From Reaction to Prevention: Ensuring that TSCA Reform and Other Chemicals Policies Stimulate the Transition Towards Safer and More Sustainable Chemicals.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Armand Racine Consultant Chemicals Branch
Advertisements

Opening Doors: Federal Strategic Plan to Prevent and End Homelessness
Toxics Use Reduction Institute Alternatives Assessment: An Overview Pam Eliason Toxics Use Reduction Institute
Jim Jones Acting Assistant Administrator Office of Chemical Safety & Pollution Prevention 1.
Sustainable Approaches: Industrial Ecology and Pollution Prevention Chapter 21 © 2004 Thomson Learning/South-Western.
A program of the National Pollution Prevention Roundtable.
Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Authorizes EPA to identify hazardous wastes and regulate their generation, transportation, treatment, storage and.
Challenges and opportunities for effective implementation of TSCA Joel A. Tickner, ScD School of Health and Environment, UMASS Lowell US EPA National Pollution.
Clean Water Act Integrated Planning Framework Sewer Smart Summit October 23, 2012.
1 Module 2: Promoting Compliance with Environmental Law.
Chemicals Policy Update Regulatory options for pollution prevention and toxics use reduction. Ken Zarker, P2 Section Manager Washington State Department.
The Path Forward: Green Chemistry and Chemicals Policy Reform Ken Zarker, Manager Pollution Prevention & Regulatory Assistance Section
Leading Corporate Citizens McGraw-Hill/Irwin © 2002 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., All Rights Reserved. In the Global Village Chapter 9 Ecological Thinking.
Georgia Institute of Technology Systems Realization Laboratory Reducing Environmental Impact.
Copyright © 2011 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin CHAPTER 11 Managing Environmental Issues.
Chemicals Policy – A View from the United States Joel Tickner, ScD, Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts.
Infrastructure Management H. Scott Matthews January 15, 2003.
Sustainability. Sustainability Defined Sustainability commonly refers to the characteristic of a process or state which can be maintained at a certain.
TRP Chapter Chapter 1.1 Introduction. TRP Chapter Why raise hazardous waste management standards? To reduce risks of inadequate controls on.
PHAB's Approach to Internal and External Evaluation Jessica Kronstadt | Director of Research and Evaluation | November 18, 2014 APHA 2014 Annual Meeting.
Produce Safety Rule Phase 2 Workgroup 1.
Environmental Engineering
 2011 Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health Regulation of Tobacco Products Mitch Zeller, JD Pinney Associates.
NATIONAL SAICM IMPLEMENTATION: DEVELOPING A GOVERNANCE FRAMEWORK Gillian Guthrie Ministry of Local Government and Environment June 19, 2006 THE CASE OF.
Energy & Materials Tracking Terri Goldberg, NEWMOA.
SECRET Green Procurement Office of Greening Government Operations May 4, 2006.
Green Chemistry in Commerce Council Drivers for Innovation & Marketing Safer Products Yve Torrie, MA Lowell Center for Sustainable Production
Experiences and lessons learned from the TNA of China WANG Can Tsinghua University, China UNFCCC workshop on Technology Needs Assessments Bonn, Germany.
Oregon Toxics Reduction Strategy: Tools and Initiatives June 25, NW NAHMMA Conference Kevin Masterson, Oregon DEQ Agency Toxics Coordinator
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
Impacts of the European Commission’s REACH Proposal on Risk Assessment Joel A. Tickner, ScD and Ken Geiser, PhD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production.
Barbara Cunningham Office of Pollution Prevention & Toxics 1.
The Toxics Use Reduction Act in Massachusetts: A Successful Model in Toxics Substitution and Reduction Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable.
The Landscape of State Chemicals Regulation Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production University of Massachusetts Lowell
