Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sustainable Rangelands Roundtable Development and Evolution of the Criteria and Indicators.
Advertisements

DRAFT Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop July 23, 2007.
U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service Conserving the Nature of America Step 7 Identify Population Objectives Population Objective is set here.
LEGG PARK DOG PARK PROJECT DESIGN Prepared for: Meridian Township Parks Commission Board August 9, 2011.
Presentation Template Conservation in a Changing Climate.
To what extent does the Natural Resources Management Act 2004 benefit biodiversity?
Ecological Systems Maintaining and Enhancing Natural Features and Minimizing Adverse Impacts of Infrastructure Projects Course Review.
Division of State Lands’ Wetlands Program. Issues That Spawned State Wetlands Program (SB 3) Lack of detailed wetlands inventory information or guidance.
Ecosystem-based adaptation helps to build the resilience of natural habitat and communities to climate change impacts and thereby reduce their vulnerability.
PROPOSED PRIORITIES FOR SCIENCE AND COLLABORATION OCTOBER 2012.
Step 1: Valley Segment Classification Our first step will be to assign environmental parameters to stream valley segments using a series of GIS tools developed.
USDA Forest Service Southwestern Region. Overview  Why Landscapes?  Other Landscape Efforts  Strategic Action Plan Summary  Region-wide Landscape.
Climate Adaptation: the Power of Conservation Across Boundaries Steven Fuller, NALCC The Wildlife Management Institute.
Chapter Florida’s Uniform Mitigation Assessment Method (UMAM)
Community consultation 3 September – 10 December 2012 Draft ACT Nature Conservation Strategy.
Chicago Wilderness: An Ecosystem Management Plan Katy Berlin Shelly Charron Lisa DuRussel NRE 317 April 11, 2001.
Future Research NeedsWorld Heritage and Climate Change World Heritage and Climate Change - Future Research Needs Bastian Bomhard World Heritage Officer.
Information Needs National Forest System Update 2011 FIA User Group Meeting – Sacramento, CA March 9, 2011 Greg Kujawa NFS, Washington Office.
Integrated Ecosystem Assessment for the Gulf of Mexico Becky Allee Gulf Coast Services Center.
2 Recognized by John C. Fremont as an area of interior drainage 145,546 square miles Precipitation, generally 7-12 inches annually Recognized by John.
Forest Plan Revision Using the 2012 Planning Rule Process Overview Steps and Expectations (I don’t know….but I’ve been told…if the horse don’t pull….you.
LCC National Workshop Denver, CO March 28-29, 2012 Defining a Future Conservation Landscape in the Southeastern United States.
What does the SALCC do? Mission: Create a shared blueprint for landscape conservation actions that sustain natural and cultural resources.
Inventory, Monitoring, and Assessments A Strategy to Improve the IM&A System Update and Feedback Session with Employees and Partners December 5, 2011.
Results: Test-run in the Willamette Basin Some areas provide higher levels of services than others. The agriculture and timber maps show dollar values—high.
Blending Science with Traditional Ecological Knowledge  Frank K. Lake  Environmental Science, Graduate Ph.D program  US Forest Service- Redwood Sciences.
Commonly referred to as MIS.  From the 1982 planning regulations 36 CFR (a)(1)- “… certain vertebrate and/or invertebrate species present in the.
1 The Lower Athabasca Regional Plan: A Case Study Biol. 595 Sept. 16, 2009.
Methods and Tools to Integrate Biodiversity into Land Use Planning
The Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook Federal Resource Management and Ecosystem Services Guidebook nespguidebook.com ASSESSMENT.
Watershed Assessment and Planning. Review Watershed Hydrology Watershed Hydrology Watershed Characteristics and Processes Watershed Characteristics and.
Information and international biodiversity conventions Eliezer Frankenberg Nature and Parks Authority.
Getting Ready for the Future Woody Turner Earth Science Division NASA Headquarters May 7, 2014 Biodiversity and Ecological Forecasting Team Meeting Sheraton.
