Meeting Objectives Meeting participants will: * Have a clear understanding of the accommodation review process * Have a clear understanding of the main.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
School Closure/Consolidation Composition of School Closure Committee (SCC) Closure/Consolidation Criteria Timelines.
Advertisements

Critical Condition Triaging School Enrollment Growth School Board Work Study November 13, 2013.
February 16, Tonight’s Agenda  Review Assets and Challenges From Last Meeting  Review Necessary Assumptions  Look at Possible Considerations.
City of Toledo Bancroft Street Neighborhood Public Meeting November 20, 2013.
Accommodation Merivale ARC Merivale Area – South of Baseline Elementary Accommodation Study Review Committee (ARC)
Rezoning Study -Committee Meeting 2- November 15, 2011.
LOOKING INWARD Principals Information Session February Staff Development Centre Cape Breton – Victoria Regional School Board.
St. Joseph’s (Thamesford) Accommodation Review Committee Public Meeting St. Joseph’s Catholic Elementary School April 30, 2013.
BOE Information Session Evolving Plan to Address Student Enrollment Challenges as of November 9, 2011.
Attendance Boundary Realignment FONTANA UNIFIEDSCHOOL DISTRICT November 19, 2008.
WALLED LAKE CONSOLIDATED SCHOOL DISTRICT Redistricting Plan for the school year.
UNIT 5 REDISTRICTING COMMUNITY FORUM mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm mmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmmm.
Elk Island Public Schools
GUIDELINES FOR DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENT ASSIGNMENT BOUNDARIES Board of Education Meeting Eugene Street Board Room July 12, 2011.
Our recommendations were informed by an initial screen of all schools, community feedback and impact analyses, building walkthroughs, program assessments.
Kindergarten Registration Information for School Communities of the Ottawa-Carleton District School Board School Year.
- 0 - Community Forums OUSD School Admissions and Attendance Boundary Policies Spring 2008.
Walkerton Accommodation Review April 24, 2008 The following most recommended scenarios were reviewed by the Accommodation Review Committee.
Space Utilization Project Chandler Unified School District 2010.
Orleans Wood / Terry Fox Public Information Session Education Options for Parents 5 November, 2009.
WELCOMEWELCOME. AGENDA – JANUARY 6, Welcome 2.Trustees Howard Goodman (Ward 8), Josh Matlow (Ward 11), and Maria Rodrigues (Ward 9) 3.Overview.
Sacred Heart and St. Jerome Schools Accommodation Review Committee (ARC) Final Report NCDSB Board of Trustees Public Meeting October 27, 2012 Sacred Heart.
Toronto Catholic District School Board Budget Consultation Meeting Catholic Education Centre May 5, 2008.
Single Track French Immersion: A Pathway For The Future. School District No. 72 Campbell River January 30, 2007 Single Track French Immersion: A Pathway.
2008 Lamar CISD Thomas Elementary Meeting Agenda January 12, 2009  Welcome - Representatives from Campbell Elementary, Wessendorff MS, Dickinson.
Proposed Sudbury West ARC OPTIONS Chair/Vice Chair Working Group June 2007.
Kingsclear Consolidated School Parent / Community Meeting November 29, 2010.
WELCOMEWELCOME. AGENDA – DECEMBER 8, Welcome 2.Introduction of the members of the Accommodation Review Committee (ARC) 3.Message from Dr. Chris.
Tuscany Public Participation Meeting St. Basil Elementary and Junior High School Wednesday, March 4, 2009.
Welcome! ARC Parent Information Night 22 May 2012.
West Sylvan Enrollment and Capacity
Planning for the Future of Dual Language in West Salem Response to DL Community Input.
DRAFT Inman Middle School Community Conversation February 19, 2015.
October Presentation Overview  Review of the Past  Board Motions – February 2015  Considerations & Guidelines  Board Announcements – October.
Build a Better Broadview Rebuild Review Guidelines & Criteria April 30, 2012 prepared by - Liz Burgess & Claire Todd Broadview School Council 2011/12.
Alton Village School Boundary Review April 17, 2012 FINAL REPORT 1.
Alton Village School Boundary Review March 8, 2012 Open House/Community Information Meeting 1.
DRAFT – FOR DISCUSSION ONLY Student Reassignment Survey Nash-Rocky Mount Public Schools October 1 – November 1, 2012.
1 Clayton Elementary Relief for Community Outreach Meeting February 17, :30 p.m.
FACILITIES MASTER PLANNING Committee Data and Findings.
PERRIS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT Superintendent’s Advisory Attendance Area Advisory Committee Report December 10, 2015.
Student Assignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Project Progress & Scenario Presentation for The Lexington School Committee March 8, 2016.
April 12, Presentation Overview  Review of the Past  Board Motions:  January, February, November – 2015  Future Considerations.
March 8, Presentation Overview  Review of the Past  Board Motions:  January, February, November – 2015  February – 2016  Education Act and.
French Immersion Program Review Community Consultation May 19, 2011.
Student Assignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Public Forum & School Committee Workshop March 16, 2016.
Student Reassignment Analysis for the Lexington Public Schools Project Introduction & Update for the LPS School Committee February 2, 2016.
Wahoo Public School District Facility Planning Update April 18, 2016.
Sudbury West ARC Public Meeting #3 Wednesday, September 19, 2007.
Program and Accommodation Review Burlington Secondary Schools Director’s Preliminary Report October 5, 2016.
Regina Catholic School Division Building a Vision for the Future Information Meetings October 2015.
Regina Catholic School Division École St
Regina Catholic School Division St
Regina Catholic School Division St
LONG-TERM FACILITY PLAN PUBLIC CONSULTATION MEETING (WESTSIDE)
Regina Catholic School Division Deshaye Catholic School Parent Information Meeting April 12, 2016.
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Class Size Capacity Impact BOARD OF EDUCATION WORK SESSION
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Regina Catholic School Division École St
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Martin Street PS Rebuild Elementary School
Boundary Review Committee Milton #10 Elementary School
Central Saint John Schools Phase 3
Preview of Moore County Board of Education
WELCOME.
Westport Public Schools
Presentation transcript:

Meeting Objectives Meeting participants will: * Have a clear understanding of the accommodation review process * Have a clear understanding of the main concepts being deliberated * Have a chance to provide feedback on those concepts with the understanding that their comments will inform the Working Group’s future discussions 1

Meeting Agenda 7:00 – 8:00 p.m. * Overview of meeting objectives, process and agenda * Accommodation Review structure, decision-making process, timelines * Overview of four(4) main Concepts currently being discussed by the Working Group * Q & A for clarification 8:00 – 9:00 p.m. * Feedback sessions in cafeteria 2

3 Working Group & Consultation Process Working Group (WG) comprised of representatives of area schools and local community associations  supported by Board Staff, Trustee and two(2) Superintendents Two Community Association co-chairs (Amanda Farris, Stefan Matiation) Weekly meetings since March Consultation Process:  The WG has identified four primary concepts for public consultation today  The purpose of tonight’s consultation is to present these concepts, gather community feedback, answer questions and provide you with resources for future feedback  The WG will present its final recommendations directly to the Board in October 2013  Board Staff will present their own recommendations to the Board in October 2013  Board will make its decision in November 2013 (to be implemented for 2014 school year)

4 Working Group Mandate The WG will: Strive to achieve a set of recommendations that will support the objective of alleviating the capacity issues at Devonshire and Elmdale Public Schools while providing students with local access to programs and balanced enrolments across study area schools Focus on solutions that will provide for at least five years of accommodation stability, minimize or eliminate the use of portables, support walkability and neighbourhood schools, and make the most effective use of District facilities involved in the area study Have regard for the implementation of Board-wide Full Day Kindergarten.

5 Working Group Guiding Principles Re-balance community school populations Re-allocate space to match program demand Ensure a community-based solution, using community schools Increase programming options across the Near West Maximize walkability and safe access to the greatest degree possible; minimize busing Work within the Board ’ s preferred, where possible, grade groupings: JK – 6, JK – 8, 7 – 12, 9 – 12

6 Key Challenges Demand for Early French Immersion (EFI) programs exceeds capacity of Elmdale and Devonshire Declining enrolment in Core English (ENG) programs at Elmdale, Connaught, Cambridge; need to make ENG more robust Balance of programs across Near West leaves some areas with gaps - no EFI in Dalhousie; no Middle French Immersion (MFI) in Hintonburg; no K-6 Alternative (ALT) between Churchill and Lady Evelyn Small schools means no perfect balance possible Variables at play: relying on projections; other reviews underway or are imminent (ALT; Far West; Special Education; Centretown) Pros and cons to single vs. dual track (specialization and reduced marginalization vs. ease of family transitions; siblings together)

