LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duvalp. 1 LOM XML Bindings Erik Duval Dept. Computerwetenschappen K.U.Leuven

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
TWO STEP EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 2. DO THE ADDITION STEP FIRST
Advertisements

Pete Johnston, Eduserv Foundation 16 April 2007 Update on work of Joint DCMI/IEEE LTSC Task.
Advanced Piloting Cruise Plot.
Art Foundations Exam 1.What are the Elements of Art? List & write a COMPLETE definition; you may supplement your written definition with Illustrations.
Slide 1 Insert your own content. Slide 2 Insert your own content.
1 Example Constraint Between Components Consider an XML instance document that has two parts: 1.The "what" part describes - using a standard taxonomy.
1 How to Specify Validation Information Roger L. Costello 27 December, 2008.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 7-1 Created by Cheryl M. Hughes, Harvard University Extension School Cambridge, MA The Web Wizards Guide.
Copyright © 2003 Pearson Education, Inc. Slide 6-1 Created by Cheryl M. Hughes, Harvard University Extension School Cambridge, MA The Web Wizards Guide.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 5 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Author: Julia Richards and R. Scott Hawley.
1 Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Inc. All rights Reserved Fig 2.1 Chapter 2.
1 Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 38.
1 Chapter 40 - Physiology and Pathophysiology of Diuretic Action Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
By D. Fisher Geometric Transformations. Reflection, Rotation, or Translation 1.
1 POPcorn: Project Portal for corn A set of project and sequence-indexed data searching resources.
IEEE P LTSC Learning Object Metadata (LOM) Wayne Hodgins – Chair Erik Duval – Technical Editor CEN/ISSS + LTSC Meetings.
The LOM RDF binding - update Mikael Nilsson The Knowledge Management Research Group Centre for user oriented IT design Royal.
OLAC Metadata Steven Bird University of Melbourne / University of Pennsylvania OLAC Workshop 10 December 2002.
Publishing Process An attempt -- GWB.
IST TEL, 25 Feb. 2004, Luxembourg, Lp. 1 Progress through Continuity Standards & Specifications for Learning Technologies Insights from Ariadne Erik Duval.
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Jeopardy Q 1 Q 6 Q 11 Q 16 Q 21 Q 2 Q 7 Q 12 Q 17 Q 22 Q 3 Q 8 Q 13
Title Subtitle.
0 - 0.
ALGEBRAIC EXPRESSIONS
DIVIDING INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
MULTIPLYING MONOMIALS TIMES POLYNOMIALS (DISTRIBUTIVE PROPERTY)
ADDING INTEGERS 1. POS. + POS. = POS. 2. NEG. + NEG. = NEG. 3. POS. + NEG. OR NEG. + POS. SUBTRACT TAKE SIGN OF BIGGER ABSOLUTE VALUE.
MULTIPLICATION EQUATIONS 1. SOLVE FOR X 3. WHAT EVER YOU DO TO ONE SIDE YOU HAVE TO DO TO THE OTHER 2. DIVIDE BY THE NUMBER IN FRONT OF THE VARIABLE.
SUBTRACTING INTEGERS 1. CHANGE THE SUBTRACTION SIGN TO ADDITION
MULT. INTEGERS 1. IF THE SIGNS ARE THE SAME THE ANSWER IS POSITIVE 2. IF THE SIGNS ARE DIFFERENT THE ANSWER IS NEGATIVE.
FACTORING Think Distributive property backwards Work down, Show all steps ax + ay = a(x + y)
Addition Facts
Year 6 mental test 5 second questions
PwC SCHEMAS Forum for metadata schema implementers The SCHEMAS project and metadata ETB Workshop, London, 9-10 January 2001 Michael Day,
1/ 26 AGROVOC and the OWL Web Ontology Language: the Agriculture Ontology Service - Concept Server OWL model NKOS workshop Alicante,
UKOLN, University of Bath
Richmond House, Liverpool (1) 26 th January 2004.
ABC Technology Project
Introduction Recall that the imaginary unit i is equal to. A fraction with i in the denominator does not have a rational denominator, since is not a rational.
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
© S Haughton more than 3?
© Charles van Marrewijk, An Introduction to Geographical Economics Brakman, Garretsen, and Van Marrewijk.
VOORBLAD.
Twenty Questions Subject: Twenty Questions
Squares and Square Root WALK. Solve each problem REVIEW:
Energy & Green Urbanism Markku Lappalainen Aalto University.
Past Tense Probe. Past Tense Probe Past Tense Probe – Practice 1.
Chapter 5 Test Review Sections 5-1 through 5-4.
GG Consulting, LLC I-SUITE. Source: TEA SHARS Frequently asked questions 2.
Addition 1’s to 20.
25 seconds left…...
Test B, 100 Subtraction Facts
11 = This is the fact family. You say: 8+3=11 and 3+8=11
Week 1.
We will resume in: 25 Minutes.
1 Ke – Kitchen Elements Newport Ave. – Lot 13 Bethesda, MD.
1 Unit 1 Kinematics Chapter 1 Day
O X Click on Number next to person for a question.
Steffen Staab 1WeST Web Science & Technologies University of Koblenz ▪ Landau, Germany Structured Data on the Web Introduction to.
Introduction Peter Dolog dolog [at] cs [dot] aau [dot] dk Intelligent Web and Information Systems September 9, 2010.
The Semantic Web – WEEK 4: RDF
An Introduction to XML Based on the W3C XML Recommendations.
The LOM RDF binding – update Mikael Nilsson The Knowledge Management.
Learning Objects Metadata IEEE P Learning Technology Standards Committee London, UK March 16, 2000 Chair: Wayne Hodgins.
Presentation transcript:

LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duvalp. 1 LOM XML Bindings Erik Duval Dept. Computerwetenschappen K.U.Leuven

p. 2LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Agenda Introduction Overall approach in taking the schema apart: –Catgories? Repeated element groups? Namespace policy –Proposals from Mikael Nilsson and Boyd Nielsen –Also for other groups? Vocabulary schema –Claude Ostyn and Mikael Nilsson, 24 July 2002 Roadmap ahead –Division of work, milestones, audio conferences

p. 3LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval To be developed Bindings Supporting documents –Guidelines –Samples of metadata instances –Working code considered A Good Thing, not a requirement But bindings should be based on practice! Xsl-t scripts for upgrading existing LOM

p. 4LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Timing Initial phase –24 May 2002: call for volunteers –3 June 2002: start of work –19 June 2002: meeting (Kirkland, WA, USA) Since then –XML Schema proposals: Thor Anderson (12 July) Boyd Nielsen (14 Sept.) –Vocabularies Claude Ostyn & Mikael Nilsson (24 July)

p. 5LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Working group Thor Anderson, IMS (USA) Kirby Bell, Outstart (USA) Kris Cardinaels, K.U.Leuven & Ariadne (B) Thomas Herrmann, Teleteach (D) Pepe Kubon, Recombo (C) Trent Miskelly & Debbie Brown, Mississippi State Univ. (USA) Brandon Muramatsu, SMETE (USA) Mikael Nilsson, Royal Institute of Technology (S) Lassi Nirhamo, University of turku (FIN) Claude Ostyn, Click2learn (USA) Dan Rehak, Carnegie Mellon Univ. (USA) Haluk Saker, Booz Allen Hamilton (USA) Steve Sarapata, Eisenhower National Clearinghouse (USA) Mike Sosteric, CanCore & Athabasca Uni. (C) Achim Steinacker, Intelligent Views (D) Schawn E. Thropp, ADL (USA) Chuck Untulis, HP & ICT (USA) Maia Zaharieva, Univ. Wien (AU)

p. 6LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Two kinds of bindings DTD Schema More expressive (data types!) Both are needed –Should not conflict Same XML LOM instance should be able to validate against both! –June meeting Generate DTD off schema Divide into subschemas for categories (& substructures)

p. 7LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Agenda Introduction Overall approach in taking the schema apart: –Catgories? Repeated element groups? Namespace policy –Proposals from Mikael Nilsson and Boyd Nielsen –Also for other groups? Vocabulary schema –Claude Ostyn and Mikael Nilsson, 24 July 2002 Roadmap ahead –Division of work, milestones, audio conferences

p. 8LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Schema proposals Before June 2002 meeting –IMS –Schawn E. Tropp, ADL –Wien –Dan Rehak Since then –Thor Anderson (12 July) –Boyd Nielsen (14 September)

p. 9LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Thor Andersons proposal No reactions…? Thor?

p. 10LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Boyd Nielsens proposal 9 schemas for categories + shared data models + lom overall Additional parents for multiplicities >1 –Educationals, relationals, etc. Extensions Multiplicities Infra –Vocabularies –Single namespace

p. 11LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Agenda Introduction Overall approach in taking the schema apart: –Catgories? Repeated element groups? Namespace policy –Proposals from Mikael Nilsson and Boyd Nielsen –Also for other groups? Vocabulary schema –Claude Ostyn and Mikael Nilsson, 24 July 2002 Roadmap ahead –Division of work, milestones, audio conferences

p. 12LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Namespace policy Mikael Nielsson –XSD namespaces Per category Also –RDF namespaces –RDF schemas Boyd Nielsen – –For all categories Should IEEE reserve this namespace?

p. 13LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Agenda Introduction Overall approach in taking the schema apart: –Catgories? Repeated element groups? Namespace policy –Proposals from Mikael Nilsson and Boyd Nielsen –Also for other groups? Vocabulary schema –Claude Ostyn and Mikael Nilsson, 24 July 2002 Roadmap ahead –Division of work, milestones, audio conferences

p. 14LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Vocabularies Vocabulary: –DC: set of data elements –LOM: value space of data elements (source,value) Claude Ostyn & Mikael Nilsson. A binding proposal for LOM vocabularies, 24 July XML schema cannot validate value based on source. Source: LOMv1.0 (or specific URI?) or URI that resolves to description of value space (next slide) LTWS: Vocabulary repository –Includes XML binding, similar to next slide

p. 15LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Vocabularies Format of value space description – Draft Brouillon Status is draft. … est brouillon. …

p. 16LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Vocabularies Boyd Nielsen: –LOM enumeration –other Not enforced

p. 17LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval Agenda Introduction Overall approach in taking the schema apart: –Catgories? Repeated element groups? Namespace policy –Proposals from Mikael Nilsson and Boyd Nielsen –Also for other groups? Vocabulary schema –Claude Ostyn and Mikael Nilsson, 24 July 2002 Roadmap ahead –Division of work, milestones, audio conferences

p. 18LOM-XML, 16 September 2002, Lawrence, KA, USA ©Erik Duval The End... Thanks! Questions?