Good thinking or gut feeling

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biases, Brains, and Decision Making. Lawyers are Lousy Decision-Makers.
Advertisements

Lecture Outline Heuristics Heuristics and Social Influence Types of heuristics Stereotypes as base rates Dilution Effect Other cognitive errors.
1 Intuitive Irrationality: Reasons for Unreason. 2 Epistemology Branch of philosophy focused on how people acquire knowledge about the world Descriptive.
Chapter 10 Decision Making © 2013 by Nelson Education.
LECTURE 4. SOME INTUITIONS  emotional processes underlie rapid, basic, and automatic evaluations  low-level processes that elicit strong valenced and.
1 st lecture Probabilities and Prospect Theory. Probabilities In a text over 10 standard novel-pages, how many 7-letter words are of the form: 1._ _ _.
Judgment and Decision Making How Rational Are We?.
© POSbase 2005 The Conjunction Fallacy Please read the following scenario: (by Tversky & Kahneman, 1983)Tversky & Kahneman, 1983 Linda is 31 years old,
Fallacies in Probability Judgment Yuval Shahar M.D., Ph.D. Judgment and Decision Making in Information Systems.
Overview of Decision Making Harrison, Ch. 1 Fred Wenstøp.
Thinking, Deciding and Problem Solving
Reasoning What is the difference between deductive and inductive reasoning? What are heuristics, and how do we use them? How do we reason about categories?
Running Experiments with Amazon Mechanical-Turk Gabriele Paolacci, Jesse Chandler, Jesse Chandler Judgment and Decision Making, Vol. 5, No. 5, August 2010.
+ Cognition. + Cognition: Thinking All the mental activities associated with thinking, knowing, remembering, and communicating.
Heuristics and Biases. Normative Model Bayes rule tells you how you should reason with probabilities – it is a normative model But do people reason like.
Problem Solving And Decision Making
Decision-making II judging the likelihood of events.
Reasoning with Uncertainty. Often, we want to reason from observable information to unobservable information We want to calculate how our prior beliefs.
Heuristics & Biases. Bayes Rule Prior Beliefs Evidence Posterior Probability.
Decision Making Decision-making is based on information Information is used to: Identify the fact that there is a problem in the first place Define and.
Decision Making. Test Yourself: Decision Making and the Availability Heuristic 1) Which is a more likely cause of death in the United States: being killed.
4e Nelson/Quick ©2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole.
Today’s Topic Do you believe in free will? Why or why not?
Psychology 100 Chapter 8 Part III Thinking & Intelligence.
THE DEVELOPMENT OF AN INFORMATION- SEEKING SCALE FOR DIFFERENT DOMAINS Brock Brothers & Jennifer Vonk, Oakland University Introduction Proponents of the.
Chapter 10 Thinking.
+ Cognition. + Cognition: Thinking All the mental activities associated with thinking, knowing, remembering, and communicating.
Lecture 15 – Decision making 1 Decision making occurs when you have several alternatives and you choose among them. There are two characteristics of good.
PowerPoint Presentation by Charlie Cook The University of West Alabama Copyright © 2005 Prentice Hall, Inc. All rights reserved. Chapter 4 Foundations.
FIN 614: Financial Management Larry Schrenk, Instructor.
LESSON TWO ECONOMIC RATIONALITY Subtopic 10 – Statistical Reasoning Created by The North Carolina School of Science and Math forThe North Carolina School.
Judgement Judgement We change our opinion of the likelihood of something in light of new information. Example:  Do you think.
Past research in decision making has shown that when solving certain types of probability estimation problems, groups tend to exacerbate errors commonly.
PSY 323 – Cognition Chapter 13: Judgment, Decisions & Reasoning.
Exercise 2-6: Ecological fallacy. Exercise 2-7: Regression artefact: Lord’s paradox.
Representativeness Heuristic Then: Framing Effects Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 6/2 /2015: Lecture 10-2 This Powerpoint.
INLS 200 thursday, january 17.
Expected utility is always used as a heuristic Konrad Talmont-Kaminski Marie Curie-Sklodowska U., Poland.
The Impact of Probabilistic Information on Deterministic & Threshold Forecasts Susan Joslyn, Earl Hunt & Karla Schweitzer University of Washington References.
5 MARCH 2015 TOK LECTURE TRUTH: TNML. ECONOMICS  ECONOMISTS HAVE A VERY SHAKY RELATIONSHIP WITH TRUTH.  AT THE HEART OF THE FINANCIAL CRISIS OF 2008.
Inductive reasoning problems … … … … ?? ?? 1210 Need.
Portfolio Management Unit – II Session No. 10 Topic: Investor Characteristics Unit – II Session No. 10 Topic: Investor Characteristics.
CHS AP Psychology Unit 7 Part II: Cognition Essential Task 7.3: Identify decision making techniques (compensatory models, representativeness heuristics,
Cognitive Processes PSY 334 Chapter 10 – Reasoning & Decision-Making.
Lecture Outline Heuristics and Social Inference Representative Heuristic Base Rate Fallacy Stereotypes as Base Rates Dilution Effect Other Cognitive Errors.
A. Judgment Heuristics Definition: Rule of thumb; quick decision guide When are heuristics used? - When making intuitive judgments about relative likelihoods.
Heuristics and Biases Thomas R. Stewart, Ph.D. Center for Policy Research Rockefeller College of Public Affairs and Policy University at Albany State University.
Implicit Decision making Dr Magda Osman Room 2.25 Office hours Mondays.
Individual Differences in Decision-Making Styles across the Life Span Rebecca Delaney, B.A. 1, JoNell Strough, Ph.D 1, Tara Karns, M.S. 1, Wandi Bruine.
The Representativeness Heuristic then: Risk Attitude and Framing Effects Psychology 355: Cognitive Psychology Instructor: John Miyamoto 6/1/2016: Lecture.
1 מקורות החשיבה המדעית/מתימטית ( ) אורי לירון שיעור ראשון – חידות, מֶטָה-חידות, תהיות, וסתם שאלות מעצבנות.
Chapter 8 Thinking and Language.
Social Interaction Anxiety. The SIAS is used to assess general levels of social anxiety (Mattick & Clark, 1998). Sample items include “I have difficulty.
Exercise 2-7: Regression artefact: Lord’s paradox
Unit 7 Part II: Cognition
Behavioral Finance.
Implicit Decision making
PSY 323 – Cognition Chapter 13: Judgment, Decisions & Reasoning.
Skepticism and Empiricism in Psychology
Pavle Valerjev Marin Dujmović
Thinking & Decision Making: Dual Process Model
1st: Representativeness Heuristic and Conjunction Errors 2nd: Risk Attitude and Framing Effects Psychology 355:
Cognition and Language
Decision making Decision making is an important area within cognitive psychology, because of the applied interest: everyone would like to make better decisions,
Background Dual Process Theory (Evans, 2010; Evans & Stanovich, 2013)
Summary of Lesson 3: Part I
Experimental Condition
HEURISTICS.
Thinking & Language (Chapter 10)
For Thursday, read Wedgwood
Presentation transcript:

Good thinking or gut feeling Good thinking or gut feeling? Decision-making style and rationality in traders, bankers and financial non-experts Volker Thoma School of Psychology

Research Question How rational are financial decision-makers? Compared to non-experts Different style of DM? Different risk-taking?

Human judgment and decision-making – Rationality Enlightenment Decisions should be informed and logical Rational Choice theory Homo oeconomicus – chooses the option with highest total utility (von Neumann & Morgenstern,1947)

The Problem with Linda (Kahneman & Tversky, 1972) Linda is 31 years old, single, outspoken, and very bright. She majored in philosophy. As a student she was deeply concerned with issues of discrimination and social justice, and also participated in anti-nuclear demonstrations. Which of the following statements about Linda is more probable? A) She is a bank cashier. B) She is a bank cashier who is active in the feminist movement. A B 2013 Choice

Heuristics in decision making Heuristic: a short cut; a strategy that risks error to gain efficiency Vs. Algorithm: a guaranteed route to an outcome, may be more tedious and effortful Tversky & Kahneman: measured human decision making against various normative standards taken from probability theory, statistics, and logic. people use heuristics to make choices These heuristics lead to biases, i.e. systematic incorrect estimates 5 2013 Choice 5

Two systems (processes) for thinking and DM Dual process models Epstein, 1994; Evans, 1984, 2000; Evans & Over, 1996; Goel, 1995; Kahneman, 2002; Kahneman & Frederick, 2005; Sloman, 1996; Stanovich & West, 2000 Also found for moral reasoning 2013 Choice

Some odd couples 2013 Choice

Research Question Are financial experts different from non-experts in susceptibility to heuristics? … and therefore “bad” decision-making Hilton (2000); Taleb (2004) Usage of DM styles? ‘reflective’ (rational) vs “intuitive’ (experiential) Risk taking? Financial risk-taking

Participants Online questionnaire Group 1 (n=57) Group 2 (n=39) respondents who do not work in banking or the financial industry Group 2 (n=39) work in a range of financial roles in banks and related organisations but not in trading or trading support roles (“back” and “mid- office”) Group 3 (n=58) are financial traders From 4 different banks/ trading firms

Methods The Cognitive Reflection test (Frederick, 2005) “A bat and a ball cost £1.10 in total. The bat costs £1 more than the ball. How many pence does the ball cost?” measures the tendency to inhibit automatic but frequently false responses in reasoning tasks 3 questions REI: Rational-Experiential Inventory (Epstein & Paccini, 1999) Statements such as: I trust my initial feelings about people I prefer complex to simple problems 10/24 questions Risk questionnaire (Dospert et al., 2006) 2013 JDM

Results

Results – Correlations Traders

Summary Traders scored significantly higher on the cognitive reflection task (CRT; Frederick, 2005) than both other groups Scores for Traders were also higher on a self-rated scale for reflective thinking (REI-R; Pacini & Epstein, 1999) There were no group differences for intuitive thinking, although self-rated experientiality (REI-E) correlated with age overall Financial risk-taking was higher for Traders vs other and Bankers vs Other a conclusion that is supported by Toplak, West, and Stanovich (2011) who previously showed that performance on the CRT predicted heuristic thinking even when measures of cognitive ability and executive functioning were controlled for.

Conclusions Traders have a higher self-rated tendency for reflective thinking and a greater propensity to inhibit the use of mental shortcuts (heuristics) Traders in the current study showed no elevated preference to use ‘intuition’ in their decision-making compared to other groups. These group effects cannot be explained by differences in sex, age, or qualification see also Toplak, West, and Stanovich (2011) a conclusion that is supported by Toplak, West, and Stanovich (2011) who previously showed that performance on the CRT predicted heuristic thinking even when measures of cognitive ability and executive functioning were controlled for.

Rationality Debate