Two Year Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Treatment and Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) Switch Data in HBeAg-Negative Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B (Study.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Hepatitis B&C Past and Present Martin J Spitz MD FACP AGAF Clinical Professor of Medicine UCSF.
Advertisements

AASLD Feedback on HBV Dr Allister J Grant Consultant Hepatologist University Hospitals Leicester NHS Trust 62 th Annual Meeting November 4 – 8, 2011.
CROI 2015, Seattle Ledipasvir/Sofosbuvir for 12 Weeks in Patients Coinfected With HCV and HIV-1: ION-4 Susanna Naggie 1, Curtis Cooper 2, Michael Saag.
BORDERNETwork Training on HIV and HBV Co-Infections Dr. med. Wolfgang Güthoff / Alexander Leffers, M.A.
Case study: Chronic HBV infection Marion Peters University of California San Francisco 2009.
Hepatitis web study H EPATITIS W EB S TUDY Therapeutic Agents Used to Treat Hepatitis B Presentation Prepared by: Nina Kim, MD and David Spach, MD Last.
TELBIVUDINE FOR THE TREATMENT OF CHRONIC HEPATITIS B: A CASE SERIES N.K. Gatselis, K. Zachou, E.I. Rigopoulou, G. Papadamou, K. Galanis G.N. Dalekos Department.
Slide #1 CL Thio, MD. Presented at RWCA Clinical Update, August Optimizing Hepatitis B Virus Treatment in HIV-Infected Individuals Chloe L. Thio,
Stephanos HADZIYANNIS. Following HBeAg seroconversion a proportion of patients retains or redevelops significant HBV replication associated with persistent.
3 rd Paris Hepatitis Conference January, 20th 2009 How to optimize the management of my HBeAg negative patients? Pietro Lampertico 1st Gastroenterology.
Rafael ESTEBAN. New Drugs for Chronic Hepatitis B R. Esteban, M.D. Hospital General Universitario Valle de Hebron Barcelona.
Can One Pill A Day Keep Hepatitis B Away? Scott K. Fung, MD, FRCPC Toronto General Hospital University of Toronto November 30, 2009 TGH.
44 th Annual Meeting of the European Association for the Study of the Liver April 22-26, 2009 Copenhagen, Denmark Oral Presentation # 21 Two Years Safety.
OBV/PTV/r + DSV + RBV Placebo Randomisation** 3 : 1 Double blind years Chronic HCV genotype 1 HCV RNA ≥ 10,000 IU/ml Failure to pre-treatment with.
Randomisation* 2 : 1 Double blind *Randomisation was stratified on genotype (1a or 1b or other) and IL28B genotype (CC, CT or TT) N = 133 N = 260 W24W48.
Management of Resistance: Implications for Treatment Choices
SMV SOF 400 Open-label OPTIMIST-2 Study: SMV + SOF for genotype 1 and cirrhosis W12  Objective –Superiority of SVR 12 (HCV RNA historical control.
UNITY-1 DCV/ASV/BCB No randomisation Open-label UNITY-1 Study: daclatasvir/asunaprevir/beclabuvir in genotype 1 without cirrhosis  Design W12 ≥ 18 years.
Placebo + PR W48 Placebo + PR Yes Hezode C. Gut 2015;64: COMMAND-1 COMMAND-1 Study: daclatasvir + PEG-IFN + RBV for genotype 1 or 4 DCV60 + PEG-IFN.
> 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 1 Failure (relapse) to 4, 6 or 8 weeks of GZR/EBR + SOF in C-SWIFT Part A Compensated cirrhosis assessed by liver.
Superior Outcome for Tenofovir DF (TDF), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Efavirenz (EFV) Compared to Fixed Dose Zidovudine/Lamivudine (CBV) and EFV in Antiretroviral.
 Objective –SVR 12 (HCV RNA < 25 IU/ml), with 95% CI, next observation carried backward DCV + SOF + RBV Randomised* 1:1 Open-label ALLY-3+ study: DCV.
SOF/VEL 400/100 mg qd N = 120 W12 SOF + RBV > 18 years Chronic HCV infection Genotype 2 Naïve or pre-treatment with IFN-based regimen Compensated cirrhosis.
Milan J. Sonneveld,1 Bettina E. Hansen, Teerha Piratvisuth, Ji-Dong Jia, Stefan Zeuzem, Edward Gane, Yun-Fan Liaw, Qing Xie, E. Jenny Heathcote, Henry.
