WAP 101 Jackie Berger David Carroll June 14, 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Rehabilitation Single-Family Housing to Green Standards NACCED Conference October 1, 2012 Lisa Henning, Asst. Director of Community & Economic Development.
Advertisements

Oregon Housing and Community Services Oregon State LIHEAP Weatherization Program NASCSP Annual Conference and DOE WAP State Managers Meeting September.
Universal Services Offered for Poverty Level Residential Consumers by Exelon Corporation’s Distribution Utilities A. Karen Hill Vice President Federal.
1 | WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM STANDARDIZED CURRICULUM – September 2012eere.energy.gov Weatherization Assistance Program Quality Control Inspector.
Do Your Weatherization Standards Measure Up? WARM CHOICE Program Standards and Procedures Energy Essentials Core Contractor Training December 10 and 11,
Making WAP/Utility Partnerships Smoother and More Substantial Jack Laverty NiSource/Columbia Gas of Ohio NLIEC 2005 Conference Phoenix, Arizona June 16,
Integrating Government-Funded & Ratepayer-Funded Fuel Assistance Programs Roger D. Colton Fisher, Sheehan & Colton Public Finance and General Economics.
JOINT LEGISLATIVE AUDIT COMMITTEE HEARING SENATE BUDGET and FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE Delivering Energy Savings for California AMERICAN RECOVERY & Karen.
Workshop on the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA) of 2009 Weatherization Assistance Program (WAP) Grant Funding and Additional (Non-ARRA) Grant.
NJ Comfort Partners Evaluation Jackie Berger August 21, 2014.
CONSUMER PROTECTIONS AND SERVICE QUALITY March 14, 2011.
Best Practices In Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference April 30, 2014.
1 Improving the lives of 10 million older adults by 2020 © 2015 National Council on Aging The Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP) 101 March.
Best Practices In Low-Income Programming Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference May 6, 2015.
Less is More: SEE Action and the Power of Efficiency Hon. Phyllis Reha Commissioner, Minnesota PUC Co-Chair, SEE Action Customer Information and Behavior.
Washington State Low Income Weatherization Program Evaluation Calendar Year 2011 DRAFT Results Prepared by: Rick Kunkle July 2013.
National Study of Low Income Energy Programs NARUC Consumer Affairs Committee David Carroll, APPRISE Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Roger Colton, Fisher, Sheehan,
Managing the Weatherization Funds Hodgepodge Jackie Berger David Carroll June 15, 2010.
Achieving High Savings from Low-Income Energy Efficiency Programs David Carroll and Jackie Berger ACI Conference – May 2015.
Climate & Usage, Health & Safety Lessons Learned ESAP Workshop #1 October 17, 2011.
Elements of Ratepayer-Funded Low-Income Programs Affordable Comfort May 2005 Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Incorporated Suzanne Harmelink, WI Energy Conservation.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Michael Blasnik M Blasnik & Associates Greg Dalhoff Dalhoff Associates, LLC David Carroll APPRISE.
1 | WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM STANDARDIZED CURRICULUM – July 2012eere.energy.gov Weatherization Assistance Program Weatherization Installer/Technician.
Weatherization Assistance Program. Mission Increase the energy efficiency of dwellings occupied by low-income Americans Reduce monthly heating and cooling.
Status of the Data Collection Completed – State and Agency Surveys – Indoor Air Quality Study – Bulk Fuels Study – Large Multi-family Buildings Study In.
Performance Metrics for Weatherization UGI LIURP Evaluation Yvette Belfort Jackie Berger ACI Home Performance Conference April 30, 2014.
National Study of Low Income Energy Programs Lessons for Connecticut January 29, 2008 David Carroll - APPRISE Roger Colton – Fisher, Sheehan, and Colton.
Weatherization 201: Weatherization Works! Updated September 23, 2008.
Wisconsin Home Energy Assistance Program (WHEAP) - Kenna Arvold, Lead Administrative Review Monitor - Jeff Heino, Administrative Review Monitor.
