Streamlining Ethics Review Using Standard Project Parameters CAREB Pre-Conference Workshop April 29, 2015 Nancy Ondrusek Public Health Ontario.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Intro. Website Purposes  Provide templates and resources for developing early childhood interagency agreements and collaborative procedures among multiple.

Advertisements

Evaluation and Human Subjects Research Julie M. Aultman, Ph.D. Chair, Institutional Review Board Associate Professor, Family and Community Medicine Northeast.

IRB SUBMISSION PROCESS FOR SHB STUDIES Version 9/18/2013.

PHIPA: The Year in Review Moderator: Debra Grant Panelists: Pam Slaughter Eric Holowaty Eric Holowaty Ron Heslegrave Ron Heslegrave PHIPA Summit: A Balancing.

University Research Ethics Committee Workshop on procedure and data protection issues 30th May 2008.

The Protection of Human Subjects in Research Piece Presenter: Roxana Killian.

Research Involving Human Subjects All research involving the participation of human subjects must be submitted for review by the IRB (Institutional Review.

Consenting Withdrawn Subjects for Follow-Up Information Anita Camic Team Leader Research Compliance Administration Tara Bateman Research Compliance Coordinator.

Fundamentals of IRB Review. Regulatory Role of the IRB Authority to approve, require modifications in (to secure approval), or disapprove all research.

Complying with Privacy to Enable Innovation & Research

Wales Accord on the Sharing of Personal Information (WASPI)

HUMAN RESEARCH ETHICS. TRI-COUNCIL POLICY The University has adopted the Tri-Council Policy Statement on the Ethical Conduct for Research Involving Humans.

IRB 101: Introduction to Human Subject Research

1 HIPAA, Researchers and the IRB: Part Two Alan Homans, IRB Chair and Nancy Stalnaker, IRB Administrator.

CUMC IRB Investigator Meeting November 9, 2004 Research Use of Stored Data and Tissues.

Research Ethics An Overview of Research Ethics and the Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer Health Sciences.

Research Ethics Western University Health Sciences Research Ethics Board Tri-Council Policy Statement 2 Grace Kelly Ethics Officer

Purpose of the Standards

An Overview of Research Ethics & The Tri-Council Policy Statement 2

DATA PROTECTION AND PATIENT CONFIDENTIALITY IN RESEARCH Nic Drew Data Protection Manager University Hospital of Wales   

2012 VA IRB Administrators Meeting Stephania H. Griffin, JD, RHIA, CIPP/G VHA Privacy Officer Director, Information Access and Privacy Privacy Officer.

Lisa Denney, MPH HRPP Assistant Director Melanie Mace, MA HRPP Education and Training Coordinator Bill Woods, PhD CAPS Policy and Ethics Core November.

Workshop on Health Examination Surveys (HES) Legal and ethical issues Susanna Conti, M. Kanieff, G. Rago Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS) (National Public.

ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AUDIT

1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 06/18/2015 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.

Protecting Human Participants in Research. Research with Humans 2 Contact Information Susanne Santi Senior Manager, Research Ethics 1027 Needles Hall.

Select and Train the Fact- Finding Team. Selecting the Team.

Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

Submitting IRB Applications (or “Do I have to do an IRB?”) Linda A. Detman, Ph.D. Research Associate Lawton & Rhea Chiles Center for Healthy Mothers and.

The Office of Research Ethics October 11, 2013 Office of Research Ethics.

Is Your Research Ethical? The application of Research Ethics Guidelines to Regional Health Authority Research Dr Alan Katz Need to Know: June 9, 2003.

HIPAA and Research Basics for IRB Tim Atkinson Director, Research and Sponsored Programs Director, Institutional Review Board Research Privacy Officer.

Teaching Research Methods (Classroom Protocols) Boston University Charles River Campus Boston University Medical Center Mary A. Banks BS, BSN IRB Director.

1 Ethics of Working with Human Subjects (BIOL/CHEM 397 ) Header image designed by Michelle Jordan, UMBC Creative Services, 2009.

