1 Modelling Task 8 EBS Task Force Meeting 16, Lund, 28 November 2012 Dr. David Holton Dr. Steven Baxter

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Mudstone CO 2 sealing efficiency K. Kurtev, A. Aplin and S. Abrakasa University of Newcastle.
Advertisements

Theoretical solutions for NATM excavation in soft rock with non-hydrostatic in-situ stresses Nagasaki University Z. Guan Y. Jiang Y.Tanabasi 1. Philosophy.
Hongjie Zhang Purge gas flow impact on tritium permeation Integrated simulation on tritium permeation in the solid breeder unit FNST, August 18-20, 2009.
EURADWASTE´04 Large-scale Experiments in Underground Research Laboratories Experience in EBS Engineering Development and Handling Feasibility Christer.
Conductivity Testing of Unsaturated Soils A Presentation to the Case Western Reserve University May 6, 2004 By Andrew G. Heydinger Department of Civil.
Jan – Dec, 2006 University of Alaska – Fairbanks Pacific Northwest National Laboratory British Petroleum Exploration Alaska Injection of CO 2 for Recovery.
An Evaluation of Borehole Flowmeters Used to Measure Horizontal Ground-Water Flow in Limestones of Indiana- Kentucky-Tennessee, 1999 Martin R. Risch, presenter,
1 Miller Similarity and Scaling of Capillary Properties How to get the most out of your lab dollar by cheating with physics.
Two-Phase: Overview Two-Phase Boiling Condensation
1 X-ray microfocus computed tomography in Materials research, doctoraatsseminarie HP15, KULeuven February 20th 2003 Characterization of the hydration of.
Dual Mesh Method in Upscaling Pascal Audigane and Martin Blunt Imperial College London SPE Reservoir Simulation Symposium, Houston, 3-5 February 2003.
Properties of Aquifers
Ground-Water Flow and Solute Transport for the PHAST Simulator Ken Kipp and David Parkhurst.
Alternative Modeling Approaches for Flow & Transport in Fractured Rock Douglas D. Walker, DE&S Jan-Olof Selroos, SKB Supported by Swedish Nuclear Fuel.
Development of a Reservoir Simulator with Unique Grid-Block System
1 Next adventure: The Flow of Water in the Vadose Zone The classic solutions for infiltration and evaporation of Green and Ampt, Bruce and Klute, and Gardner.
1 Miller Similarity and Scaling of Capillary Properties How to get the most out of your lab dollar by cheating with physics.
Imbibition Assisted Recovery
HYDRUS_1D Sensitivity Analysis Limin Yang Department of Biological Engineering Sciences Washington State University.
Status report on Step1 of Task A, DECOVALEX-2011 modeling for Ventilation Experiment –modeling for Ventilation Experiment By Xiaoyan Liu, Chengyuan Zhang.
Vivek Muralidharan Simulation and imaging experiments of fluid flow through a fracture surface: a new perspective.
Upscaling, Homogenization and HMM
Task Force meeting #29, Lund, November Task 8 1 Some ideas for continuation of Task 8 Task 8 is intended to lead to:Task 8 is intended to lead to:
Task #8: Hydraulic interaction rock/bentonite Objectives: Scientific understanding of the exchange of water across the bentonite-rock interface. Better.
Investigating shear-thinning fluids in porous media with yield stress using a Herschel model PERM Group Imperial College London Taha Sochi & Martin J.
About EOS for Äspö granite Klaus-Peter Kröhn, GRS Joint meeting of the Task Forces EBS and GWFTS 28 th November 2012.
HYDROLOGICAL PROPERTIES OF GROUNDWATER. I. Porosity A. Basic Concept.
Soil physics Magnus Persson. Surface tension   2·R·cos  R 2·r P1P1 P2P2 z Due to surface tension water can be held at negative pressure in capillary.
Profiling Transmissivity and Contamination in Fractures Intersecting Boreholes USEPA-USGS Fractured Rock Workshop EPA Region 2 14 January 2014 Claire Tiedeman.
RF-Accelerating Structure: Cooling Circuit Modeling Riku Raatikainen
Dubrovnik meeting, 13/10/ Different approaches to simulate flow and transport in a multi scale fractured block October 2008 Bernard-Michel G. Grenier.
Posiva Oy Olkiluoto Eurajoki Puh. (02) 8372 (31) faksi (02) DOPAS Demonstration of Plugs and Seals Posiva Plug Experiment POPLU at URCF.
