Short Term Testing Mod 65_08 Modification Committee 25 th November 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Demand Side Units in the SEM
Advertisements

INTRA-DAY TRADING: Conference Call COD for Interconnector Units in WD1 Ending Overlap Optimisation Period (EOOP) 29 November 2011.
Background T&SC V9.0: The Market Operator shall not grant the status of Under Test for the purposes of this Code to Autonomous Generator Units, Pumped.
Mod_34_11 : Transition to SEM Intra-Day Trading 6 December 2011.
Overview of Make Whole Payments Modifications Committee Meeting February 2015.
Global Aggregation Working Group 15 th September 2010.
Global Aggregation Working Group 15 th September 2010.
MPID 223 (Failure to Follow Synchronising Instruction) JGCRP 12 th November 2014 (Anne Trotter)
Wind Power in Ireland: Treatment of wind in the Single Electricity Market APEx Conference, Paris 16 th October 2007.
Review of Bulk Energy Storage in SEM Gaelectric Energy Storage T&SC Modification Working Group 6 th September 2012 Mullany Engineering Consultancy Energy,
Mod_18_10 Intra Day Trading Conference Call Commercial Offer Data for Interconnector Units in Ending Overlap Optimisation Period (EOOP) for WD1 MSP Software.
1 Adjusting the “Dispatch Instructions” to the Defined Metering Point (DMP). “Functional Deferral 6 (FD-06)” Market Operations Standing Committee (MOSC)
MARKET SYSTEM RELEASE UPDATE Modifications Committee Meeting 31 January 2012.
INTRA-DAY TRADING Development of Modification(s) 1st February 2011.
Evaluation of Proposals for New Rules for Energy Storage Gaelectric Energy Storage T&SC Modification Working Group 23 rd October 2012.
Unit Registration Process Improvement SEMO 05/12/2012.
Metering Modification to T&S code Cathal Kearney Protection & Metering 15/04/2015.
Modification Proposal Mod_11_12 Gaelectric Energy Storage Presentation to Modifications Committee 29/05/2012.
Mod 10_11 Interconnector Under Test Mod 14_11 Pumped Storage Under Test Tuesday, 5 th April 2011.
SEM – One Year On Liam Ryan, Market Operations Manager.
INTRA-DAY TRADING Modification Development 5 April 2011.
INTRA-DAY TRADING DESIGN Changes required to the MIUN Calculation for SEM Intra-Day Trading 27 March 2012.
Discretionary Release of Non Obligated NTS System Entry Capacity Transmission Workstream 1st May 2008.
Mod_18_10_v2 : SEM Intra-Day Trading 6 December 2011.
1 UNC Modification 429 Customer Settlement Error Claims Process – Guidance Document.
Training Session Managing Formal Queries by Katia Compagnoni.
A Sustainable Future Powered by Electricity DS3 Workshop EAI Perspectives 14 th October 2013.
Interconnector Under Test Update to TSC Modifications Committee 5 th December 2012.
Market Systems Release Update Modifications Committee Meeting 65 December 3rd
Impact of Increasing Meter Errors on the SEM Modifications Committee Meeting 65 3 rd December 2015.
Metering Modification to T&S code Cathal Kearney Protection & Metering 03/12/2015.
MARKET SYSTEM RELEASE UPDATE Modifications Committee Meeting 27 March 2012.
T&SC Modification Proposal: Clarification of Outturn Availability
Intraday Trading March RAs raised a Modification (18_10) in March 2010, proposing the implementation of “intra-day trading” in the SEM. The Modifications.
ERGEG – Stakeholder Meeting Tuesday 14 th November 2006.
Impact Assessment Mod_17_12 : Report on Offered Capacity in Implicit Auctions 24 October 2012.
Juliet Corbett, NIAUR. Regulatory Structure  Ireland  CER  Licenses Generators Suppliers ESBCS ESBPG ESB Networks Eirgrid Transmission License Eirgrid.
Interconnector Physical Notification submissions following XBID (Cross Border Intra Day) market implementation; the cross border gate closure definition.
1 February, 2012 QMWG S&B Protocol Clarifications QSE-Requested Decommitment of a DAM Commitment ERCOT Mandy Bauld.
IMM alternate framework for Look-Ahead SCED November 21, 2011.
Consolidated EIM Initiatives from 2017 Roadmap Issue Paper
* MARKET SYSTEM RELEASE UPDATE Modifications Committee Meeting 9 August 2011 * 1##
MOD_04_17 Solar in the SEM 9th June 2017.
UNC Modifications 061 & 062 – An Overview
Global Aggregation Mod raised by ESB CS at Mods Meeting 24 ( )
Recovery of Costs due to Invalid Ex-Ante Contracted Quantities in Imbalance Settlement 12th December 2017.
Unsecured Bad Energy Debt and Unsecured Bad Capacity Debt Version 2
Contract Refusal Contract Refusal is a process associated with participant’s ex-ante trading behaviour; It relates to how the Traded Not Delivered element.
MOD_04_18 Reporting and Publication for Operational Schedules, Dispatch Instructions, Forecast Availability and SO Trades 13th March 2018.
Update to Unit Under Test Process
Redefinition of Schedule Production Cost
Ex Ante Quantities Deferral
MOD_27_18 Martin Kerin 06th September 2018
Mod_25_18 Unsecured Bad Energy Debt and Unsecured Bad Capacity Debt
Paragraph 14 Table 2: Mod_15_18 – IP/QBOA
Mod_34_18 Removal of Make-Whole Payments for biased quantities and negative imbalance revenue, and small clarifications to determination of Start Up Costs.
Imbalance Price Modifications
Mod_38_18 Limitation of Capacity Market Difference Payments to Loss Adjusted Metered Quantity. 12th December 2018.
CMC_04_19 Finalisation of Exchange Rate in Auction Information Pack
MOD_13_17 V2 Deferral of SEM NEMO Credit Reports and Non-acceptance of Contracted Quantities 13th March 2018.
Summary Issue Modification Aim Effect of the mod Impacts
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
Use of Technical Offer Data in Instruction Profiling / QBOA Version 2
Imbalance Price Modifications
Mod_32_18 Working Group 2 Dublin, 13 March 2019.
Recovery of Costs due to Invalid Ex-Ante Contracted Quantities in Imbalance Settlement 25th January 2018.
Correction to No Load Cost - “and” vs “or”
Mod 09_19 - Removal of locational constraints from Imbalance Pricing
Interconnector trading in SEM 7th June 2007
Correction to COP and clarification to CNLR
Presentation transcript:

Short Term Testing Mod 65_08 Modification Committee 25 th November 2010

Modification Objective  To modify SEM rules to allow Within-Day testing to be settled through SEM  Within-Day testing currently not considered in SEM, even though it provided for in Grid Code  Current workaround:  DIs with test flags issued in EDIL  DIs with test flags do not get sent to and profiled in SEM systems  This results Uninstructed Imbalance Payments by Generators  Modification is to remove this cost for generators © EirGrid & SONI 20102

Background  Mod 65_08 was submitted in November 2008  Mods meeting on December 1 st 2008: a working group was established  Two working group sessions were arranged during  The final working group report concluded that further investigation and discussion of the issues be investigated by SEMO and the TSOs.  An impact assessment was carried out  Changes to the original drafted Modification (V2)  Modifications Committee unanimously recommended for approval at Dec. 3 rd 2009 Modifications Meeting (#25)  Subject to further investigation of wording, full costs & implementation  Insufficient information available for FRR 3

Mod 65_08 Application for Short Term Test Status Application for Short Term Test status  Subject to approval by TSO  Generator does not make any submission to the Market Operator.  TSO approval for single contiguous number of Trading Periods in a single Trading Day is required.  Can be approved any time up until the end of the relevant Trading Day. Short Term Test status must:  Last at least 4 Trading Periods in a given Trading Day.  If spanning two Trading Days, be submitted for each Trading Day. Units under Short Term Test  Variable Price Makers, Variable Price Takers, Pumped Storage, Interconnector Units, Demand Side Units, IRCU and Autonomous Units cannot have Short Term Test status.  If Unit has Short Term Test status, it cannot be considered as Under Test. © EirGrid & SONI,

