Results of NASA/DARPA Automatic Probe and Drogue Refueling Flight Test Keith Schweikhard NASA Dryden Flight Research Center 661-276-3411

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AUTOMATIC FLIGHT CONTROL SYSTEM (AFCS)
Advertisements

Georgia Tech Aerial Robotics Dr. Daniel P Schrage Jeong Hur Fidencio Tapia Suresh K Kannan SUCCEED Poster Session 6 March 1997.
Aircraft Controls.
Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Omega Tanker (K-707) Air Refueling Procedures Brief
Orbital Operations – 2 Rendezvous & Proximity Operations
THE PHOENIX PROJECT Coordinated Flight of Multiple Unmanned Vehicles Michael P. Anthony Lab for Control and Automation Princeton University Princeton,
Ancient Dreamers Leonardo da Vinci Italian artist and scientist ( ) gathered data on the flight of birds and developed concepts of the propeller,
Luis Mejias, Srikanth Saripalli, Pascual Campoy and Gaurav Sukhatme.
Pre-Solo Training Program
MotoHawk Training Model-Based Design of Embedded Systems.
Calspan In-Flight Simulation Projects SAE Presentation Oct 2008 Learjet – Automated Aerial Refueling Learjet – Sense & Avoid Flight Test Flight Research.
Development of Guidance and Control System for Parafoil-Payload System VVR Subbarao, Sc ‘C’ Flight Mechanics & Control Engineering ADE.
KAP 140 Autopilot A self-study tool for pilots who fly with the Bendix/King KAP 140 Autopilot System This presentation is provided free of charge to everyone.
Eights-on Pylons Not to be confused with Eights around pylons Eights across a road Eights along a road.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P Management Review (MSD I) Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Design of a Control Workstation for Controller Algorithm Testing Aaron Mahaffey Dave Tastsides Dr. Dempsey.
EDGE™ MAV Control System - P09122 Final Project Review Erik Bellandi – Project Manager Ben Wager – Lead Engineer Garrett Argenna – Mechanical Engineering.
Aircraft Response to Control Input Data Collection System Presenter: Curtis Cutright Advisor: Dr. Michael Braasch Project Sponsor: JUP.
Use of FOS for Airborne Radar Target Detection of other Aircraft Example PDS Presentation for EEE 455 / 457 Preliminary Design Specification Presentation.
April 26, Team Information Designation Ongo-03 Members Advisors Dr. J. Lamont, Prof. R. Patterson, Dr. Rajagopalan, Dr. J. Basart ClientSpace Systems.
Omega Tanker (K-707) Air Refueling Procedures Brief
Use of FOS to Improve Airborne Radar Target Detection of other Aircraft Example PDS Presentation for EEE 455 / 457 Preliminary Design Specification Presentation.
Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: 1) What part of the aircraft that is located on the outer portion of the trailing.
Warm-Up – 8/28 – 10 minutes Utilizing your notes and past knowledge answer the following questions: What flight control surface is used to pitch the.
1 SAIC V22 Simulation Support Manned Flight Simulator By Roger A. Burton Head, Air Vehicle Branch Simulation and Research Division Science Applications.
Vertical Profile Navigation
Embedded Microcomputer Systems Andrew Karpenko 1 Prepared for Technical Presentation February 25 th, 2011.
Mobile Distributed 3D Sensing Sandia National Laboratories Intelligent Sensors and Robotics POC: Chris Lewis
Autonomous Surface Navigation Platform Michael Baxter Angel Berrocal Brandon Groff.
Advanced Speed Guidance for Merging and Sequencing Techniques Chris Sweeney,
March, 2006 NASA Dryden Update Aerospace Control and Guidance Systems Committee Meeting #97 Lake Tahoe, NV March 1-3, 2006 Joe Pahle (661)