Why Data Matters! Building and Sustaining a Business Case Kansas City NEUAC June 18, 2014.
Urban League Low Income Home Energy Assistance Program LIHEAP.
Why Weatherization? Low-income families often choose between heat and other necessities 33.8 million households nationally eligible for Weatherization.
MEANING OF THE WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND ITS PURPOSES ENERGY PRICES, ENERGY BURDENS, AND THE ROLE OF THE PROGRAM FEBRUARY 22, 2010.
How Energy Efficiency Can Reduce Bill Subsidization Affordable Comfort, April 2007 John Augustino, Honeywell Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Susan Moser, Ohio.
Energy Behavior – Lessons from Low-Income Education Programs David Carroll, Jackie Berger ACEEE Summer Study on Energy Efficiency in Buildings August 20,
Home Energy Assistance Program Evaluation Jackie Berger July 28, 2010.
Demand Side Management Programs National Energy and Utility Affordability Conference Denver, Colorado David Carroll June 18, 2008.
Ratepayer Funded Low-Income Energy Programs Performance and Possibilities 2007 NLIEC David Carroll, APPRISE Jacqueline Berger, APPRISE Roger Colton, Fisher,
Measures that Save The Most Energy Jackie Berger David Carroll ACI New Jersey Home Performance Conference January 25, 2007.
New Evidence on Energy Education Effectiveness Jackie Berger 2008 ACI Home Performance Conference April 8, 2008.
Achieving Higher Savings in Low-Income Weatherization Jacqueline Berger 2015 IEPEC Conference ― Long Beach, California.
Non-Energy Benefits Estimating the Economic Benefits of the Ohio Electric Partnership Program 2006 ACI Home Performance Conference May 25, 2006 Jackie.
Coordination of LIHEAP with State and Utility Payment Assistance Programs NEUAC Conference June 28, 2011 Jackie Berger.
Why Data Matters Building and Sustaining a Business Case NEAUC Conference June 18, 2014.
1 | WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM – September 2012eere.energy.gov The Federal Perspective – Part 1 WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM – September 2012.
Impact of Energy Efficiency Services on Energy Assistance NEUAC Conference June 18, 2014.
1Managed by UT-Battelle for the Department of Energy Findings from the National Weatherization Evaluation Process Field Study Jackie Berger APPRISE Training:
Click to edit Master title style 1 Energy Savings Assistance Program And California Alternate Rates for Energy (CARE) Program Proposed Decision.
SAM YODICE PROGRAM DIRECTOR PASSAIC COUNTY TODAY’S TOPIC: R – E – N – T REDUCING ENERGY NEEDS FOR TENANTS - LANDLORD.
1 Hearing to Discuss the Potential Interplay and Effect of the Money Available to States’ Low- Income Weatherization Programs under the American Recovery.
Goal of HRES Our goal is to empower our clients to establish positive relationships with real estate agents, landlords or Social Services Agencies to feel.
National Study of Low Income Energy Programs Lessons for Connecticut
MEANING OF THE WEATHERIZATION ASSISTANCE PROGRAM AND ITS PURPOSES
Best Practices in Residential Energy Efficiency
Evaluating Weatherization Programs
Evaluating Impact Do it Right or Not At All
Understanding & Improving Energy Affordability in New Jersey
Health and Safety Investments to Increase Energy-Saving Opportunities
What We’ll Cover What is the Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program (LIHEAP)? Who does LIHEAP help? Overview of LIHEAP How LIHEAP Works Eligibility.
Low Income Programs - Hydro One Experience
WAP Warm Climate Weatherization: Opportunities for Energy Savings
LIHEAP Performance Measures – What Tribal Program Managers Need to Know NEUAC 2018 David Carroll APPRISE Brenda Ilg Wyoming Department of Family Services.
Health and Safety Investments to Increase Energy-Saving Opportunities
Understanding New York’s Low- to Moderate Income Market Segment
Understanding LIHEAP Assurance 16
Performance Measurement Report Pilot
Coordinating Customer Assistance Programs in Ohio
Evaluating Low-Income Programs Why and How
Promoting Better Health Through Climate Change Mitigation
Welcome to the Virginia Weatherization Assistance Program
Presentation transcript:

WAP 101 Jackie Berger David Carroll June 14, 2010

Session Goals Provide an introduction to WAP and Weatherization Plus Alert LIHEAP and WAP managers about options for LIHEAP funding of WX Look at the value of different models for WAP and utility program collaboration Learn how the National WAP Evaluation will help you make program decisions 2

Introduction to WAP and Weatherization Plus 3

What is WAP? The Weatherization Assistance Program has been in operation for over thirty years and is the nation’s largest single residential energy efficiency program. It’s primary purpose, established by law, is “…to increase the energy efficiency of dwellings owned or occupied by low-income persons, reduce their total residential energy expenditures, and improve their health and safety, especially low- income persons who are particularly vulnerable such as the elderly, the handicapped, and children.” Title 42 of the U.S. Code, Chapter 81, Subchapter III, Part A,

WAP Logistics DOE provides grants to states and territories based on funding formulas States provide grants to local weatherization agencies Eligible households receive energy audits and weatherization services About 35 million households are income- eligible for WAP 5

WAP Services Typical Energy Efficiency Measures –Air Sealing: Attics, ducts, windows –Insulation: Attics, walls, rim joists –Furnace: Tune-up, repairs Energy efficiency measures need a savings to investment ratio (SIR) of 1.0 or greater Spending limits mean that sometimes measures with a SIR > 1.0 are not installed 6

WAP Services Health and Safety Measures –Combustion Appliances: Furnace, Water Heater, Stove/Oven, Dryer –Moisture Management: Kitchen and Bathroom Ventilation, Dryer Vents Health and Safety measures are subject to limits identified in each state WAP Plan 7

WAP Funding WAP pre-ARRA (PY2008) –WAP Budget = $250 million –Annual Goal = 100,000 homes –Average Investment = $2,500 per home –Income Limit = 150% of poverty WAP during ARRA –ARRA Budget = $5 billion –Target = 650,000 homes –Average Investment = $6,500 per home –Income Limit = 200% of poverty 8

Weatherization Plus The goal of Weatherization Plus is to achieve significantly greater energy cost savings for more low income households and to increase the Program’s contribution to the economic and environmental health and sustainability of the nation’s communities. 9

Weatherization Plus Strategies Flexibility – Make changes in program legislation and regulations to facilitate interactions with other programs and funding sources Capabilities – Increase technological capabilities by making training and technical assistance available to the Weatherization Network Leveraging – Expand resources by disseminating information on successful initiatives and partnerships 10

WAP/LIHEAP Collaboration 11

LIHEAP Program Elements (2008) Heating Assistance – 51 Grantees / 53% of funds Crisis Assistance – 49 Grantees / 19% of funds Weatherization – 43 Grantees / 10% of funds Cooling Assistance – 15 Grantees / 3% of funds Assurance 16 – 23 Grantees / 1% of funds Equipment Repair – 13 Grantees / 1% of funds 12

WAP/LIHEAP Funding PY 2008 WAP Funding –WAP Budget = $239 million (30%) –LIHEAP Contribution = $362 million (45%) –PVE = $9 million (1%) –Other = $195 million (24%) [Note: Excludes Alaska $200 million] PY 2008 WAP Units –DOE Units = 92K –LIHEAP Units = 74K –PVE Units = 3K –Other Units = 64K Units Source: NASCSP PY 2008 Funding Survey 13

WAP/LIHEAP Models LIHEAP WX Using DOE Rules –Advantages: Energy Savings Predictability, Accountability –Disadvantages: Health and Safety Limits, Per Unit Limits LIHEAP WX Using LIHEAP Rules –Advantages: Flexibility to meet client needs –Disadvantages: Expertise of LIHEAP managers Emergency Furnace Replacement Program –Advantages: Need independent of WX needs –Disadvantages: Furnace sizing issues for weatherized units Assurance 16 Energy Education 14

Wisconsin Model Energy Office = LIHEAP and WAP WAP Funds – DOE Rules LIHEAP WX Funds – LIHEAP Rules –Additional measures with SIR of 1.0 or more –Needed health and safety measures (reduces “walk aways) Emergency Furnace Program – LIHEAP / Other Sources –Can be coordinated with Weatherization –Can be implemented independently 15

Other Common Models LIHEAP in DHS / WAP in DCA (NJ / Old) –LIHEAP funds transferred to WAP –Emergency furnace funds transferred to WAP LIHEAP in CDHS / WAP in Governor’s Office (CO) –LIHEAP funds transferred to WAP –Crisis Intervention Program (CIP) administered by DHS LIHEAP and WAP in Maine Housing Office –LIHEAP funds available for Weatherization –Direct access to home rehabilitation funds 16

Collaboration Between WAP and Ratepayer-Funded Usage Reduction Programs 17 Missouri Pennsylvania Ohio

Missouri 18

Missouri Collaboration Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers WAP and several ratepayer funded utility low-income usage reduction programs. Program is delivered by Community Action Agencies, city government, and other nonprofits. 19

Missouri Collaboration Most providers have 3 funding sources: –WAP –Electric utility –Gas utility All programs are integrated. All programs follow WAP rules. Some agencies prioritize jobs that can be coordinated with utility programs. 20

