Program Evaluation Tool Overview Library Media Leadership Council / Instructional Technology Leaders October 2, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Designing School Level Professional Development. Overview Assessing prior knowledge of professional development Defining professional development Designing.
Advertisements

Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research October 2004 G. Sue Shannon and Pete Bylsma Office of Superintendent of Public Instruction.
A Quick Look at MDE’s Program Evaluation Tool. At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then.
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk –
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) August Core Principles of OIP  Use a collaborative, collegial process which initiates and institutes Leadership.
Academic Alignment CROSBY TURNAROUND COMMITTEE
Welcome Coaching Competency Driver Thanks to State Implementation & Scaling-up of Evidence Based Practices Oregon.
Building & Using an Effective Leadership Team Kathi Cooper Aida Molina Bette Harrison Sandy Lam.
School Improvement Work Day. Continuous School Improvement The Model of Process Cycle for School Improvement provides the foundation to address school.
1 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations – for all students – for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through the.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Program Evaluation and Improvement Planning The MDE Program Evaluation Student Achievement Strategy/Program/Initiative Implementation Impact.
Tracy Unified School District Leadership Institute – “Leading the Transformation” Breakout Session Authentic Data Driven Decision Making July/August 2014.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
New York State Professional Development Standards S/CDN 2010.
Shared Decision Making: Moving Forward Together
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Implement Plan and Monitor Plan.
Technology Leadership
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
1 PI 34 and RtI Connecting the Dots Linda Helf Teacher, Manitowoc Public School District Chairperson, Professional Standards Council for Teachers.
40 Performance Indicators. I: Teaching for Learning ST 1: Curriculum BE A: Aligned, Reviewed and Monitored.
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
MDE Program Evaluation Tool January 13, 2015 MAISD.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
“Current systems support current practices, which yield current outcomes. Revised systems are needed to support new practices to generate improved outcomes.”
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
August 5, Commitment Purpose To strategically plan roll out of the CSIP goal(s) and plan for the school year? How do we build ownership.
The contents of this presentation were developed under a grant from the US Department of Education, #H323A However, these contents do not necessarily.
Calhoun ISD Facilitated School Improvement Planning October 1, 2012 Beth Brophy and Mitch Fowler DO Implement Plan Monitor Plan Evaluate Plan.
What is HQPD?. Ohio Standards for PD HQPD is a purposeful, structured and continuous process that occurs over time. HQPD is a purposeful, structured and.
Critical Elements Effective teaching Alignment of curriculum and instruction to standards Instructional program coherence Fidelity of implementation Evaluation.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
External Review Exit Report Springfield Platteview Community Schools March 2-4, 2015.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Lessons Learned about Going to Scale with Effective Professional Development Iris R. Weiss Horizon Research, Inc. February 2011.
Strengthening Student Outcomes in Small Schools There’s been enough research done to know what to do – now we have to start doing it! Douglas Reeves.
Michigan Department of Education Office of Education Improvement and Innovation One Voice – One Plan Michigan Continuous School Improvement (MI-CSI)
Jackson County Public Schools Technology Plan Kimberly Body and Elizabeth Perin Liberty University Education 639.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Notes by Ben Boerkoel, Kent ISD, based on a training by Beth Steenwyk.
1 Module L R ole of Coaches Coaches’ Monthly Meeting Add DC Name Here.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
IMPROVING SCHOOL LEADERSHIP: LESSONS FROM OECD COUNTRIES UNESCO MEETING, 12 JANUARY 2013 Beatriz Pont, Sr. Policy Analyst Policy Advice and Implementation.
One Voice – One Plan Office of Education Improvement and Innovation MI-CSI: Do Stage Evaluate the Plan.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
The Michigan Department of Education Program Evaluation Tool (PET) Lessons Learned & Support Documents.
Interrelationships: Plans + Funding = Student Proficiency Ingham ISD Curriculum Director’s Meeting November 4, 2015.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Office of Service Quality
Office of Service Quality
The Big Rocks: TLC, MTSS, ELI, C4K, and the Iowa Core School Administrators of Iowa July 2014 IOWA Department of Education.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE OVERVIEW. CONTEXT & RATIONALE.
CMCSS Digital Blended Learning Introduction – Session 1 The Case for Blended Learning The CMCSS Vision And Purpose End of Year 1 (16-17) Expectations.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Fidelity: Maximizing the Effectiveness of Tier 2 September 24, 2013 Facilitated/Presented by: The Illinois RtI Network is a State Personnel Development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Quarterly Meeting Focus
February 21-22, 2018.
Linking Evaluation to Coaching and Mentoring Models
Characteristics of Improving School Districts Themes from Research
Presentation transcript:

Program Evaluation Tool Overview Library Media Leadership Council / Instructional Technology Leaders October 2, 2014