Lecture 2 Single Phase Flow Concepts
1 Preliminary implementation / results, Task 7A1 Andrew Frampton Vladimir Cvetkovic KTH, Sweden David Holton Serco Assurance, UK.
Discussion on Modeling Stefan Finsterle Earth Sciences Division Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory 29. Task Force Meeting Lund, Sweden November 29-29,
DRAFT INFLUENCE OF PHYSICS OF TABLET COMPRESSION Small-Scale Presenter: Alberto Cuitino November 3 rd, 2010.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Numerical simulation of the Alum lakes geothermal outflow J. Newson and M. J. O’Sullivan.
1:1 scale wellbore experiment for a better understanding of well integrity in the context of CO 2 geological storage, Mont Terri underground rock laboratory.
Bin Wen and Nicholas Zabaras
ARMA-NSF-NeSS Workshop Some Needs and Potential Benefits Related to a National Underground Science Laboratory NUSL–Geo-Hydrology–Engineering-Team Overview.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Site Characterization Using Physical and Chemical Methodologies Kent Novakowski Queens University Kingston, ON EPA Fractured Bedrock Workshop.
How Faulting Keeps Crust Strong? J. Townend & M.D. Zoback, 2000 Geology.
Order of Magnitude Scaling of Complex Engineering Problems Patricio F. Mendez Thomas W. Eagar May 14 th, 1999.
Improved Application of Gas Reservoir Parameters ACARP Project C10008 May 10 th 2002 Mackay Technology Transfer Update.
David G Bennett December 2014
Experimental and numerical studies on the bonfire test of high- pressure hydrogen storage vessels Prof. Jinyang Zheng Institute of Process Equipment, Zhejiang.
Purpose Probe construction Field and laboratory measurements Data processing, applicational example Conclusions, outlook A NEW METHOD TO DETERMINE in.
February 13-15, 2006 Hydromechanical modeling of fractured crystalline reservoirs hydraulically stimulated S. Gentier*, X. Rachez**, A. Blaisonneau*,
Mitglied der Helmholtz-Gemeinschaft Jörg Wolters, Michael Butzek Focused Cross Flow LBE Target for ESS 4th HPTW, Malmö, 3 May 2011.
ANALYSIS PHASE OF BUSINESS SYSTEM DEVELOPMENT METHODOLOGY.
History Matching Flowmeter Data in the Ghawar Field
EARS5136slide 1 Theme 6: INTEGRATION OF STRUCTURAL DATA AND RESERVOIR MODELS.
SPE What Factors Control Shale Gas Production Decline Trend: A Comprehensive Analysis and Investigation HanYi Wang, The University of Texas at Austin.
Two-Stage Upscaling of Two-Phase Flow: From Core to Simulation Scale
Dual Mesh Method in Dynamic Upscaling
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Hydraulic Fracture Optimization Study
Impact of Flowing Formation Water on Residual CO2 Saturations
Next adventure: The Flow of Water in the Vadose Zone
Modeling and experimental study of coupled porous/channel flow
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
COUPLED HYDRO-MECHANICAL SIMULATIONS
Gas Field Development Class Example
by Wolf Tilmann Pfeiffer, Christof Beyer, and Sebastian Bauer
Gas Condensate Blockage
Gas Condensate Blockage
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Gas Field Development Class Example
Presentation transcript:

1 Modelling Task 8 EBS Task Force Meeting 16, Lund, 28 November 2012 Dr. David Holton Dr. Steven Baxter

2 Motivation The Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) are studying and considering the safe disposal of high level wastes within the UK. –A range of potential concepts are being considered, including the use of bentonite as part of an EBS to surround disposal canisters. Participation in the EBS Task Force offers the NDA the unique opportunity to further the UK’s capabilities. Modelling Task8 has provided NDA the opportunity to: –verify and validate techniques and processes developed for modelling bedrock and the bentonite interface; –demonstrate confidence in modelling the resaturation process; and –develop methodologies to represent the interaction between the groundwater flow from the rock, and resaturation of the bentonite.

