2009-2010 District Performance Union County Public Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Presented to the State Board of Education August 22, 2012 Jonathan Wiens, PhD Office of Assessment and Information Services Oregon Department of Education.
Advertisements

1 Test Data Review and Adequate Yearly Progress. 2.
EDU 221.  Group Presentation Reflections due for 7 & 8  Quiz #2 (Tuesday, Nov. 16 th ) – Problem- based ◦ What makes an outstanding response? Referring.
Franklin Public Schools MCAS Presentation November 27, 2012 Joyce Edwards Director of Instructional Services.
Measures of Student Achievement Appoquinimink School District November 2007.
Data 101 Presented by Janet Downey After School Program Specialist Riverside Unified School District.
1 Prepared by: Research Services and Student Assessment & School Performance School Accountability in Florida: Grading Schools and Measuring Adequate Yearly.
Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Board Presentation March 25, 2008.
2010 California Standards Test (CST) Results Lodi Unified School District Prepared by the Assessment, Research, and Evaluation August 17, 2010 Board Study.
Closing the Achievement Gap A 3-hour training for experienced SBDM Council members.
Title 1 at J. Evans Middle School. Title 1 of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 was created to ensure that all children have a fair,
K-12 Student Performance and Efficiency Commission July 18, 2014 School Year Data.
November 7, 2014 WILLMAR PUBLIC SCHOOLS WORLD’S BEST WORKFORCE SUMMARY.
Introduction to Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Michigan Department of Education Office of Psychometrics, Accountability, Research, & Evaluation Summer.
KCCT Kentucky’s Commonwealth Accountability Testing System Overview of 2008 Regional KPR.
Springfield Public Schools Adequate Yearly Progress 2010 Overview.
San Leandro Unified School Board Looking Closely About Our Data September 6, 2006 Presented by Department of Curriculum and Instruction Prepared by Daniel.
District Assessment & Accountability Data Board of Education Report September 6, 2011 Marsha A. Brown, Director III – Student Services State Testing and.
Patricia Sheffer, Assistant Superintendent & Director of Instruction Holly Keeney, Supervisor of Instruction.
1 Paul Tuss, Ph.D., Program Manager Sacramento Co. Office of Education August 17, 2009 California’s Integrated Accountability System.
Our Road to Success PIONEER SCHOOL DISTRICT. Student Demographics  Enrollment 734 students pre-K through 8 th  2.1% American Indian/Alaskan Native 
1 Differentiated Accountability. 2 Florida’s Differentiated Accountability Model On July 28, 2008, Florida was named one of six states to pilot a differentiated.
School Report Card ACCOUNTABILITY STATUS REPORT: ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS, MATHEMATICS, SCIENCE, AND GRADUATION RATE For GREENVILLE CSD.
375 students took the number sense common formative assessments this school year. These are their stories. (Please view as a slide show)
July,  Congress hasn’t reauthorized Elementary & Secondary Education Act (ESEA), currently known as No Child Left Behind (NCLB)  U.S. Department.
Department of Research and Planning November 14, 2011.
Collecting data & information Talking with teachers, administrators, service providers Progress Monitoring Consolidated Planning /Use of Data Alternative.
School Accountability in Delaware for the School Year August 3, 2005.
Making Sense of Adequate Yearly Progress. Adequate Yearly Progress Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) is a required activity of the No Child Left Behind (NCLB)
Adequate Yearly Progress The federal law requires all states to establish standards for accountability for all schools and districts in their states. The.
Public School Accountability System. Background One year ago One year ago –100 percent proficiency required in –AMOs set to increase 7-12 points.
School Accountability No Child Left Behind & Arizona Learns.
Capacity Development and School Reform Accountability The School District Of Palm Beach County Adequate Yearly Progress, Differentiated Accountability.
1 Mitchell D. Chester Commissioner of Elementary and Secondary Education Report on Spring 2009 MCAS Results to the Massachusetts Board of Elementary and.
Welcome to Abbett Elementary! Curriculum Night 2015.
The Pike County School Corporation “The Role of the School Administrator In School Improvement” The Learning Conference Indianapolis, IN January 30, 2006.
Click to edit Master subtitle style 2010 Adequate Yearly Progress Report Lawrence Public Schools August 9, 2010.
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
Annual Progress Report Data Ankeny Community Schools.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
2009 Report Card and TVAAS Update Recalibration 2009 October 26, 2009.
1 Accountability Systems.  Do RFEPs count in the EL subgroup for API?  How many “points” is a proficient score worth?  Does a passing score on the.
Report to Board of Education April 12, 2010 Trenton Public Schools.
Joshua E. Powell Patricia Sheffer. Rationale for Improvement Index * District161/17587/175 High School165/175115/175 Middle School145/17599/175.
Presented by: Frank Ciloski, Sherry Hutchins, Barb Light, Val Masuga, Amy Metz, Michelle Ribant, Kevin Richard, Kristina Rider, and Helena Shepard.
Annual Progress Report Summary September 12, 2011.
1 Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) U.S. Department of Education Adapted by TEA May 2003 Modified by Dr. Teresa Cortez for Riverside Feeder Data Days February.
Anderson School Accreditation We commit to continuous growth and improvement by  Creating a culture for learning by working together  Providing.
Gallatin County High School Accountability & Assessment Data.
Unbridled Learning: CSIP Development and Delivery Targets November/December 2014 Intermediate School Brian Futrell, Principal.
NDE State of the Schools Adequate Yearly Progress Persistently Lowest Achieving Schools Nebraska Performance Accountability System Board of Education.
NYS School Report Card & Spring 2014 NYS Assessment Results Orchard Park Central School District Board of Education Presentation August 26, 2014.
UNBRIDLED LEARNING: College/Career Ready for All
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
LIVINGSTON COUNTY MIDDLE SCHOOL
Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools
College/Career Ready for All
Mesa Union School District “A Day in the Life of Data”
Academic Report 2007/2008 AYP.
OFFICE OF CURRICULUM & INSTRUCTION
Anderson Elementary School
Lauren Kinsella Dr. Wright ITEC 7305
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System
Teaching & Learning Update
Annual Report on Curriculum, Instruction and Assessment
College/Career Ready for All
November 09, 2012 Suzanne M. Wright Joe Prather
Presentation transcript:

District Performance Union County Public Schools

District Performance: All Students ImprovementGoal Reading71.94%75.37%+3.43%68.69% Math59.24%61.82%+2.58%59.79% Science54.67%57.54%+2.87%----- Social Studies52.79%53.93%+1.12%----- Writing40.29%42.74%+2.45%----- DISTRICT PERFORMANCE: Made gains in every subject area African American students met AYP goals in Reading and Math 1 st Time in 5 years MES met All AYP Goals 1 st Time in NCLB history that UCMS met All AYP Goals Although NCLB in Special Education was met at each school, district goal was not met

District Turnaround Performance: 2 Year View 2008: Onset % Growth Reading59.07%71.94%75.37%+16.30% Math45.38%59.24%61.81%+16.43% Science 46.28% 54.67% 57.54%+11.26% Social Studies46.56 % 52.79%53.93 %+7.37 % Writing 34.07% 40.29% 42.74%+8.67%

UCHS % Proficient & Distinguished ImprovementGoal Reading67.68%57.14%-10.54%59.63% Math32.12%34.78%+2.66%59.88% Science40.61%41.85%+1.24%----- Social Studies27.27%47.83%+20.56%----- Writing24.07%27.39%+3.32%----- Met AYP in Reading for All Students 1 st Time met non-academic goal for AYP since o State required 2% increase in graduation rate; UCHS had 6% increase. o State goal – UCHS had Last year was at 83 Gained in every area except for Reading Did not meet AYP Goals for White and Free/Reduced Lunch students in the area of math

UCMS % Proficient & Distinguished Gain/LossGoal Reading68.54%75.25%+6.71%72.80% Math53.91%62.07%+8.16%58.25% Science56.10%59.15%+3.05%----- Social Studies59.20%51.53%-7.67% Writing42.53%44.79%+2.26% st Time in NCLB History that UCMS met ALL AYP Goals in Reading & Math for ALL Students.

MES % Proficient & Distinguished Gain/LossState Goal Reading70.62%76.73%+6.11%73.64% Math69.59%67.82%-1.77%61.23% Science50.72%69.49%+18.77%----- Social Studies68.66%54.79%-13.87% Writing37.31%47.95%+10.64% Made significant gains in Science and Writing 1 st Time since that MES met ALL AYP Goals in Reading & Math for ALL students.

SES % Proficient & Distinguished Gain/LossNCLB Goal Reading85.88%85.57%-0.31%73.64% Math78.53%76.29%-2.24%61.23% Science81.82%78.95%-2.87%----- Social Studies70.00%75.93%+5.93%----- Writing61.67%62.96%+1.29%----- Made AYP in Reading & Math Improved in Social Studies by +5.93% Exceeded NCLB Goals

UES % Proficient & Distinguished Gain/LossNCLB Goal Reading75.00%78.64%+3.64%73.64% Math77.00%68.93%-8.07%61.23% Science78.13%60.00%-18.13%----- Social Studies80.56%56.67%-23.89% Writing72.22%63.33%-8.89% Gained in the area of Reading Significant decreases in four of five subject areas; however, UES exceeded NCLB goals for Reading and Math Met AYP in Reading & Math

NCLB Status: Title I Schools % Goals Met 2008 % Goals Met 2009 % Goals Met 2010Improvement District75% (12/16) 81.3% (13/16) All Schools Met AYP, except UCHS-Math * As a district-free/reduced lunch (math) and disability (reading/math) did not meet MES75% (9/12) 92.9% (13/14)100% (14/14) 1 st Time in 5 yrs. Met AYP in All Areas UCMS68.8% (11/16) 87.5% (14/16)100% (16/16) 1 St Time in History of NCLB Met AYP in All Areas UES100% (10/10) 100% (10/10)100% (9/9) Met AYP in All Areas SES100% (10/10) 100% (10/10) Met AYP in All Areas UCHS58.3% (7/12) 57.1% (8/14)70% (7/10) Met AYP in All Areas, except math-free/reduced & white