Mod 65_08 Submission and Publication Requirements Participant to provide  COD for all Price Maker Generator Units, even if they have Under Test status (allows for within day change to Short Term Test). TSO to provide (Ex-Post):  TEST dispatch instruction and TSTO dispatch instruction for each Generator Unit in the relevant Trading Day. o To the Market Operator by 14:00 on TD+1. o Market Operator to publish Short Term Test Notifications as submitted by the relevant TSO by 14:00 on TD+1. © EirGrid & SONI,

Mod 65_08 Impacts on MSP Software  Calculation of Availability and Minimum Stable Generation for Price Makers –Availability = Minimum Stable Generation = DQ during Short Term Test.  Calculation of Schedule Demand for Ex Post MSP Software Runs –Add Short Term Test status where ‘Under Test’ is referenced.  Calculation of MSQs for use in Settlement –MSQ=DQ during Trading Periods where a Unit has Short Term Test status. © EirGrid & SONI,

Mod 65_08 Impacts on MSP Software © EirGrid & SONI, Short Term Test status 80 MSP Scheduling (between Min Avail And Max Avail) MSP Scheduling (between Min Avail And Max Avail) MSP Scheduling fixed to DQ during Short Term Test Trading Periods Availability Minimum Stable Generation Dispatch Quantity (DQ)

Mod 65_08 Settlement  No Start Up Cost recovered during Short Term Test period  No Make Whole Payments apply during periods of Short Term Test status  MSQ=DQ during Short Term Test period  Specific provision: MSQ for PPTGs equal to DQuh during Short Term Test period  Subject to Testing Charges during Short Term Test period  No Constraint Payments during Short Term Test period (as DQ=MSQ)  Eligible Availability set as normal © EirGrid & SONI,

Mod 65_08 Version 2 Definition of Short Term Test: May only occur where it is initiated and proposed by a Participant Eligible Availability: EA is set to the Availability Profile for the Generator Unit for duration of Short Term Test Only applicable to Predictable Price Makers and Predictable Price Takers TEST and TSTO dispatch instructions to indicate the start and the end of the Short Term Test period. © EirGrid & SONI,

Impact Assessments SEMO: In the region of €467k EirGrid and SONI: €60k approximately 10

Benefits of Mod 65_08: Grid Code caters for Within Day Test, but currently not provided for in SEM. Mod 65_08 would align SEM with Grid Code Avoid current workaround Avoid Uninstructed Imbalance Payments by Generators Submission of COD for Generator Unit Under Test Enable a generator to come off test in SEM earlier than the Unit Under Test End date with the relevant System Operator’s approval. Greater testing flexibility © EirGrid & SONI,

Thank you 12

Scenarios 13

Scenarios 1.Unit is on and reduces Output for Short Term Test 2.Unit is on and increases Output for Short Term Test 3.Unit is on and goes off for Short Term Test 4.Unit is off and comes on for Short Term Test only 5.Unit comes on for Short Term Test and stays on in market and dispatch 6.Unit comes on for Short Term Test and stays on in market but not in dispatch 7.Unit comes on for Short Term Test and stays on in dispatch but not in market © EirGrid & SONI,

Scenario 1 – Unit is on and reduces Output for Short Term Test © EirGrid & SONI,  Unit is on prior to Short Term Test.  Unit Output is reduced for Short Term Test period:  No Start-Up = No Start Up Costs.  No Make Whole Payments.  MSQ=DQ, hence no Constraint Payment.  Testing Charges due.  No issues with the Modification for this Participant- supplied Scenario. Output Time DQ=MSQ Short Term Test