Framing a Future Chemicals Policy Joel A. Tickner, ScD Lowell Center for Sustainable Production April 28, 2005.
Sustainable Chemicals Management A Canadian Labour Perspective Framing a Future Chemicals Policy Conference Boston - April 28-29, 2005.
Infusing TSCA with Green Chemistry: The Role of Innovation in Chemical Risk Management Dr. Kira Matus Senior Policy Analyst Center for Green Chemistry.
Managing Environmental Issues
Green Chemistry & Commerce Council (GC3) A project of the Lowell Center for Sustainable Production, University of Massachusetts Lowell.
Preventive Emergency Planning Emergency Plans should focus not just on response but on reducing risk Emergency Planning that focuses on risk should consider.
Policy Options to Support the Use of Green Chemistry Colin Price Research Director Oregon Environmental Council June 9, 2010.
Pilot Projects on Strengthening Inventory Development and Risk Management-Decision Making for Mercury: A Contribution to the Global Mercury Partnership.
Session 6: Summary of Discussion A. Institutional Barriers and Potential Solutions 1. Natural environment does not have national or institutional boundaries,
1 Green chemistry and green economy: an economic approach. Ignazio Musu Ca’ Foscari University of Venice.
WHAT IS THE GC3? The Green Chemistry and Commerce Council (GC3) is a project of the Chemical Policy & Science Initiative at the Lowell Center for Sustainable.
Background Innovators Roundtable on Sustainable Business and Safer Chemistry Through the Supply Chain discussing barriers and opportunities in the application.
1 Children and chemical safety: framework for action to protect children from harmful exposures Presented on behalf of the IFCS Children & Chemical Safety.
Compliance Promotion Formalizing an Approach to Support Stakeholder Compliance.
SAICM preparations towards International regulation of chemicals = dismal pace. Example, the asbestos in all its forms, is no fully listed.
ROPES & GRAY LLP Chemical Policy Reform: State/Federal Approaches Mark Greenwood.
CAI-Asia is building an air quality management community in Asia Investment Implications of the Action Plan Sustainable Urban.
New Framework for EPA’s Chemical Management Program Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics Wendy Cleland-Hamnett, Director.
EPA National Pollution Prevention Update Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics, Pollution Prevention Division.
ORDER ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION PROGRAM WORKSHOP OVERVIEW OF ORDER Larry Stirling
1 25 STRONG WORKFORCE RECOMMENDATIONS IMPLEMENTATION OVERVIEW #strongworkforce DoingWhatMATTERS.cccco.edu.
A Sustainable Tourism Framework for the Caribbean Mercedes Silva Sustainable Tourism Specialist Caribbean Tourism Organization “Ma Pampo” World Ecotourism.
Sustainability in the Supply Chain 5 © 2014 Pearson Education, Inc. SUPPLEMENT.
Helsinki Chemicals Forum 2015 Concluding Remarks Second Day Jukka Malm European Chemicals Agency.
ITC-ILO/ACTRAV Course A Trade Union Training on Occupational Safety, Health & HIV/AIDS (26/11 – 07/12/2012, Turin) Introduction to National Occupational.
Environmental Management Division 1 NASA Headquarters Environmental Management System (EMS) Michael J. Green, PE NASA EMS Lead NASA Headquarters Washington,
Design for the Environment Program Overview April 6 th, 2005.
Managing Environmental Issues
Green Chemistry at Ecology and Northwest Green Chemistry
Multidisciplinary nature of environmental studies Lecture #1
GREEN CHEMISTRY ARAVIND ES CE13M022.
CAPACITY BUILDING FOR GHS IMPLEMENTATION: the perspective of Civil Society Contact : Dr Olga Speranskaya Co-Chair, IPEN
Profiting from Cleaner Production
Considerations in Development of the SBSTA Five Year Programme of Work on Adaptation Thank Mr. Chairman. Canada appreciates this opportunity to share.
Industrial Value Chain: A Bridge Towards a Carbon Neutral Europe
Lowell Center for Sustainable Production
Presentation transcript:

From Reaction to Prevention: Ensuring that TSCA Reform and Other Chemicals Policies Stimulate the Transition Towards Safer and More Sustainable Chemicals Joel A. Tickner, ScD University of Massachusetts Lowell ABA Spring Conference on the Environment, June, 11, 2010 Joel A. Tickner, ScD University of Massachusetts Lowell ABA Spring Conference on the Environment, June, 11, 2010

Overview Green Chemistry and safer alternatives in TSCA reform Current EPA actions Barriers to green chemistry and safer alternatives programs Precursors to advancing green chemistry and safer products Policy options to advance this area

Goals of TSCA reform POLICY.—It is the policy of the United States— ‘‘(1) to protect the health of children, workers, consumers, and the public, and to protect the environment from harmful exposures to chemical substances and mixtures; ‘‘(2) to promote the use of safer alternatives and other actions that reduce use of and exposure to hazardous chemical substances and reward innovation toward safer chemicals, processes, and products; POLICY.—It is the policy of the United States— ‘‘(1) to protect the health of children, workers, consumers, and the public, and to protect the environment from harmful exposures to chemical substances and mixtures; ‘‘(2) to promote the use of safer alternatives and other actions that reduce use of and exposure to hazardous chemical substances and reward innovation toward safer chemicals, processes, and products;

Green Chemistry and Safer Alternatives in TSCA reform Section 32 Safer Alternatives and Green Chemistry Safer Alternatives Program Create program to establish market incentives –Expedited review for new safer chemcials –Recognition programs –Other Incentives Green Chemistry Research Network (4 centers to explore alternatives to priority substances) Green Chemistry Research Grants Green Chemistry Workforce Development Section 32 Safer Alternatives and Green Chemistry Safer Alternatives Program Create program to establish market incentives –Expedited review for new safer chemcials –Recognition programs –Other Incentives Green Chemistry Research Network (4 centers to explore alternatives to priority substances) Green Chemistry Research Grants Green Chemistry Workforce Development

Why focus on Green Chemistry and Safer Alternatives and green chemistry in chemicals policy reforms? New understandings chemical uses, hazards, and prevention Focus on innovation and economic development to solve problems rather than “stopping bads” Focus on entire chemical lifecycle and “history” of chemicals – manufacture, use, and disposal Helps to avoid trade-offs along lifecycles Detailed chemical by chemical assessment is costly, does not prevent impacts on its own and is not innovation generating New understandings chemical uses, hazards, and prevention Focus on innovation and economic development to solve problems rather than “stopping bads” Focus on entire chemical lifecycle and “history” of chemicals – manufacture, use, and disposal Helps to avoid trade-offs along lifecycles Detailed chemical by chemical assessment is costly, does not prevent impacts on its own and is not innovation generating

Evolving Chemicals Knowledge From Large Industrial Emissions… Point sources, facility specific, media specific (air, water, waste) Few identified chemicals of concern Policy tools: End-of-pipe controls, permitting, monitoring, risk-based standards To a Broad Range of Product-Based Emissions. Smaller, disperse, non-point, difficult to control, different toxicological mechanisms Many identified chemicals of concern and impacts throughout lifecycles “embedded hazards” Policy tools: Redesign, green chemistry, substitution, safer alternatives

Current EPA initiatives on green chemistry and safer alternatives Green chemistry Presidential Green Chemistry Awards Green Chemistry support in new chemical design Sustainable Futures and other design tools Pollution prevention Hospitals for a Healthy Environment Green Suppliers Design for Environment Formulators initiative Alternatives assessment – informed substitution Partnership programs Green chemistry Presidential Green Chemistry Awards Green Chemistry support in new chemical design Sustainable Futures and other design tools Pollution prevention Hospitals for a Healthy Environment Green Suppliers Design for Environment Formulators initiative Alternatives assessment – informed substitution Partnership programs

Past EPA initiatives on Green Chemistry and Safer Alternatives Cleaner Technologies Substitute Assessments Use Cluster Scoring System Product Side of Pollution Prevention/Sector Notebooks ORD Green chemistry research grants Cleaner Technologies Substitute Assessments Use Cluster Scoring System Product Side of Pollution Prevention/Sector Notebooks ORD Green chemistry research grants

Actions not consistent with goals: Why are safer alternatives and prevention not prioritized in government programs? Limited funding Lack of regulatory requirements Knowledge first culture Preoccupation with “problem-sphere” research Large commitment to detailed mechanistic knowledge on each chemical - eg. BPA Institutional barriers Lack of infrastructure Lack of commitment (does prevention “sell”?) Doesn’t neatly fit a particular jurisdictional or departmental boundary Chemical issues cross agency boundaries Limited funding Lack of regulatory requirements Knowledge first culture Preoccupation with “problem-sphere” research Large commitment to detailed mechanistic knowledge on each chemical - eg. BPA Institutional barriers Lack of infrastructure Lack of commitment (does prevention “sell”?) Doesn’t neatly fit a particular jurisdictional or departmental boundary Chemical issues cross agency boundaries