Using Student & Staff Feedback in Educator Evaluation November 5, 2014 MASC/MASS Joint Conference.

IWK Research Ethics - Workshop Series Session #2 REB Review Procedures How to submit … October 24, 2013 Bev White, Manager, Research Ethics Research Services,

The Office of Research Ethics September 10, 2012 MClSc Physical Therapy Student Orientation Office of Research Ethics.

RESPONSIBLE CONDUCT IN HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH MARGARITA M. CARDONA DIRECTOR OF SPONSORED RESEARCH Institutional Review Board.

H I P A A T R A I N I N G Self Directed Module 7 Research Disclosures For Data Custodians START Click to begin…

Research Ethics Research Methods Grace Kelly Ethics Officer Health Sciences Research Ethics Board.

The Institutional Review Board: A Community College Toolkit Dr. Geri J Anderson.

Office of Research Integrity and Compliance March 2011.

How to Successfully Apply to the IRB Richard Gordin, IRB Chair True Rubal, Administrator / Director For the Protection of Human Participants in Research.

IRB BASICS: Issues in Ethics and Human Subject Protections Prepared by Ed Merrill Department of Psychology November 12, 2009.

SUNY Oswego Human Subjects Committee Last Revised 10/28/2011.

Alyssa Speier, MS, CIP QA/QI Education Specialist Stanley Estime, MSCI QA/QI Specialist Interview, Survey, and Focus Group Research: IRB Processes and.

G544 – Practical project SELF REPORT. Revision  Socrative quiz  In pairs – answer each question.  We will then discuss each answer given.

Institutional Review Board Procedures and Implications After the applied dissertation committee has approved the proposal and the IRB package, the student.

Preparing a Research Plan. Purpose of plan Detailed description. Written plan helps illustrate aspects. Anticipate potential problems.

Dustin Yocum, MA Institutional Review Board University of Illinois HUMAN SUBJECTS RESEARCH.

Research Ethics Western University & University of Windsor Grace Kelly Ethics Officer

Human Subjects Review: Policies and Procedures. Why A Human Subjects Review? It is the policy of this University that all researchers undertaking studies.

What Institutional Researchers Should Know about the IRB Susan Thompson Senior Research Analyst Office of Institutional Research Presented at the Texas.

G544 – Practical project SELF REPORT. Revision  Socrative quiz  In pairs – answer each question.  We will then discuss each answer given.

Case Studies: Puzzles in Human Research Kevin L. Nellis, M.S., M.T. (A.S.C.P.) Program Analyst, Program for Research Integrity Development and Education.

Online MSP APR System U. S. Department of Education.

1 NJ Dept. of Health Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016 Is this research defined as: A systematic investigation which includes research.

California Department of Public Health / 1 CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC HEALTH Standards and Guidelines for Healthcare Surge during Emergencies How.

Research Ethics Office of Research Compliance. Responsible Conduct of Research (RCR) Covers 9 content areas –Animal Subjects (IACUC) –Human Subjects (IRB)

Institutional Review Board (IRB) for Human Subject Protections: Working with the IRB Erin A McClure, PhD Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences.

Slide 1 Standard Operating Procedures. Slide 2 Goal To review the standard operating procedures Creating the informed consent document Obtaining informed.

Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016

Disclaimer The information provided in this presentation is consistent with the current policies and guidelines laid out within our office, the Research.

Module 8: Effective Innovation Review and Selection Process

Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/12/2016

Decision Tree for eIRB Submission Revised: 01/25/2016

WHAT TO EXPECT: A CROWN CORPORATION’S GUIDE TO A SPECIAL EXAMINATION

Dr. Sarah Quinton, UREC Chair,

Supporting SEACs across the Province:

Compliance Manual Update Staff Requirements Check

Presentation transcript:

Streamlining Ethics Review Using Standard Project Parameters CAREB Pre-Conference Workshop April 29, 2015 Nancy Ondrusek Public Health Ontario

PublicHealthOntario.ca Outline WHY? WHAT? HOW? SPP Development and Approval Review of Projects using SPPs WHAT ELSE? 2

