Efficacy of Produce Wash Product: Use of Fresh Potatoes as Model System for Evaluating Pathogen Control in Produce Processing Peter Gray, Dong-Hyun Kang.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Can We Control Rot Losses ? Roger Brook, Ph.D., P.E. Agricultural Engineering Department Michigan State University Presentation to otato growers Montcalm.
Advertisements

Sources Of Microorganisms In Foods
The methods of inactivation and removal of bacterial biofilm Petra Sedláčková.
100% Natural – 100% Effective Fresh Wash – Seafood TM.
BIO HAZARD CONTROL in the FOOD INDUSTRY
Postharvest Alternatives to Chemical Fungicides Dr. Ron Porat Dept. of Postharvest Science of Fresh Produce ARO, The Volcani Center, Bet Dagan, Israel.
On Site Sewage Facility Pathogen Removal & Disinfection Alternatives Stephanie L Sturman, R. S., D. R., S. E. Senior Inspector, Watershed Protection Group,
Disease Control Products for Stored Potatoes
Washes and Sanitizers to Reduce Microbial Contamination JIM DICKSON DEPARTMENT OF ANIMAL SCIENCE INTER-DEPARTMENTAL PROGRAM IN MICROBIOLOGY Iowa State.
Jeanette A. Thurston-Enriquez
Kitchen Safety Videos Great Food Fight Basic Food Safety.
CONTROL OF FOODBORNE PATHOGENS IN MEAT PRODUCTS BY SANITATION, DRYING AND ANTIMICROBIALS John N. Sofos Colorado State University
Controlling Listeria monocytogenes (Lm) in Retail Delicatessens
Effect of Mustard Powder on the Survival of Salmonella ser. Typhimurium in Packaged Shredded Cheese Dipak Pokhrel, Naveen Chikthimmah, & Joongmin Shin.
Ozone for Fish, Poultry and Food Processing Applications ClearWAter Tech, llc.
FOOD SAFETY.
All About… Organic Foods Judy A. Harrison, Ph.D. Professor and Extension Foods Specialist Dept. of Foods and Nutrition The University of Georgia Phone:
SEAVURIA Seattle + Kenya (2012)
Use of Chlorine Dioxide Gas as an Antimicrobial Agent for Foods and Food Contact Surfaces Richard H. Linton, Professor of Food Safety Valentina Trinetta,
Multiple Hurdle Interventions Against E. coli O157:H7 in Apple Cider Steve Ingham University of Wisconsin-Madison.
Food Safety on the Go Jim Meyer Nutrition and Health Ed. Spec. Ralls County.
The Effects of Chlorinated Water on Microbial Life Jeff Van Kooten 9 th Grade Central Catholic High School.
Who’s Minding the Store - The Current State of Food Safety and How It Can Be Improved Devon Zagory, Ph.D. Senior Vice President Food Safety & Quality Programs.
Kitchen Safety Do Now: List 6 important Kitchen Safety rules that we’ve discussed this week on a piece of loose leaf paper.
Zoonotic Diseases & The Environment -The story from a Food Safety researcher Luxin Wang, Ph.D. Assistant Professor Food Microbiology and Safety Department.
Introducing Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment.
Interventions to improve microbial safety –Compounds, Ingredients, Processes 1. Carcass washing - remove, reduce beginning numbers –remove bacteria before.
What happens in the body after the microbes that produce illness are swallowed? After they are swallowed, there is a delay, called the incubation period,
Current Strategies used to Eliminate or Reduce Pathogenic Microorganisms from Fruits and Vegetables Lesson 3 of 4 Supported in part by a USDA-CSREES grant.
Special thanks to: Marion County Health Department Purdue University Indiana University - Purdue University Indianapolis HACCP Solution Company Indiana.
Deanna Scheff, Jim Burritt, Karunanithy Chinnadurai, and Naveen Chikthimmah University of Wisconsin-Stout, Menomonie, WI Introduction: The United.
Antibacterial Inhibition of Common Cooking Spices Against Escherichia coli Mariah Weir Department of Biological Sciences, York College of Pennsylvania.
Factor of food spoilage
Umass Food Science EXTENSION RESEARCH
Microbiological Hazards of Apple Juice/Cider
Food Science and Industry
Introducing Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment.
Technical Information
Introduction All pathogenic microorganisms implicated in foodborne diseases are considered enteric pathogens, except S. aureus, B. cereus, C. botulinum.
Introduction to Food Safety. Objective هدف Assess food practices to ensure safer food.
Efficacy of a novel bactericide for elimination of biofilm in food processing facilities Tong Zhao Center for Food Safety University of Georgia For 3 rd.
Food Microbiology 1 Unit 4 Microbial Growth. Bacteria are single-celled organisms Bacteria multiply in a process called binary fission in which two cells.
Foodborne Illness Outbreaks and Sprouts FDA Public Meeting: 2005 Sprout Safety May 17, 2005 Amy Dechet, M.D. Foodborne and Diarrheal Diseases Branch Centers.
Current Outbreaks Mike Kim, Matt Schilling, Kevin Cho, Nikilesh Kannan.
Foodborne Illnesses People become sick because food is not handled, prepared, cooked or stored correctly Challenges of Food Safety Time Language Literacy.
Click to add subtitle. Where on earth does my hamburger come from? Have you ever wondered where every single piece of your hamburger comes from? Well.
Water Quality Of Ground water and Surface water. Physical Characteristics Color Odor Taste Temperature Turbidity: cloudiness or haziness.
1. I can recognize the risk factors for foodborne illness. 2. I can define FAT TOM. 3. I can understand the important prevention measures for keeping.
Research, Education, and Advocacy for the Indiana Produce Industry Amanda Deering, Ph.D. Department of Food Science Scott Monroe Purdue Extension – Daviess.
APIC Greater NY Chapter 13 Journal Club Session January 20, 2016 by Yuri Castillo RN BSN CIC Infection Prevention and Control Department /
1 ©2016, G.R. Acuff Process Validation Pathogens, Indicators or Surrogates Gary R. Acuff Director, Texas A&M Center for Food Safety Professor, Food Microbiology.
UNCLASSIFIED Dr. Andre Senecal Science Advisor Food Protection US Army Natick RD&E Center Combat Feeding Directorate Food Protection and Innovative Packaging.
Introducing Antimicrobial Fruit & Vegetable Treatment
Cleaning & Sanitation of Food Contact Surfaces
Let’s watch a DVD… DVD Instructor Notes
Thermal and Non-Thermal Preservation
Evaluation of chemical immersion treatments to reduce microbial counts in fresh beef Ahmed Kassem1, Joseph Meade1, Kevina McGill1, James Gibbons1, James.
Food Safety and Sanitation
Scallop Powder Containing Ice for Fresh Fish Preservation: A New-fledged View about Food Safety of Bangladesh Sunzid Ahmed1,Md. Tanvir Islam1*, Sharmin.
UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA
Foodborne Illnesses People become sick because food is not handled, prepared, cooked or stored correctly Challenges of Food Safety Time Language Literacy.
A natural safe alternative to harsh chemical disinfectant for raw meat or vegetables and working surfaces Wets out for a uniform disinfection 3x more effective.
Hot Water Treatment of Tomatoes
Challenges to Food Safety
The Effects of antibacterial hand soap on bacteria survivorship
Joe Stern Pittsburgh Central Catholic Grade 9
Disinfectant Wipe Extract Effects on Bacteria
Anti-microbial Technologies
Presentation transcript:

