begin momentarily. RIGHT REASON TECHNOLOGIES YOUR SOLUTION FOR STUDENT SUCCESS.
1 Oregon K-12 Literacy Framework and K-3 Statewide Outreach.
Common Core Implementation Plan Whittier City School District Board of Education Meeting April 7, 2014.
District Insight on What We Are Learning SCEE webinar, June 12, 2012 Principal Effectiveness.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Integrating Evaluation and Curriculum, GLTS. Welcome Presenters: Lauren Jones - Lead Teacher - Carpentry/ Architectural Drafting, ILT member Paul Mears.
Creating System-Wide Support for Learning Coaches with Joellen Killion
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Facilitators: Teresa Roe English Language Arts Division Manager, TDS Latahshia Coleman English Language Arts Instructional Facilitator, TDS Session Outcomes.
Milwaukee Partnership Academy An Urban P-16 Council for Quality Teaching and Learning.
October 3, 2012 SPECIAL SCEE WEBINAR The Principal’s Role in Evaluating Teachers.
School Governance for Parents: Advisory Committees How ELAC and SAC Can Help Your School Develop a Better Balanced Scorecard.
 K-12 Principal Internship and Competency Summary Aaron Freed K-12 Principal Licensure Candidate Bethel University.
Curriculum Update January What are the big projects? Fall 2013 – Math Common Core Implementation Fall 2014 – English/Language Arts Common Core Implementation.
Special SCEE Webinar Districts and States Work to Develop and Support an Effective Principal Pipeline 1.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
Instruction, Assessment & Student Achievement Presented: September 23, 2013 Bessie Weller Elementary School.
Read On, Indiana! Anna Shults, Reading Specialist John Wolf, Reading Specialist Indiana Reading Initiatives.
Leading Change Through Differentiated PD Approaches and Structures University-District partnerships for Strengthening Instructional Leadership In Mathematics.
“Just can’t live that negative way… Make way for the positive day.” -Bob Marley Positive Vibration.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Developing Professional Learning Communities To Promote Response to Intervention Linda Campbell Melissa Nantais.
ECE–12 Mathematics Denver Public Schools Accepting Responsibility for Every Child Elaine Boyer Elementary Mathematics Coordinator Becky Sauer Secondary.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 Mathematics MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
PCG Education Helping Florida Schools and Districts Successfully Transition to the Florida Standards Palm Beach Charter School Administrators.
Program Overview The College Community School District's Mentoring and Induction Program is designed to increase retention of promising beginning educators.
Elementary & Middle School 2014 ELA MCAS Evaluation & Strategy.
Maryland’s Journey— Focus Schools Where We’ve Been, Where We Are, and Where We’re Going Presented by: Maria E. Lamb, Director Nola Cromer, Specialist Program.
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Effective Instruction in a Turnaround School- Instructional Focus REL Appalachia Featuring Ms. Kathy Fields Lead Instructional Administrator Jessamine.
December 13, 2011 Teacher and Leader Evaluation Systems Legal Defensibility 1.
The Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE) March 20, 2012 International Summit on the Teaching Profession:
Tiered Licensure & Developmental Continuums August 9, 2011 CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness (SCEE)
Continuing the Conversation About Educator Evaluation: Next Steps After the SCEE Topical Meeting November 1, 2011.
Continuing the Conversation Leveraging Professional Learning Systems to Increase Principal Effectiveness 1.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
Leading and Learning in a Time of Change #CCSS.
Evaluating Teacher Preparation Programs Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness Monthly Webinar December 10,
Data Report July Collect and analyze RtI data Determine effectiveness of RtI in South Dakota in Guide.
SCEE Monthly Webinar July 10, 2012 Implementing Evaluation Pilots.
IN-SIG: FOUNDATIONS & RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION November 1, 2007.
Council of Chief State School Officers State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness Webinar May 14, 2013 Theory to Practice: How One SEA Uses Implementation.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
PRINCIPAL READY FALL SOUTHEAST. PRINCIPAL READY: FALL 2015 Welcome Introductions Overview of the Day Service Support Team Overview Service Support.
Teaming/Data/Interventions RtI Infrastructure: Teaming RtI Partnership Coaches meeting January 6, 2011 Terry Schuster, RtI Partnership Lead Coach.
TEACHER LEADERSHIP & COMPENSATION IN THE WATERLOO COMMUNITY SCHOOL DISTRICT FEBRUARY 2015.
August 14, 2012 Using Classroom Assessments to Measure Student Performance in Non-Tested Grades and Subjects (NTGS)
Iowa Administrators Association and PLS 3 rd Learning A conversation with Steve Barkley Facilitators: Dana Schon, School Administrators of Iowa Margaret.
Iowa ASCD: Curriculum Leadership Academy, April 2012 Instructional Coaching Through RTI Little by Little:
September 11, 2012 What’s Next with Common Core Implementation 1.
Interboro School District Keystones to Opportunity Grant Four Year Overview School Years.
Response to Invention (RTI) A Practical Approach 2016 Mid-Level Conference.
Using PLCs to support MTSS Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012 Florida Association of Staff Developers September 24, 2012.
July 9, 2013 Partnerships for Transforming Educator Preparation CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness Monthly Webinar.
PLCs and the high performing, High Poverty school
Connecticut Core Standards for English Language Arts & Literacy
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Presentation transcript:

October 8, 2013 Shared & Distributed Leadership CCSSO State Consortium on Educator Effectiveness Monthly Webinar

Moderator 2  Circe Stumbo President, West Wind Education Policy, and Consultant to CCSSO

Webinar Logistics  Everyone is muted  Use the chat function to make a comment or ask a question—send questions to “All Participants” (NOT “All Attendees”) or to individual panelists 3  If you have problems, send Naz Rajput a message via the chat function or an at

Raising Your Hand

Why this topic? (1) GTL Center CCR CoP Problem of Practice  Principals struggle with workload  What *must* *principals* do and what might other district, school, and teacher leaders do? (assistant principals, coaches, etc.)  Principals struggle to perform both managerial and instructional leadership roles (and really struggle with leading second order change) 6

GTL Center CCR CoP Principal Workload Problem of Practice  Possible solutions:  REL study of the actual workload of principals in the pilot districts  Provide different models for how leadership responsibilities can be shared among different actors within a school (e.g., teacher leaders, assistant principals, coaches, etc.) 7

(2) State Initiatives, such as Iowa’s 8

Overview and Introductions  Irv Richardson Program Director, Shared and Effective Leadership CCSSO, Educator Workforce Initiative 9

From a distributed perspective, leadership involves mortals as well as heroes. It involves the many and not just the few. It is about leadership practice, not simply roles and positions. And leadership practice is about interactions, not just the actions of heroes. —Spillane 2006

 Teacher Leader Model Standards  Focus of Educational Leadership  Comprehensive Assessment of Leadership for Learning Interest in Sharing Leadership

Why the Interest?  Involve more educators in initiatives that improve student learning  Develop the talents and skills of educators  Implement important initiatives  Develop a pipeline for other leadership positions  Increasing impact on student learning

New Roles  Instructional Leaders  Students who need additional assistance  Monitoring students’ progress  Collaboratively addressing problems of practice  Coaching and mentoring  Structuring time and instruction differently

New Roles + New Structures = New Tensions  Authority  Decision making  Division and Coordination of tasks  Communication

New Structures = Better Results?  Better results  For students?  For parents and other community members?  For educators?

Two examples  Math and Science Learning Academy, Denver, Colorado  Harding High School, St. Paul, Minnesota

Presenters Lynne Lopez-Crowley Co-Lead Teacher Math and Science Learning Academy Denver, CO 17

Presenters Douglas Revsbeck Principal Harding High School St. Paul, MN 18

Webinar Resources  Doug’s and Lynne’s PowerPoint slides and the pre-readings are in the webinar module on the SCEE site.  web web 19

Questions and Answers 20

Upcoming SCEE Events  Next SCEE webinar Tuesday, November 12, 2:00-3:00 pm EDT Followed by a live chat, 3:00-3:30 pm EDT  December SCEE Topical Meeting w/ICCS December 3-4 Supporting Principal Effectiveness in Leading Teacher Evaluation and Support & Common Core Implementation 21

30 Minute Live Chat  Audio will be off  Participants ask questions of the presenters in the Chat box  We will post the chat transcript on the webinars page at the conclusion of this event 22

30 Minute Q&A Chat  Find the Chat in the bottom right side of your screen  To make the Chat appear larger on your screen, click on the triangle next to the Participants list to minimize it  Questions and comments sent to “All Participants” are visible to everyone (NOT to “All Attendees)  To offer an anonymous question or comment privately, click on “Circe Stumbo” in the list of panelists or her at  For technical assistance chat with Naz Rajput or her at 23

Please complete the webinar evaluation. You will receive a link to the form via shortly after the webinar concludes. Thank you 24

The Mathematics and Science Leadership Academy

Teams Peer Assisted Review (PAR) Climate and Culture Data and Curriculum Technology Teams we no longer have Professional Development

School Leadership Team The School Leadership Team is required by our district and by contract. MSLA has used this team to satisfy district and union requirements and has developed it further to enhance and streamline the decision making process. Outcomes: More voice Time management

