4.0 Accelerator Physics & Pre-operations (1.10) Phil Martin, Stan Ecklund, Rick Baartman & Peter Limon 4.1Accelerator Physics 4.1.1 Findings The hot spare.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WHAT IS AN OPERATING SYSTEM? An interface between users and hardware - an environment "architecture ” Allows convenient usage; hides the tedious stuff.
Advertisements

ESS Timing System Plans and Requirements Timo Korhonen Chief Engineer, Integrated Control System Division May 19, 2014.
Henrik Loos LCLS FAC Meeting 27 October RF Gun Status LCLS Facility Advisory Committee Meeting October 26, 2005 Mechanical.
Modifications to DESY-II M. Minty Nov 11, The DESY-II 7GeV Lepton Synchotron DORIS f inj = 6.25 Hz E inj = 4.5 GeV N ppb = 5 · 10 9, typical DORIS.
Operations and Availability GG3. Key decisions Summary of Key Decisions for the Baseline Design The linac will have two parallel tunnels so that the support.
FAC, 10/12/06 D. Schultz 1 e-Beams Systems Update Linac Injector Undulator Production MMF commissioning ARR David Schultz.
Global Magnet Systems including Field Mapping MICE Project Board 28 th June 2011 M Courthold – RAL R Preece - RAL.
Tom Himel Linac Controls Upgrade Nov SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory 1 Linac Controls Upgrade Status Tom Himel.
OPERATING SYSTEM OVERVIEW
D. Schultz FAC 6/17/08 1 e-Beams Systems Update People Progress the last review LTU and Dump Installation Status Undulator.
Stephen Milton Undulator System 20 April, 2006 LCLS Undulator System Update S. Milton, ANL FAC, April 20 th, 2006.
Doug Michael Jan. 12, First goal is to be ready to select an optimal technology in ~one year. –Demonstrate that fundamental technologies are ready.
Interfaces with the SNS Project for the ARCS Instrument Doug Abernathy ARCS Hardware Project Manager ARCS Construction Project Review DOE Germantown Aug.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Argonne National Laboratory Office of Science U.S. Department.
Database System Development Lifecycle Transparencies
MIRI software; implementation plan Peter Roelfsema.
Linac Front-End R&D --- Systems Integration and Meson Lab Setup
Chapter 9 Database Planning, Design, and Administration Sungchul Hong.
FAC, 10/12/06 D. Schultz 1 Readiness for 2007 Startup Linac Injector Controls ARR David Schultz.
WU1 - Management S. Gammino (INFN). WU1 Management and TDR preparation: overview and criticalities 2 The WP6 aim is to define the best design of the Warm.
MICE Magnetic Field Mitigation Review Potential impact on ISIS of MICE Stray Magnetic Fields 24 th September 2013 Martin Hughes.
Gek 16/6/041 ITRP Comments on Question 19 GEK 9/06/04 19) For the X-band (warm) technology, detail the status of the tests of the full rf delivery system.
Large Scale Software Systems Derived from Dr. Fawcett’s Notes Phil Pratt-Szeliga Fall 2010.
J. G. Weisend II Deputy Head of Accelerator Projects April 2, 2014 Actions at ACCSYS Resulting from the Recommendations of the Annual Review.
Summary of WG1 K. Kubo, D. Schulte, P. Tenenbaum.
Proton Improvement Plan William Pellico FRA Visiting Committee Meeting March 14-15, 2011.
LABORATORY MANAGEMENT The Administrative Process.
M&O status and program for ATLAS LAr calorimeter R Stroynowski (on vacations)
Status of the Front End Test Stand April Infrastructure R8 refurbished Laser lab under construction Vacuum system for first section delivered Stands.
Life cycle services for automation products
CLIC main activities and goals for 2018 Design and Implementation studies: CDR status: not optimized except at 3 TeV and not adjusted for Higgs discovery,
1: Operating Systems Overview 1 Jerry Breecher Fall, 2004 CLARK UNIVERSITY CS215 OPERATING SYSTEMS OVERVIEW.
Fall 2015 ECEn 490 Lecture #8 1 Effective Presentations How to communicate effectively with your audience.
