EUSO-SODC status report M.C. Espírito Santo Huntsville, May 2003.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Proposal / Request For Proposal Proposal / Request For Proposal Initiation Control Planning Close-down Execution.
Advertisements

Solar System Division DVK, 10 Jul 2001 Rosetta Science Operations The planning concept - current status Detlef Koschny Space Science Department ESA/ESTEC.
DAVOS, November 2010 group GETCU (JP Marcovici) PICARD : Consortium meeting 1 PMOD/WRC Davos november 2010 Présenté par : JP. Marcovici Sigle.
GLAST LAT ProjectManager’s Face to Face - ISOC, 17 March GLAST Large Area Telescope WBS 4.1.B Instrument Science Operations Center Manager’s Face.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 3.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 2.1 Requirements 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST Large.
WBS & AO Controls Jason Chin, Don Gavel, Erik Johansson, Mark Reinig Design Meeting (Team meeting #10) Sept 17 th, 2007.
RFA 18 – Automation of Operations Software Specific Request –Specify plans and requirements for automation of operations software, and describe the software.
Section 15-1GLAST Ground System Design Review August 18&19, 2004 ISOC Organization ISOC Manager R Cameron Commanding, H&S Timeline Planning Command Generation.
GLAST LAT Project ISOC Peer Review - March 2, 2004 Document: LAT-PR Section 3 LOF Operations Concept 1 Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope GLAST.
GLAST LAT ProjectISOC CDR, 4 August 2004 Document: LAT-PR-04500Section 4.11 GLAST Large Area Telescope: Instrument Science Operations Center CDR Section.
09 May 2014page 1 ROCC to PPL ICD Initial Definition ExoMars Rover Operations Control Center ROCC.
Chapter 3 Project Initiation. The stages of a project  Project concept  Project proposal request  Project proposal  Project green light  Project.
LSU 01/18/2005Project Life Cycle1 The Project Life Cycle Project Management Unit, Lecture 2.
LSU 07/07/2004Communication1 Communication & Documentation Project Management Unit – Lecture 8.
Data Processing and User Software Ken Ebisawa (Astro-E2 GOF) presentation and demonstration.
EUSO General Meeting – Huntsville May 2003 FEW WORDS ON AUGER-EUSO Presented by Osvaldo Catalano.
FP OntoGrid: Paving the way for Knowledgeable Grid Services and Systems WP8: Use case 1: Quality Analysis for Satellite Missions.
1 CCSDS Information Architecture Working Group SEA Plenary Daniel J. Crichton, Chair NASA/JPL 12 September 2005.
D. McMahon Generation of Ground ODFs ESA ODF-CB 3-5 March 2004 Gerd Soellner (DLR/Col-CC) Co-author Nathalie Gérard.
Designing a HEP Experiment Control System, Lessons to be Learned From 10 Years Evolution and Operation of the DELPHI Experiment. André Augustinus 8 February.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
SGS: Activities and Requests Helen Middleton. Hermean Environment Working Group Meeting | SGS Team | Key Largo | 16/05/2013 | Slide 2 Contents 1.ESAC.
MAPLDDesign Integrity Concepts You Mean We’re Still Working On It? Sustaining a Design.
1 Next Generation of Operational Earth Observations From the National Polar-Orbiting Operational Environmental Satellite System (NPOESS): Program Overview.
CAPACITY Operational Atmospheric Chemistry Monitoring Missions CAPACITY Final Meeting - WP Ground Segment synthesis Final Meeting ESTEC02/06/05.
ALMA Software B.E. Glendenning (NRAO). 2 ALMA “High Frequency VLA” in Chile Presently a European/North American Project –Japan is almost certainly joining.
PACS SVR38/9 Nov 2007 Commissioning Phase1 Commissioning Phase H. Feuchtgruber.
.1 RESEARCH & TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT CENTER SYSTEM AND INFORMATION SCIENCES JHU/MIT Proprietary Titan MESSENGER Autonomy Experiment.
Final Version Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Mission Operations Tim Rykowski Jeffrey Hosler May 13-17, 2002.
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Planned Organization of ROCC Operations I. Musso.
CLIC Project breakdown structure: organization, documentation and cost estimate Beam Instrumentation Workshop, June 2-3, 2009 CLIC Project breakdown structure:
The System and Software Development Process Instructor: Dr. Hany H. Ammar Dept. of Computer Science and Electrical Engineering, WVU.
WGISS /09/2015 DATA PRESERVATION – CNES APPROACH B. Chausserie-Laprée.
THE PROJECT LIFE CYCLE PROJECT MANAGEMENT LIFE CYCLE LSU 01/18/2005 PROJECT LIFE CYCLE 1.
PACS IBDR 27/28 Feb 2002 PACS Data Flow1 PACS Data Flow, Instrument Modes and Operations Helmut Feuchtgruber MPE.
DPE CSSW Process Model Annex A WP-400 ECSS Case Study.
NASA/Air Force Cost Model presented by Keith Smith Science Applications International Corporation 2002 SCEA National Conference June
All rights reserved © Altec ExoMars 2018 Rover Operations Control Centre Science instruments data pipeline G. Martucci.
NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter Ground System Requirements.
1 UML Modeling of Spacecraft Onboard Instruments Takahiro Yamada, JAXA/ISAS April 2005.
RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes RBSP Radiation Belt Storm Probes 12/25/20151 Flight Software Template for Instrument Critical Design Review Gary M. Heiligman.
Solar Probe Plus A NASA Mission to Touch the Sun March 2015 Instrument Suite Name Presenter's Name.
Aquarius Mission Simulation A realistic simulation is essential for mission readiness preparations This requires the ability to produce realistic data,
KEY PERSONNEL Dr. Bob Schutz, GLAS Science Team Leader Dr. Jay Zwally, ICESat Project Scientist, GLAS Team Member Mr. David Hancock, Science Software Development.
Final Version Kequan Luu May 13-17, 2002 Micro-Arcsecond Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF) Flight Software.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Systems Engineering Mike DeKlotz GSFC Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large.
GLAST Large Area Telescope LAT Flight Software System Checkout TRR Test Suites (Backup) Stanford Linear Accelerator Center Gamma-ray Large Area Space Telescope.
1. 2 Purpose of This Presentation ◆ To explain how spacecraft can be virtualized by using a standard modeling method; ◆ To introduce the basic concept.
How the NCSX Project Does Business
Requirements to WSO Ground Segment Lavochkin Association & ROSCOSMOS 30/06/2006.
3 He Fridge SPIRE WE Review Dec. 6-7, IFSI 1 3 He Sorption Fridge “Cooler” WE Preliminary Design Presented by: L. Rodriguez / CEA/SAp. Subsystem.
GLAST LAT ProjectCDR/CD-3 Review May 12-16, 2003 Document: LAT-PR Section 5 IOC Subsystem 1 GLAST Large Area Telescope: IOC Subsystems WBS: 4.1.B.
ESA UNCLASSIFIED – For Official Use HSO-OP - Solar and Planetary Missions Division Solar Orbiter Instrument Operations, Data Handling and FDIR Ignacio.
SwCDR (Peer) Review 1 UCB MAVEN Particles and Fields Flight Software Critical Design Review Peter R. Harvey.
E-USOC operations in Increments José Miguel Ezquerro Navarro E-USOC/UPM Jul 2010POIWG#28 - Huntsville, AL.
ESA Payload Operations Overview: MSL August 07, 2009 / POIC-MSFC.
S-band Telemetry Description DMC 211 October 2015.
RSOC Overview at SWT #26, 11/12 June 2009
Design Review.
I&T&C Organization Chart
Detlef Koschny Research and Scientific Support Department ESA/ESTEC
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Authors: Maria de Fatima Mattiello-Francisco Ana Maria Ambrosio
IEEE Std 1074: Standard for Software Lifecycle
Exploitation of ISS Scientific data - sustainability
Preparations for a Lehman Review
Integration & Test Instrument Operations Coordination
<Your Team # > Your Team Name Here
GLAST Large Area Telescope:
Presentation transcript:

EUSO-SODC status report M.C. Espírito Santo Huntsville, May 2003

1.Mid-Term Review  “EUSO operations: flight & ground” document  The comments  Replies & evolution 2.Towards the end of Phase A  Specific documents  Contribution to end of phase A report Contents

One of the documents requested for MTR package Prepared by SODC team, with collaboration of TEO, on IM request A description of EUSO operations concept, covering flight and ground segments. “EUSO operations: flight and ground” document

2EUSO system description 2.1The flight segment 2.2The ground segment 2.3End-to-end communications scheme “EUSO Operations: flight and Ground” 3EUSO operations concept 3.1Basic operational requirements and constraints Telemetry and telecommand budget 3.2Operations overview 3.3Calibration 4Flight operations 4.1System functionalities 4.2System elements 4.3System interfaces 5Ground operations 5.1System functionalities 5.2System elements 5.3System interfaces

End-to-end communications scheme MCC-H WSGT TDRS COL-CC SODC COL-APM EUSO COL-APM: Columbus Attached Pressurized module TDRS: Track and Data Relay Satellite system WSGT: White Sands Ground Terminal MCC-H: Mission Control Center – Houston Col-CC: Columbus Control Center SODC: Science Operations and Data Center (EUSO) Ku-band S-band

Flight Segment Ground Segment AS MAP UIFEDBIF CICI ICR ICF ICR: Instrument Control and Readout ICF: Instrument Configuration Files CI: Communications Interface AS: Atmospheric Sounding system TCG: TC Generation TMH: TM Handling MADB: Mission Archive and DB TVF: Test and Validation Facility SWM: SW Maintenance MAP: Mission Activity Planning DPM: Data Processing and Monitoring UIF: User I/F EDBIF: External DB I/F MADBMADB TM TC TMH TCG Subsystems TVF DPM Operations concept

Flight operations The on-board operations system has different Operational States Power off Initialisation HK1 Standby HK1,HK2 Engineering mode HK1,HK2 Diagnostic HK1,HK2,SC5 Technical calibration HK1,HK2,SC4 Observation HK1,HK2 EECR Slow GLS calib SC1 SC2 SC3 In each mode given TM packets are generated and given TC are accepted Collection and pre-processing of the scientific data Collection and verification of HK data Preparation of TM packets TC handling Management of the trigger configuration Management of the different subsystems Management of emergency situations Interface to the atmospheric sounding system