PublicHealthOntario.ca WHY? A Brief History 3 You are going to grind public health to a halt! ©iStock.com/GlobalStock We are expanding the scope of ethics review beyond research! Courtesy D Willison

PublicHealthOntario.ca A Brief History (Cont’d) 4 Don’t worry— we’ll make it easy! Courtesy D Willison I’ll believe it when I see it! ©iStock.com/GlobalStock

PublicHealthOntario.ca 5 "Administrative burden" by Pizarros - Own work. Licensed under CC BY-SA 3.0 via Wikimedia Commons - :Administrative_burden.JPG

PublicHealthOntario.ca WHY? Pressures and Constraints 6 Expanded Scope Increased volume Demands for efficiency Finite resources TCPS 2 compliance Quality reviews

PublicHealthOntario.ca WHY? Solution Requirements Quality review Reduce turn-around-time Reduce burden on teams and REB Adaptable Investigators engage in ethics review 7 SPPs

PublicHealthOntario.ca WHAT?: Standard Project Parameters (SPPs) 8 Generic project template—a set of Ethics Review Board (ERB) approved parameters or conditions Mechanism to streamline approval of routinely used project protocols

PublicHealthOntario.ca Standard Project Parameters (SPPs) Parameters to be standardized may include: Recruitment method Limits to data collection, use and disclosure Need for and approaches to obtaining consent Data storage, retention and destruction 9

PublicHealthOntario.ca SPP for Expert Consultation Data Collection and Use: No identifying information other than professional role and type of organization unless consent to do so. No collection of opinions regarding specific individuals or specific organizations. No collection of information expected to be potentially harmful to participants, named organizations or other individuals if released. 10 For projects involving professionals sharing their knowledge about a content area.

PublicHealthOntario.ca HOW?: SPP Development Identify suitable project type Frequency of use (cost-benefit) Generalizability of project elements relevant to ethics Work with project teams—get examples (3+) 11 ©iStock.com/Kay&Ella

PublicHealthOntario.ca HOW?: SPP Development Make table of common elements, e.g., General purpose of project Scope of data Data sources Recruitment and consent approaches Etc. Determine appropriate scope of SPP 12

PublicHealthOntario.ca HOW?: SPP Development 13 adults identifiers reporting individual level results children data linkage potentially stigmatizing results video recordings deception focus groups reports using aggregated data business contact info consent password protected data

PublicHealthOntario.ca HOW?: SPP Development Develop general statements that encompass desired range of activity Exclude activities that warrant additional ethics scrutiny Work with project teams to ensure list of statements align with projects Frame statements as checklist of conditions to be satisfied (e.g., “Project does not include…”) Develop consent form/script templates if applicable 14

PublicHealthOntario.ca How? Privacy Section Example 15 You are designing an SPP for projects that will include online surveys. What conditions will you cover in your SPP?

PublicHealthOntario.ca How? SPP Development Submit draft SPP (i.e., checklist of conditions) to Ethics Review Board (ERB) for review Revise as needed SPP approved for three years 16

PublicHealthOntario.ca How?: Review of Projects Using SPPs Applicant works through checklist to determine alignment of project with SPP Completed checklist and project description sent to ethics office for validation Ethics staff may: approve as is ask for additional details or revisions (e.g., consent form changes) determine SPP does not fit Applicant sent approval letter OR Applicant instructed to follow routine ethics review process 17

PublicHealthOntario.ca HOW?: Review of Projects Using SPPs 18

PublicHealthOntario.ca 19 PHO Ethics Review Process

PublicHealthOntario.ca SPP Experience to date Approved SPPs: Expert Consultation ICES data Evaluation of an Educational Activity Evaluation of PHO Knowledge Product or Resource (in progress) Turnaround time: Hours to days 20

PublicHealthOntario.ca Acknowledgements Don Willison Vinita Haroun Judith Friedland Maggie Civak Maria McDonald PHO Ethics Review Board PHO Staff 21

PublicHealthOntario.ca What Else? 22 ©iStock.com CDC/ Lt. Cmdr. Gary Brunette