3 Task 8 Task 8C Task 8C1 –Create a local scale model of the BRIE / TASO site. Boundary conditions from large scale model. –Use specified deformation zones (3). –Predict inflows to deposition holes (~0.07). –Support field experiment - importance of fractures and rock matrix. Task 8C2 –Evaluate the effects of fractures on the wetting of the bentonite. –This is the Base Case for future calibration and learning from prediction exercise.

4 Model domain & boundary conditions

5 Tools

6 Fracture orientation

7 Transmissivity / length correlation

8 Fracture model Model domain Major structures Major structures + background fractures wfracture_02 wfracture_01 NNW4 wfracture_01 wfracture_02

9 Transmissivity local to the tunnel Fractures coloured by transmissivity for a vertical slice through the boreholes, and a horizontal slice at z = -418m. wfracture_01 NNW4

10 Pressures local to the tunnel Fractures coloured by pressure for a vertical slice through the boreholes, and a horizontal slice at z = -418m.

11 Inflows to probe boreholes Borehole Average Inflow (ml/min) Realisation 2 Inflow (ml/min) Measured Inflow (ml/min) KO KO KO KO KO

12 Inflows for “realisation 2” Inflow locations to each of the probe boreholes Fracture connected to the boreholes, coloured by transmissivity

13 Pressure recovery for “realisation 2” The upper 1m of boreholes are packed off. Borehole Average Pressure (bar) Realisation 2 Pressure (bar) Measured Pressure (bar) KO KO KO KO KO

14 Expansion of KO0017 and KO0018 Average inflows increase to the larger diameter holes: –Flows are consistent with log(r) behaviour. –A skin may exist in the vicinity of the borehole wall, and therefore the scaling may be different. –Flows are channelised, and hence there is the possibility of intersecting new channels. –Larger diameter hole intersects more fractures.

15 Expansion of KO0017 and KO0018 Borehole Av. inflows for all probe holes Av. inflows for expanded KO0017 & KO0018 % increase (ml/min) KO % KO % Inflows to KO0017G01 Inflows to KO0018G01 Inflow to probe boreholes Inflow to expanded deposition hole

16 Expansion of KO0017 and KO0018 Expansion of boreholes KO0017 and KO0018 to 0.3m diameter

17 Effective permeability Use CONNECTFLOW to calculate the effective permeability for individual grid blocks CONNECTFLOW Model TOUGH2 permeability

18 Upscaling k eff = (k max k int k min) 1/3 The geometric mean of the principle components of the permeability tensor Upscaled conductivities, with fracture traces overlain.

19 TOUGH2 – open borehole conditions KO0017G01 KO0018G01 Inflows to open boreholes KO0017G01 and KO0018G01. –Locations consistent with CONNECTFLOW calculations.

20 Resaturation of bentonite TOUGH2 used to model the resaturation front through the emplaced bentonite in the 5 deposition holes. Note: –7 orders of magnitude variability in permeability. –Initially gave some convergence difficulties, especially with heterogeneous wetting associated with a fractured host rock. Following slides illustrate results for realisation 2 of the stochastic fracture network.

21 Parameters Fracture permeability and porosity from the upscaling. Assume a matrix permeability for granite ~ m 2, porosity 0.5%. Bentonite ~ 6.4 x m 2, porosity 44%.

