What we found in TTSD About 30-40 students (per school) who need a comprehensive reading program Middle schools: 1000 students High Schools:2000 students.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process
Advertisements

RtI Response to Intervention
RESPONSE TO INTERVENTION _______District Presentation ______, 2008.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Response to Intervention: Creating a Systematic Response.
*This is a small school district of fewer than 1000 students located in northern Illinois. *The district consists of: an Elementary School (Pre-K--4 th.
An Introduction to Response to Intervention
Dr. Kelley. Share LiveText Assignment Discuss at table (rubric, typed AIP, student assessments):  The assessment tools you used.  What you learned.
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level “I think what makes a difference for our kids is that they graduate with a sense of place: high school,
Extend RtI systems thinking from reading Create priorities around new content areas Discuss RtI systems for Math, Writing, Behavior.
Multi-tiered Instruction at the Secondary Level. Today We’ll Be Serving… Secondary RTI: Uncharted territory Data-based Teaming Leadership Professional.
0 1 2 Required Elements: Universal Screening Tier I Tier II and Tier III Progress Monitoring District and School RTI² Teams Fidelity of Implementation.
RTI Response to Intervention. What are RTI systems? Definition (NCRTI, 2010) RTI programs integrate assessment systems and student interventions Are multi-tiered.
PBIS Coaches Conference October 2010 Lisa Bates, Sally Helton, Jon Potter, Dean Richards & Tammy Rasmussen PART 2.
David Putnam, Jr., Ph.D. Associate Director, C & I Tigard Tualatin School District.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Response to Intervention North Santiam School District August 25, 2009.
Data Study Strategies Shawna Moran – School Improvement
Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports
RESPONSE TO INSTRUCTION AND INTERVENTION (RtII) Adapted from School District of Philadelphia Rtii Materials.
Tigard-Tualatin Spring site visit overview April 23, 2008.
MI draft of IDEIA 2004 (Nov 2009) WHAT HAS CHANGED? How LD is identified:  Discrepancy model strongly discouraged  Response To Instruction/Intervention.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
0 From TN Department of Education Presentation RTII: Response to Instruction and Intervention.
Evaluation Is a process, not an event; Is individual to the student; Is comprehensive in design; Is used to inform eligibility; Is the same process whether.
Response to Intervention: Improving Achievement for ALL Students Understanding the Response to Intervention Process: A Parent’s Guide Presented by: Dori.
Squirrel Video. RTI.
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project Jennifer Doolittle Oregon Department of Education, January 27, 2006.
Effective Teaming Using Data to Guide Actions Sally Helton & Lisa Bates B ehavior and I nstructional S upport E ffective.
Strategies for School-wide Achievement
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Using Data in the EBIS System Universal Screening and Progress Monitoring.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Response to Intervention (RtI) & The IST Process Jennifer Maichin Patricia Molloy Special Education Teacher Principal IST Chairperson Meadow Drive Elementary.
Response to Intervention in KPS Linda Campbell
Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Problem Solving Team (PST)  Elkmont High School  Pilot Program  Response to Instruction  School Year.
RTI in Tigard-Tualatin School District: Effective Behavior & Instructional Support (EBIS) National SEA Conference on SLD Determination April 20, 2006 Erin.
Using RTI for LD Eligibility: We Are All Members of the Assessment Team Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Special Education Referral and Evaluation Report Oregon RTI Project Sustaining Districts Trainings
Lori Wolfe October 9, Definition of RTI according to NCRTI ( National Center on Response to Intervention) Response to intervention integrates assessment.
 Kingsport City Schools.  The foundation of our work with RTI is to support all student needs using a solutions-focused approach. We will utilize evidence-based.
Standard Behavior Protocols for TTSD September 26,2008.
Responsiveness to Instruction RtI Tier III. Before beginning Tier III Review Tier I & Tier II for … oClear beginning & ending dates oIntervention design.
Secondary Systems Overview What to Know Before Venturing Out of Bounds OrRTI Project January 15, 2009.
Response to Instruction: Creating a Systematic Response.
EBIS Effective Behavior & Instructional Supports Tina Rodriguez June 23, 2013.
Effective Behavior & Instructional Support. Implementing RTI through Effective Behavior & Instructional Support.
Interventions Identifying and Implementing. What is the purpose of providing interventions? To verify that the students difficulties are not due to a.
 October 29,2009. Define Response to Intervention Provide an overview of EBIS implementation Learn about TTSD’s history, demographics, program and outcomes.
Response To Intervention “Collaborative Data Driven Instruction at Lewis & Clark Elementary” Owen Stockdill.
SRBI SYMPOSIUM 2015 Tiered Instruction at JJIS Presented by: Jack Jackter Intermediate School Deb Sandberg, Principal Carissa Capozzi, Social Worker Lynne.
RTI 101 Jon Potter Dean Richards Oregon RTI Project.
UNIVERSAL SCREENING AND PROGRESS MONITORING IN READING Secondary Level.
Updated Section 31a Information LITERACY, CAREER/COLLEGE READINESS, MTSS.
+ Response to Intervention Ann Morrison Ph.D.. + Two Parts of Response to Intervention To ensure that all students will meet state and district standards.
1 Average Range Fall. 2 Average Range Winter 3 Average Range Spring.
Progress Monitoring Goal Setting Overview of Measures Keith Drieberg, Director of Psychological Services John Oliveri, School Psychologist Cathleen Geraghty,
Somers Public Schools Building and Departmental Goals
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Plan for Response to Intervention (RTI). What is Response to Intervention? Response to Intervention (RTI) is a practice of providing high-quality instruction.
WestEd.org Washington Private Schools RtI Conference Follow- up Webinar October 16, 2012 Silvia DeRuvo Pam McCabe WestEd Center for Prevention and Early.
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model Oakland Schools 3 Tier Literacy Leadership Team Training November
RSU #38 Response to Intervention
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
Are students benefitting from core instruction + interventions?
The Continuum of Interventions in a 3 Tier Model
RESPONDING TO K-12 STUDENTS
RTI Procedures Tigard Tualatin School District EBIS / RTI Project
Presentation transcript:

What we found in TTSD About students (per school) who need a comprehensive reading program Middle schools: 1000 students High Schools:2000 students A few students who need to build fluency students who need comprehension strategy instruction per school Many students who benefit from literacy instruction across the curriculum

Curriculum Choices Language! (Comprehensive Reading & Writing) Soar to Success (MS Comprehension) Literacy Strategies Classes (HS Comprehension) McREL & Beers/Tovani Teaching Reading in the Content Areas

All students have access to embedded literacy strategies across content areas Foci: Frayer Model Anticipation Guide Word Sorts Active Participation DR/TA or KWL Group Summarizing Definition Word Chart Differentiated Assessment Tier III Tier II Tier I Across the Tiers

Tier I: What do students receive?  General Ed Classes  Access to Content Literacy Strategies  A limited number of students are monitored by the Literacy Specialist Target = 80% of student population

Content Literacy Strategies Purpose/Prior KnowledgeAnticipation Guide Vocabulary DevelopmentDefinition Word Chart Frayer Model Word Sorts Cues and Questioning/ Patterns DRTA KWL ReflectionGroup Summarizing

Literacy Strategies in Math Class!

Tier II: What do students receive?  General Ed Classes  Access to Content Literacy Strategies  Strategic Intervention  Soar to Success (Middle School)  Literacy Strategies (High School)  Identify Text Structure  Predictions  Main Idea/Detail  Inferences  Visualization  Summarizing  Definition Word Chart Target = 15% Student Population

Students Write about Strategic Instruction

Tier III: What do students receive?  Access to Content Literacy Strategies  Comprehensive reading and writing support  LANGUAGE! (High School)  LANGUAGE! (Middle School) Target: 5%

LANGUAGE!- A student’s perspective

GradeUniversal Screening Tools Core ProgramSecond Tier Interventions Third Tier Interventions 6-8  MAZE  Oregon Assessment of Knowledge & Skills (OAKS)  HOLT – Elements of Literature  HOLT – Elements of Language  Content Literacy Strategies Supported Throughout All Content Areas  Soar to Success  45 minutes/day minimum  Language!  90 minutes/day 9-12  Oregon Assessment of Knowledge & Skills (OAKS)  Literacy Strategies  Identify Text Structure  Predictions  Main Idea/Detail  Inferences  Visualization  Summarizing  Definition Word Chart  Language!  90 minutes/day Who does this work? ALL STAFF Language Arts Teachers / Reading Specialists Reading Specialists TTSD 6-12 Reading Protocol

TTSD 6-12 Reading Decision Rules Screening: Every student at each grade level who scores in the lowest 20 percent on MAZE, or at or below the 35 th percentile on the OAKS, is: further screened with oral reading fluency measures from 6- Minute Solution (check for fluency & accuracy); then, the San Diego Quick is administered to evaluate what level of the SRAI to use; then, the SRAI is administered to gauge comprehension skills; then, for students with the most comprehensive reading needs, the Language! placement tests are administered. Progress monitoring (6-12): Maze-CBM twice monthly.

Reading Decision Rules Continued Intensifying interventions (These conditions should instigate a discussion in an EBIS meeting at the end of an intervention period): Maze scores indicate 3 to 4 data points (in a semester) below the aimline AND are below the 50 th percentile. Maze trendline analysis indicates a flat or declining slope AND scores are below the 50 th percentile. Grade+ scores are in the 3 rd stanine or below. Exiting interventions: Maze scores indicate 3 or more data points above the aimline AND are at or above the 50 th percentile; AND, Grade+ scores are at or above the 5 th stanine; AND OAKS scores are at or above the 36 th percentile

Measuring Reading Comprehension with a Cloze Procedure “Maze” is a multiple-choice “cloze” task that students complete while reading silently for 3 minutes. The first sentence of a word passage is left intact. Thereafter, every 6th word is replaced with three words inside parenthesis. One of the words is the exact one from the original passage. The number of correct responses is normed, as is the rate of improvement. Science-based research has shown that this provides a reliable and valid measure of reading comprehension.