On-treatment management for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in patients receiving oral antiviral therapy Byung-Ho Kim Kyung Hee University School of Medicine.
Hepatitis web study Hepatitis web study Elbasvir-Grazoprevir in Treatment-Naïve HCV Genotype 1, 4 or 6 C-EDGE Treatment Naïve (TN) Phase 3 Treatment Naïve.
Hadziyannis SJ et al. EASL Peginterferon alfa-2a (40KD) (PEGASYS ® ) in combination with ribavirin (RBV): efficacy and safety results from a phase.
Maria Buti, MD Professor of Medicine Hospital Universitario Vall d'Hebron Barcelona, Spain Clinical Focus: Impact of HBV Therapy on Liver Fibrosis and.
Clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Using Virologic and Serologic Tests in the Management of Hepatitis B Diagnose chronic HBV infection When in slideshow mode,
Entecavir Superior to Lamivudine for Treatment of Nucleoside-Naive, HBeAg- Negative Patients Slideset on: Lai CL, Shouval D, Lok AS, et al. Entecavir versus.
بنام خداوند مهربان. دکتر نرگس نجفی دانشیار دانشگاه.
A randomized study of tenofovir containing HAART compared to lamivudine containing HAART in antiretroviral naïve HIV/HBV coinfected patients in Thailand:
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
Telbivudine Versus Lamivudine in Chinese Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Results at 1 Year of a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial HEPATOLOGY 2008;47:
Early Hepatitis B Virus DNA Reduction in Hepatitis B e Antigen–Positive Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B : A Randomized International Study of Entecavir.
Publication stage: In Press Accepted Manuscript
eGFR (MDRD) > 50 mL/min
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in GT 1-6 with Renal Disease EXPEDITION-4
Design Randomisation 1 : 1 Double-blind W8 W12
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Design Single arm Open label W12 ≥ 18 years, HCV genotype 1 to 6
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
C-ISLE study: EBR/GZR + SOF + RBV in genotype 3 and cirrhosis
Jointly sponsored by Postgraduate Institute for Medicine and Clinical Care Options, LLC Treatment Selection for HBV-Infected Patients With Decompensated.
EFV versus ATV + RTV, both with ABC-3TC or TDF-FTC ACTG 5202
Daclatasvir + Sofosbuvir in Genotype 3 ALLY-3 Study
ARV-trial.com C-CREST study, Part B: uprifosbuvir (MK-3682)/GZR/ruzasvir (MK-8408) fixed-dose combination + RBV for genotypes 1, 2 and 3 - Phase II Randomisation.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
AL study: AL ODV + SMV in naïve patients, phase II
Creatinine clearance ≥ 50 ml/min No HBV or HIV co-infection
Clinical Focus: Impact of HBV Therapy on Liver Fibrosis and Cirrhosis
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
LEAGUE-1 study: daclatasvir + SMV + RBV for genotype 1
How to optimize the management of my HBeAg negative patients?
Volume 140, Issue 1, Pages (January 2011)
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Regression of cirrhosis during treatment with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for chronic hepatitis B: a 5 year open-label follow-up study Martin Gerbert,
GS-US Study: SOF/VEL + GS-9857 in genotype 1 - Phase II
Volume 139, Issue 4, Pages e3 (October 2010)
Volume 136, Issue 2, Pages (February 2009)
ARV-trial.com C-CREST study, Part B: uprifosbuvir (MK-3682)/GZR/ruzasvir (MK-8408) fixed-dose combination + RBV for genotypes 1, 2 and 3 - Phase II Randomisation.
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Phase 3 Treatment-Naïve and Treatment-Experienced
Glecaprevir-Pibrentasvir in Non-Cirrhotic Genotype 2 ENDURANCE-2
Presentation transcript:

Two Year Tenofovir Disoproxil Fumarate (TDF) Treatment and Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) Switch Data in HBeAg-Negative Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B (Study 102) 1 Hopital Beaujon, Clichy, France; 2 Hospital Valle Hebron, Barcelona, Spain; 3 University Hospital “St Ivan Rilsky”, Sofia, Bulgaria; 4 University of Uludag, Bursa, Turkey; 5 Tokuda Hospital, Sofia, Bulgaria; 6 Royal Free Hospital, London U.K.; 7 University of Calgary, Calgary Alberta, Canada; 8 Toronto Western Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto Ontario, Canada; 9 Gilead Sciences, Durham NC Patrick Marcellin 1, Maria Buti 2, Zahary Krastev 3, Selim Gurel 4, Rozalina Balabanska 5, Geoff Dusheiko 6, Robert Myers 7, E Jenny Heathcote 8, Jeff Sorbel 9, Jane Anderson 9, Elsa Mondou 9 and Franck Rousseau 9 59 th Annual Meeting of the American Association for the Study of Liver Disease October 31-November 4, 2008 San Francisco, CA Oral Presentation # 146

Acknowledgements Participating Centers Australia & New Zealand W.Cheng D. Crawford P. Desmond E. Gane J. George P. Gow I.Kronborg C. Moyes M. Ngu S. Roberts J. Sasadeusz W. Sievert N.Stace S. Strasser F. Weilert US & Canada N. Afdahl F. Anderson M. Bennett N. Bzowej S. Chan A. DiBisceglie P. Gaglio N. Gitlin S. Gordon J. Heathcote US & Canada K. Hu I.Jacobson L. Jeffers K. Kaita A. Lok P. Martin T. Min R. Myers T. Nguyen P. Pockros N.Ravendhran R. Rubin V.Rustgi M. Sherman M. Shiffman M. Tong H. Trinh N. Tsai C. Wang Z. Younossi Bulgaria, Czech Republic & Poland R. Balabanska M. Beniowski R. Flisiak A.Gladysz W. Halota A. Horban P. Husa I. Kotzev Z.Krastev W. Kryczka T. Mach J. Sperl K. Tchernev P. Urbanek M. Volfova Spain, Germany & France K. Barange Y. Benhamou T. Berg J. Bronowicki W. Boecher P. Buggisch M. Buti J. Calleja Spain, Germany & France T. Casanovas J. Enriquez G. Gerken F. Habersetzer T. Heintges C. Hezode H. Hinrichsen D. Huppe S. Kaiser M. Manns P. Mathurin S. Mauss B. Moller J. Peterson M. Prieto G. Teuber C. Trepo R. Zachoval J. Zarski S. Zeuzem UK & Netherlands R. DeMan G. Dusheiko D. Mutimer R. Williams Greece, Turkey & Italy U. Akarka P. Andreone G. Dalekos G. Germanidis S. Gurel S. Hadziyannis G. Kitis O. Kurdas S. Ozenirler M. Rizzetto H. Senturk O. Ozdogan Gilead Sciences J. Dinsdale A. Foster E. Montgomery ICON Quintiles

Patrick Marcellin, MD Hospital Beaujon, University of Paris I have financial relationships within the last 12 months relevant to my presentation with: Hoffman La Roche, Schering Plough, Gilead Sciences, Bristol Myers Squibb and Idenix-Novartis,Vertex, Human Genome Sciences, Cytheris, Intermune, Pharmasset and Tibotec. AND My presentation does include discussion of off-label use of emtricitabine for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B

Background Tenofovir DF (TDF) is a nucleotide analog and obligate chain terminator Approved for HIV-1 in 2001: ~ 2 million patient-years of experience Approved for chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in 2008 Week 48 Phase 3 data showed TDF superior to ADV: –93% of HBeAg-negative TDF-treated patients had HBV DNA <400 copies/mL

Aim To evaluate the safety and efficacy of: 2 years of TDF therapy Switch from ADV to TDF

RANDOMIZATION 2:1 Tenofovir 300 mg Adefovir 10 mg Open-label Week 48 Liver Biopsy Pre-treatment Liver Biopsy Double Blind Week 96 Tenofovir 300 mg HBeAg Negative Study 102 Design * Week 72 HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL option to add emtricitabine (FTC) to TDF in a fixed dose tablet Year 2 Year 1 Week 72* TDF TDF-TDF: N= TDF FTC/TDF: N= (2)* ADV ADV-TDF: N= Patients (on study drug) Week 384 Year 8

HBeAg- patients Age years Compensated liver disease Lamivudine experienced or naive HBV DNA > 10 5 copies/mL ALT > ULN and <10 x ULN Knodell necroinflammatory score ≥ 3 HIV-1, HDV, HCV seronegative Key Eligibility Criteria

Methods HBV DNA and laboratory analyses every 8 weeks HBsAg every 16 weeks Resistance surveillance: patients with HBV DNA ≥ 400 copies/mL (69 IU/mL) Assessments During Year 2 (after week 48 through week 96)

Baseline Disease and Demographic Characteristics CHARACTERISTIC TDF (N=250) ADV (N=125) Mean Age (years)4443 Race Caucasian Asian 64% 25% 65% 24% Male77%78% Prior lamivudine experience17%18% Mean HBV DNA (log 10 copies/mL) Mean ALT (U/L) Mean Knodell necroinflammatory score Mean Knodell fibrosis score Knodell fibrosis score = 4 (cirrhosis)19%20% Viral Genotype A B C D 12% 9% 12% 64% 11% 14% 10% 63%

