MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) MEM UNIT GENERAL PROPOSALS TO THE OPERATIONAL PROCESS Second Part - Sofia I. Kosmas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism Pre-IWG October
Advertisements

ENTITIES FOR A UN SYSTEM EVALUATION FRAMEWORK 17th MEETING OF SENIOR FELLOWSHIP OFFICERS OF THE UNITED NATIONS SYSTEM AND HOST COUNTRY AGENCIES BY DAVIDE.
Secretariat for Multidimensional Security
Special Multilateral Fund of the Inter-American Council for Integral Development – FEMCIDI Inter-American Committee of Education - CIE.
Financing of OAS Activities Sources of cooperation Cooperation modalities Cooperation actors Specific Funds management models and resources mobilization.
EU funds’ evaluation plan , Latvia
THE APRM MONITORING PROCESS MOZAMBIQUE EXPERIENCE Workshop on Harmonizing the Zambian APRM NPoA with the NDP and MTEF Oct. 2014, Lusaka 1.
DR MACIEJ JUNKIERT PRACOWNIA BADAŃ NAD TRADYCJĄ EUROPEJSKĄ Guide for Applicants.
Evaluation Team Chair Training Presented By Dr. Tim Eaton TRACS Regional Representative.
THE EU FRAMEWORK FOR INTEGRATION Didier Boone BE National Contact Point on Integration to the European Commission Brussels Regional Parliament - June 8th.
Purpose of the Standards
IAEA International Atomic Energy Agency How do you know how far you have got? How much you still have to do? Are we nearly there yet? What – Who – When.
Organization Mission Organizations That Use Evaluative Thinking Will Develop mission statements specific enough to provide a basis for goals and.
NEXT Lessons Learned from Integrated Regulatory Review Service (IRRS) 22 nd and 23 rd January 2014, Brussels Fernando Franco, Spanish Nuclear.
Global Action Plan and its implementation in other regions Meeting for Discussion of the draft Plan for the Implementation of the Global Strategy to Improve.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
THE INTER-AMERICAN UNION OF ELECTORAL AUTHORITIES.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU. Quality Assurance José Viegas Ribeiro IGF, Portugal SIGMA.
Module N° 8 – SSP implementation plan. SSP – A structured approach Module 2 Basic safety management concepts Module 2 Basic safety management concepts.
March 2015 Inter-American Network for the Prevention of Violence and Crime.
Conclusions and Next steps Conclusions and Next steps EVD Preparedness Meeting: January 2015.
Tracking of GEF Portfolio: Monitoring and Evaluation of Results Sub-regional Workshop for GEF Focal Points Aaron Zazueta March 2010 Hanoi, Vietnam.
EMAC – Network and Support of National Contact Points solitander:
UNITED NATIONS Population Unit ECONOMIC COMMISSION FOR EUROPE Road Maps for Mainstreaming Ageing  Fiona Willis-Núñez.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION DG Employment, Social Affairs and Equal Opportunities Luca PIROZZI Social Protection and Inclusion Policies PROGRESS Community Programme.
Inter-American Drug Abuse Control Commission (CICAD) EXPERT GROUP ON DEMAND REDUCTION October 22-24, Argentina Organization of American States (OAS)
PACIFIC AID EFFECTIVENESS PRINCIPLES. Purpose of Presentation Provide an overview of Pacific Principles on Aid Effectiveness Provide an overview of Pacific.
Evaluation of EU Structural Funds information and publicity activities in Lithuania in Implementing recommendations for Dr. Klaudijus.
The Multilateral Fund and its Management Structure UNFCCC Workshop on the Adaptation Fund 3-5 May 2006 Alberta, Canada Maria Nolan Chief Officer - Multilateral.
Building and Recognizing Quality School Systems DISTRICT ACCREDITATION © 2010 AdvancED.
RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE INSTITUTIONALIZATION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE REMJA WORKING GROUP ON MUTUAL LEGAL ASSISTANCE IN CRIMINAL MATTERS AND EXTRADITION.
UNDP Latvia strategy to support absorption of EU funds Janis AIZSALNIEKS, Project Coordinator UNDP Latvia CAPACITY BUILDING TO ABSORB EU FUNDS LOCAL GOVERNANCE,
