Curriculum and Assessment Overview State/District Standards Formative Assessment with Performance Rubrics Differentiated Instruction RTI.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
[Imagine School at North Port] Oral Exit Report Quality Assurance Review Team School Accreditation.
Advertisements

Collegial Coaching Rebecca Derenge Title I, Reading Coordinator Teamwork Collegial.doc.
Reading ARDT Teams September 10 & 11, Agenda Your Role Your Role Big Picture Big Picture PLC for ARDT PLC for ARDT CI support CI support Plan on.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Keewaydin School Where learning happens every day for everyone.
PD Plan Agenda August 26, 2008 PBTE Indicators Track
TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes
Program Improvement Unit Collaborating to increase student achievement and fundamentally improve the interaction between the teacher and the students to.
Division of School Effectiveness1 Common Core State Standards: Transitioning from Awareness to Implementation December 1, 2011 Rutledge Conference Center.
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation Grant No Building, Supporting, and Sustaining Professional Growth.
Common Core State Standards and Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Common Core State Standards and Partnership for.
Best Practices. Overview of Best Practices Literacy Best Practice Documents: Were developed by curriculum staff and area specialists, with coaches’ and.
+ Hybrid Roles in Your School If not now, then when?
Common Core State Standards & Assessment Update The Next Step in Preparing Michigan’s Students for Career and College MERA Spring Conference May 17, 2011.
Check-in on Curriculum Progress Next Steps.  Brings all of the pieces together.  Transparency  Creates curriculum conversation  A tool for the journey.
Deepening Our Understanding of Student Learning Objectives (SLOs)
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Getting It Right at the Building Level  Introductions  Burton Street Elementary  NYS TAC Grant Pilot School.
Access to the GPS – Making the link between student skill, academic content and activity Access to the GPS/GAA Elluminate Session 1 September 11, 2008.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
Administrative Evaluation Committee – Orientation Meeting Dr. Christine Carver, Associate Superintendent of Human Capital Development Mr. Stephen Foresi,
Measuring Student Success in the
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Leveraging Educator Evaluation to Support Improvement Planning Reading Public Schools Craig Martin
Agenda for New Teacher Induction Brief overview of Formative Assessment Brief Overview of Differentiated Instruction Standards Aligned System-
Together Twenty-first Century Learning Environment Washington Elementary Federal Grant.
1 NEEDS BASED TECHNOLOGY PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Aland Russell Director of Technology Escuela Campo Alegre Documents available upon.
State Role in Supporting Educators C HRIS M INNICH M AY 2012 | SCEE M EETING.
Curriculum Mapping Leadership Team Planning Based on the work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs, Ph.D. and Susan Udelhofen, Ph.D.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
PANAMA-BUENA VISTA UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT
Full Implementation of the Common Core. Last Meeting Performance Tasks Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium Upcoming Accountability Measure Strong teaching.
Empowering Parents. Ideas to improve parent engagement in four areas: Helping the classroom teacher Creating an ELL Parent Night Positioning the ESL teacher.
Sharing in Leadership for Student Success DeAnn Huinker & Kevin McLeod, UWM Beth Schefelker, MPS 18 April 2008.
The Guaranteed and Viable Curriculum January 29, 2013 Karen M. Beerer, Ed.D.
Laying the Groundwork for the New Teacher Professional Growth and Effectiveness System TPGES.
Standards-Based Education Curriculum Alignment Project Elementary Principals’ Meeting October 21, 2010.
Leadership Team Meeting March 24,  Project Based Approach  Cross Functional Project Teams  Projects Support Multiple Operational Expectations.
DRAFT Title I Annual Parent Meeting Elliott Point September 15, 2015 Janet Norris.
Next-Generation Standards and Accountability Terry Holliday, Ph.D. Kentucky Education Commissioner Quality New Mexico June 9, 2011.
Destination--- Common Core Staff Meeting/SSC February 2013.
Adopting the Iowa Core CSL Working Group Nov. 10, 2009.
Teacher and Principal Evaluation A new frontier….
Professional Learning Communities “The most promising strategy for sustained, substantial school improvement is developing the ability of school personnel.
FEBRUARY KNOWLEDGE BUILDING  Time for Learning – design schedules and practices that ensure engagement in meaningful learning  Focused Instruction.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Educator Evaluation Information Edward Everett School Laura Miceli, Principal September 24, 2014.
Hastings Public Schools PLC Staff Development Planning & Reporting Guide.
City of Salem Schools Gifted Program Parent Meeting 2008 Children Come First in Salem!
Using Adequate Resources to Double Student Performance Sarah Archibald Allan Odden CPRE Invitational Conference February 21, 2007.
Onslow County Schools Division of Media and Instructional Technology This presentation was prepared under fair use exemption of the U.S. Copyright Law.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Gifted & Talented Program Evaluation CCSD Board Meeting Monday, May 19th, :00 PM.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Writing Policy for SBDM Councils. Goals of this Session provide an overview of Senate Bill 1 requirements related to writing provide guidance in reviewing.
Mathematics Performance Tasks Applying a Program Logic Model to a Professional Development Series California Educational Research Association December.
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Castle / Kahuku Complex Area Support Team (CK CAST) Phase I Professional Development
Zimmerly Response NMIA Audit. Faculty Response Teacher input on Master Schedule. Instructional Coaches Collaborative work. Design and implement common.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
What do you think should be the goal of technology in education?
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Goal Progress Measure 1.1 Update September 26, 2017 Academics Division
SGM Mid-Year Conference Gina Graham
Presentation transcript:

Curriculum and Assessment Overview State/District Standards Formative Assessment with Performance Rubrics Differentiated Instruction RTI

Curriculum coming together with Assessment State/District Standards Formative Assessment with Performance Rubrics Differentiated Instruction RTI Remember, the goal of standards based curriculum is to: IMPROVE STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT by TEACHING LESS BETTER!!! By having an aligned curriculum and assessment program, teachers have a more defined idea of the content for which they are responsible. They can monitor student progress more effectively and are accountable for instruction and student growth.

A Principal’s Role in Curriculum Knowledge of the Big Picture Knowledge of the Resources Facilitator of Implementation Responsible for Accountability Instructional Practices Innovator

Knowledge of the Big Picture State Standards National Standards Consortium or District Standards Need to the know the “big picture” but don’t need to be experts in every field. Have a good feel for what proficiency looks like in each grade level. Need to be able to weed out “need to know” vs. “nice to know” to help teachers plan efficiently

State Curriculum Standards Cycle

Curriculum and Instruction Unit August 2010 Phase 2, Pilot Online Formative Assessment Writing Program The Office of Public Instruction (OPI) is launching Phase 2 of a pilot online formative assessment. The purpose of this pilot is to gain further experience with a formative assessment writing program, Vantage Learning’s My Access. This product was chosen from a group of four writing programs used in Montana classrooms as Phase 1 of the online formative assessment writing program in the school year. The OPI invites you to apply to use My Access in your classroom as part of Phase 2 of the pilot. For more information and the application: Professional Development Opportunities-Communication Arts Northwest Montana’s Reading Council’s Annual Literacy Conference, August 18, 2010, Flathead High School, Kalispell, Montana. For more information and a registration form please contact Northwest Reading Council, c/o Megan Koppes, 103 Getty Drive, Kalispell, MT Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Update Thirty states have adopted. Montana is following a plan and you can help. Montana will be conducting an alignment study that involves out-of-state experts completing a comparison of the CCSS and Montana Standards and Essential Learning Expectations, completing a comparison using Achieve’s Gap Analysis Tool; and looking at a comparison using the CCSSO Survey of Enacted Curriculum Tool. This alignment study will help determine the next steps. What can you do? Examine the documents Watch the online presentation and keep checking for updates. Give us your views by completing a survey about the CCSS (found in two locations): Join the team that will meet at the Montana Learning Center, August 11-13, to complete the comparison using Achieve’s Gap Analysis Tool as well as determine what and how the 15 percent possible addition to the CCSS will look like. Sign up TODAY for the August 11-13, CCSS Team; contact Kris Goyins, or Jean Howard, OPI’s Content Standard Informer Sign up on OPI’s Curriculum and Assessment website

OPI Curriculum Specialists Michael Hall Curriculum and Instruction Unit Manager/Technology Curriculum Specialist Colet Bartow Library Media Curriculum Specialist Gifted and Talented Specialist Deb Poole Kris Goyins Communication Arts Curriculum Specialist Jean Howard Mathematics Curriculum Specialist Katie Burke Science Curriculum Specialist

Knowledge of the Resources Most important resource is PEOPLE – Find out who to ask at the state, district, and building level and DON’T be afraid to ask questions. BE REAL. – Identify the teachers who are doing the best job of raising achievement and use them as resources. Survey your building to understand the resource materials available or not – Identify weaknesses in resources – Research how materials are adopted – Support teachers with getting what they need to teach efficiently and effectively—don’t hamstring them by expecting superior teaching without sufficient resources

Facilitator of Implementation Principals have the power to drive school improvement. – Target areas where there is buy in first in order to build trust – Don’t try to implement everything at once – It will ALWAYS take much longer than anticipated. – Plan extended staff development to insure success. Best staff development contains combines content knowledge and instructional methods. Make follow up an integral part of staff development.

Responsible for Accountability Pair Curriculum with Assessment Create a culture of high expectations for students and staff – Go slowly in order to build trust Identify and target effective instructional strategies to help teachers set goals. – Celebrate growth with teachers – Give teachers opportunities to learn and grow – Identify those teachers who can change and work with them to change. If they cannot change, work to change their situation. Use your building/district evaluation tool to help implement curriculum and school improvement changes

Instructional Practices Innovator Model good instructional/learning practice at faculty meetings, staff development, and your own professional growth. Principals cannot delegate the tasks of creating the vision and maintaining the focus. They must perform the vital function of communicating the school’s goals to teachers, students, parents and the community. Gene Bottoms Management tasks can be delegated.