Efficacy of Produce Wash Product: Use of Fresh Potatoes as Model System for Evaluating Pathogen Control in Produce Processing Peter Gray, Dong-Hyun Kang. Department of Food Science and Human Nutrition, Washington State University, Pullman, WA Jeff Kronenberg. Department of Food Science & Toxicology, University of Idaho, Moscow, ID

Foodborne Illness in the USA (Source: CDC) 76 million illnesses every year Results in 300,000 hospitalizations Causes 5,000 deaths Increasing incidence of STEC O157 infections traced to fresh produce, while those related to meats decreasing

Outbreak-Associated Cases of Foodborne Illness (CDC) STEC O157 outbreak (32 confirmed cases) traced to spinach 2 STEC O157 outbreaks (14 confirmed cases) traced to lettuce Multistate outbreak of Salmonella Typhimurium (58 confirmed cases) traced to tomatoes Outbreak of Salmonella Newport (37 confirmed cases) traced to tomatoes

Escherichia coli O157:H7 Outbreak traced to raw spinach from Salinas Valley, California, cases in 26 states (CDC)

Salmonella Typhimurium Outbreak traced to tomatoes, 183 cases in 21 states, 2006 (FDA)

Bacterial Soft Rot of Potatoes Caused by Gram-negative bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum (formerly classified as Erwinia cartovora ssp. carotovora)Caused by Gram-negative bacterium Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum (formerly classified as Erwinia cartovora ssp. carotovora) Dissolves middle lamella (intercellular cement), causing vegetables to liquifyDissolves middle lamella (intercellular cement), causing vegetables to liquify

Search for Effective Produce Sanitizers Must be effective in wash flumes and dip tanks under a wide variety of water conditions Increasing consumer demand for effective but safe, “natural”, “environmentally- friendly” disinfectants