Barriers to Green Chemistry and safer alternatives at numerous levels Data Lack of data on chemical toxicity, uses, product ingredients Lack of good supply chain information flows How is safer defined? Prioritization of 1000s of chemicals and hundreds of uses Implementation Technical barriers that can compromise performance Lack of cost-effective or viable alternatives Lack of good incentives/disincentives Poorly designed regulatory structures can work against implementation Data Lack of data on chemical toxicity, uses, product ingredients Lack of good supply chain information flows How is safer defined? Prioritization of 1000s of chemicals and hundreds of uses Implementation Technical barriers that can compromise performance Lack of cost-effective or viable alternatives Lack of good incentives/disincentives Poorly designed regulatory structures can work against implementation

The Need for Green Chemistry 10% of chemicals in production are low hazard 25% of hazardous production chemicals could be substituted with currently available, low hazard substitutes 65% of hazardous production chemicals have no currently available low hazard substitutes Reference: John Warner, Warner,-Babcock Institute

Barriers to Green Chemistry and safer alternatives at numerous levels Institutional Designers rule – cost, performance first Technology lock-in Lack of technical or science capacity in firms, particularly SMEs Costs of more dangerous chemicals and products not internalized Little incentive to change, little recognition or investment Educational Chemists not trained in toxicology Designers not taught about environment and health Science of problems separated from science of solutions Institutional Designers rule – cost, performance first Technology lock-in Lack of technical or science capacity in firms, particularly SMEs Costs of more dangerous chemicals and products not internalized Little incentive to change, little recognition or investment Educational Chemists not trained in toxicology Designers not taught about environment and health Science of problems separated from science of solutions

What are prerequisites for a transition to Green Chemistry and safer alternatives Leadership and commitment Clear definitions and metrics Good information on chemical uses, hazards, and potential exposures Tools to rapidly and thoughtfully compare alternative chemicals, processes, and products Policies that incentivize safer chemicals and disincentivize more problematic ones – requirements to explore and seek alternatives KEY: RECOGNIZE DIFFERENT NEEDS AND MOTIVATIONS OF DIFFERENT ACTORS ALONG SUPPLY CHAINS Leadership and commitment Clear definitions and metrics Good information on chemical uses, hazards, and potential exposures Tools to rapidly and thoughtfully compare alternative chemicals, processes, and products Policies that incentivize safer chemicals and disincentivize more problematic ones – requirements to explore and seek alternatives KEY: RECOGNIZE DIFFERENT NEEDS AND MOTIVATIONS OF DIFFERENT ACTORS ALONG SUPPLY CHAINS

Green Chemistry Definition: “Green chemistry is the utilization of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products.” -Anastas and Warner, Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, 1998 Definition: “Green chemistry is the utilization of a set of principles that reduces or eliminates the use or generation of hazardous substances in the design, manufacture and application of chemical products.” -Anastas and Warner, Green Chemistry: Theory and Practice, 1998

Learning from the States: Massachusetts Toxics Use Reduction Program Understand function and use of chemicals Examine alternatives Innovation and technical support Measure progress and re-evaluate Results: % reduction in waste 40% reduction in use 80% reduction in emissions Benefits to industry $15 million (not considering health/environmental benefits)

MA TCE Cleaning Use Data The Result of the MA Toxics Use Reduction Planning and Technical Support Process

The Precursors to Change Willingness (motivation, compliance, fear, courage, commitment) Opportunity (awareness, interest, learning, access, timing) Capacity (resources, intelligence, knowledge, assistance) Willingness (motivation, compliance, fear, courage, commitment) Opportunity (awareness, interest, learning, access, timing) Capacity (resources, intelligence, knowledge, assistance)

Policy options to strengthen Green Chemistry and safer alternatives efforts Information options Establish a list of chemicals and chemical categories of concern – those that should be avoided Establish a database of safer alternatives to chemicals of concern for users Issue clear guidance for chemical manufacturers and users on safer chemical design – list of “greener chemicals” Information options Establish a list of chemicals and chemical categories of concern – those that should be avoided Establish a database of safer alternatives to chemicals of concern for users Issue clear guidance for chemical manufacturers and users on safer chemical design – list of “greener chemicals”

Policy options to strengthen Green Chemistry and safer alternatives efforts Safer alternatives review requirements Establish a functional use-based prioritization and management program Create requirements for firms manufacturing or using chemicals of concern to explore alternatives (substitutes analysis) Require that chemical risk assessments include an alternatives assessment component Green chemistry/safer alternatives challenge programs for high concern chemicals Safer alternatives review requirements Establish a functional use-based prioritization and management program Create requirements for firms manufacturing or using chemicals of concern to explore alternatives (substitutes analysis) Require that chemical risk assessments include an alternatives assessment component Green chemistry/safer alternatives challenge programs for high concern chemicals