Investment in Sustainable Natural Resource Management (focus: Agriculture) increases in agricultural productivity have come in part at the expense of deterioration.
Wetland Monitoring What Do We Need? Integration of Wetland Monitoring and Wetland Management Wetlands and Waterways Program Maryland Dept. of the Environment.
STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING DECEMBER 19-20, 2013 PERFORMANCE MEASURES.
Economic and Environmental Sustainability: Working with New Partners and Incentives Frank Casey, Ph.D Conservation Economics Program Defenders of Wildlife.
Goals of CRAM program –Roles of Teams –Need and Intended Uses Summary of Science of Rapid Assessment Conceptual Model Development Process and Schedule.
Wildlife Program Amendments CBFWA Members Meeting – Sept
SCIENCE in California’s Natural Community Conservation Plans (NCCPs) California Department of Fish and Game Brenda S. Johnson, Ph.D.
What Do NGOs Do With FIA Data? (Preview: a lot!) Christine Negra The Heinz Center for Science, Economics and the Environment March 2009 SAF National FIA.
Atlin-Taku Land Use Plan Resource Chapters Update Presentation to Multiparty Workshop #6 Atlin Rec Centre, Nov 27-28, 2009.
Ecological Landscape Analysis Project Background and Status.
Biodiversity. Bio = Life Bio = Life Diverse = consisting of different things Diverse = consisting of different things Refers to the variety of species.
Corporate Ecosystem Valuation (CEV) Road Test Case Study: Lafarge May 3, 2011.
European Commission, DG Environment, Nature Unit
A Pivotal Moment for Leaders Across the Gulf Coast States and Connected Communities Throughout the Country.
1 NOAA Priorities for an Ecosystem Approach to Management A Presentation to the NOAA Science Advisory Board John H. Dunnigan NOAA Ecosystem Goal Team Lead.
CALIFORNIA'S STATE WILDLIFE ACTION PLAN 2015 UPDATE A Conservation Legacy for Californians Armand Gonzales, Project Lead.
BLM’s Landscape Approach REAs and Related Landscape Initiatives Karen Prentice, BLM, Healthy Landscapes Coordinator, Gordon.
Considering Ecosystem Services in Restoration Decisions on the Upper Mississippi River System ACES, 2008 K. S. Lubinski K. Barr J. Barko S. Bartell R.
Monitoring Programme. What is monitoring? Environmental monitoring is the systematic observation, measurement and calculation of the condition of the.
Sara Vickerman May 10, 2012 Defenders of Wildlife Proposed Habitat/Biodiversity Metric Framework Agreement.
1. Adaptation – management actions to help fish and wildlife and their habitats adapt to climate change, using a Strategic Habitat Conservation Framework.
Conservation Strategy Revisions: 1. Grassland Conservation Strategy Natural Temperate Grassland Button Wrinklewort Ginninderra Peppercress Baeuerlan’s.
Jeff Horan, Habitat GIT Chair February 16, 2012 CBP Decision Framework in Action.
Wildlife Program Amendments Joint Technical Committees and Members Advisory Group Amendment Strategy Workshop.
Challenges in conservation Alan Law, Director for Biodiversity Delivery, Natural England.
MRERP Missouri River Ecosystem Restoration Plan and Environmental Impact Statement One River ▪ One Vision A Component of the Missouri River Recovery Program.
For EBTJV meeting October 26, 2010 Executive Order Strategy for Protecting and Restoring the Chesapeake Bay Watershed.
Eng UK © TYRÉNS 2016 ROAD ECOLOGY Mårten Karlson Tyréns AB
North Atlantic LCC Science Needs and Projects Background Vision and Mission 2010 Projects (review, status, next steps) 2011 Science Needs Assessment, Workshop.
Toward 2020 Biodiversity Goals and Targets for Canada: Status and Next Steps FPT Biodiversity Working Group January 2013.
RUPES Workshop, Cagayan de Oro , September 2012
Puget Sound Watershed Characterization Project
MITIGATING FOREST HEALTH IMAPCTS THROUGH PARTNERSHIPS
Washington County Parks and Open Spaces
Case Studies in EI Measurement: Fathom Five & Banff National Parks
Green Infrastructure and Natura 2000
Landscape management for resilient value chains
Presentation transcript:

Measuring Habitat and Biodiversity Outcomes Sara Vickerman and Frank Casey September 26, 2013 Defenders of Wildlife

What is biodiversity? Variety of life and its processes Genetic, species, habitat, large landscapes What is biodiversity? Variety of life and its processes Genetic, species, habitat, large landscapes

Defenders of Wildlife Biodiversity conservation requires: Right amount, configuration, and management of land and water in each region (coarse filter) Attention to individual elements (fine filter) Biodiversity conservation requires: Right amount, configuration, and management of land and water in each region (coarse filter) Attention to individual elements (fine filter)

Defenders of Wildlife Broad agreement that biodiversity is threatened by: Human development Degradation, conversion of native habitat Invasive species Toxics, other direct mortality Climate change Broad agreement that biodiversity is threatened by: Human development Degradation, conversion of native habitat Invasive species Toxics, other direct mortality Climate change

Defenders of Wildlife Many approaches to tracking impacts and conservation outcomes to habitats and species but... Little progress reaching agreement on more consistent approach Many approaches to tracking impacts and conservation outcomes to habitats and species but... Little progress reaching agreement on more consistent approach

Defenders of Wildlife Effectiveness of biodiversity conservation is difficult to measure Goals often not stated or agreed upon May conflict with human activities Focus on single species, habitats Need measures at multiple scales – species to landscapes Effectiveness of biodiversity conservation is difficult to measure Goals often not stated or agreed upon May conflict with human activities Focus on single species, habitats Need measures at multiple scales – species to landscapes

Defenders of Wildlife Status and trends for biodiversity poorly monitored Nobody is responsible for comprehensive system Biodiversity is not uniformly regulated Tendency to re-invent the wheel Low priority for public and policy-makers

Defenders of Wildlife Why consistent metrics? To help improve conservation outcomes – what works, what doesn’t Work across land ownership boundaries Connect disparate program investments to address scale issues Align management plans Apply adaptive management

Defenders of Wildlife Level of involvement Capture everything Precision Practicality Speed Cost

Defenders of Wildlife Purpose To examine a few efforts to date Engage experts in conversation Propose workable, practical framework Test alternative approaches

Defenders of Wildlife Three approaches with considerable overlap Individual habitat metrics Ecological Integrity Assessments Biodiversity Index

Defenders of Wildlife Site level metrics Developed by Willamette Partnership and others Prairie, wetland, salmon, water temperature Focus on regulations that drive trading or mitigation programs Measuring Up report outlined framework for biodiversity metrics

Defenders of Wildlife Defenders metrics Natural Resources Conservation Service, Bullitt funded Address unregulated biodiversity values in Western U.S. Oak, floodplain, sage brush / sage grouse Percent of optimal ecological functioning

Site level conditions –Context –Vegetation –Species –Abiotic –Practices –Risk Defenders of Wildlife What the metrics measure

Defenders of Wildlife Sagebrush metric: Final scores

Defenders of Wildlife Where to find these metrics Marketplace for Nature web site Counting on the Environment – Willamette Partnership

Defenders of Wildlife Challenge with site level metrics Should they be habitat specific? How many habitats? Who develops, maintains, updates them? How do they connect to larger landscape scale metrics? Not useful for landscape scale conservation planning

Setting Ecological Integrity Goals Setting Ecological Integrity Goals Rank A Rank B Rank C Rank D Increasing human disturbance Increasing ecological integrity Ecosystem Conservation Goal

Ecological Integrity Monitoring Level 1) Remote assessment Level 2) Rapid field assessment Level 3) Intensive assessment

Level 1: Remote assessment Landscape context – Connectivity, surrounding land use, patch size, and stressors

Level 2: Rapid field assessment  Landscape characteristics  Vegetation cover and composition  Soil condition  Disturbance regimes  Wildlife abundance and composition  Stressors  Calibration of remote techniques

Level 2: Rapid field assessment Photo plots as example

Level 3: Intensive assessment

Defenders of Wildlife Application Initially to select priority conservation areas Useful where natural habitat of interest Also used for wetland assessment, monitoring Expanded to measure habitat quality Can be applied at multiple scales NatureServe network supports

Defenders of Wildlife Challenges Might not fit where biodiversity is a secondary goal Less useful where data are limited - like other methods, requires sustained investment

Challenge of representing biodiversity

Biodiversity is an ecosystem service People harvest, consume wild plants and animals Healthy ecosystems filter water, control erosion, pollinate crops Nature has cultural (existence) values Landscape pattern, functions, species, combine – Biodiversity Service Score

Biodiversity can be characterized by: Mapped features Quantitative tabular data Narrative description

Assumptions underlying biodiversity framework Coarse filter looks at habitat abundance, type, integrity, rarity and distribution Fine filter looks at species needs not captured in coarse filter Ecological integrity characterizes functioning systems that support native biodiversity

Ecological integrity Vegetation, structure, composition Ecological processes – fire, hydrology Species composition –Common species –Invasive species Rare, uncommon species not good indicators

Species measures Rarity weighting applied – priority Relevant regulations Migratory patterns for some fish, wildlife Population sizes Biotic condition

Defenders of Wildlife Application for biodiversity index Broad scale conservation planning Context of ecosystem service assessments Linked to social, economic factors Impact of corporate sourcing decisions

Defenders of Wildlife Challenges May be too complex as presented Needs translation for broad application Requires high quality, detailed information Challenges May be too complex as presented Needs translation for broad application Requires high quality, detailed information

Defenders of Wildlife Questions for the group Examples of habitat/biodiversity measures ? Other approaches? Field applications? Collaborate to find creative solutions?

Defenders of Wildlife Sara Vickerman Defenders of Wildlife