22 Modelling bentonite resaturation van Genuchten capillary pressure function used for Bentonite and fractured rock: Fractured Rock Bentonite Relative permeability functions (a: aqueous phase, g: gas phase): –van Genuchten used for the fractured rock: –Fatt and Klikoff cubic law used for the bentonite:

23 Evolution of the bentonite Bentonite is emplaced in all 5 boreholes –The evolution of liquid saturation is highly heterogeneous. T = 0yrs Liquid SaturationLiquid Pressure [MPa]

24 Evolution of the bentonite Bentonite is emplaced in all 5 boreholes –The evolution of liquid saturation is highly heterogeneous. T = 0.1yrs Liquid SaturationLiquid Pressure [MPa]

25 Evolution of the bentonite Bentonite is emplaced in all 5 boreholes –The evolution of liquid saturation is highly heterogeneous. T = 1yrs Liquid SaturationLiquid Pressure [MPa]

26 Evolution of the bentonite Bentonite is emplaced in all 5 boreholes –The evolution of liquid saturation is highly heterogeneous. T = 10yrs Liquid SaturationLiquid Pressure [MPa]

27 Evolution of the bentonite Bentonite is emplaced in all 5 boreholes –The evolution of liquid saturation is highly heterogeneous. Liquid SaturationLiquid Pressure [MPa] T = 100yrs

28 Resaturation rate of the bentonite For the heterogeneous description of the bedrock. –Saturation is characteristically heterogeneous for the low permeability rock matrix ( m 2 ) –Minimum & maximum values taken for 5 realisations of the model. Homogeneous descriptions of the bedrock are shown to resaturate much more quickly. Time to 99% SaturationKO0020G01KO0018G01KO0017G01KO0015G01KO0014G01 Minimum Realisation Maximum Time to 95% saturationKO0020G01KO0018G01KO0017G01KO0015G01KO0014G01 Heterogeneous Homogeneous0.6

29 Rock matrix effects T = 10yrs The low permeability rock matrix is potentially slightly desaturated by the bentonite

30 Altering rock matrix permeability The default rock matrix permeability is m 2. –Sensitivity analysis by considering rock matrix permeabilities of: m 2, and m 2. –Deposition hole KO0015G01 considered in isolation. Base Case: m 2 Variant: m 2 Variant m 2 T = 0yrs

31 Altering rock matrix permeability The default rock matrix permeability is m 2. –Sensitivity analysis by considering rock matrix permeabilities of: m 2, and m 2. –Deposition hole KO0015G01 considered in isolation T = 0.1yrs Base Case: m 2 Variant: m 2 Variant m 2

32 Altering rock matrix permeability The default rock matrix permeability is m 2. –Sensitivity analysis by considering rock matrix permeabilities of: m 2, and m 2. –Deposition hole KO0015G01 considered in isolation Base Case: m 2 Variant: m 2 Variant m 2 T = 1.0yrs

33 Altering rock matrix permeability The default rock matrix permeability is m 2. –Sensitivity analysis by considering rock matrix permeabilities of: m 2, and m 2. –Deposition hole KO0015G01 considered in isolation Base Case: m 2 Variant: m 2 Variant m 2 T = 10yrs

34 Altering rock matrix permeability Time evolutions for the centre of the bentonite at z = -417m. Rock Matrix Variant Time (years) 95% Saturation99% Saturation Base Case Permeability = m Permeability = m Permeability = m

35 Conclusions Have illustrated a methodology to model the heterogeneity in the rock. Default properties show highly heterogeneous wetting and resaturation times. Resaturation depends on intersecting fractures, but also on the rock matrix. Surprisingly a deposition hole can have the same effective equivalent hydraulic conductivity but can resaturate at a different rate (depends on matrix conductivity of the granite).

36 Potential future Task 8 activities Task 8D –e.g. updating the fracture network, bentonite installation, etc. Sensitivities (e.g. matrix permeability of the granite). Larger models (although smaller models were useful). Capillary pressure / relative permeability functions (robustness). The stochastic fracture generation. –Further realisations of the upscaled fracture network (what does the resaturation look like on “average”). –Transmissivity relationship. –Calibration of the fracture network (does this help?). Mechanical coupling? Bentonite installation. –Including a bottom plate, central tube and upper rubber seal.