ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Evaluation of a Nighttime Directional Guidance System for Heavy Vehicles R ichard Hanowski, Ph.D. Virginia Tech.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 V2V Safety Research for Heavy Commercial Vehicles 2013 ITS Connected Vehicle Public Meeting Arlington, VA September 24, 2013 Alrik L. Svenson National.
Advertisements

U.S. Approach to Roadway Traffic Safety National Highway Traffic Safety Administration U.S. Department of Transportation (USDOT / NHTSA) Presented by Ronald.
HFST Council Meeting FHWA Update Frank Julian Federal Highway Administration Resource Center - Safety and Design Team August, ATSSA Mid Year.
Safety Data Analysis Tools Workshop Michael S. Griffith, Director FMCSA Office of Research and Analysis TRB Transportation Safety Planning Working Group.
The application of real-time distraction monitoring to driver safety systems Matthew R. Smith Gerald J. Witt Debi L. Bakowski January 25, 2007.
A Comprehensive Study on Pavement Edge Line Implementation Presented by: Mark J. Morvant, P.E. Associate Director, Research Louisiana Transportation Research.
Industry Benchmarks How do you measure up?. Driver Qualification Standards For years insurance companies have been tightening up their driver MVR standards.
Florida Department of Transportation, November 2009
Matthew Smith Results of the SAVE-IT Program Matthew R Smith Gerald J Witt Debi L. Bakowski May 13, 2008.
DRAFT.  Its Mandated for funding › Strategy, activity or project  It is a Guide › How to  It is a story › History (where we were) › Possible look.
HERO UNIT Training Module Work Zone Traffic Control And Incident Management Operations.
Human Factors Research Issues for Cooperative Intersection Collision Avoidance Systems (CICAS) Vicki Neale, Ph.D. Director, Center for Vehicle-Infrastructure.
Transport Canada Transports Canada Road Safety Sécurité routière Canadian Speed Management Overview James G. White Engineering Advisor Road Safety and.
The Effects of Text Messaging On the Driving Performance of Young Novice Drivers MUARC: Kristie Young, Simon Hosking & Michael Regan NRMA Motoring & Services:
Transportation Safety Assessments Commodor E. Hall, CDS ISRI Transportation Safety Manager
Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: A Legacy for Users SAFETEA-LU Key Safety Provisions Federal Highway Administration.
Fleet Safety. Introduction: Why Address Fleet Accidents Frequency of Fleet Accidents (NSC) 22% of workplace fatalities were highway accidents 80-90% were.
Hypothesis 1: Narrow roadways and roadways with higher speed limits will increase risk of vehicle/bicycle crash Hypothesis 2: Bicycle lanes and signage.
Traffic Incident Management – a Strategic Focus Inspector Peter Baird National Adviser: Policy and Legislation: Road Policing.
All Roads Transportation Safety (ARTS) Program Kevin J. Haas, P.E. Traffic Investigations Engineer, ODOT February 26, 2015.
Project 5: Ramp Metering Control in Freeway System Team Members: Faculty Mentor: Isaac Quaye Dr. Heng Wei Junior GRA: Emma Hand Kartheek K. Allam Sophomore.
Advancing Highway Safety in the U.S. Michael Halladay, Director FHWA Office of Safety Integration Federal Highway Administration Border to Border Transportation.
1 Paul Pisano FHWA, Team Leader Road Weather & Work Zone Management Weather and the Connected Vehicle Presentation at the Connected Vehicle Program Public.
People Saving People Dec. 4, 2000 Overview of U.S. Crashes & Weather Environment Louis V. Lombardo Office of Human-Centered Research.
Center for Risk Management of Engineering Systems University of Virginia, Charlottesville 26 Schedule.
Transportation Active Safety Institute TASI: Our Focus on the Human Machine Interface 25 January 2007 Purdue School of Engineering & Technology, IUPUI.
Rural Intersection Collision Avoidance System (RICAS) US Highway 53 and State Highway 73 Minong, Wisconsin Additional information Project Website:
Overview November 2002 ISA across Europe. Trials around Europe - S S Active accelerator Warning system “speed checker” Umeå Sweden.
CICAS Coordination Meeting September 27 th, 2004 Virginia Overview.
Wyoming’s Approach to Safety Using the New SHRP2 Data Martin Kidner, State Planning Engineer Wyoming DOT July 22, 2015.
FMCSA Tools To Improve State Data Quality Presented By: Shaun Dagle.
October 17, 2012 Connie S. Sorrell Chief of Systems Operations.