1 AGS RSVP Review 4-5 November 2004 Upgrade and Operations Cost & Schedule Summary Philip Pile Collider-Accelerator Department 4 Nov 2004.
Neutron Chopper Technologies Work Package
Beam Dynamics WG K. Kubo, N. Solyak, D. Schulte. Presentations –N. Solyak Coupler kick simulations update –N. Solyak CLIC BPM –A. Latina: Update on the.
O AK R IDGE N ATIONAL L ABORATORY U. S. D EPARTMENT OF E NERGY The Spallation Neutron Source Project: Update T. E. Mason Oak Ridge National Laboratory.
Y. R. Roblin Hall A beamline and accelerator status.
Thursday August 20, 2009 John Anderson Page 1 Accelerator Interlock System Issues Flow Down of Requirements from the Safety Order to Engineered Safety.
Proton Driver Resources & Schedule (R&D Plan) Rich Stanek May 10, 2005.
A Few Pointers from the Linac4 Beam Commissioning of Warm Linac Yngve Levinsen Beam Physics Section 05/02/16.
Software Development Process CS 360 Lecture 3. Software Process The software process is a structured set of activities required to develop a software.
T. Fleck, GSI, Darmstadt, Germany ICALEPCS Status of the Control System for HICAT at an advanced stage of Commissioning Functions, Restrictions.
LARP Review, June 12-14, 2006 Prebys, Todesco, Zisman 1 Accelerator Systems Eric Prebys Ezio Todesco Mike Zisman.
Linac2 and Linac3 D. Küchler for the linac team. Planning first preparative meeting for the start-up of Linac2 in June 2013 –this early kick-off useful.
Technical Board Summary Alan Bross MICE CM17 CERN February 25, 2007.
BSBPMG501A Manage Project Integrative Processes Manage Project Integrative Processes Project Integration Processes – Part 2 Diploma of Project Management.
Linac4 status and long-term schedule M. Vretenar, Project Meeting  status  timeline  open issues  status  timeline  open issues.
Details on the Accelerator Installation Plan E. Sargsyan & L. Lari 20 April 2016.
Eric Prebys, Fermilab Program Director, LARP July 10, 2012.
RLSR 16/4/2015 UK Financial Plan & Risks. Content Finances – FY 2014/15 – Cost to Completion Risks – Top level to completion – R9 working space – Summary.
Introduction to NS-FFAGs and EMMA Rob Edgecock STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
O. Kester, NuSTAR annual meeting, 27/02/2013
1 Important Factors in My Landing As suggested by Ed Schultz, I responded back their requirements with bullets of my experience. At first I thought I had.
Project management. Software project management ■It is the discipline of planning, organizing and managing resources to bring about the successful completion.
Introduction to the effort on C-ADS accelerator physics and review charges Jingyu Tang For the Joint IHEP-IMP group on the C-ADS Accelerator Physics International.
1. Baseline – from LMC  Presentation by F. Bordry at LHC Machine Committee 5.10 on LS1 Organisation: 1. Linac4 is not going to be connected.
M. Munoz April 2, 2014 Beam Commissioning at ESS.
Welcome to Michigan Welcome to MSU/FRIB Welcome to the Spring 2015 EPICS collaboration meeting Welcome! L.T.Hoff, Slide 1.
MAC meeting (12-13 January 2010) Machine Advisory Committee participants: B.Sharkov (ITEP/FAIR) P.Belochitskii (CERN) S.Ivanov (IHEP, Protvino) M.Steck.
21 Mar 2007ALICE - Paul Dauncey1 ALICE CR07: Installation and Commissioning Paul Dauncey Material from: L. Leistam: “ALICE Status” W. Riegler: “Commissioning.
Project Managers Report CM38 – Napa Roy Preece 24th February 2014.
Jefferson Lab Overview
SNS Status Report Karen S. White 10/15/08.
Project Controls: As-Built S-Curves
LINAC4 Vacuum Control System Review
Update on Linac4 Status, Reliability Run and Modelling
Injector –Linac Status & Schedule E. Bong LCLS FAC October 12, 2006
(Beam) Commissioning Plan
Reliability, MPS, Operations and Tuning Work Packages
Presentation transcript:

4.0 Accelerator Physics & Pre-operations (1.10) Phil Martin, Stan Ecklund, Rick Baartman & Peter Limon 4.1Accelerator Physics Findings The hot spare ion source has proved useful in development and reliability tests. Reliability is much improved, but still needs more improvement. Commissioning of DTL1 was very productive. Energy and phase jitter appear to be within spec, but the horizontal emittance does not. There are features of the beam halo and of the beam characteristics as a function of time along a single pulse that are not understood. The LEBT chopper still is not functional. It has had failure problems. Work continues. The electromagnetic noise reduction effort has paid off. The commissioning plans are well thought out and have sufficient detail. Application software has progressed well. A system is in place that allows scripts to be quickly written which efficiently assists the commissioning efforts. The ORBIT code has now been extended to include e-cloud effects. As well it has been benchmarked more thoroughly against PSR data;

4.0 Accelerator Physics & Pre-operations (1.10) AP Comments We encourage work on improving front end pulse flatness and pulse-to-pulse variations. The excellent performance of the linac beam diagnostics systems and applications interfaces resulted in very productive DTL commissioning runs. The beam centroid appears to wander around especially during the first 50 microseconds of the pulse. The cause is not known but is being pursued. We eagerly await these demonstrations. Work should also continue on understanding the causes of the horizontal beam halo and centroid wander. The LEBT chopper development has been disappointingly slow. We applaud the decision to install it on the hot spare, so that it can be developed independent of commissioning runs. There appears to be little progress on the MEBT chopper. We would like to see a schedule and plan developed for this component. We suspect that there will be other systems that will require “tender loving care” before and after commissioning. We are gratified to see that continued attention is being given to the ion source, and advise the SNS management to remember when scheduling and distributing manpower that there will be other systems that will require such “TLC.” AP Recommendations: Develop and publish schedules for delayed items such as choppers and scrapers.

4.0 Accelerator Physics & Pre-operations (1.10) 4.2 Pre-Operations - Installation & Commissioning Findings: Tremendous progress has been made in installation since the last review in November, 2003, but much remains to be done.. The commissioning of the DTL 1-3 went well and was very productive. There is a detailed commissioning schedule with ARRs and commissioning teams defined. SNS has spent about one-third of the PreOps budget, of ~$120 million, and half of the ASD PreOps of $64 million. The ASD manpower projections for preops to the end uses essentially all of the remaining ASD preops budget. The water system was responsible for most (75%) of the downtime during the DTL1- 3 commissioning. The problems are a combination of hardware and controls. There were also separate water conductivity problems affecting the ion source.

4.0 Accelerator Physics & Pre-operations (1.10) 4.2 Pre-Operations - Installation & Commissioning Comments Commissioning is a major pre-ops activity. We suspect that there will be other systems that will require “tender loving care” before and after commissioning. We are gratified to see that continued attention is being given to the ion source, and advise the SNS management to remember when scheduling and distributing manpower that there will be other systems that will require such “TLC.” We suspect that considerably more than half of the ASD commissioning remains. Hence, the preops budget is very tight. Budget categories, of course, are not necessarily important. A tight budget is good, but requires constant vigilance. Personnel for commissioning are identified and budgeted, but delays in deliveries of components or difficulties in commissioning of systems could squeeze the commissioning, stressing the available manpower. The partner labs might be useful as a source of expert manpower if problems arise. The water systems problems are recognized by SNS management, and remediation is underway Recommendations Present a status report on the water systems at the next review Keep lines of communication and involvement open between SNS and the partner laboratories, even though their project work is complete.

4.0 Accelerator Physics & Pre-operations (1.10) 4.2 Pre-Operations - Transition to operations Findings There is a plan for making a transition from construction to operations that has considerable detail in management structure and manpower Comments: This plan seems to make sense, but it is difficult to say whether it is the best plan. In any case, it is a dynamic document that can be changed. What is important to note that such a plan exists and the SNS management should be commended for thinking far ahead. It should also be noted that the manpower, particularly the technician manpower is lean. SNS is assuming exceptional quality in this group to compensate for the small numbers. ASD’s intention is to bring in help from their lab partners when necessary Recommendations Keep the lines of communications and involvement open between SNS and the partner labs even though their project work may be complete.

4.0 Accelerator Physics & Pre-operations (1.10) 4.2 ????? Findings:The SNS project is planning only to procure spare Lambertson magnet coils,as opposed to full magnets. Comments:Lambertson magnets have complicated vacuum chambers which are susceptible todeveloping leaks. The magnets also become highly activated, complicatingrepairs.The magnets are also very expensive which drives the decision to procureonly spare coils. A magnet failure during commissioning could delay furthercommissioning by as much as two months, and of course would have similar ramifications afterCD-4. The committee views the decision not to have spare magnets with someconcern. Consider building complete spares of the Lambertson magnets and other complicated devices.