GPS Monitoring of High-Risk Sex Offenders Evaluation of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s San Diego County Pilot Program Jesse.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Evidence Based Practices Lars Olsen, Director of Treatment and Intervention Programs Maine Department of Corrections September 4, 2008.

Advertisements

Applying EBP In The Field Midge Christianson, Director 6W Community Corrections Montevideo, Minnesota , extension 212

Criminal Justice and Behavioral Health Partnerships Review of projects recognizing the needs of and providing treatment supports to DUI offenders Nisha.

Implementing Best Practice In Probation Casework Why And How Vincent J. Iaria MSW, MPA Chief Probation Officer San Diego.

Sex Offender Registration and Community Notification Meeting The purpose of community notification is to provide information to protect you and your family,

Implementing Evidence Based Practices in Probation Departments Presented By: Natalie Pearl, Ph.D.

Conducting Research in Challenging Times: California Parolee Reentry Court Evaluation Association of Criminal Justice Research, California March

An Introduction To Grayson County’s Juvenile Problem Solving Court Honorable Brian Gary 397 th District Court.

Bernard Warner, Secretary.  Over 7 million people in the US are under community supervision.  More than 50% of parolees and 37% of probationers fail.

THE IMPACT OF AB 109 ON LAPD. Overview AB 109 impact on the LAPD Statistical information AB 109 impact on LAPD jail facilities Securing the safety of.

MILWAUKEE COUNTY’S PRETRIAL RELEASE DECISION PROCESS & PRETRIAL SERVICES RE-DESIGN PRESENTED TO THE MILWAUKEE COUNTY COMMUNITY JUSTICE COUNCIL JULY 24,

Measuring Environmental Performance: Beyond the Beans – San Diego County’s EPIC Pilot Project 16 th ANNUAL CIHC CONFERENCE December 4, 2006 presented by:

Council of State Governments Justice Center | 1 Michael Thompson, Director Council of State Governments Justice Center July 28, 2014 Washington, D.C. Measuring.

Percentage with COMPAS Percentage of Parolees with Correctional Offender Management Profiling for Alternative Sanctions (COMPAS) that have Medium-High.

Managing drug- involved offenders with HOPE Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD October 22, 2010 ACJRCA.

An Overview of the Mental Health Remedial Plan California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Division of Juvenile Justice REDEFINING MENTAL HEALTH.

WISP Assessing Implementation and Early Outcomes Seattle City Council Presented by: Angela Hawken, PhD December 12, 2011.

END THE SILENCE. THE TEAM APPROACH COLLABORATION WITH LANDLORDS, VICTIM ADVOCACY, AND OTHER MEMBERS OF THE SEX OFFENDER MANAGEMENT PROGRAM.

Forensic Evaluation of Sex Offenders Standards of Practice & Community Safety Hawaii Psychological Association November 9, 2009 Marvin W. Acklin, PhD,

In the Community. Community Corrections Continues after incarceration And it deals with split sentences.

State Advisory Committee on Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention March Board Update 2014.

Overview of Adult Community Corrections. Outline Organizational Structure Organizational Structure Probation population breakdown Probation population.

Public Safety Realignment Act of 2011 (AB109) Impacts on San Francisco County Wendy S. Still Chief Adult Probation Officer Association for Criminal Justice.

Mentally Ill Offenders and Sex Offenders. The Problem Mental illness and the lack of sufficient mental health care have driven offenders into the CJ system.

Evidence-based Practices (EBP) in Corrections

Evidence-Based Sentencing. Learning Objectives Describe the three principles of evidence- based practice and the key elements of evidence-based sentencing;

The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Juvenile Probation Commission.

The Rhode Island Experience Ellen Evans Alexander Assistant Director RI Department of Corrections.

BREAKING GROUND : PRELIMINARY REPORT OF BUTTE COUNTY SHERIFF’S ALTERNATIVE CUSTODY SUPERVISION PROGRAM.

Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief Juvenile Crime Prevention Evaluation Phase 2 Interim Report Findings in Brief.

© 2009 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill Chapter 5 Intermediate Sanctions: Between Probation and Incarceration 1.

One in 31 The Long Reach of American Corrections Adam Gelb, Director Public Safety Performance Project Pew Center on the States National Partnership on.

Community Policing. Developed in Response ● To the changes that put police in cars and removed them from neighborhoods ● To understanding that modern.

END THE SILENCE. THE TEAM APPROACH COMMUNITY NOTIFICATION IN COLLABORATION WITH LAW ENFORCEMENT & VICTIM SERVICES.

Snohomish County Sheriff’s Office Special Investigations Unit n 98% of our investigations involve crimes where the victim has been assaulted by someone.

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS AND REHABILITATION 2010 Board of Parole Hearings Revocation Trends.

The Ohio Parole Board’s implementation of Select Strategies Presented by: Cynthia Mausser Chair.

TREATMENT COURTS Inns of Court Presentation By John Markson & Elliott Levine October 17, 2012.

Click Here to Add Text This could be a call out area. Bullet Points to emphasize Association for Criminal Justice Research (California) 76th Semi-Annual.

A NEW RESOURCE FOR RECONNECTING CHILDREN AND FAMILIES WITH COMPLEX AND ENDURING NEEDS Residentially Based Services.

Missouri Reentry… It’s a Process! George A. Lombardi, Director Missouri Department of Corrections.

OFFENDER REENTRY: A PUBLIC SAFETY STRATEGY Court Support Services Division.

Implementing SACPA: Orange County’s Experience October 16, 2008 ACJR Semi-annual Conference Christie Gardiner, Ph.D. California State University, Fullerton.

Washington State Department of Social & Health Services – Division of Behavioral Health and Recovery - PRI One Department Vision Mission Core set of Values.