Saving Lives: A Vital FHWA Goal Safety Priorities for 2003 Michael Halladay FHWA Office of Safety Michigan Traffic Safety Summit; April 29, 2003.
Timothy E. Barnett, P.E., PTOE State Safety Operations Engineer Alabama Department of Transportation.
Working Together to Save Lives An Introduction to the FHWA Safety Program for FHWA’s Safety Partners.
IIHS 2 nd Annual Regional Safety Conference Emerging Vehicle Safety Technology October 18, 2007 Stephen Oesch.
IVBSS Program Overview and Accomplishments Presented by: Jim Sayer UMTRI ITS America 2007 Annual Meeting & Exposition Palm Springs, CA June 6, 2007.
3000 Connecticut Avenue, N.W., Suite 208 Washington, DC
LARGE TRUCK CRASHES Michigan Traffic Safety Summit East Lansing, Michigan March 13, 2007 PRESENTED BY: Capt. Robert R. Powers Commanding Officer Motor.
What It Means for Great Dane Customers Comprehensive Safety Analysis (CSA) 2010.
Fatigue and driving. What is fatigue? Subjective experience of sleepiness, tiredness, lack of energy that cause decrease in performance and arousal. Five.
Status of ITS research May Peter Sweatman David Kapp.
May, 2005ITS America 2005Slide 1 Integrated Vehicle Based Safety Systems Jack Ference, IVBSS Technical Manager ITS America Annual Meeting May, 2005.
Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division National Highway Traffic Safety Administration Ray Resendes Intelligent Technologies Research Division.
Research Elements of Integrated Vehicle Based Safety Systems Jack Ference, IVBSS Technical Manager ITS America Annual Meeting May, 2005.
IntelliDrive Safety Workshop July 20, 2010 Stephanie C. Binder National Highway Traffic Safety Administration US Department of Transportation Human Factors.
Driver-Vehicle Interface Design Principles Chris Monk September 24, 2013.
Using Technology to Prevent & Reduce Distraction Webinar for ITSA – HMI Working Group ( ) Adapted from A Presentation To The USDOT’s Distracted Driving.
1 Integrated Vehicle-Based Safety Systems Initiative Jack Ference United States Department of Transportation 2006 ITS World Congress 8-12 October 2006.
Low Cost Safety Improvements Pooled Fund Study Combination Centerline and Edgeline Rumble Strips Dr. Frank Gross, VHB.
5/8/02FHWA Office of Safety1 FHWA Safety Core Business Unit Office-Level Structure Develops and manages programs for the safe operation of roadways, bicycle.
1 National Highway Traffic Safety Administration An Overview of NHTSAs Vehicle Safety Research Priorities Nathaniel Beuse Associate Administrator, Vehicle.
A LongROAD Study December 2015 Keeping Older Adults Driving Safely: A Research Synthesis of Advanced In- Vehicle Technologies.
The Use of PAVEDAT for the District-wide Truck Enforcement Plan June 20, 2012 Mark Berndt Eulois Cleckley.
Proprietary and Copyright of The Descartes Systems Group Inc. All rights reserved. February 2015 Descartes Airclic Perform™ Release 9.6 Sales Training.
Utah Driver Education and Training Strategies for Managing Risk with Vehicle and Highway Designs Part I Source: FHWA.
1 IntelliDrive SM Vehicle to Infrastructure Connectivity for Safety Applications Greg Davis FHWA Office of Safety RD&T U.S. Department of Transportation.
Human Interaction with Intelligent Transportation Systems Committee Meeting 4 – February 2, 2012.
Estimation of 2001 Crash Costs Using FARS and GES John McFadden, Len Meczkowski, FHWA-Office of Safety R&D; Carol Conly, Lendis Corporation; Promod Chandhok,
Beyond Distracted Driving. Over the Last Several Years Numerous research studies have been conducted regarding driving while distracted One such study.
Defeating Distracted Driving 1. Wikipedia Distracted Driving Definition Driving while engaged in other activities Talking on a cell phone Texting Eating,
ITS P ROGRAM O VERVIEW JEFFREY F. PANIATI ITS JOINT PROGRAM OFFICE.
Basic Maneuvering Tasks: Moderate Risk Driving Environment Topic 1 -- Risk Topic 2 -- Space Management System Topic 3 -- Lane Changes Topic 4 -- Turnabouts.
Overview of U.S. Crashes & Weather Environment
New Findings on Crash Avoidance Technology
Risk Evaluation for In-vehicle Sign Information
MS DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY DISTRACTED DRIVING IN MISSISSIPPI 2011
HERO UNIT Training Module
Electronic Stability Control Systems
Graduate Research Assistant
Presentation transcript:

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Evaluation of a Nighttime Directional Guidance System for Heavy Vehicles R ichard Hanowski, Ph.D. Virginia Tech Transportation Institute

