Goals for Learning: I can describe what rigor looks like in my classroom. I can examine student work products for rigor. I can incorporate rigor into my.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Teaching Strategies Gold
Advertisements

Every child, every school, every day. What’s the real product of Arts Learning?
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
CCSS/ES in CMS. Argumentation Students form and express opinions, derive supporting reasons, and draw conclusions from a variety of sources. Students.
Learning Objectives, Performance Tasks and Rubrics: Demonstrating Understanding and Defining What Good Is Brenda Lyseng Minnesota State Colleges.
Curriculum and Rigor in your Classroom “Teaching is only as good as the learning that takes place.” International Center for Leadership Education.
Project-Based Learning
Writing Instructional Objectives
Rights Respecting Schools: Workshop Series
ACOS 2010 Standards of Mathematical Practice
Big Ideas and Problem Solving in Junior Math Instruction
Technology and Motivation
Principles of Assessment
Common Core Math Professional Development
“Knowledge” Do Now: As a teacher, what does this statement make think about or feel: “He Who Can Does He Who cannot Teaches” George Bernard Shaw.
The Common Core Curriculum By Dean Berry, Ed. D. Gregg Berry, B.A.
Colorado Families as Faculty Project Families as Faculty: Improving Home-School Communication Beth Schaffner.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Writing Across the Curriculum (WAC) at Sojourner Douglass College Faculty and Staff Session One Saturday, November 9, 2013.
A Framework for Inquiry-Based Instruction through
Fall 2011 AE610: Survey of Art Education. Agenda Announcements 5:00-5:05 Review of Pedagogies 5:05-5:30 Action Planning 5:30-6:00 Upcoming Assignments.
Math and Science Institute Exploring Physical Science Today’s Agenda Review of homework and participant sharing of their ENGAGE components of 5E. Engage.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
 Update on Math Initiatives - Redux Principals’ Meeting October 24, 2013.
Your Name Grading and Reporting on Student Learning What is it? A system of assessing and reporting that describes student progress in relation to standards.
ESSENTIAL QUESTION What does it look like and sound like when students use evidence to support their thinking?
 This prepares educators to work in P-12 schools (1)  It provides direction (1)  It is knowledge-based, articulated, shared, coherent, consistent with.
Authentic Learning and Assessment Erin Gibbons Five Standards of Authentic Instruction  Higher-Order Thinking  Depth of Knowledge  Connectedness to.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
PRINCIPAL SESSION 2012 EEA Day 1. Agenda Session TimesEvents 1:00 – 4:00 (1- 45 min. Session or as often as needed) Elementary STEM Power Point Presentation.
Community College Survey of Student Engagement (CCSSE) Benchmarks of Effective Educational Practice Summary Report Background: The Community College Survey.
Gradual Release of Responsibility
Sharing our Un-Beautiful Projects. The Six A’s of Powerful Projects Academic Rigor Projects address key learning standards identified by the school or.
MATH COMMUNICATIONS Created for the Georgia – Alabama District By: Diane M. Cease-Harper, Ed.D 2014.
Pennsylvania Standard J. Geometry Standard
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
PLANTING THE SEEDS OF RIGOR Region I Principals’ Meeting November 5, 2010.
 Sign In and find your assigned table  Enjoy breakfast items  You will NOT need a computer until much later  Be ready to share at 9 a.m. a check for.
Depth of Knowledge. Let’s review... 1.Students perform simple procedures like copying, calculating, and remembering. They either know an answer or they.
Inquiry Learning and Social Studies College and Career Readiness Conferences Summer
A Signature Tool of The Institute for Learning
IST_Seminar II CHAPTER 12 Instructional Methods. Objectives: Students will: Explain the role of all teachers in the development of critical thinking skills.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
Digging Deep into Reading Informational Text CCSS Standards 1-3.
Recognizing these in the classroom
1 Engaging Students Incorporating Depth, Complexity, and Questioning Strategies into the classroom. Phase 1 “Plan for Using Questioning” November 4, 2009.
Common Core: Depth of Knowledge Rigor for Coaches.
GREAT EXPECTATIONS: THE POWER OF SETTING OBJECTIVES September 2014 Ed Director Meeting.
Greenbush. An informed citizen possesses the knowledge needed to understand contemporary political, economic, and social issues. A thoughtful citizen.
Instructional Leadership: Planning Rigorous Curriculum (What is Rigorous Curriculum?)
Effective mathematics instruction:  foster positive mathematical attitudes;  focus on conceptual understanding ;  includes students as active participants.
© 2012 Common Core, Inc. All rights reserved. commoncore.org NYS COMMON CORE MATHEMATICS CURRICULUM A Story of Units Module Focus- Grade 3.
Christchurch New Zealand October 2009 Integrating new technologies to empower learning and transform leadership.
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
Inquiry Road Map A Guidance System for 21 st Century Learning By Mary Ratzer.
Designing a Culminating Task Presented by Anne Maben UCLA Science & Literacy Coach Based on the model by Jay McTighe, Maryland Assessment Consortium.
Authentic service-learning experiences, while almost endlessly diverse, have some common characteristics: Positive, meaningful and real to the participants.
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Introduction I am interested in applying for the Lead Teacher Position in Third Grade. I hold a Bachelors Degree in Elementary Education with an Emphasis.
Using WICOR to increase rigor and engagement during instruction.
Teaching Research Skills with the New Utah Core State Standards for Library Media (6-12) Caitlin Gerrity and Anne Diekema (Sherratt Southern.
The Learner Centered Classroom
Contemporary Issues November 8, 2010.
Gifted Behaviors Rating Scale
I’ll Know It When I See It CHETL-Rigor
Lesson Plan Models for Differentiation
Big Ideas and Problem Solving
Q uality uestioning Henrico County Public Schools
Bellwork: Student Engagement Chart
By Barb Baltrinic and Angela Smith
Presentation transcript:

Rigor Let’s Investigate!