% Patients with HBV DNA <400 copies/mL (95% CI) (ITT)

% Patients with HBV DNA <400 copies/mL (95% CI) (On-Treatment Analysis)

Mean HBV DNA (log 10 copies/mL) (95% CI)

ADV Switch Patients Viral suppression on ADV is maintained after switching to TDF –100% of patients (76/76) were responders at Week 96 Viral suppression of viremic patients on ADV is rapidly obtained with TDF –At week 64: 94% –At week 96: 100% HBV DNA response (below 400 copies/mL) at Week 96 for ADV patients who switched to TDF at Week 48:

Mean ALT (U/L) (95% CI) ULN for females=34 U/L ULN for males=43 U/L

Patients with Virologic Breakthrough During Year 2 Definition of Virologic Breakthrough: confirmed ≥400 copies/mL after being <400 copies/mL OR confirmed 1 log increase from nadir

Patients with Virologic Breakthrough Pt 7957 TDF FTC+TDF Non-adherent (TDF levels BQL) HBV DNA (Log 10 Copies/mL) Weeks on Study LLOQ TDF non-adherent (TDF levels BQL) Pt 6852

Patients with Virologic Breakthrough Pt 1674 Pt 1669 Patient off drug between weeks 80 and 96 TDF

Resistance Surveillance All patients : – at baseline – yearly if ≥ 400 copies/mL ( ≥ 69 IU/mL – at discontinuation of TDF mono-therapy if ≥ 400 copies/mL Any patient post-baseline with: –conserved site changes in pol/RT –virologic breakthrough –polymorphic site changes (> 1 patient)

Resistance Surveillance Results No resistance up to 2 years of TDF mono-therapy No HBV pol/RT amino acid substitutions associated with TDF resistance were detected through 96 weeks of TDF monotherapy Week 96 TDF Resistance Surveillance; A Snow-Lampart et al. Poster # 977

Summary of Safety Data during Open Label TDF Week 96 TDF-TDF (N=250) ADV-TDF (N=125) Study Drug-Related SAE 1 (<1%)0 Deaths Metastatic liver carcinoma1 (<1%) 0 G3 or G4 Laboratory23 (10%)11 (10%) Discontinue due to an AE hepatic neoplasm dizziness, fatigue, lack of concentration 2 (1%) Confirmed ↓ phosphorus < 2mg/dL 2 (<1%) 1 (<1%) Confirmed 0.5 mg/dL  in creatinine 00 Confirmed creatinine clearance <50 mL/min 00

Conclusions Week 96 TDF demonstrated durable, potent antiviral activity through Week 96: –99% of patients on therapy had HBV DNA <400 copies/mL No resistance to TDF monotherapy detected up to 2 years Patients can safely and effectively switch from ADV to TDF treatment: –100% of patients had HBV DNA <400 copies/mL TDF was well tolerated through Week 96

Patient Disposition N= 375 Randomized and Treated TDF  TDF n = 225 Completed Week 96 N = 125 Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) Entered Open-Label TDF Period TDF  TDF = 235 ADV  TDF = 112 Discontinued Treatment Prior to Week 48 TDF = 6 ADV = 4 N= 250 Tenofovir DF (TDF) ADV  TDF n = 110 Completed Week 96 Discontinued Treatment Between Weeks 48 and 96 TDF  TDF n = 10 ADV  TDF n = 2 Permanently Initiated FTC/TDF prior to Week 96 TDF  TDF n = 2 ADV  TDF n = 0

Patient Disposition N= 375 Randomized and Treated TDF  TDF N = 225 TDF-TDF – FTC/TDF* N= 2 (of 225) Completed Week 96 N = 125 Adefovir Dipivoxil (ADV) Entered Open-Label TDF Period TDF  TDF = 235 ADV  TDF = 112 Discontinued Treatment Prior to Week 48 TDF N = 6 ADV N = 4 N= 250 Tenofovir DF (TDF) ADV  TDF N = 110 ADV-TDF – FTC/TDF* N= 0 (of 110) Completed Week 96 Discontinued Treatment Between Weeks 48 and 96 TDF  TDF N = 10 ADV  TDF N = 2 Marcellin P, et al., AASLD 2008; Oral #146 ~ 89% Retention *Permanently Initiated FTC/TDF Combination therapy  Week 72 TDF  TDF N = 2 ADV  TDF N = 0