The MTR comments On MTR preliminary report: 1. On-board operations: A.Level of autonomy defined as high but no precise info given B.Definition of on-board operations system unsatisfactory: processing power cannot be deduced 2. Calibration of the instrument undefined 3. Telemetry & telecommand budgets largely unspecified

On-board autonomy Definition of level of autonomy of on-board operations crucial for the dimensioning of EUSO flight and ground systems No permanent contact is provided Limited uplink capability More on-board processing capability and redundancy required Particular care with test and validation facilities  Clearly define operations concept  Be more concrete on definition of autonomy  Refer to appropriate (electronics) document for details on on-board system 1

On-board autonomy Transitions between states controled by on-board system and triggered by Time-tagged commands uplinked from ground Reception of ISS ephemeris parameters Exceptional events Within each operational state the on-board system is totally autonomous Most “routine” transitions can be performed autnomously (see next slide) Ground commands organised in schedule files containing only specific actions: calibration, system configuration setting Example: Shutter closing triggered by ISS ephemeris (position or time) and commanded autonomously by on-board system. Also: autonomous contingency procedure 1 Current concept:

On-board autonomy Discussions with P. Tua and A. De Masi 1 Power off Initialisation HK1 Standby HK1,HK2 Engineering mode HK1,HK2,HK3 Setting mode HK1,HK2,SC5 Technical Calibration HK1,HK2,HK3,SC4 HK1,HK2,HK3 Observation modes Slow SC2 EECR SC1 Science Calib SC3 Power_On/Off Ground TC Contigency HK1,HK2 Non-observation

Calibration Autonomy / ground command Procedures TM volume? TechnicalScientific e.g. diode system e.g. GLS Paragraph on calibration operations, vague at this stage Calibration working group ! 2 Calibration issues are a more general question Only operations point of view to be discussed in this document

Telemetry/Telecommands budget Current assumptions for available resources: 3 Telemetry Assuming 300 Kbit/s for 10 min. => 180 Mbit/orbit Telecommands EUSO: similar reasoning => 360 Kbit/orbit (TBC)

EUSO TM needs (TBC) Telemetry Type Telemetry volume/Orbit Scientific - EECR0.7 Mbit HK30 Mbit Atmopheric Mbit Calibration1 Mbit (GLS) + TBD Science - EECR data: GTU 1  s, 300 GTU, 1 event/orbit assumed, Baseline (X,Y, ph_cnt, 9 macrocells) (Pixel info: 12 Mbit ?) Slow events: ~EECR, rate TBD HK: FS + TCU + LIDAR (see P. Tua estimation) Atmospheric data: AS document: 25 Kb/s for 30 s on EECR 2.5 Kb/s continuous Calibration: GLS: assumptions of OM doc (30 Hz, 2  s, 30 s, once per 24 hours) Technical:can be critical Telemetry peaks in certain orbits 3

Telecommands In large autonomy scenario, uplink is: Time-tagged commands for “non-routine” operations (expected to be low) Updates of configuration parameters –Dominated by FS parameters –Of the order of 10 K parameters (TBC) –One configuration file per operation mode x several operation conditions ~ 200 Kbytes of configuration files (TBC) –Update rate: 10% in orbit (TBC) SW patches/upgrades: TBD Still many open questions: –Sizes and rates –Bandwidth during commissioning phase –Possibility of larger bandwidth for SW upgrades 3

EUSO operations: flight & ground 2.EUSO system description 3.EUSO operations concept –Observing plan –Basic requirements & constraints –Operations overview –Instrument calibration 4.Flight operations –System functionalities –System modes of operation Operation modes diagram On-board autonomy Configuration parameters HK parameters –System elements & interfaces 5.Ground operation 6.Telemetry & Telecommand budget

Towards the end of Phase A Two specific documents EUSO operations: flight and ground Phase A specification and design document for the EUSO SODC... And contribution to Final Phase A report

SODC document 1.Introduction 2.SODC objectives & lifecycle 3.SODC components and functionalities 4.SODC budget and timeline Unit 1 TCGTelecommand generation MAPMission Activity Planning TVF/SWMTest & validation Facility / SW Maintenance Unit 2 TMHTelemetry reception & handling MONData Monitoring PROCData Processing Unit 3 ADBArchive & database maintenance UIFUser Interface & Support EDBExternal databases interface “Phase A specification and design document for the EUSO-SODC”

Concluding... Section 7: Operations (C. Espirito Santo) Data products: C. Maccarone Closely connected to: Section 6: Mission overview (A. De Masi) Readout & control electronics (O. Catalano / P.Tua) 3. Final Phase A report 1. Updated version of MTR Operations doc under way 2. SODC specifications and design doc for end of Phase A

On-board operations Calibration Telemetry Keywords 123 Will discuss each of them separately A wider team of people needs to be involved Close colaboration with HW teams

The TCU Detailed capability description => Dimensioning of the system Preliminary technical description? 1