Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University Evaluation Session: Gateway Cities Education Agenda - English Language Learners Enrichment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The Principals Role in Systemic Change for Reading Commitment.
Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
NOTE: To change the image on this slide, select the picture and delete it. Then click the Pictures icon in the placeholder to insert your own image. LOCAL.
College & Career Readiness in Illinois Brian Durham Senior Director for Academic Affairs & CTE Illinois Community College Board
The Massachusetts Framework for Educator Evaluation: An Orientation for Teachers and Staff October 2014 (updated) Facilitator Note: This presentation was.
The Heart of Improvement: Leadership. The Story of Thomasville City Schools…
Effective Outreach Strategies to IT Students Lessons Learned by BATEC National Career Pathways Network Louisville, Kentucky October 10 –
FOR YOUTH DEVELOPMENT FOR HEALTHY LIVING FOR SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY PUTTING SUCCESS INTO WORDS Y Readers Charlotte, NC | Y READERS | ©2012 YMCA OF GREATER.
What is the Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? Why do we have a Parent Involvement Plan (PIP)? (PIP) PARENT INVOLVEMENT PLAN 1.
Teachers have a significant role in developing and implementing the most effective teaching and learning strategies in their classroom and striving for.
Educator Evaluation: The Model Process for Principal Evaluation July 26, 2012 Massachusetts Secondary School Administrators’ Association Summer Institute.
Preparing for the CCR Regional Sessions. Massachusetts Department of Elementary & Secondary Education College and career readiness means an individual.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
DISTRICT IMPROVEMENT PLAN Student Achievement Annual Progress Report Lakewood School District # 306.
Project P.O.S.T. Preparing Outstanding Science Teachers A Partnership of GCS & UNCG A Partnership of GCS & UNCG.
Listening, Learning, and Leading Emmanuel Caulk August 24, 2015.
Tracy Keenan, Kara Mitchell, and Barbara Dray With Alan Davis, Honorine Nocon, Sheila Shannon & the DPS-UCD Research Collaborative Council of the Great.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
Schoolwide Preparation for English Language Learners: Teacher Community and Inquiry-Based Professional Development.
Elgin Community College’s Alliance for College Readiness Building Effective Partnerships & Transition Strategies Julie Schaid, Ph.D., Assoc. Dean College.
The SIOP ® Model Continuing Professional Development.
Assistant Principal Meeting August 28, :00am to 12:00pm.
FewSomeAll. Multi-Tiered System of Supports A Comprehensive Framework for Implementing the California Common Core State Standards Professional Learning.
Reaching for Excellence in Middle and High School Science Teaching Partnership Cooperative Partners Tennessee Department of Education College of Arts and.
Heather L. B. Smith. 1.Define the scope of the Entry Plan and initiate the process by identifying stakeholders, entry plan goals, documents for review,
Connecting the Dots PLC AfL DI Higher Order Thinking TLCP Multi- Literacies Arts Technology Inquiry BIP SEF SIP.
Summer Transitions BRIDGES TO HIGH SCHOOL, CONNECTIONS FOR LIFE How Three Community Partnerships are Planning to Enhance and Expand their Summer Transition.
PARENT INFORMATION NIGHT Rashel Taylor Howard High BSAP Academic Liaison Black Student Achievement Program Be Successful And Proud! HCPSS Black Student.
Planning and Integrating Curriculum: Unit 4, Key Topic 1http://facultyinitiative.wested.org/1.
City Year: Putting Idealism to Work for Philadelphia Students
Evaluation of Behavior-Focused Training for Chemically Dependent Parents Mary E. Lutz, DSW, MPH, Roberta Shafter, PhD, Joyce Park, BA, Katherine Barbacci,
Lenoir County Public Schools SIOP Leadership Meeting for Planning, Support, and Implementation February 3, 2011 Rochelle Middle School.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Strengths and Potential Creating a Culture of Inquiry Creating Interdisciplinary Synergy Enhancing Communication Creating a Community of Scholars Research.
Assistant Principal Meeting September 18, :00am to 1:00pm Presenters: Anna Arrigo & Marygrace DiForte.
New English Language Development and Common Core State Standards Institute Salinas Union High School District Pathways to Success: Long Term English Learner.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Fall, 2013 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Evaluation of the Quebec Community Learning Centres: An English minority language initiative Learning Innovations at WestEd May 21, 2008.
Lincoln Community Learning Centers A system of partnerships that work together to support children, youth, families and neighborhoods. CLC.
State Advisory Council Community Support Grant Summary Presentation for Policy Committee Meeting December 3, 2012.
Presented by: Barbara A. Deane–Williams, Superintendent Christopher Marino, Teacher Leader Susan Streicher, Principal Strengthening Teacher & Leader Effectiveness.
Overview.  Accreditation is both a status and a process  Status:  Status: Accreditation provides public notification that standards of quality are.
GAPSS ANALYSIS REPORT Lindley Sixth Grade Academy A T T H E B A R N E S C E N T E R ANALYSIS REVIEW “In the Pursuit of Excellence”
BROMWELL COMMUNITY MEETING November 17, SCHOOL PERFORMANCE FRAMEWORK (SPF)
Family Homework Night Establishing Routines to Support Parent Involvement Kaitlyn Nykwest Homeless Children’s Education Fund 1.
Snohomish High School School Improvement Plan. Why Change?
Quality Enhancements in After- School and Out-of-School Time (ASOST-Q) Competitive Grant (FC 530) Grant Information Session (ESE, Malden) June 6, 2014.
Statewide Evaluation Cohort 7 Overview of Evaluation March 23, 2010 Mikala L. Rahn, Ph.D.
Berkeley County Schools
The Importance of Professional Learning in Systems Reform AdvancED Performance Accreditation Bev Mortimer Concordia Superintendent
Increasing Student Success One Visit At A Time.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Pathway to Excellence. School’s Out Washington provides services and guidance for organizations to ensure all young people have safe places to learn and.
Welcome to the (ENTER YOUR SYSTEM/SCHOOL NAME) Data Dig 1.
New Haven, A City of Great Schools MOVING FROM COMPLIANCE TO COHERENCE IN EVALUATION AND DEVELOPMENT: THE IMPACT OF THE E3 PROGRAM NEW HAVEN PUBLIC SCHOOLS.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Family Genetics Education Through School and Community Partnerships Louisa A. Stark, Genetic Science Learning Center University of Utah Rebecca Giles,
Cummunity- University Project for Literacy English.
SIOP Implementation in Manatee County A Title I and Title III Partnership Presented by: Debra Estes, ESOL Coordinator.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Can You Enhance Knowledge and Stimulate Excellence One STEM Unit at a Time? AEA – October 16, 2014 Panel: Evaluating STEM Professional Development Interventions.
School Redesign and SRCL Implementation
Agenda Welcome and Introductions Purpose of Investment
Differentiated Supports in Special Education
Who We Are For more than 20 years, we have believed the key to preparing student for a successful future is providing rigorous and relevant instruction.
Systemic Student Support (S3) Academy
Building Coherence: P. S
ANNUAL TITLE I MEETING NOBLE ACADEMY COLUMBUS.
Colorado Department of Education
Presentation transcript:

Statewide Convening October 16, 2014 Worcester State University Evaluation Session: Gateway Cities Education Agenda - English Language Learners Enrichment Academies

Evaluation Goals  Support Implementation  Share successful strategies  Identify and problem-solve challenges  Improve Future Academies  Support Cross-Site Learning Network  Report on Implementation and Outcomes 1

Evaluation Questions 1.Implementation: What program design and conditions need to be in place to ensure that the Summer Academies are implemented effectively? What conditions hinder implementation? 2.Student level impact: What is the impact of the Summer Academies on student outcomes? How and to what extent does impact on student outcomes differ across Summer Academy models? 3.Program partners (school, district, community) level impact: How and to what extent do the Summer Academies impact teachers, students, families? How will lessons and strategies be shared with schools and districts? 2

Question 1: Data Collection  Implementation: What program design and conditions need to be in place to ensure that the Summer Academies are implemented effectively? What conditions hinder implementation?  How we collected data:  Reviewed 20 Grant Applications  Reviewed Interim Reports  Conducted 6 site-visits (mid-/late- July) Observations, Focus Groups, Interviews, Collected Materials  Reviewing 20 Final Reports 3

Question 1: Emerging Findings from Site Visits  Cross-Site Strengths:  High Expectations for ELLs  Caring teachers & staff  Safe environment for ELLs  Strong relationships with community partners  Culturally relevant recreational & enrichment activities 4

Question 1: Emerging Findings from Site Visits cont.  Cross-Site Areas of Improvement:  Curriculum  Enrichment  Attendance  School-Year Practice  Community Partnerships 5

Question 2: Data Collection  Student level impact: What is the impact of the Summer Academies on student outcomes? How and to what extent does impact on student outcomes differ across Summer Academy models?  How we collected data:  Data capture Excel file: Site-Level Data Student-Level Data Summer enrollment & attendance Summer Pre- and post-test data  SY 2014 & SY 2015 State Student-level Data MCAS ACCESS SIMS SSDR 6

Question 2: Emerging Findings Total Days Total Hours/Day Total Hours Mean Min Max  Duration of 20 academies:

Question 2: Emerging Findings Cont. Summer 2014 Data # of Students in Academies % of District ELL Enrollment Attendance Rate Mean 889%83% Min 171%56% Max 25330%98% 8  Students Served:

Question 3: Data Collection  Program partners (school, district, community) level impact: How and to what extent do the Summer Academies impact teachers, students, families? How will lessons and strategies be shared with schools and districts?  How we collected data:  Site-Visit Data: Teacher Focus Groups Parent Focus Groups Community Organization Focus Groups  Reviewing 20 Final Reports  Document Fall Convening Conversations 9

Question 3: Emerging Findings from Site Visits  Eliminating Summer Learning Gap  Teacher-Student Relationships  Small Class Size 10

Cross-Site Roundtable Discussions  Three topics: A.Curriculum (Academic & Enrichment) B.Family and Community Engagement C.Impact of Academies on School Year Practice 11

Roundtable Goals  Reflect upon your academy using indicators from ELL Practice Framework  Share your academy’s strengths and challenges with other sites  Discuss future collaborations or partnerships  Learn new strategies for 2015 academy  Share lessons and strategies with your schools and/or district 12

Roundtable Discussions  Group 1: Student Center, Foster Room (All Sessions)  Facilitator: Rosann Tung  Group 2: Student Center, Fallon Room (Sessions A&B)  Session C, 1:40pm: Sullivan Academic Center Room 209  Facilitator: Ruth López  Group 3: Sullivan Academic Center Faculty Lounge Room 310 (All Sessions)  Facilitator: Lynne Sacks  2:30pm-3pm Foster Room (ALL GROUPS) 13

Questions? Comments? Contact: Principal Investigator: Rosann Tung, Ph.D. or Project Researcher: Ruth López,