Change the Intervention!!! Grade+ Composite Score = 1 st Stanine Intervention: LANGUAGE! D

Intervention Change: Language! Grade+ Composite Score = 1 st Stanine

Grade Level(s)Universal Screening ToolsCore ProgramSecond Tier InterventionsThird Tier Interventions K-1  First Step To Success Behavior Screener  Phoneme Segmentation Fluency  Office Discipline Referrals  Attendance Reports  Suspension/Expulsion Data  School Rules & Behavior Expectations Are Explicitly Taught to ALL Students  All Students Regularly & Consistently Acknowledged for Demonstrating Behavior Expectations  All Students Immediately & Reliably Corrected When Behavior Expectations Are Not Demonstrated. Positive Behavior Expectation Re-taught & Reinforced Immediately  School-wide Social/Emotional Curriculum Delivery (e.g., Second Steps, Steps to Respect, Too Good for Drugs/Violence, etc.)  Re-Teach Expectations  Check & Connect Programs  HUG Program  Adult Mentoring  Skills Groups  Behavior Contracts  Targeted Social/Emotional Curriculum Follow-up (e.g., Second Steps with Small Group of Struggling Students)  Core + Second Tier and…  First Step To Success  Functional Behavior Assessment & Individual Behavior Support Plans  Individualized Behavior Goals and Progress Monitoring (IEP & 504) 2-12  Office Discipline Referrals  Attendance Reports  Suspension/Expulsion Data  Oregon Healthy Teens Survey  Social Marketing Surveys  Grades  Re-Teach Expectations  Check & Connect  HUG Program  Check in/Check out  Strategic “Positive Referrals” for Identified Students Working Towards Increased Positive Behavior  Adult Mentoring  Peer Mentoring  Skills Groups  Behavior Contracts  Advisory Classes  Targeted Social/Emotional Curriculum Follow-up (e.g., Too Good for Drugs for Struggling Students)  Strategic Tutors  Core + Second Tier and…  Functional Behavior Assessment & Individual Behavior Support Plans  Individualized Behavior Goals and Progress Monitoring (IEP & 504) Who does this work? EBIS / EBS Teams FSTS Staff EBS Teams & ALL STAFF Appropriate Staff as Determined by EBIS Teams TTSD Standard Behavior Protocol

TTSD Standard Behavior Protocol Decision Rules: Screening 6-12 Office Discipline Referral Data reviewed monthly. If more than 1 major referral per day per month for every 200 students, revisit the CORE and look for patterns in location, time, grade, type, and frequency of incidents. K-12 CORE: If more than 20% of all students received 2 or more referrals: revisit the CORE. If more than 20% of students are failing, revisit the CORE. If more than 40% of referrals occur in classrooms: re-teach classroom expectations, increase professional development in classroom management strategies, and/or revisit CORE instruction in specific classrooms. If more than 30% of referrals occur in a specific area of the school: re- teach specific common area behavior expectations, acknowledge/reward positive behavior, & correct inappropriate behavior immediately.

Behavior Decision Rules, Continued Strategic: If more than 2 referrals in a 30-day period, meet with parents and develop a plan. If more than 5 absences in a 30-day period: instigate communication strategies with families and EBIS team reviews other data to determine appropriate interventions. If a student has 2 or more F’s or a GPA of <1.4 during any quarter, provide intervention. If more than 5 referrals, complete an FBA and individualize your interventions. Progress monitoring: K/1: 1x/week PSF & Behavior Intervention Data. K-12: Behavior data from Check and Connect program, referrals, grades and attendance K-12: Progress on individual behavior goals or Behavior Support Plan. Intensifying intervention: If progress is below the expected rate after 4 to 6 weeks of Second Tier Intervention, students move to Third Tier Interventions (consider performing a Functional Behavior Assessment and developing a Behavior Support Plan). Students receiving 6 or more behavior referrals during the school year - perform an appropriate Functional Behavior Assessment & develop a Behavior Support Plan.

Donald participates in the general curriculum Effective Support Team reviews achievement and behavioral data (school wide) and places Donald in group intervention Donald isn’t doing well Donald improves Donald improves Effective Support Team conducts Individual Problem Solving Resumes general program Donald doesn’t improve Donald doesn’t improve Special Education referral is initiated Donald probably recycles Donald may recycle Intervention is intense and LD is suspected Improvement is good and other factors are suspected as cause Evaluation planning meeting, Procedural safeguards provided, consent obtained, 60 school day timeline starts

Median Reading Comprehension Gain vs. Expected Gain for Students In Secondary Literacy Programs - By Curriculum December 2006 Through May Students w/ 3 or more scores only Expected Growth Rate for Students Below the 25th Percentile is.1 Words Per Week

For more information: ex.htm