7 Area Under Consideration +11 CRs, 40% +6-8 CRs, 60% -6 CRs, 160% -11 CRs, 143% +3 CRs, 85% CRs, 81% * Percentages of capacity as of 2016 ** “CR” = number of surplus (+) or deficit (-) classrooms

8 Lessons Learned Surplus (+) or deficit (-) of classrooms is the best indicator of available space in area schools  Percentages of maximum capacity of each school does not tell the space story  Classrooms that are not already used as homerooms are considered “available”  Classrooms may need to be re-purposed to serve as homerooms Enrolment numbers fluctuate from year to year, need to ensure cushion for future growth  Expected intensification of Near West; uncertainty of projecting future enrolment Demand for EFI programming places pressure on schools that currently offer the program  No easily identifiable infrastructure available to provide relief  Pressure is in the west, but the available space is located throughout the boundary  Difficult to balance enrolments since schools are in close proximity to each other and have limited space

9 Concept A – Fisher Park JK-8 EFI with Connaught K-8 ENG - Fisher Park becomes a balanced JK-8 EFI ( draws from Elmdale and Devonshire catchments) - Connaught becomes a JK-8 English with additional 7/8 programming - Elmdale ENG splits to Connaught and Hilson Strengths/OpportunitiesWeaknesses/Challenges Adds equivalent of a “ new ” K-6 school in Near West Fisher Park and Connaught slightly top heavy Top heaviness reduced at Fisher ParkFisher Park yard, school access and security still to be addressed as well as cost of renovations Adds EFI program where there is demandSafety of crossing Parkdale and Holland Reduces transitions for many studentsAre timeframes sufficient for renovations? Creates a more robust ENG program at Connaught, serving a larger part of the Near West Is a small 7/8 program at Connaught viable? Sufficient classrooms are available to meet demand with room for growth – makes use of available space Outcome: Devonshire: 3 free classroomsElmdale: all portables removed, 85% Connaught: 0 free classroomsFisher Park: 3-13 free classrooms Cambridge: 6-8 free classroomsHilson: 2 free classrooms Outcome: Devonshire: 3 free classroomsElmdale: all portables removed, 85% Connaught: 0 free classroomsFisher Park: 3-13 free classrooms Cambridge: 6-8 free classroomsHilson: 2 free classrooms

10 Concept B – Cambridge Dual Track with small Fisher Park JK-8 - Fisher Park draws from Elmdale and Devonshire catchments, but less from Devonshire - Cambridge becomes dual track JK-6 ENG/EFI (draws from Devonshire and Elgin catchments) - Connaught becomes JK-8 ENG; 7/8 is a feeder school for ENG & ALT - Elmdale ENG splits to Connaught and Hilson Strengths/OpportunitiesWeaknesses/Challenges Adds 2 EFI programs in the Near WestClassroom availability is limited at Cambridge and may not accommodate a full K-6 Increases EFI in Somerset allowing these children to stay in their immediate neighborhood + walkability Safety of crossing Bronson Reduces transitions for many students + siblings can remain together Possibility of squeezing out special education and programs supporting ENG at Cambridge Creates a more robust ENG program in the Near West Viability of the 7/8 feeder program at Connaught; Does Summit program stay at Fisher or move to Connaught? No Ports at ElmdaleSuggested change does not alleviate classroom pressure at Elgin Concern about dual tracking Cambridge Outcome: Devonshire: 3 free classroomsElmdale: all portables removed, Connaught: 0 free classroomsFisher Park: 3-13 free classrooms Cambridge: 0 free classroomsHilson: 2 free classrooms Outcome: Devonshire: 3 free classroomsElmdale: all portables removed, Connaught: 0 free classroomsFisher Park: 3-13 free classrooms Cambridge: 0 free classroomsHilson: 2 free classrooms