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Acknowledgements FMCSA funded- DRFH61-00P Tim Johnson was COTR Phil Roke served as COTR early in the project Paul Rau (NHTSA) provided technical input VTTI assistance from Miguel Perez, Seth Cross, Jon Hankey, Walt Wierwille, Andy Petersen, Rebecca Olson, Eryn Perry Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration U.S Department of Transportation

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 INTRODUCTION

Problem Over 3 million single vehicle roadway departures (SVRD) each year Result in 13,000 fatalities and an estimated $100 billion in damage Combination-unit trucks are involved in 31,000 SVRD crashes annually Out of the 4,847 fatal crashes in 1999 that involved a large truck, the number one driver-related factor was the driver’s failure to keep in the lane

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Potential Countermeasure Laser Guidance System (by Mr. Locke White) –2 fixed-point lasers (class 3A), positioned on either side of the vehicle –The laser device emits red “dots” ~ 7.26 m (25 ft) ahead on the pavement –Dots provide the driver with path prediction information; indicate the vehicle’s path should the driver maintain the current heading

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Driver’s View Simulated View

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Laser Schematic

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Research Objective The goal of this research was to collect data to investigate the effectiveness of this guidance device: –Determining the impact that a laser directional guidance system has on improving a driver’s ability to maintain directional control –Assessing the extent to which such a device would enhance or reduce driving performance, workload, and situation awareness –Determining the attitudes of truck drivers towards the device

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Cost Comparison Guidance ClassificationSystem typeCost Infrastructure-based Lateral Departure Warning Systems CSRS – Rumble Strips $217/km ($347/mile) Ferromagnetic markers $6875/km ($11,000/mile) Vehicle-based Lateral Departure Warning Systems SafeTRAC$40,000/truck Laser Guidance System $30/truck

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 METHOD

Overview To achieve the research objectives, an on-road empirical field study was conducted All experimental tasks required driving an instrumented 1997 Volvo, VN-series class 8 tractor with a m (48 ft) trailer The LG system’s effect on the commercial vehicle driver was measured by evaluating how the driver’s driving performance, workload, and situation awareness changed during exposure to the system

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Experimental Design Mixed factorial design with one between-subject variable (Driving Experience, experienced/ inexperienced) and one within-subject variable (Laser Guidance System Status, on/off) N=16 Experienced = > 5 yrs; Inexperienced = < 2 yrs The LG system’s presentation order was counter- balanced –The test route was divided into quarters of approximately km (60 miles) per quarter –Half of the subjects had the laser presentation order, on- off-on-off, while the other half had the opposite order, off- on-off-on

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Instrumented Truck

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 RESULTS

Investigate System Impact On… Lane Keeping Behavior Driving Performance Metrics Driver Acceptance and Opinions Sample of the results are presented; all findings included in final report

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Number of Lane Deviations Driver Experience Experienced drivers had less than half the number of deviations than inexperienced drivers (8.75 vs. 17.8) Experience X LG System Status When the system was on, number of lane deviations was reduced for inexperienced drivers (from to 15.5; 23.23% reduction) No reduction for experienced drivers

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Number of Lane Deviations ?2 yrs?5 yrs Driver Experience Laser Off Laser On

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Mean Headway LG Status X Driver Experience Consistent headway for experienced drivers when system on or off Less headway for novice drivers when system off Headway increased by 0.22 sec when system on for novice drivers (~21 ft at 65 mph) Unexpected safety benefit for novice drivers? Red dots act as extension of truck, or more cautious behavior due to increased cognitive load?

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Mean Headway ?2 yrs?5 yrs Driver Experience Laser Off Laser On

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 CONCLUSIONS

Conclusions Lane keeping improvement –23% reduction in lane deviations for novice –No reduction for experienced drivers –System may serve as useful training tool for novice drivers Negligible negative impact on driving performance –Possible reduction in SA with initial use –Unexpected benefit of increasing headway for novice drivers

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Conclusions Novice drivers derive most benefit –Are practical implications of this finding- most lane departure crashes occur with younger drivers (Wang & Knipling, 1994) –Novice drivers need help most Favorable driver opinion Cost effective countermeasure

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003 Next Steps System has cleared preliminary hurdles, further research warranted Look at driver’s re-design suggestions –Move dot location further out –Increase size of dots –Change color of dots (other than red- color of taillights) –Automatically deactivate under specified speed (e.g., 35 mph) where greatest likelihood of lasers path being crossed Need to assess driver behavior with long-term use (does long-term use introduce negative behaviors?) Other applications for message presentation location?

ITSA’s 13 th Annual Meeting- May 22, 2003