Proton beams for the East Area The beams and their slow extraction By : Rende Steerenberg PS/OP.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 ILC Bunch compressor Damping ring ILC Summer School August Eun-San Kim KNU.
Advertisements

Injection and extraction
Transverse optics 2: Hill’s equation Phase Space Emittance & Acceptance Matrix formalism Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP)
M. LindroosNUFACT06 School Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Mats Lindroos.
Massimo GiovannozziCOULOMB' September Resonant multi-turn extraction: principle and experiments M. Giovannozzi and S. Gilardoni, M. Martini,
Longitudinal motion: The basic synchrotron equations. What is Transition ? RF systems. Motion of low & high energy particles. Acceleration. What are Adiabatic.
Longitudinal instabilities: Single bunch longitudinal instabilities Multi bunch longitudinal instabilities Different modes Bunch lengthening Rende Steerenberg.
Lattice calculations: Lattices Tune Calculations Dispersion Momentum Compaction Chromaticity Sextupoles Rende Steerenberg (BE/OP) 17 January 2012 Rende.
Massimo GiovannozziPAC05, May 16th FINAL RESULTS FROM THE NOVEL MULTI-TURN EXTRACTION STUDIES AT CERN PROTON SYNCHROTRON M. Giovannozzi and R. Cappi,
Paul Derwent 30 Nov 00 1 The Fermilab Accelerator Complex o Series of presentations  Overview of FNAL Accelerator Complex  Antiprotons: Stochastic Cooling.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014 Lecture.
Nov. 17, 2005Fermi Lab AP Seminar AC Dipole Based Diagnostics Mei Bai, C-A Department.
Eric Prebys USPAS, Knoxville, TN, Jan , 2014.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
H. Bartosik, K. Cornelis, A. Guerrero, B. Mikulek, G. Rumolo, Y. Papaphilippou, B. Salvant, E. Shaposhnikova June 16 th, 2011.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
1 EPIC SIMULATIONS V.S. Morozov, Y.S. Derbenev Thomas Jefferson National Accelerator Facility A. Afanasev Hampton University R.P. Johnson Muons, Inc. Operated.
Simulations and measurements of the injection oscillations and the MTE A. Huschauer Supervisor: S. Gilardoni Acknowledgements: H. Bartosik, H. Damerau,
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Double RF system at IUCF Shaoheng Wang 06/15/04. Contents 1.Introduction of Double RF System 2.Phase modulation  Single cavity case  Double cavity case.
Part III Commissioning. Proof of Principle FFAG (POP) study The world first proton FFAG –Commissioned in March –From 50 keV to 500 keV in 1ms. –Proof.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
The Quadrupole Pick-up in the CPS -intro and progress report PPC 3 Dec 1999 A. Jansson.
Overview of Booster PIP II upgrades and plans C.Y. Tan for Proton Source group PIP II Collaboration Meeting 03 June 2014.
E.M, PS-OP shut-down lectures, 20/02/ u Requirements of the LHC on its injectors u What are the nominal & already achieved beams at PS exit? u How.
J-PARC Spin Physics Workshop1 Polarized Proton Acceleration in J-PARC M. Bai Brookhaven National Laboratory.
SPS proton beam for AWAKE E. Shaposhnikova 13 th AWAKE PEB Meeting With contributions from T. Argyropoulos, T. Bohl, H. Bartosik, S. Cettour.
Crossing transition at RHIC V.Ptitsyn, N.Abreu, M. Brennan, M.Blaskiewicz, W. Fischer, C. Montag, R. Lee, S.Tepikian.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Eric Prebys, FNAL.  We consider motion of particles either through a linear structure or in a circular ring USPAS, Hampton, VA, Jan , 2015 Longitudinal.
INTENSITY LIMITATIONS IN THE LHC INJECTORS Discussion on Landau damping Ibon Santiago González Summer Student Session 2007.
Overview of Ramp Development Giulio Stancari E-835 Collaboration Meeting Torino, May
Beam loss and radiation in the SPS for higher intensities and injection energy G. Arduini 20 th November 2007 Acknowledgments: E. Shaposhnikova and all.
Present MEIC IR Design Status Vasiliy Morozov, Yaroslav Derbenev MEIC Detector and IR Design Mini-Workshop, October 31, 2011.
F Project X: Recycler 8.9 GeV/c Extraction D. Johnson, E. Prebys, M. Martens, J. Johnstone Fermilab Accelerator Advisory Committee August 8, 2007 D. Johnson.
E.Wildner NUFACT09 School 1 Accelerator Physics Transverse motion Elena Wildner.
Lecture 4 Longitudinal Dynamics I Professor Emmanuel Tsesmelis Directorate Office, CERN Department of Physics, University of Oxford ACAS School for Accelerator.
Hybrid Fast-Ramping Synchrotron to 750 GeV/c J. Scott Berg Brookhaven National Laboratory MAP Collaboration Meeting March 5, 2012.
MTE commissioning status S. Gilardoni, BE/ABP With C. Hernalsteens and M. Giovannozzi.
Summary of ions measurements in 2015 and priorities for 2016 studies E. Shaposhnikova 3/02/2016 Based on input from H. Bartosik, T. Bohl, B. Goddard, V.
Professor Philip Burrows John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science Oxford University ACAS School for Accelerator Physics January 2014 Longitudinal Dynamics.
Lecture 5 - E. Wilson - 6/29/ Slide 1 Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2014 E. J. N. Wilson.
LEIR re-commissioning and other operational aspects First ideas for new tools and organization First draft re-commisisoning plan H. Bartosik, A. Huschauer,
Contents:  Lattices and TWISS Parameters  Tune Calculations and Corrections  Dispersion  Momentum Compaction  Chromaticity  Sextupole Magnets 
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
J-PARC main ring lattice An overview
A.Lachaize CNRS/IN2P3 IPN Orsay
Academic Training Lecture 2 : Beam Dynamics
Beam based measurements
Space charge studies at the SPS
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
Elena Wildner CERN CA15139 Meeting, Sofia 15/
PSB rf manipulations PSB cavities
Pretzel scheme of CEPC H. Geng, G. Xu, Y. Zhang, Q. Qin, J. Gao, W. Chou, Y. Guo, N. Wang, Y. Peng, X. Cui, T. Yue, Z. Duan, Y. Wang, D. Wang, S. Bai,
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Review of Accelerator Physics Concepts
Thursday Week 1 Lecture Jeff Eldred Nonlinear Sextupole Resonance 1 1
Collider Ring Optics & Related Issues
Multi-Turn Extraction for PS2 Preliminary considerations
Electron Rings Eduard Pozdeyev.
Beam dynamics requirements after LS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
JLEIC Collaboration meeting Spring 2016 Ion Polarization with Figure-8
Update on CEPC pretzel scheme design
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2009 E. J. N. Wilson.
Lecture 5 ACCELERATOR PHYSICS MT 2015 E. J. N. Wilson.
G.H. Wei, V.S. Morozov, Fanglei Lin Y. Nosochkov (SLAC), M-H. Wang
Presentation transcript:

Proton beams for the East Area The beams and their slow extraction By : Rende Steerenberg PS/OP

The beam in the P.S. Booster The beam in the P.S. The slow extraction process –An intuitive approach –How does it work in our P.S. machine –Some problems and possible solutions Diagnostics What will we cover:

The Beam in the P.S. Booster Two users : EASTA and EASTB (in future a third one TOF) EASTA is 1 bunch ring 3 on H=1 EASTB is depending on the required intensity: 1 bunch ring 3 on H=1 2 bunches ring 3 on H=2 Intensity for both is adjusted by means of transverse shaving. Low intensity Q-settings: Q-strips are at 0 Amp. InjectionEjection Qh Qv

The Beam in the P.S. Injection (Like most other beams) Coherent oscillations Longitudinal blow-up (as function of shaving in P.S. Booster) Preparation for slow extraction (later in more detail) Prepare machine magnetically R.F. gymnastic for bunch rotation Slow extraction (later in more detail) Length and instantaneous intensity of spill Shape of spill Position of extracted beam in East Area beam lines Acceleration (straight forward, no splitting) EASTA H8 beam control EASTB H8 beam control for Ip > per bunch H16LI beam control for Ip < per bunch Three users : EASTA, EASTB and EASTC (combined with TOF beam)

The slow extraction process ‘intuitively’ The slow extraction in the P.S. machine is no ‘hocus pocus’, but is based on the third order resonance. After a certain number of turns around the machine the phase advance of the betatron oscillation is such that the oscillation repeats itself. E.g. If the phase advance per turn is 120 degrees then the betatron oscillation will repeat itself after 3 turns E.g. This corresponds to Q = or 3Q = 19 What does this mean?