Public Safety and Offender Rehabilitation Services Act of 2007 (AB 900) Implementation and Impact on County Mental Health Robin Dezember Chief Deputy Secretary.

Immediate Sanction Probation Pilot Project Virginia Criminal Sentencing Commission June 8, 2015.

“Key Issues Facing Probation and Parole” NPAMC November 10, 2009 Carl Wicklund American Probation and Parole Association.

Purpose of Volunteer Selection The primary purpose of volunteer screening is the protection of the youth enrolled in our programs, our volunteers and our.

Connecticut Department of Correction Division of Parole and Community Services Special Management Unit Parole Manager Frank Mirto October 14, 2015.

The impact of community-based drug and alcohol treatment on reoffending in Indigenous communities Anthony Morgan, Tracy Cussen, Alex Gannoni & Jason Payne.

California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation Office of Research 1.

ADULT REDEPLOY ILLINOIS Mary Ann Dyar, Program Administrator National Association of Sentencing Commissions August 7, 2012.

 State leadership created the bipartisan, inter-branch, inter- governmental Missouri Working Group on Sentencing and Corrections.

Courtesy of National Council on Drug Abuse (NCDA) and Department of Correctional Services (DCS) Jamaica. Please do not reproduce without permission. Evaluation.

1 Assessment Guided Life Planning: The San Diego SB 618 Prisoner Reentry Experience Criminal Justice Research Division Darlanne Hoctor Mulmat

 As of July 1, 2014, 61 operational courts: › 28 Adult Drug Courts  5 Hybrid Drug/OWI Courts › 14 OWI Courts › 9 Veterans Treatment Courts › 4 Mental.

 First drug court opened in Miami-Dade, FL in 1989  Goal is to reduce recidivism by using graduated sanctions and incentives combined with treatment.

The Changing Landscape in Community Corrections and Supervision of High Risk Offenders San Francisco Juvenile Probation Department Board of Supervisors,

Probation and Community Justice Program Overview

Evidence Based Practices in Napa County Probation

Challenges in Determining Whether Treatment Programs are Effective

Why Does Housing Matter with the Justice Involved Population?

Intercept 5 Community Supervision

California State Association of Counties

1.6 miles walking distance 1.2 miles walking distance

1.6 miles walking distance 1.2 miles walking distance

24-hours a day 7-days a week 365 days per year

Key Legislative Outcomes 2017

Marion County Re-Entry Coalition Presentation to CWF coaches

Presentation transcript:

GPS Monitoring of High-Risk Sex Offenders Evaluation of the California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation’s San Diego County Pilot Program Jesse Jannetta, Research Specialist Center for Evidence-Based Corrections, UC Irvine March 30, 2006

Applying Evidence to Sex Offender Management A subset of sex offenders is a particularly high risk to sexually re-offend –CDCR supervised 1,906 High Risk Sex Offender (HRSO) parolees as of January 1, 2005 These offenders may commit extremely damaging crimes of particular concern to the public Global Positioning System (GPS) monitoring is a fast-proliferating but little evaluated tool for sex offender supervision

CDCR Will Have 500 GPS Units in Place Statewide by July, 2006 Program Goals 1.Reduce sexual and violent criminal behavior of HRSO parolees 2.Improve detection of violations of parole conditions and patterns of risky behavior through enhanced supervision of HRSO parolees 3.Increase HRSO parolee compliance with conditions of parole 4.Identify or eliminate parolees as suspects in new crimes by sharing GPS information with law enforcement agencies 5.Develop partnerships with local law enforcement to reduce crime

CDCR Will Have 500 GPS Units in Place Statewide by July, 2006 Program Components Reduction of caseloads for GPS agents to 20:1 Screening of HRSO parolees to determine their risk to re-offend, and targeting GPS monitoring to the highest risk parolees Enrollment and orientation of parolees into the parameters of GPS monitoring Integration of active GPS monitoring information into the intensive supervision regime Synthesis of parolee GPS and law enforcement crime data

CEBC Evaluating the GPS San Diego County Pilot San Diego pilot placed the first California parolees on GPS in June of GPS-monitored HRSO parolees in San Diego County Research team meets regularly with the San Diego GPS implementation team

Research Questions What motivated the GPS HRSO program/what is the program design? What are the characteristics of the offenders who participated in the pilot/how do they compare with other HRSO offenders in San Diego and the statewide sex offender parolee population? What were the implementation experiences? What impact did GPS have on system and offender behavior? What were the costs of the pilot program?

The Center Will Produce Three Research Products 1.Program Model Description 2.Implementation Analysis 3.Outcome Analysis

Information on Implementation Obtained from Multiple Sources Interviews –Supervising parole agents –Division of Adult Parole Operations staff –Sex offender treatment providers –Law enforcement –Vendor representative Parolee focus groups Descriptive analysis of parolees placed on GPS compared to San Diego County and California sex offender parolees

Outcomes for GPS Group Will Be Compared with Outcomes for Non-GPS Parolees Treatment Group –94 HRSO parolees placed on GPS monitoring in San Diego County from June through November of 2005 Control Group –116 parolees on HRSO caseloads in San Diego County from June-November of 2005, but not placed on GPS monitoring during that interval One year observation period, concluding December 1, 2006

Preliminary GPS Pilot Implementation Observations GPS information is labor-intensive to utilize Program effectiveness is impeded by shortcomings of ancillary technologies Bargaining unit participation preserves programmatic flexibility

Evaluation Next Steps Involve Answering Two Key Data Questions 1.Can the data on the relevant parolee characteristics and outcomes be abstracted from existing data? 2.Are the identified treatment and comparison groups sufficiently similar?