October 2006 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Williamsburg, VA October 2006 John Bosworth (661)
B757 Review Questions. AutoFlight At what RA does flare mode engage? 45 feet RA.
20a - 1 NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center Attitude Control System (ACS) Eric Holmes, Code 591 Joe Garrick, Code 595 Jim Simpson, Code 596 NASA/GSFC August.
MAV activities in flight dynamics and control 1 Prof A.V. Efremov, Ph. D., D. of Sc., The Head of Flight Dynamics and Control Department, Moscow Aviation.
C182T Nav III GFC 700 Automatic Flight Control System Module I
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
Page 1 of 35 Achieving Over-The-Horizon Requirements Using Low Earth Orbit Satellites (LEOS) Presented by Eric Saikin.
UC SANTA CRUZ, AUTONOMOUS SYSTEMS LAB, An Improved Line-of- Sight Guidance Law for UAVs R. Curry, M. Lizarraga, B. Mairs, and G.H. Elkaim University of.
HARDWARE INTERFACE FOR A 3-DOF SURGICAL ROBOT ARM Ahmet Atasoy 1, Mehmed Ozkan 2, Duygun Erol Barkana 3 1 Institute of Biomedical Engineering, Bogazici.
COBXXXX EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK FOR EVALUATION OF GUIDANCE AND CONTROL ALGORITHMS FOR UAVS Sérgio Ronaldo Barros dos Santos,
Calspan Status Update AG&C Committee, October 11-13, 2006 Williamsburg, VA Lou Knotts/Eric Ohmit.
Introduction to Control / Performance Flight.
HIAPER 3D Winds – current status - Dick Freisen -.
AMCOM MK66 Guidance Module Software Block Diagram Data Handler IMU ProcessingGPS ProcessingRMS Control Serial I/O Ctrl Parallel Ctrl.Actuate,
Calspan Status Update AG&C Committee, March 1-3, 2006 Lake Tahoe, NV E. Ohmit.
Control & Data Handling, Operator Control, Aircraft Interface to C&DH Steve Musko Space Physics Research Laboratory University of Michigan Ann Arbor, MI.
February 2007 NASA Dryden Status Aerospace Control & Guidance Sub-committee Boulder, CO February 2007 John Bosworth (661)
Smart Icing Systems Review, June 19-20, Aircraft Autopilot Studies Petros Voulgaris Vikrant Sharma University of Illinois.
Automatic Flight Control System
6.111 Final Project A motion sensor baseball game By Chris Falling and JinHock Ong.
Aircraft Motion and Control
Ex. 6 - Straight-and-Level Flight Ex. 6 – Straight-and-Level Flight.
Mini Autonomous Flying Vehicle CASDE is part of the National effort to develop a Micro Air Vehicle. CASDE has chosen a Mini Vehicle, in the short term,
Uh-60 Navigation and Command Instrument System
For Official NASA Use Only
CAP – Cessna Differences TrainingSummer 2016 Cessna Aircraft Differences Training (Autopilots)
Aircraft Auto Pilot Roll Control System
KNU RTLAB A Real-Time Linux System For Autonomous Navigation And Flight Attitude Control Of An Uninhabited Aerial Vehicle Charles E. Hall, Jr. Mechanical.
Arrow N7508J STEC System 30 Autopilot
Localization Life in the Atacama 2004 Science & Technology Workshop January 6-7, 2005 Daniel Villa Carnegie Mellon Matthew Deans QSS/NASA Ames.
KAP 140 Autopilot A self-study tool for pilots who fly with the Bendix/King KAP 140 Autopilot System This presentation is provided free of charge to everyone.
Four Forces of Flight Lift Weight Thrust Drag
AUTOPILOT The autopilot or automatic pilot is a system of automatic controls that holds the aircraft on any selected magnetic heading & returns the aircraft.
Aircraft Controls.
Aircraft Controls.
Pre-Solo Training Program
KAP 140 Autopilot A self-study tool for pilots who fly with the Bendix/King KAP 140 Autopilot System This presentation is provided free of charge to everyone.
Requirements Overview
Presentation transcript:

Results of NASA/DARPA Automatic Probe and Drogue Refueling Flight Test Keith Schweikhard NASA Dryden Flight Research Center

Program Objective To make one demonstration fully automatic engagement (probe plugging the drogue) between the F-18 and the Omega Air B707 tanker using the Autonomous Airborne Refueling System.

Technical Background ➢ High Risk Technology ➢ Technology Demonstration not Development Program ➢ Low Cost ➢ Compressed Development Schedule ➢ Reduced number of test conditions ➢ Reduced redundancy/ error correction in the system.

Project Timeline ➢ March 05 Proposal Kickoff DFRC ➢ DARPA Kickoff Meeting ➢ Technical Kickoff Meeting ➢ System Requirements Review ➢ Preliminary Design Review ➢ Critical Design Review ➢ Risk Reduction Flight ➢ Hardware Arrives at Dryden ➢ Flight Readiness Review ➢ Airworthiness and Flight Safety Review Board ➢ Tech Brief (Surrogate Tanker) ➢ through Surrogate Tanker Flights ➢ Tech Brief (Omega Tanker) ➢ through Omega Tanker Flights ➢ Project Completion

System Architecture Data Link Pitch Stick Roll Stick Delta Throttle Rudder = 0 Command/ Status Information Push Button Display Tanker Pallet Production Support Flight Control Computers Receiver System Video Input

Refueling Geometry 20' 100' Trail Position Closure Hold Position Precontact 1&2 Position Capt

AARD Modes and States Precon t 1 Precon t 2 Trail Closur e Captur e Hold Unplug Retreat Miss Init Standb y Ready Relative GPS Relative GPS + Tracker

Accuracy Design Targets ➢ Station Keeping Mode. ➔ ±6.5' longitudinal position ➔ ±6.5' vertical position ➔ ±10' lateral position ➢ Capture Mode ➔ System must be able to reliably guide/control receiver aircraft within ±11” of desired location, in the conditions intended for demonstration, 95% of the time ➔ Requirement driven by basket dimensions: 32” outside diameter ➔ Project pilot estimates plug success rate at 95% if the probe is positioned inside 4” from outside edge of drogue

Guidance & Control Block Diagram

Omega Tanker Risk Reduction ➢ Approach to plug on left and right drogues using the cockpit and pylon camera ➢ Tanker pitch/ roll/ yaw maneuvers ➢ Varying approach rates/ trajectories ➢ Survey of capture and miss locations on the drogue ➢ Varying plug attempts at different diameters from the center of the drogue

Surrogate Tanker Flights  Surrogate tanker was used to increase test efficiency ➔ Lower cost per hour to fly ➔ Easier to schedule.  Tested engage/ disengage/ reversion modes.  Commanded Autonomous modes through Precontact 1  Gathered system performance data using sine and step inputs  Gathered system performance data for a variety of gains  Tracked Surrogate tanker through a turn in Trail and Precontact 1

Longitudinal Axis Results

Lateral Axis Results

Vertical Axis Results

Omega Tanker Flights  Tested engage/ disengage/ reversion modes.  Commanded mode transitions through unplug  Gathered/ tuned the video tracking algorithm.

Video Tracker Performance

First Plug Attempt

Second Plug Attempt

Success

Control Position Comparison

Where Do we go from here ➢ Follow on activity planned for Oct 06 through Apr 07 ➢ Added Objectives for the follow on activity ➔ Optimal tuning of controller and Drogue Motion Compensation to improve performance and robustness of the system in the capture phase ➔ Expand the envelope to include plugs and unplugs in steady turns ➔ Receiver autonomous rendezvous with the tanker from up to 2nm and ±60° off tanker heading ➔ Improve robustness of the video tracker system in the area of drogue recognition, expanded search and acquisition

Summary ➢ Designed, developed and successfully tested a prototype system to autonomously perform probe to drogue refueling. ➢ Demonstrated autonomous station keeping behind the tanker in both level flight as well as through a 20° banked turn. ➢ Demonstrated acquisition and tracking capability of the video tracking subsystem.

Questions?

System Architecture NASA Instrumentation System (AIMS) Input Signal Management Control Laws Output Signal Selected Fader logic Actuator Signal Management Disengage Logic Replication CLAW Executive Dual Port Ram A/D D/A Discrete Input 1553 I/O Surface Actuator Analog Interface Flight Control Computers Push Button Display Pilot Light Panel Instrumentation Handler Operating System Executive Process Display Handler AARD Handler Ethernet I/O 1553 Input 1553 Output RS 422 I/O Discrete Output Pilot Vehicle Interface Operating System Nav Processes Data Link Processes D/A Ethernet I/O AARD Controller GPS Ant Data Link Ant Camera (2) Analog Inputs Control Positions SLIC Bus 1 Data Recorder IMU Cockpit Analog Inputs Operating System Nav Processes Video Processes Data Link Processes PVI Processes GNC Processes Simulation Interface Processes Data Recorder IMU Data Link Ant GPS Ant Tanker Pallet Analog Multiplex Card