NCLB Accomplishments: Title I Schools MES – Closed disability gap for reading! – Met AYP for first time in five years UCMS – Closed disability gap for both reading and math! – Met AYP for first time ever in all areas District did not meet AYP; has not ever made AYP

Carnegie Math: UCMS/UCHS Grade* ** Gains UCMS41% 54% 62%+21% UCHSN/A32%35%+3% Overall P & D36% 39% 55%+19% *Prior to Carnegie Math implementation **Spring semester implementation of Carnegie Math at UCMS Transition Index Grade* ** Gains UCMS UCHSN/A Percent Proficient and Distinguished Grade* ** Gains UCMS22.6% 13.22% 11.16%+11.44% UCHSN/A34.55%25.55%+9% Novice Reduction

District Gains African American (% P &D) Two Year View READING Gains District38.00%54.34%59.01%+21.01% State49.72%51.09%53.77% MATH Gains District20.00%33.33%41.82%+21.82% State38.90%41.32%41.78% In , African Americans had zero percent proficient and distinguished in math and 13% proficient and distinguished at UCHS.

Significant Gains at Tier Schools African American (% P &D) Two Year View READING Gains MES35.00%50.00%63.04%+28.04% UCMS46.00%56.96%60.26%+14.26% MATH Gains MES25.60%47.83%52.17%+26.57% UCMS20.60%30.38%43.59%+22.99%

District Gains Special Education – (% P &D) Two Year View READING Gains District39.00%50.76%54.49%+15.49% State41.04%43.33%48.67% MATH Gains District26.57%34.34%39.33%+12.76% State35.33%39.63%43.37%

Significant Gains at Tier Schools Special Education – (% P &D) Two Year View READING Gains MES18.00%45.65%65.85%+47.85% UCMS34.60%37.66%44.29%+9.69% MATH Gains MES7.30%43.48%43.90%+36.60% UCMS17.00%20.78%35.71%+18.70

District Gains Gifted & Talented – (% P &D) Two Year View READING Gains Elementary95.00%98.11%100.00%+5.00% UCMS78.33%91.62%90.62%+12.29% MATH Gains Elementary84.33%97.17%94.45%+10.12% UCMS71.33%81.43%85.81%+14.48%

District Rankings Percentile Percentile 2010 Percentile District161/1758%87/17450%71/17459% High School165/1756%115/17434%93/16945% Middle School 145/17517%99/17443%59/17466% UES247/71365%181/71975%397/71745% SES373/71348%198/71972%241/71766% MES671/7136%482/71933%397/71745% Elem. TOTAL147/17516%65/17463%74/17457%

Success: A Roadmap for the future District climbed from 161 to 87, and now from 87 to 71 Continued progress although not to the standards of Union County Must make up considerable ground to obtain Top 10 status All Tier schools made significant progress Gaps between subgroups were significantly reduced

District Overall Index Scores Gain/loss (1yr) KASC 2014 Projected Index District On Track to 100 UCHS Improving UCMS On Track to 100 Elementary (Total) On Track to 100 MES On Track to 100 UES On Track to 100 SES On Track to 100

District Subject Performance Index Points - 2 Year View Subject Gain Since 2008 Math Reading Science Social Studies Writing

District Distinguished Improvement- 2 Year View 2008 % Distinguished 2009 % Distinguished 2010 % Distinguished Increase Since 2008 Math33%72%64%31% Reading27%42%50%23% Science30%52%56%26% Social Studies24%44%50%26% Writing9%14%18%9%

District Novice Reduction 2 Year View 2008 % Novice 2009 % Novice 2010 % Novice % Novice Reduction Math82%56%45%37% Reading20%8%12%8% Science60%32%30% Social Studies 52%43%37%15% Writing37%18% 19%

Reasons for Success Teachers Instructional support staff Students Community Support Belief that Union County and excellence should go hand in hand

Reasons for Success Formative Assessment Carnegie Math Kentucky Association of School Councils (KASC) Right people in the right places Special thanks to KDE’s Special Education Department

Concerns: District Although we made tremendous progress, we are still in NCLB consequences-must meet AYP 1 more year The high school has not made satisfactory progress – Double digit number of NOVICE in the areas of Science, Math, and Social Studies – ACT scores Elementary schools did not make satisfactory progress Again, we must understand that this data is not an end, but rather a roadmap for future improvement

Needs for Continued Improvement High performance mindset-Top 10 High EXPECTATIONS for all stakeholders RIGOR Culture of high expectations Response to Intervention (RtI) at every level Improved instructional strategies Use of existing formative assessment and curriculum specialist Continued use of innovative Special Education strategies Elimination of bureaucratic barriers