Goals for Learning: I can describe what rigor looks like in my classroom. I can examine student work products for rigor. I can incorporate rigor into my lesson plans. I

What is Rigor? * On a piece of chart paper, describe rigor as it applies to the classroom. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Aot1SNflbTE

Myths Myth 1: If you have rigorous standards, you have a rigorous course. Myth 2: Rigor means more work. Myth 3: Rigor means harder. Myth 4: Rigor is a matter of content. Myth 5: Young students cannot engage in rigorous instruction. Myth 6: In order to engage in rigor, students must first master the basics. Myth 7: Rigor is for the elite. http://www.mindstepsinc.com/2011/01/seven-myths-about-rigor/

Rigor Myths 7 Myths of Rigor from MindSteps Inc. Evaluate each myth and discuss a time you have broken the myth. http://www.mindstepsinc.com/2011/01/seven-myths-about-rigor/ If you google Myths of rigor you will find Barbara Blackburn heavily quoted, you will find 5 myths, 4 myths and 7 myths- the myths are all similar. I chose this list because it specifically addresses young children. Activity: give each group several notecards. ONE notecard will have a myth about rigor (see next slide). Give each group only one notecard with a myth. The other notecards will have factual statements.

Mythbusters? In your groups, read the card at your table that displays one of the 7 myths. Identify a strategy to bust the myth! Discuss with your group and be ready to share. <iframe width="420" height="315" src="//www.youtube.com/embed/m9We2XsVZfc" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe>

Blackburn’s Definition “Rigor is creating an environment in which each student is expected to learn at high levels, each student is supported so he or she can learn at high levels, and each student demonstrates learning at high levels.” Blackburn, Barbara R., Rigor Is Not a Four-Letter Word. Second ed. London and New York: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group, 2013. Print.

State Board Policy- Rigor State Board Policy on rigor Teachers must: Engage students in active reasoning and critical thinking Work collaboratively with other faculty members and staff Cultivate positive relationships with students, parents, and community Provide students with necessary academic and social supports

What are teachers doing? Choosing and creating valuable learning experiences based on standards Creating a positive environment Having and communicating high expectations for all children Questioning for higher levels of thinking (Bloom’s, Webbs DOK) Providing appropriate support Engaging children in thinking and academic conversation Assessing to determine understanding and guide instruction Briefly discuss/clarify each of these points. You may want to add a slide or resource about bloom’s or webb’s DOK

What are students doing Active, hands‐on learning Questioning, predicting, exploring Creating, evaluating, analyzing Constructing knowledge Collaborating and actively participating Communicating and discussing Inquiring Engaging in project‐based learning

Rigor Checklist RIGOR: COGNITIVE CHALLENGE DIMENSION Does this assignment engage students in substantive content and provide an opportunity to apply highly complex thinking? Does the assignment contain the following quality indicators within this dimension? o Is engaging to students o Leads to deep understanding of content o Allows opportunities for students to reflect on their own thought processes and/or set goals for their own learning (encourages metacognition) o Makes connections to other concepts within this discipline and/or to concepts in other disciplines o Asks students to perform higher order cognitive skills as analyze, apply, evaluate, examine issues, solve problems

Checklist continued o Is appropriate in age and grade level o Expresses high teacher expectations for completing the work o Encourages the study of essential concepts or understandings (the work involved is worthy of the time and energy invested) o Mirrors an authentic and challenging task (real world application or connection) 0 Contains clear, yet rigorous expectations for learning (beyond minimum standards) UNC Greensboro – SERVE Center

Group Activity Review the student work samples at your table. Use the Rigor Checklist handout to determine if the product is rigorous. Discuss with your group.

An example for planning Instead of telling students about the class rule: “We work together in our class” You could…..

Try this with your students... Tell your children: I am going to show you 2 pictures of children working. Look closely at the pictures and think about which children you would like to work with (the children in picture 1 or picture 2). Then say: Talk to an elbow partner about the children in the pictures. Pic 1: http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=picture+of+students+working+together&go=Submit&qs=n&form=QBIR&pq=picture+of+students+working+together&sc=0-24&sp=-1&sk=#view=detail&id=3D214C0CBBF55F888100D689B6870B8ACFC064AA&selectedIndex=13 Pic 2: http://www.bing.com/images/search?q=picture+of+student+cheating&go=Submit&qs=n&form=QBIR&pq=picture+of+student+cheating&sc=0-20&sp=-1&sk=#view=detail&id=4D68F9DAD192F60A2B10DA674A39AB910C3A7B5B&selectedIndex=50 Which picture did you choose? Why? Why didn’t you choose the other children in the other picture?

Reflect Rigor is…. part of quality instruction. part of a quality schooling experience. You cannot have quality instruction or a quality school without rigor.