Department of Cooperative Governance Disaster Management Amendment Bill, 2002 (Act No. 57 of 2002) Briefing to the Select Committee 23 June 2015

To brief the Select Committee on the Disaster Management Amendment Bill introduced into Parliament by the Minister. Purpose 2

 Disaster management is a functional area listed in Schedule 4A of the Constitution. This implies that the national legislative authority has concurrent competence with the provincial legislative authority  The Disaster Management Act, 2002 (the principal Act) is internationally reputed for its emphasis on prevention and its relative comprehensive approach to Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR).  The main thrust of the principle Act & the National Disaster Management Framework, 2005 (NDMF) centres around the creation of appropriate institutional arrangements for disaster management. It is argued that the ideals of disaster management cannot be achieved without structures to support its myriad of actions.  However, the implementation has posed significant challenges, particularly at the level of local municipalities. The purpose of the review was to tackle these challenges by maximising the effect of disaster management legislation to communities, especially those most at risk. Background 3

The aim of the principal Act is to ensure implementation of an integrated and coordinated approach to disaster management across all spheres of government involving all relevant stakeholders. Some challenges were experienced in implementing the principal Act which necessitated that the Act be amended making it simpler to implement, to strengthen certain regulatory provisions, avoid ambiguity and provide greater legal certainty. Executive Summary 4

 Cabinet approved the publication of the draft Disaster Management Amendment Bill (the Bill) for public comment in June subsequently published in Government Gazette number (Notice No. 637 of 2013) on 19 June  The key issues that were raised during the consultation process and in the comments subsequent to the publication of the Disaster Management Amendment Bill for public comments, were incorporated in the current Bill.  Cabinet approved the submission of the final Bill to Parliament on 17 September  Complied with the rules of the National Assembly and the Joint Rules of Parliament to introduce the Bill to Parliament. The explanatory summary of the Bill, as required by Rule 241, was published in the Government Gazette on 30 January  The National Assembly has completed and passed the processing of the Disaster Management Amendment Bill to the NCOP. Executive Summary 5

 The Review of Disaster Management Legislation formed part of the strategic plan of the Department of Cooperative Governance  Due consideration in the amendment process was given to, among other things, the Government's Programme of Action and the 18 key targets of the National Development Plan.  The disaster management approach of the Department of Cooperative Governance pays specific attention to the pressing needs of poor communities in relation to both natural and human induced disasters in the context of a developmental and capable state.  The proposed amendments to the principal Act, provide more impetus on aspects of disaster management planning that support these priorities. Strategic focus 6

Calls to amend the Disaster Management Act, 2002 came from,  the political leadership  South African Local Government Association (SALGA  Disaster Management Institute of Southern Africa (DMISA)  National Disaster Management Advisory Forum (NDMAF)  Academics  Practitioners, and  Research reports by SALGA, the IFCC and the FCC A process commenced to define the scope of the amendments required. This culminated in the Disaster Management Amendment Bill which was approved by Cabinet for public comment and published in Government Gazette number (Notice No. 637 of 2013) on 19 June Main discussion 7

Consultation resulted in the drafting of the Disaster Management Amendment Bill which is aimed at-  clarifying terminology.  the representation of traditional leaders in the disaster management advisory forums.  providing for the NDMAF to serve as the SA National Platform for DRR thereby incorporating the obligations set out in global commitments (Hyogo Framework of Action, followed by Sendai Framework for DRR).  clarifying the roles and responsibilities of organs of state to assist the disaster management structures.  Strengthening reporting on policy implementation, DRR, relief, recovery and rehabilitation efforts using IGR structures.  Expanding the contents of disaster management plans of organs of state to include expected climate change impacts and risks.  Re-affirming the role of municipalities (both at district and local level) to establish disaster management centres and improve capacity for the development and coordination of disaster management plans.  Granting the Minister authority to make regulations on education, training, research and the classification and declaration of disasters. Main discussion (cont) 8

Two key issues that were elevated by stakeholders could not be dealt with by the Disaster Management Amendment Bill  There is a notion that implementation challenges are experienced due to the inappropriate location of disaster management centres within the organisational structures of provinces and municipalities, (Seniority of the Head of the Disaster Management Centre) and  There is no specific funding allocated for disaster risk reduction efforts across the spheres of government. 9 ISSUES THAT COULD NOT BE DEALT WITH

 Careful consideration should be given to the placement of Disaster Management Centres in the organisational structure to fulfil its strategic role to effectively reduce the risk of disaster and be responsive to the needs of communities in the municipality. The Head of the Disaster Management Centre should thus form part of the decision-making structure of the organisation and should ideally report to the highest office within a municipality and province, respectively. Such an approach, empowers the executive leadership to ensure that the disaster management centre is fulfilling its coordination and strategic role to effectively reduce the risk of disaster within that particular sphere of government.  The matter was partially and indirectly addressed in the Bill by prescribing reporting requirements to IGR structures, thereby highlighting the strategic importance of issues of disaster risk reduction and the management of allocated disaster funding. This legislative provision should ultimately also raise the profile of disaster management centres within the respective spheres 10 OPTIONS TO ADDRESS ISSUES

 The Chief State Law Adviser suggested the Bill to be tagged as a Section 76 Bill since it contains provisions affecting the interests of the provinces.  The NDMC will continue to support the parliamentary process.  Once the Bill is passed into law, the Department of Cooperative Governance will have sessions to engage with provinces and municipalities (including SALGA) on the substance of the Amendment Act. Circulars will also be distributed to provinces, municipalities and stakeholders.  Regulations concerning the declaration and classification of disasters will be published before the end of the 2016/17 financial year. 11 Implementation

ORGANISATIONAL AND PERSONNEL IMPLICATIONS No new implications. However, the principal Act already requires all organs of state to have capacity to develop and implement disaster management plans and perform the disaster management function. In many instances, especially in sector departments and local municipalities, little or no organisational capacity for disaster management currently exists. A few Local Municipalities have recognised the need for dedicated disaster management capacity and have appointed officials to coordinate and implement the disaster management function in the municipality with positive results (eg Tlokwe LM in NW; Polokwane LM in Limpopo; Kwadukuza LM in KZN; Greater Giyani LM in Limpopo; Rustenburg LM in NW; Mafikeng LM in NW). The Amendment Bill re-emphasizes the requirement to establish capacity to implement disaster management effectively. Governance implications 12

FINANCIAL IMPLICATIONS In terms of current legislative provisions, organs of state across the spheres and sectors of government already have a responsibility to provide for developing disaster management plans and the implementation thereof. The Amendment Bill seeks to affirm these responsibilities by having organs of state assign the required resources to perform its mandated functions. Governance implications (Cont.) 13

 COMMUNICATION IMPLICATIONS Once the Disaster Management Amendment Bill has been published, appropriate communication mechanisms will be activated through the Department of Cooperative Governance and Traditional Affairs (COGTA) and the Government Communication and Information System (GCIS).  CONSTITUTIONAL IMPLICATIONS The Bill seeks to give effect to the principles of co-operative government set out in chapter 3 of the Constitution through clear guidance on issues of disaster management across the spheres of government. Furthermore, by placing emphasis on reducing the risk of disasters, it also affirms the collective duty on the part of each sphere of government and all organs of state within each sphere to ‘secure the well-being of the people of the Republic’.  IMPLICATIONS FOR VULNERABLE GROUPS The interest of vulnerable communities and groups are protected through a focus on disaster risk reduction across the spheres and sectors of government. 14 Governance implications (Cont)

15 Thank you