HealthPro Brands FIT® Fruit and Vegetable Wash Produce cleaner and antibacterial agent Ingredients: citric acid, sodium lauryl sulfate, grapefruit oil extract, sodium carbonate. All FDA GRAS. Very safe and easy to store, handle, and prepare; available to general public Used at pH 3.0; 5 g/L powdered formulation, 1:128 (v:v) liquid formulation WSU Sensory panel detected no off-flavors in FIT-treated baked potatoes

Chlorine Dioxide (ClO 2 ) Approved for use on fresh fruits and vegetables Hazardous ingredients (sodium chlorite, hydrochloric acid, sodium hypochlorite) Hazardous to store and prepare Personal protective gear required Commonly used at 5 ppm free ClO 2 ClO 2 produces no toxic by-products or off-flavors in produce

FIT Testing Protocol – Fresh Pack Potato Operation Assay for aerobic plate count (bacterial microflora) and Gram negative bacteria (indicator of enteric human pathogens and Pectobacterium soft rot) Flume washed potatoes – powdered FIT, untreated water control Spray bar treated potatoes – liquid FIT, 9 ppm ClO 2, untreated water control

Reduction of Gram Negatives, APC in Fresh Pack Potato Tubers

Reduction of Gram Negatives, APC in Fresh Pack Potato Flume Water

Sanitizer Evaluations Utilizing Bacterial Suspensions in Vitro Chemicals: powdered FIT, liquid FIT, 9 ppm ClO 2, water control Chemicals: powdered FIT, liquid FIT, 9 ppm ClO 2, water control Bacteria suspended in treatment solutions, enumerated at selected intervals Bacteria suspended in treatment solutions, enumerated at selected intervals E. coli O157:H7, S. Typhimurium, P. carotovorum ssp. carotovorum tested E. coli O157:H7, S. Typhimurium, P. carotovorum ssp. carotovorum tested Both deionized and potato flume water evaluated Both deionized and potato flume water evaluated

Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 in Vitro Using Deionized Water Treated With Sanitizers

Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in Vitro Using Deionized Water Treated with Sanitizers

Reduction of Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum in Vitro Using Deionized Water Treated with Sanitizers

330 mg/L total dissolved solids 2,186 mg/L total suspended solids Water containing soil particles, potato tissues present serious challenges to sanitizers In Vitro Trials Using Sterile Flume Water From Fresh Pack Potato Operation Flume water (left), deionized (right)

Reduction of Escherichia coli in Vitro Using Flume Water Treated with Sanitizers

Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium in Vitro Using Flume Water Treated with Sanitizers

Reduction of Pectobacterium carotovorum ssp. carotovorum in Vitro Using Flume Water Treated with Sanitizers

Tests on Inoculated Potato Tubers E. coli O157:H7, S. Typhimurium inoculated onto unwashed tubers and dried Treatments prepared with flume water Tubers agitated in treatment solutions, removed at selected intervals, enumerated Treatments FIT (powdered and liquid formulations) 9 ppm ClO 2 Flume water control

Reduction of Escherichia coli O157:H7 on Inoculated Potatoes

Reduction of Salmonella Typhimurium on Inoculated Potatoes

Tests on Uninoculated Potato Tubers Unwashed, uninoculated tubers agitated in treatment solutions, removed at selected intervals, enumerated Aerobic Plate Count (APC) Yeasts Molds

APC of Uninoculated Potato Tubers in Flume Water Treated With Sanitizers

Yeast Microflora of Uninoculated Potato Tubers in Flume Water Treated With Sanitizers

Mold Microflora of Uninoculated Potato Tubers in Flume Water Treated With Sanitizers

Conclusions – Potato Wash Water FIT highly effective (>6 log reduction in 30 sec) against cell suspensions of enteric pathogens and P. carotovorum ssp. carotovorum under all water conditions tested Limited APC reduction, possibly due to acid- resistant yeasts and molds ClO 2 effective only in low solids water FIT has significant potential for preventing cross- contamination of pathogens in flumes and dip tanks with high soil loading

Conclusions – Potato Tuber Tests Low impact from both disinfectants In lab tests FIT reduced enteric pathogens by log but only after 5 min; ClO 2 resulted in <0.9 log reduction In lab tests FIT reduced APC, yeasts, molds by 0.8 – 1.2 log; ClO 2 was no more effective than water control Potato tubers represent challenges due to heavy soils, lenticels, other surface features More research needed involving other vegetable models

Acknowledgements Todd Wichmann, HealthPro Brands, Inc. of Cincinnati, Ohio Wada Farms Marketing Group, LLC. Of Pingree, Idaho International Dioxide, Inc. of North Kingstown, Rhode Island