Policy options to strengthen Green Chemistry and safer alternatives efforts Creating green chemistry/safer alternatives Incentives Partnership and research programs Procurement of safer chemicals and products Technical and networking support Establish pre-competitive consortia for green chemistry/DfE challenges Support state/regional green chemistry/safer alternatives technical support centers Creating green chemistry/safer alternatives Incentives Partnership and research programs Procurement of safer chemicals and products Technical and networking support Establish pre-competitive consortia for green chemistry/DfE challenges Support state/regional green chemistry/safer alternatives technical support centers

Policy options to strengthen Green Chemistry and safer alternatives efforts Education and research Promote college and K-12 courses in green chemistry Provide scholarships and graduate student research and internship support Tie research funding to green chemistry R&D Supportive Policy Develop adequate fees to fund safer alternatives and green chemistry efforts (% of money from fees, fines, etc) Develop enforcement programs focused on green chemistry and safer alternatives Education and research Promote college and K-12 courses in green chemistry Provide scholarships and graduate student research and internship support Tie research funding to green chemistry R&D Supportive Policy Develop adequate fees to fund safer alternatives and green chemistry efforts (% of money from fees, fines, etc) Develop enforcement programs focused on green chemistry and safer alternatives

Take a comprehensive, integrated approach to all chemicals and impacts through lifecycles Ensure adequate data collection and dissemination providing open access to information. Establish processes that allow rapid chemical assessment, prioritization, and decision- making Maximize information sharing and responsibility through supply chains Establish processes to transition from more dangerous chemicals to safer alternatives Promote green chemistry and safer product design, by promoting research and innovation Take a comprehensive, integrated approach to all chemicals and impacts through lifecycles Ensure adequate data collection and dissemination providing open access to information. Establish processes that allow rapid chemical assessment, prioritization, and decision- making Maximize information sharing and responsibility through supply chains Establish processes to transition from more dangerous chemicals to safer alternatives Promote green chemistry and safer product design, by promoting research and innovation But TSCA reform isn’t enough: Need for Comprehensive Chemicals Policy

Moving towards comprehensive chemicals policy Establish interagency taskforce on Safer Chemicals and Green Chemistry Create new administrative structures that focus on all chemicals across jurisdictions and all phases of the lifecycle – a “chemicals agency?” Marry environment and health protection aspects of green chemistry with economic, jobs and innovation. Establish new science of green chemistry and safer alternatives assessment Establish interagency taskforce on Safer Chemicals and Green Chemistry Create new administrative structures that focus on all chemicals across jurisdictions and all phases of the lifecycle – a “chemicals agency?” Marry environment and health protection aspects of green chemistry with economic, jobs and innovation. Establish new science of green chemistry and safer alternatives assessment

Conclusions If advancing green chemistry and safer alternatives is a goal of TSCA reform then there must be a resource and regulatory commitment to make that happen. While we still need research and data development on chemical hazards, we need significantly more research and action on chemical alternatives and how they can be implemented in practice TSCA reform is a critical but insufficient step to advancing implementation of green chemistry and safer alternatives. A more comprehensive approach is needed. Safer chemistry is not only an environment and health issue but also an economic one. If advancing green chemistry and safer alternatives is a goal of TSCA reform then there must be a resource and regulatory commitment to make that happen. While we still need research and data development on chemical hazards, we need significantly more research and action on chemical alternatives and how they can be implemented in practice TSCA reform is a critical but insufficient step to advancing implementation of green chemistry and safer alternatives. A more comprehensive approach is needed. Safer chemistry is not only an environment and health issue but also an economic one.

“The ultimate facts here in dispute are on the frontiers of scientific knowledge and though the factual finger points, it does not conclude. Under the command of OSHA, it remains the duty of the Secretary to protect the working-man, and to act even in circumstances where existing methodology or research is deficient…. We wish to emphasize, the Secretary is not restricted by the status quo. He may raise standards which require improvements in existing technologies or which require the development of new technology and he is not limited to issuing standards based solely on devices already fully developed ” 2 nd Circuit Court of Appeals, The Society of the Plastics Industry, Inc., v. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, 1975