11 Concept C – Connaught Dual Track with Fisher Park JK- 6 EFI - Connaught becomes dual track JK-6 ENG/EFI to relieve Devonshire overcrowding - Fisher becomes JK-6 EFI; addition of EFI to relieve Elmdale - Elmdale ENG splits to Connaught and Hilson Strengths/OpportunitiesWeaknesses/Challenges New JK-6 EFI at Fisher Park relieves stress at Elmdale Creates new neighbourhood school Top heavy Fisher Park (i.e. larger 7/8 population compared to JK-6) Local solution for both Devonshire and Elmdale - two solutions for two schools Safety of crossing Parkdale and Holland Avenue for some area students Better balance of EFI across the Near WestDoes not fully utilize extra space at Fisher Park Addresses desire for French programming at Connaught Limited EFI boundary for Connaught, is it sustainable Some Devonshire JKs can continue at ConnaughtFisher renovations required to elementary school (cost, timing) Gr. 7/8 Status Quo at Fisher Park (current programs remain at Fisher Park) Outcome: Devonshire: 2/3 free classroomsElmdale: 0 free classrooms Connaught: 4 classrooms overFisher Park: 9 free classrooms Cambridge: 1 free classroomHilson: 3 free classrooms Outcome: Devonshire: 2/3 free classroomsElmdale: 0 free classrooms Connaught: 4 classrooms overFisher Park: 9 free classrooms Cambridge: 1 free classroomHilson: 3 free classrooms

12 Concept D – Connaught ALT JK-8 with large Fisher Park JK-8 - Connaught becomes JK-8 ALT - Fisher Park becomes dual track JK-8 EFI/ENG; 7-8 feeder school without Summit - Cambridge becomes dual track JK-6 ENG/EFI Strengths/OpportunitiesWeaknesses/Challenges New ALT JK-8 Program in a dedicated, non-co- located, new facility Loss of cohesive Summit ALT staff if moved to Connaught, putting the viability as a true ALT program at risk Improves program availability and program distribution across Near West Support for new ALT program is unknown – do not know JK-6 demand and unsure of 7/8’s willing to transfer facilities Provides community based solution for alternative learning Results of ongoing review of ALT programs expected in September All programs are robust (class sizes, grade groupings, funding) Triggers an ARC which would require additional time Fewer transition points for a greater percentage of children in Near West Fisher Park yard, school access and security still to be addressed as well as cost of renovations More balanced Fisher ParkClassroom availability is limited at Cambridge and may not accommodate a full JK-6 EFI Outcome: numbers are soft; unclear how many Connaught children would choose to stay; Board Staff currently running numbers

13 Other Concepts Under Consideration Hilson becomes JK-6 ENG/EFI taking Elmdale overflow, Connaught becomes ENG/MFI taking Hilson MFI, Cambridge becomes ENG/EFI taking Devonshire overflow Connaught becomes JK-6 ENG/EFI taking Devonshire and Elmdale, FP becomes 5-8 taking Devonshire and Elmdale 5 & 6s Connaught becomes EFI only; FP adds JK-6 EFI/ENG dual track, or, Connaught ENG redirected to Cambridge, Centennial and Hilson Connaught becomes dual track ENG/EFI taking Devonshire overflow and Elmdale keeps all portables

Other Concepts Under Consideration cont’d Fisher becomes JK-8 EFI, ALT, G-EFI, Connaught becomes JK-8 ENG with junior seed ALT program, Cambridge gets JK-3 seed EFI in addition to retaining ENG or ALT could be swapped for MFI. Concept C variations could include: - an introduction of a JK-6 EFI program at Cambridge (phase-in starting JK-3), - Elmdale becomes JK-3 and Fisher adds 4-6, or - Elmdale keeps portables 14

15 Next Steps The WG will consider the feedback that is provided tonight and will continue to develop and evaluate concepts and scenarios In September, we will return to update you on our work and to seek additional feedback In October, we will finalize our recommendations and submit them for the Board’s consideration Board staff will submit their own recommendations to the Board The Board of Trustees is the decision-maker Board Staff along with Community input will develop implementation strategies Thank You!

16 Where to Find Additional Information A video of tonight’s presentation will be available on youtube and on some websites of Community Associations (e.g., Tonight’s power point presentation and other documents can be found at dationReview.aspx dationReview.aspx If you want to share your feedback, express concerns or share your ideas with the WG you may do so at any time by ing us at