SACS and The Accreditation Process Faculty Convocation Southern University Monday, January 12, 2009 Presented By Emma Bradford Perry Dean of Libraries.
Senior Evaluation Officer GEF Independent Evaluation Office Minsk, Belarus September 2015 Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations.
Office of Performance Review (OPR) U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (DHHS) Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) Stephen Dorage.
Model of the Permanent Council for OAS Interns - MOAS/PC Nelly Robinson, MOAS Program Coordinator Department of International Affairs Secretariat for External.
African Centre for Statistics United Nations Economic Commission for Africa Conclusions and Recommendations of the Friends of the Chair of the CSC Secretariat.
The Multilateral Evaluation Mechanism (MEM) and the Caribbean JUNE
Riga’s AC Baseline Review Säästva Eesti Institute Heidi Tuhkanen, SEI-Tallinn Centre
Working Group on Ageing Third Meeting 22 to 23 November 2010 Geneva, Switzerland Tuesday, 23 November Item 4 Discussion on the second review and appraisal.
Erasmus Mundus Action 2 - Strand 1 Lot 1: Algeria, Morocco, Tunisia Erasmus Mundus - Al Idrisi: A scholarship scheme for exchange and cooperation between.
Preparatory Stakeholder Workshop - Laos 26 May 2010.
A short introduction to the Strengthened Approach to supporting PFM reforms.
Application procedure From theory to practice Dieter H. Henzler, Steinbeis-Transfercenter Cultural Resources Management, Berlin.
Source: OEA/Ser.W /XIII.2.3 CIDI/CIDS/doc. 6/02 The Inter-American Program on Sustainable Development establishes the priorities and policy guidelines.
MICS Data Processing Workshop Multiple Indicator Cluster Surveys Data Processing Workshop Overview of the MICS Process.
DRAFT TOR FOR HUMAN RESOURCE FOR HEALTH GROUP. Background  HRH are important for improving quality of health care  HRHG is required to response the.
WORK PLAN OF THE MANAGEMENT BOARD OF THE INTER-AMERICAN AGENCY FOR COOPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT (MB/IACD) ENRIQUE MARURI LONDOÑO Chair of the.
Information Meeting for Permanent Delegates on UNESCO’s Cooperation with National Commissions 25 February 2011 Internal Oversight Service.
NMTPF for Azerbaijan NMTPF development process The NMTPF in Azerbaijan was formulated in 2009 with the request of the Government of Azerbaijan,
The MESICIC Experience & Civil Society Participation.
Analysis of Mandates 2007–2011 Working method approved by the Working Group for the Review of OAS Programs.
Workshop on international standards, contemporary technologies and regional cooperation Noumea, New Caledonia, 4 – 8 February World Population.
Project Management December 2008 Department of Planning and Follow-up (DPF) Secretary of Administration and Finance (SAF)
Developing National Capability for Integrated Border Management (IBM) in Lebanon Project Funded by the European Union Implemented by the International.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS organizations in Papua New Guinea Day 4. Session 11. Reporting.
GTFORCIDI Summary of mandates and proposal for streamlining sectoral ministerial processes.
United Nations Statistics Division
Programming Committee - composition
Summary of the Outcomes of the 1st AfriGEOSS Steering Committee Meeting Humbulani Mudau DST, South Africa 1st AfriGEOSS Symposium 27 – 29 April 2016.
Objectives of the Training
GEOSS Data Sharing Principles
WORKING PRINCIPLES ECONOMIC COOPERATION ORGANIZATION REGIONAL COORDINATION CENTRE FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ECO/FAO REGIONAL PROGRAMME FOR FOOD SECURITY.
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
Assessment of Quality in Statistics GLOBAL ASSESSMENTS, PEER REVIEWS AND SECTOR REVIEWS IN THE ENLARGEMENT AND ENP COUNTRIES Mirela Kadic, Project Manager.
United Nations Voluntary Fund on Disability (UNVFD)
Task Force on Target Setting and Reporting TFTSR
United Nations Statistics Division
"Experience with the peer reviews, successes and things to change for next reviews" Delina Ibrahimaj, Albania.
Presentation transcript:

MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) MEM UNIT GENERAL PROPOSALS TO THE OPERATIONAL PROCESS Second Part - Sofia I. Kosmas

PROPOSAL: Content – Thematic structure of the Anti-Drug Strategy in the Hemisphere, recommendations and conclusions. Source of the Report – Questionnaire responses; Introductory document; GEG consultations with countries and external sources. Intro Document – overview of the country’s drug control efforts. Achievements, difficulties and areas in which cooperation should be strengthened. Mandatory for all countries Frequency - dependent on final decision regarding the evaluation cycle. Production - MU prepares 1 st narrative draft report; the GEG makes its evaluation and conclusions throughout its drafting sessions. Final approval – CICAD Commission 5. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE MULTILATERAL EVALUATION REPORT

6. CHARACTERISTICS OF THE RECOMMENDATION IMPLEMENTATION FOLLOW-UP REPORT PROPOSAL: Content – Recommendations assigned to the country, status of implementation, difficulties encountered, conclusions. Source of the Report – Responses to the follow-up on the progress of recommendations form and GEG consultations with countries. Frequency – dependent on final decision regarding the evaluation cycle. Production - MU prepares 1st narrative draft report; the GEG makes its evaluation and conclusions throughout its drafting sessions. Final approval – CICAD Commission

8. CHARACTERISTICS OF COUNTRY VISITS DURING THE EVALUATION PROCESS PROPOSAL: In-Situ Visits In-Situ Visits Duration - maximum 3 days Duration - maximum 3 days Visiting Team – GEG experts and 1 MU Staff Visiting Team – GEG experts and 1 MU Staff Authorization – CICAD Commission and country authorities Authorization – CICAD Commission and country authorities Purpose – Purpose – obtain political support from the country; obtain political support from the country; promote cooperation among Member States; promote cooperation among Member States; Improve the quality of dialogue among the Member States and CICAD; Improve the quality of dialogue among the Member States and CICAD; Promote full participation in the MEM process. Promote full participation in the MEM process.

8. CHARACTERISTICS OF COUNTRY VISITS DURING THE EVALUATION PROCESS (cont.) Method - Method - Interviews with authorities and technical personnel on the topic. Interviews with authorities and technical personnel on the topic. Awareness workshop for those responsible for completing the MEM indicators and report on the implementation of recommendations. Awareness workshop for those responsible for completing the MEM indicators and report on the implementation of recommendations. Justification – country did not provide info; need to acquire more info, or clarify info, provided that it cannot be obtained from other acceptable sources. Justification – country did not provide info; need to acquire more info, or clarify info, provided that it cannot be obtained from other acceptable sources. Product: Report prepared by the visiting team to be presented to CICAD. Product: Report prepared by the visiting team to be presented to CICAD.

8. CHARACTERISTICS OF COUNTRY VISITS DURING THE EVALUATION PROCESS (cont.) PROPOSAL: Promotional Visits Promotional Visits Duration - maximum 2 days Duration - maximum 2 days Visiting Team – 1-2 MU Staff Visiting Team – 1-2 MU Staff Authorization – MEM Promotional Strategy Authorization – MEM Promotional Strategy Purpose – Purpose – Disseminate info on the MEM; Disseminate info on the MEM; Promote full participation in the MEM process; Promote full participation in the MEM process; Inform authorities on how the MEM operates. Inform authorities on how the MEM operates. Method - Method - Interviews with authorities and technical personnel on the topic; Interviews with authorities and technical personnel on the topic; Awareness workshop for those responsible for completing MEM indicators and report on the implementation of recommendations. Awareness workshop for those responsible for completing MEM indicators and report on the implementation of recommendations.

9. CHARACTERISITCS OF THE MEM SOLIDARITY FUND PROPOSAL: Financing – Funds depend on donor countries contributions and the funds provided by the OAS Regular Fund, which were assigned specifically to the MEM. Objective – Assist the participation of countries that due to exceptional circumstances are unable to finance the participation of their experts to the GEG meetings only. Administration – CICAD Executive Secretariat Requesting Procedure – Requesting country sends a letter to the CICAD Executive Secretariat (minimum 3 weeks before the meeting) explaining the reason for its application. MU Coordinator reviews and considers all the requests. CICAD Executive Secretariat will advise the country of the type of assistance that will be provided.

9. CHARACTERISITCS OF THE MEM SOLIDARITY FUND (CONT.) Factors to be considered for approval – Factors to be considered for approval – Exceptional circumstances of the country Exceptional circumstances of the country Availability of funds at the moment Availability of funds at the moment Strong commitment by the country to the MEM process Strong commitment by the country to the MEM process Active participation of the expert Active participation of the expert Expert’s fulfillment of responsibilities (during GEG sessions as well as in their capitals) Expert’s fulfillment of responsibilities (during GEG sessions as well as in their capitals) Willingness of the country to share the costs of funding its expert. Willingness of the country to share the costs of funding its expert. Approval results – Approval results – Requesting country receives resources to partially cover its expert’s expenses. Requesting country receives resources to partially cover its expert’s expenses. Frequency of assistance will be determined once an evaluation cycle has been established. Frequency of assistance will be determined once an evaluation cycle has been established.

10. INTERGOVERNMENTAL WORKING GROUP (IWG) PROPOSAL: CICAD Commissioners- Convoke IWG before each round to streamline the process and update the questionnaire. Elect the President. President – Assist the MEM Unit in the coordination/ organization of the IWG preparatory work.

MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) MEM UNIT GENERAL PROPOSALS TO THE OPERATIONAL PROCESS End of MULTILATERAL EVALUATION MECHANISM (MEM) MEM UNIT GENERAL PROPOSALS TO THE OPERATIONAL PROCESS End of Second Part - Sofía I. Kosmas THANK YOU