x’  x 1st turn 2nd turn 3rd turn 2  q = 2  /3 q = fractional part of Q Third order resonance on a normalized phase space plot

Sextupole (deflection  (position) 2 ) For Q = 6.33: Oscillation induced by the sextupole kick grows on each turn and the particle is lost (3rd order resonance 3Q = 19) For Q = 6.25: Oscillation is cancelled out every fourth turn, and the particle motion is stable 1st turn 2nd turn 3rd turn 4th turn Q = th turn Q = 6.33

Septum A more realistic view on a 3 rd order resonant extraction

The slow extraction process in the P.S. P.S. Main field Resonance area   Resonance area R R time T start T +  t T end ms p0p0 p0p0 P 0 = Average momentum, 24GeV/c Extracted beam Which variable influences which parameter ???

Variables to change, parameters concerned. Radial position or average momentum different start of spill Momentum spread or magnetic ramp length and start of spill will change Horizontal emittance instantaneous momentum spread will be different Horizontal tune Qh if change is big then no 3 rd order resonance if change is small then different start of spill Horizontal chromaticity  h can create more or less losses on extraction septa (we will see later why) Sextupole strength resonance area will have a different size and thus the instantaneous momentum spread will be different What about the ripple on the spill ???

FIRST EXTRACTOR SEPTUM MAGNET 61 SEPTUM MAGNET 57 QUADRUPOLE 29 ELECTROSTATIC SEPTUM 23 SEXTUPOLE 19 SEXTUPOLE 7 QUADRUPOLE 87 D53 D59 D61 (septum) D67 D27 D19 Which elements are used what for ??? PE.GSQSE PE.GSXSE PE.GSBSW57 PE.GSBSW23

Preparation for slow extraction ‘boucle en huit’ goes to 0 Amp (short circuited), PFW D and F generate: the correct tune Qh = 6.2 the correct chromaticity  h = -0.9 Switch on the slow extraction elements (bumps, quadrupoles, sextupoles and septa) Quadrupoles: add a Qh of 0.13 which gives Qh = 6.33 increase  make dispersion small at SES23 make dispersion big and positive at SMH57 Sextupoles: add a  h of 0.4 which gives  h = -0.5 control the ‘stability triangle’ size and the ‘spiral pitch’ (phase space kick) Bumps: approach beam to the different septa Septa (SES23, SMH57, SMH61) Put the beam on the right orbit (with perturbation) Perform bunch rotation, jump to and from the unstable phase Switch off the R.F. voltage when the bunch is upright in the bucket De-bunch the beam The slope on the flat top of the magnetic field will now move the beam into the resonance. How does some of this look like on an oscilloscope ???

Magnetic preparation for slow extraction Arrival at ‘flat-top’ W8L short circuited PFW F and PFW D take over Bump for electrostatic septum SextupolesQuadrupoles Spill

R.F. preparation for slow extraction Schematically: Detected pick-up R.F. voltage Real life:

‘Optics and septa’ sources of losses Extraction Magnetic Septum (SD57) (34 sections)  45º Electrostatic Septum (SD23) Cathode Anode Low momentum particle high momentum particle Septum blade The electrostatic septum kicks a part of the beam and creates the space for the 1st magnetic septum. Optimum situation obtained by changing the dispersion coefficients at SES23 and SMH57. This is done by the 2 quadrupoles. Dispersion at SES23 small and positive Dispersion at SMH57 Big and positive.

Some problems and possible solutions General shape of spill ‘ Spill shaping’ by modeling dQ h /dt or dB/dt (One of the study objects this year, MD’s) Stability and reproducibility In case of drift, how to determine what has drifted, why and how to correct it. Setting-up, measurement and debugging procedures. Low frequency ripple Feed forward system (improved) Feed back system (difficult, but still under study) Channeling buckets (effective, but need optimization)

Channeling buckets The basic idea is that the particles cross the resonance more quickly. This leaves less time for the perturbations to influence the resonating particles, which in the end will reduce the ripple on the extracted spill.

Diagnostics We can distinguish again two different parts: 1. Beam between slow extraction preparation and extraction Tune measurement Chromaticity measurement Bunch shape measurement Transverse emittance measurement (flying wire scanner) 2. Beam during extraction Beam losses at 23, 57, 61, 63. (analog signals) Mini Toposcope 57 Spill measurement LSD Spill analyzer (extended and improved) F61.MTV01

Questions or …….. ???