Discussion and Possible action on the historic designation by the City of Laredo Landmark Board on certain LISD Schools.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Landmarks Preservation Commission.
Advertisements

TEA Facilities Standards
Planning & Community Development Department Consideration of a Call for Review Conditional Use Permit #6084 Proposed Chick-Fil-A Restaurant 1700 East Colorado.
“TI” Ohhhh….. (TIO) (No TIO is not a person!) What is it all about?
Board of Standards and Appeals Community Board 3 / Manhattan June 13, 2011 Introduction Introduction Applications: Applications: –Variances –Special Permits.
Preservation Tax Incentives for Historic Buildings A Joint Program of the following agencies: Department of the Treasury Internal Revenue Service Department.
“TOD” Development Opportunity Case Studies for Reference & Historic Preservation Opportunities Moline, Illinois October 18, 2011.
Planning & Community Development Department Maranatha High School Master Plan City Council Meeting December 15, 2014.
Area Commissions Purpose Area commissions are established to afford additional voluntary citizen participation in decision-making in an advisory.
Planning & Community Development Department Municipal Code Amendments: Adoption/Certification Authority of California Environmental Quality Act Reviews,
Zoning The legislative division of an area into separate districts with different regulations within each district for land use, building size, and the.
October 4, 2004 Detrich B. Allen City of Los Angeles Environmental Affairs Department 1 Siting New Development Detrich B. Allen General Manager Environmental.
Sector Planning Process Alachua County Commission July 8 th,
C I T Y O F S A L E M Neighborhood South Salem March 18, 2008 PRESERVATION DISTRICT STUDY.
Historic Rehabilitation Tax Credits Federal Incentives for Preservation.
HRB Meeting June 9, 2015 City Council Remand of AP 14-02/ZC
Capital Improvement Plan “Building a World of Opportunities ” Laredo Independent School District Construction/Facilities Committee Meeting October 9, 2001.
Establishing and Managing Historic Districts
Building Codes and Interior Design
PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS AND REVIEW FOR THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CODES AND THE 2011 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE.
Planning & Community Development Department Hillsides Residential Care and Educational Center Master Plan City Council July 20, 2015.
Annual COSCDA Training Conference CDBG Disaster Recovery: Renovation, Reconstruction, and Renewal of Historic Properties and Neighborhoods A. Elizabeth.
2010 Florida Building Code: I nterpretation P rocess O verview.
Amendments to Orange County Code Chapter 9 (Building & Construction Regulations) Orange County BCC June 16, 2015.
Code Officials and the Code Process.  To design the interior of the building in conjunction with codes, standards and federal regulations required in.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
Property Maintenance Code Chapter 9 Code Enforcement Division November 18, 2014 BCC Public Hearing.
NEIGHBORHOOD CONSERVATION DISTRICT STRATEGY Lund Consulting, Inc. Community Outreach Spring 2015 City of Seattle.
Planning and Community Development Department Update on Improvements to the Development Review Process and Recommended Changes Related to Design Review.
Planning & Community Development Department 2362 East Washington Boulevard “St. Luke Medical Center” Predevelopment Plan Review City Council Meeting December.
National Historic Districts And Why Taylor Should Be Among Them.
Saving Tybee Island's history and preserving its character.
Planning & Community Development Department Zoning Code Amendment Public Hearing Proposed elimination of the 50% review step from the design review process.
PARKING.
1 Presented to the Fort Worth League of Neighborhood Associations By the City of Fort Worth, Planning and Development Department August 24, 2009 CONSERVATION.
West Linn Historic Resources and Architectural Styles Overview March 17, 2015.
Department of Sustainable Development and Construction Proposed Revision to the Historic Preservation Tax Exemptions and Economic Development Incentives.
Planning & Community Development Department Consideration of a Call for Review Minor Conditional Use Permit #6003 (1528 Whitefield Road) City Council Meeting.
CCC Hearing January 7, 2015 Item W33a. Subject Site 2.
UTA - REAE /31/07: Architecture & Governmental Context for Development.
Planning & Community Development Department Lower Hastings Ranch Moratorium Extension City Council January 25, 2016.
C U S T O M E R D R I V E N. B U S I N E S S M I N D E D. Department of Licensing & Regulatory Affairs Bureau of Construction Codes Keith E. Lambert, P.S.,
Code Officials and the Code Process.  Concentrates on the code process as a whole.  Different type of code officials  Various steps that are taken.
Cultural Resources office — St. Louis Planning & Urban Design Agency an introduction.
The need for regulations to address minimum property maintenance standards has its origins in 2002, when the Board of County Commissioners adopted 2000.
Redevelopment in the Resort Housing District To the Sanibel- Captiva Chamber of Commerce Nov. 29, 2011 Prepared by: Planning Department.
Hillsborough Building & Planning. Green Building 101  Efficiency of buildings and responsible use of water, and construction materials  Reducing building.
Planning & Community Development Department Board of Zoning Appeals: Hillside Development Permit # Hillcrest Place City Council March 14, 2016.
Permit Process & Application Guide
1 Guinn School Restoration Update Presented by Transportation and Public Works Department February 17, 2009.
Palos Verdes Estates The ABCs of Planning & Building November 17, 2011.
Fall  Alternative Enforcement : The City of Mankato has established an Administrative Enforcement and Hearing Program as an enforcement option.
1 Presented to the City Council by the Planning and Development Department March 31, 2009 HISTORIC PRESERVATION ORDINANCE UPDATES.
Planning & Community Development Department 180 South Euclid Avenue Demolition of Existing Structure Consolidated Design Review (Appeal) City Council June.
AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: AGENDA ITEM: DATE: PROJECT: APPLICANT: PRESENTOR: 9.01CA3-05 January 17, 2006 City-initiated Code Amendment.
Ontario Building and Fire Code Overview Presentation for the Downtown Revitalization Committee May 4, 2016 Jack Tosta, Chief Building Official Andrew McPherson,
PUBLIC HEARING PROCESS AND REVIEW FOR THE PROPOSED ADOPTION OF THE 2012 INTERNATIONAL CODES AND THE 2014 NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE.
Regulation of land use and building activities
Jefferson County SA Red Rocks Site Approval
City Council Meeting October 23, 2017
MPO School Transportation Working Group
Consideration of Action Re: Commercial Cannabis Businesses
1211 Wellington Avenue Application for Landmark Designation
Proposed Magnolia Landmark District Public Hearing
City Council Meeting August 27, 2018
Constructed c.1932 Designated as a Master Plan Historic Site in 1979 Significant for commercial and social history related to the Depression A unique.
Browne’s Addition Local Historic District Plan Commission Workshop #1
Overlay Districts Presented by: Zina Lagonegro Manager of Zoning
Washoe County Board of Adjustment
12 D. Variance Request – 211 Jennifer Lane
Presentation transcript:

Discussion and Possible action on the historic designation by the City of Laredo Landmark Board on certain LISD Schools

Outline of presentation Overview of the City of Laredo Historic District/Landmark Board –Order # 382 & justification designating five LISD campuses as Locally Significant Historic Landmarks –Procedural requirements for designation –Appeal process Environmental Issues – Dr. Oscar Cartas Architectural Issues – Jorge Cabello Educational Issues – Dr. Cecilia Moreno Committee Recommendations

City of Laredo Historic District/Landmark Board On December 6, 2001 via Order # 382 the City of Laredo Historic District/Landmark Board as petitioner approved the designation as locally significant historic landmarks the following LISD campuses: –Bruni Elementary –Heights Elementary –Memorial Middle –L. J. Christen Middle –R & T Martin High School

Justifications by the Landmark Board for the designation: Consistent with the Secretary of the Interior’s Standards for Rehabilitation and Guidelines for Rehabilitating Historic Buildings; Consistent with the City of Laredo Historic Urban Design Guidelines; Does not adversely affect residential property; Serves to protect the historic building’s integrity; Save the heritage of Laredo; Does not impair the essential character of the neighborhood, and; Conforms with the purpose and intent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.

Procedural Requirements by the City of Laredo Historic District/Landmark Board

Creating “Historic Districts” and Designating “Locally Significant Historic Landmarks” Section – Designating locally significant historic landmarks –The Historic District/Landmark Board is authorized to designate individual sites and structures as locally significant historic landmarks subject to the provisions of the code.