Learning Outcomes Understand the purpose, benefit, and process of program evaluation Understand the role of program evaluation within a continuous improvement process Learn about the MDE Program Evaluation tool and resources to help evaluate a strategy/program/initiative/reform strategy

At the top of an index card, identify a hobby, sport, or activity in which you enjoy participating. Then identify the following: 1. What would you have to do to be ready to participate? 2. What knowledge and/or skills would you need? 3. What opportunity would need to be present? 4. How would you know if you were carrying out the activity in the way it was intended? 5. What would be the result if you were skilled at the activity? Making Connections

Purpose of Program Evaluation Demonstrate impact on student achievement (closing achievement gaps) Ensure that high quality planning, implementation and evaluation are part of the district/school improvement process Ensure ongoing engagement of multiple stakeholders Maximize the coordination, focus and use of local, state and federal resources Provide data to inform future decision-making

Benefits of Program Evaluation Improve planning and implementation of strategies/programs/initiatives/ Examine the impact on student achievement as well as the process used to make such impact (readiness, knowledge/skill, opportunity, implementation) Share accountability

Activity: Why, How, What? Why: Why is it important to strategically implement, monitor, and evaluate the strategy/program/initiative/reform strategy? How: How will we communicate the plan to all stakeholders so that they clearly understand and own their roles in implementation? How will we ensure implementation with fidelity? How is the implementation and impact of your plan monitored and evaluated? What: What will each strategy/program/initiative/reform strategy look like when it is implemented with fidelity? What is the expected impact on student achievement?

Process: Program Evaluation Tool IMPACT: What is the IMPACT of the STRATEGY/PROGRAM/ INITIATIVE ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? 1. What is the READINESS for implementing the strategy/ program/initiative? 2. Do participants have the KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS to implement the program? 3. Is there OPPORTUNITY for implementation? 4. Is the program IMPLEMENTED AS INTENDED?

What to Evaluate Longstanding or New District and School Specific Resource Allocation— Cross Funding Time Effort Cost

Reflection on Current Reality… What are you doing now to implement, monitor and evaluate your initiative/program/strategy? Are the right people do the right things, in the right way, at the right time for the benefit of students??

LEADERSHIP COMPETENCY ORGANIZATION TRAINING COACHING SELECTION PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT TECHNICAL ADAPTIVE DATA-DRIVEN DECISION MAKING LEADERSHIP SUPPORT SYSTEM SUPPORT MDE PROGRAM EVALUATION What is/was the readiness for implementing the program/ initiative/strategy or activity? Do/did the participants have the knowledge and skills to implement the program? What is/was the program’s impact on students? Is/was the program implemented as intended? Is/was there opportunity for high quality implementation?

Plan forward…to evaluate impact Get Ready 1. Readiness? 2. Knowledge/Skills? 3. Opportunity? Implement 4. Implement With Fidelity? Monitor/ Evaluate 5. Impact on Students? Planning: How will we ensure ….. ? Evaluation: To what extent was there/did we…..?

Does your plan include activities to monitor and evaluate? ➢ Monitor Implementation ➢ Evaluate Implementation Adult Focused Student Focused ➢ Monitor Impact ➢ Evaluate Impact

Process within Improvement Planning GoalObjectiveStrategyActivities

Process within Improvement Planning Activity Getting Ready to Implement ImplementationMonitoring Adult Implementation Impact on Student Achievement Evaluating Adult Implementation Impact on Students Achievement

Program Evaluation Tool IMPACT: What is the IMPACT of the STRATEGY/PROGRAM/ INITIATIVE ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT? 1. What is the READINESS for implementing the strategy/ program/initiative? 2. Do participants have the KNOWLEDGE AND SKILLS to implement the program? 3. Is there OPPORTUNITY for implementation? 4. Is the program IMPLEMENTED AS INTENDED?

Program Evaluation Tool 15 minute Break

Program Evaluation Tool Blueprint For Writing Lets practice!

Program Evaluation Tool Technology Plans—Goals Expand the effective integration of technology to reflect current trends in relevant education technology that support curriculum, instruction and assessment. We will integrate technology literacy within the content areas. All students and staff will have adequate and timely access to the computer hardware, digital content, and connectivity necessary for teaching and learning.

Program Evaluation At tables, discuss one program/strategy/initiative that you have implemented in your school/district. Briefly share the impact on student achievement, then discuss #1 – Readiness #2 – Knowledge & Skills #3 – Opportunity #4 – Implemented as Intended Report out! What does your table group notice about the application of the four questions?

Thank You! However noble, sophisticated, or enlightened proposals for change and improvement might be, they come to nothing if teachers don’t adopt them in their own classrooms and if they don’t translate them into effective classroom practices. “unknown”