Scenario 2 – Unit is on and increases Output for Short Term Test © EirGrid & SONI,  Unit is on prior to Short Term Test.  Unit Output is increased for Short Term Test period:  No Start-Up = No Start Up Costs.  No Make Whole Payments.  MSQ=DQ, hence no Constraint Payment.  Testing Charges due.  No issues with the Modification for this Participant- supplied Scenario. Output Time DQ=MSQ Short Term Test

Scenario 3 – Unit is on and goes off for Short Term Test © EirGrid & SONI,  Unit is on prior to Short Term Test.  As a result of test initiated by the Participant, the Unit goes off for Short Term Test period and returns at the end of the test:  Participant decision to go off for the Short Term Test, hence no Start Up Costs should be applicable.  No Make Whole Payments.  MSQ=DQ, hence no Constraint Payment.  Testing Charges due during Short Term Test.  No issues with the Modification for this Participant- supplied Scenario. Output Time DQ=MSQ Short Term Test

Scenario 4 – Unit is off and comes on for Short Term Test only © EirGrid & SONI,  Unit is off prior to Short Term Test.  As a result of a test initiated by a Participant, the Unit comes on for Short Term Test period and goes off at the end of the test:  Participant decision to come on for the Short Term Test, hence no Start Up Costs should be applicable.  No Make Whole Payments.  MSQ=DQ, hence no Constraint Payment.  Testing Charges due during Short Term Test.  No issues with the Modification for this Participant- supplied Scenario. Output Time DQ=MSQ Short Term Test

Scenario 5 – Unit stays on © EirGrid & SONI,  Unit is off prior to Short Term Test, with MSQ=DQ=0.  As a result of test initiated by the Participant, the Unit comes on for Short Term Test period:  No Make Whole Payments.  MSQ=DQ, hence no Constraint Payment.  Testing Charges due during Short Term Test.  Unit stays on in the market (MSQ>0) and physically (DQ>0), Start Up Costs not paid but no forced loss.  TSO may dispatch the Unit at the end of the Short Term Test as required. As already ON, no Dispatch Start will have occurred. Unit will receive Constraint Payments after the test, if applicable (MSQ ≠ DQ). Output Time DQ=MSQ Short Term Test

Scenario 6 – Unit stays on in market © EirGrid & SONI,  Unit is off prior to Short Term Test, with MSQ=DQ=0.  As a result of test initiated by Participant, the Unit comes on for Short Term Test period:  No Make Whole Payments.  MSQ=DQ, hence no Constraint Payment.  Testing Charges due during Short Term Test.  MSQ>DQ after test, hence constrained down.  After the Short Term Test period, the Unit is scheduled in the market (MSQ>0) and is dispatched off (DQ = 0).  TSO may dispatch the Unit at the end of the Short Term Test as required, including dispatching OFF. Unit will receive Constraint Payments (down in this case) after the test, if applicable. Output Time DQ=0 Short Term Test MSQ>0

Scenario 7 – Unit stays on in dispatch © EirGrid & SONI,  Unit is off prior to Short Term Test, with MSQ=DQ=0.  As a result of test initiated by Participant, the Unit comes on for Short Term Test period:  No Make Whole Payments.  MSQ=DQ, hence no Constraint Payment.  After test, Unit is dispatched up and will receive Constraint Payments – no Dispatch Start is relevant (no avoidable loss).  Testing Charges due during Short Term Test.  After the Short Term Test period, the Unit is scheduled off in the market (MSQ=0) and is dispatched by the TSO (DQ>0).  TSO may dispatch the Unit at the end of the Short Term Test as required. Unit will receive Constraint Payments after the test, as in this case (DQ>MSQ after test). Output Time DQ>0 Short Term Test MSQ=0

Outcome of Scenario Consideration  The definition of a Short Term Test:  May only be initiated by a Participant.  Agreed by the relevant System Operator.  If the System Operator requires to test a Unit from a Grid Code perspective, this will not be performed via a Short Term Test:  Dispatch Instructions will be supplied to match the required test.  If a Unit is required to start, a Dispatch Start will be paid (not a Short Term Test).  Unit will receive Constraint Payments if applicable. © EirGrid & SONI,