Missouri Collaboration Measure Limitations –No replacement of electric heating systems. –$600 incidental material repair limit. –No refrigerator replacement. –Air conditioning work only if related to health issues. –CFLs began as an optional measure in mid

Missouri Collaboration Benefits –Increased efficiency – single intake, audit, and inspection. –Economies of scale – can maintain trained weatherization staff at small agencies. –One set of standards and training. –More comprehensive treatments. –Increased ability to provide health and safety and repair work. ($600/home) –Reduced client time on waiting lists. 22

Missouri Collaboration Disadvantages –Less client awareness of utility program. –Less focus on program specific goals. –Clients who received WAP cannot later receive utility program. 23

Pennsylvania 24

Pennsylvania Collaboration PA Department of Commerce and Economic Development (DCED) administers WAP. Utilities deliver the Low Income Usage Reduction Program (LIURP). PA Electric utilities have additional Act 129 Funding. Some utilities have been coordinating programs for some time. 25

Pennsylvania Collaboration PA Public Utilities Commission Working Group – Universal Service Coordination Working Group. –DCED, gas and electric utilities, low-income advocates. Guidelines for coordination based on heating source and contractor’s program provision. 26

Pennsylvania Collaboration FirstEnergy LIURP/WAP Coordination –LIURP priority for highest usage/lowest income customers, as specified by PUC. –FirstEnergy will move WAP applicants up on their priority list. –WAP agencies were not able to do this. –Working better under ARRA. –Utilities have given WAP agencies lists of high use LIHEAP customers. –21 of their 28 contractors do combination jobs. 27

Pennsylvania Collaboration FirstEnergy LIURP/WAP Coordination –WAP agencies will log on to FirstEnergy’s LIURP data system to check for customer application. –WAP agencies will send list of scheduled customers to FirstEnergy to check pending applications. –FirstEnergy will ask WAP applicants to apply for LIURP if FirstEnergy does not have a LIURP application for that customer. –Customers must meet usage requirements to be served under LIURP. 28

Pennsylvania Collaboration FirstEnergy LIURP/WAP Coordination –Joint WAP/LIURP audit is conducted. –Mostly FirstEnergy non electric heat customers. –LIURP provides: Refrigerators, freezers, lighting, air conditioners. 25% of job costs can be spent on health and safety. –FirstEnergy data system captures information on WAP spending for jointly delivered jobs. 29

Ohio 30

Ohio Collaboration OH Department of Development (ODOD). –WAP –Electric Partnership Program (EPP), ratepayer funded electric efficiency program Gas and electric utilities deliver additional ratepayer funded usage reduction programs. Some providers deliver both WAP and ratepayer funded programs. 31

Ohio Collaboration Coordination between WAP and EPP is minimal. –Length of audits required. –Auditor skills. –Program targeting. Ohio has been more successful integrating WAP with weatherization focused utility programs. 32

National WAP Evaluation 33

Data Collected Surveys All States Survey All Agency Survey Subset Agency Survey 34

Data Collected Surveys Occupant Survey –Energy knowledge, non-energy benefits, occupant health, satisfaction Weatherization Staff Survey –Weatherization careers and training Open-ended Interviews –DOE, sample of states and agencies 35

Data Collected Program and Utility Housing Unit Data Energy Usage Data –Natural gas –Electricity –Fuel oil –Propane 36

Data Collected On-Site 6-10 High Performing Agencies Process Field Study –Audits, Education, Training, Quality Assurance Special Technical Studies –Air sealing, duct sealing, heating system –Indoor air quality –Refrigerator monitoring –Air conditioner monitoring 37

Data Collected Innovative Programs Client education Staff training 38

Analyses Conducted Program characterization Energy impacts Cost savings Non-energy impacts (utility, occupant, societal) 39

Analyses Conducted Cost effectiveness Explanatory factors –Pre consumption, measures, house characteristics, occupant characteristics, fuel prices, climate zone, training methods, funding sources, testing results (air leakage, duct leakage, furnace efficiency) 40

What it Will Tell You How much energy was saved through WAP in 2007 and 2008? How cost effective were the energy savings? What measures were most cost-effective? What was the value of the non-energy benefits result from the program? 41

What it Will Tell You What are the characteristics that are related to higher energy savings? How effective are different approaches to weatherization? How effective are different client education approaches? 42

What it Will Tell You How effective are weatherization staff training approaches? How effective are quality assurance procedures? 43

Contacts 44 Jackie Berger, David Carroll, APPRISE 32 Nassau Street, Suite 200 Princeton, NJ 08540