PAR PAR teams Pre Par Conversations Peer Observations Peer Debriefs Modifications Alignment with district evaluation system (LEAP) Observation focus

yes

Evolution of MSLA Systems Meeting time Lead Teacher duties Aligned focus Others

Effect on Academics

Growth Rating

Challenges

Questions

Harding Senior High School Enrollment 37 1,973 Students in Grades 9-12 Special Education14% Free/reduced lunch 86% English Learners30% Home Language Other Than English69% (42 different languages)

Harding’s Learning culture Journey Sustainability Stage Exploration Innovation Stage Stage Installation Full Implementation Stage Stage Initial Implementation Stage ’05 ’06’07 ’08 ’09 ’10 ’11 ’12’13 ‘14 Harding’s Learning Journey

Our Learning Journey 07/08 4 Questions (shift in mindset-teaching to learning) 08/ Big Rocks (conceptualizing big ideas of PLCs) 09/10 – Breakthrough results and focus on LITERACY (the key is literacy embedded in our practice) 10/11 - Believe it - Meeting students where they are (taking literacy deeper with reading strategies) 11/12 – Hitting the target: A shared focus on Instructional practice - from “what” to “how” (ELL/Literacy/Differentiation/GANAG) 12/13 – Knowing our impact – Sharpening instructional practices through PLC and inquiry learning 13/14 – Sustaining our momentum of shared focus on Harding targets using an Equity Lens

HHS MTSS Leadership Team Goals/Purpose: Serve as “Target Design Team” with school-wide focus on Equity & instructional targets aligned with SCIP Tasks: Design & 0rganize professional learning structures/direction Participants: LTFs, PD Team Leaders, coaches, consultants & administrators Leadership Supports: Turnaround Saint Paul consultants, teacher leaders, admin, coaches Meets: 2-3 times per year Harding Equity Team Goals/Purpose: Achieve educational equity by developing support for school leaders Tasks: Examine school policy, practices, and climate to identify barriers for equity leading to systemic change of achievement Participants: 6 equity leaders Leadership Supports: SPPS alignment, Administrators PLC Goals/Purpose: Instructional leadership learning Tasks: Use Data Team Process to support and monitor the implementation of school-wide instructional targets (walkthroughs) Participants: 6 admin & 1 teacher facilitator Leadership Supports: Coaches and Equity Lead Tasks: Learning work around effective instruction Meets: Monthly Inquiry MTSS (Tier 1) - Goals/Purpose: learning focused instruction practices Tasks: Provide differentiated PD focused on school- wide instructional targets Participants: All staff Leadership Supports: Administrators, literacy coaches, instructional coaches, Inquiry Facilitators Meets: Monthly PLC Teams MTSS (Tier 1) Goals/Purpose: Work collaboratively to increase student learning through instructional strategies and common assessments, Tasks: Address school priorities related to PLC Participants: Teachers leaders (LTFs) Leadership Supports: 2 admin Meets: Individually and collectively with administration on a Weekly basis MTSS (Tier 2) Goals/Purpose: Implement intense literacy in Tier 2 classes (reading, ELL,, electives, etc) Tasks: Use Data Team Process to guide, support, & monitor literacy strategies Participants: Five Teacher Leaders (LTFs) Leadership Supports: TOSA Meets: Weekly MTSS (Tier 3) GRAD Crisis Goals/Purpose: Monitor “at risk” students Tasks: Provide interventions for at risk students (key focus on GRAD and intervention support) Participants: 1 admin, 2 counselors, 2 literacy coaches, data specialist, teacher, parent liaison, testing coordinator, counselors Leadership Supports: Admin Meets: Weekly Department Chairs Goals/Purpose: Facilitate dept. work that is not related to PLCs and instruction Tasks: Manage dept resources and schedule Participants: A rep. from each dept. Leadership Supports: Admin Meets: As needed English (5 PLCs) Math (4 PLCs) Social Studies (4 PLCs) World Language (1 PLC) Teacher led classroom visits FACS (1PLC) CTE (1PLC) Art) (1P LC ELL (1PLC) Reading (1PLC) Differentiation Literacy GANAG ELL Strategies Science (4 PLCs) Health (1PLC) AVID (1PLC) MTSS Distributive Leadership Model 2013/2014 Harding High School updated 03/07/13

HARDING HIGH SCHOOL COMMON PURPOSE & SHARED FOCUS

PLC team meetings Period PLCs (# of teachers) 1ELL (4) 2Social Studies (12) + Sped (3) 3 Math (19) + Sped (1) Science 9 (3) + Sped (1) 4 Period 4/5 World Language (7) Period 5/6 Physics (2) Chemistry (2) (7) PSD (3) 8 9English (13) + Sped (2) 10 Biology (5) + Sped (1) Art (4) LTF meeting PLC Schedule

Cultural shifts From isolation to collaboration From individualized to shared practice From us vs them to a partnership model From checklist to reflective practice From what to how From coverage to ensuring learning From content to literacy strategies Individually structured lesson to commonly designed structured lessons