Requirements for Designation - Locally Significant Historic Landmarks Shall be a recorded Texas Historic Landmark or listed individually on the National Register of Historic Places; or Shall have documentation establishing its contribution to the historic and cultural heritage of the city; or Shall have documentation establishing its archaeological or architectural significance; and Shall retain sufficient structural and architectural integrity to permit rehabilitation, restoration and or preservation as determined by the Building Official; and Shall be endorsed in writing by the Webb County Historical Commission and the Webb County Heritage Foundation.

Procedures for Designation A public hearing shall be held to receive testimony for and against – Thursday December 6, 2001 at 2:00 City Chambers Room The Board shall make finding concerning the following and entered into the minutes of the meeting; –The Site or structure meets the requirements for local designation; –The designation as a locally significant historic landmark is necessary to assist in the preservation of the City’s historic and cultural heritage, and; –The designation conforms with the purposes and intent of the City’s Comprehensive Plan.

Procedural Requirements An application for designation as a locally significant historic landmark shall be submitted to the City Department of Planning on a form approved by the board, and shall contain the following: –The name, address and telephone number of the individual or entity seeking designation –The location and address of the property to be designated –The name, address and telephone number of the owner of the property if different from that of the applicant –Documentation substantiating the historical, cultural, architectural, or archaeological significance of the property –Letters of endorsement from the Webb County Historical Commission and the Webb County Heritage Foundation Upon receipt of an application the building official or designee shall inspect the property and shall prepare a report concerning the structural and architectural integrity of any structure

Appeal Process The designation of any structure or site as a locally significant historic landmark may be appealed to City Council within 6 months of such designation, subject to such procedures as the council shall establish. Following a public hearing, the Council shall make a final determination concerning the designation.

Environmental Issues Dr. Oscar Cartas – LISD Director of Safety and Occupational Health Kent Burcham – Principal of Burcham Environmental Services, Inc.

Architectural Issues Jorge Cabello, PE – Construction Project Manager –Support facilities Electrical, Plumbing, Mechanical, Heating, Ventilating, & Air Conditioning Systems Structural Energy conservation Heat losses/gains Asbestos abatement – floor tile, mastic, caulking, exterior fascia panels –ADA issues – ramps, elevators, accessibility for approaches to doors

Renovation – vs. – New Construction (Bruni Elementary School) New Construction Asbestos Abatement:$ 150,000. Total Demolition:$ 150,000. Subtotal:$ 300,000. Square footage 13,600 SF Cost per square foot:$ 22.06/ SF New Building Cost:$ 65.00/ SF Total Cost:$ 87.00/ SF Anticipated Cost:$ 1,183,200. Renovation Environmental Clean-up:$ 200,000. Asbestos Abatement:$ 150,000. Selective Demolition:$150,000. Bracing, shoring:$ 50,000. Subtotal:$550,000. ADA Elevator:$120,000 Total:$670,000. Square footage 13,600 SF Cost per square foot:$ 49.26/ SF Renovation Cost:$ 55.00/ SF Total Cost:$ / SF Anticipated Cost:$ 1,418,000. $234,800. Minimum Projected Cost Difference

Educational Issues Dr. Cecilia Moreno – Administrative Assistant for Instruction – Wellness Older school buildings do not support current educational needs –Classroom sizes too small –Lighting and ventilation levels not adequate –State of the Art Technology deprived

Committee’s Recommendation Remove the Locally Significant Historic Landmarks designation for Bruni Elementary and Memorial Middle Schools with the understanding that he District will create an Historical Landmark Allowance of $ 25,000 for the creation and implementation of a historical landmark. An ad hoc committee comprising of the Project Architect, LISD Construction department, community members that reside within the district, and campus administration shall be formed to research and recommend to the LISD School Board and the City of Laredo Historical Landmark Board different schemes for the construction of the building’s landmark. Agree with the designation of Locally Significant Historic Landmarks at the following campuses, Heights Elementary School, L. J. Christen Middle School, and R & T Martin High School. Renovations to the interior of the structures shall be conducted as required to accommodated instructional program requirements. Committee further recommends to have periodic meetings between LISD and City of Laredo to discuss any matter pertinent to the historical designation

Question and Answer Session